AzTrials
AzTrials

MyopiaNCT04073238

Efficacy of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy in Myopia Control

A study testing Low-level Red-light Therapy in people with Myopia and Refractive Errors, run by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University at 4 sites in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if repeated low-level red-light therapy can slow myopia progression in Chinese schoolchildren. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 13 years
Conditions the study is for
Myopia, Refractive Errors, Eye Diseases
What is being tested?
Low-level Red-light Therapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
264 participants
Where
4 sitesChina
Study dates
23 Jul 2019to Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 13 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age at enrolment: 8-13 years
  • Spherical equivalent refractions (SERs): -1.00 to -5.00 diopters (D)
  • Astigmatism of 2.50 D or less
  • Anisometropia of 1.5 D or less
  • Spectacle corrected monocular logMAR visual acuity (VA): 0 or better
  • Parents' understanding and acceptance of random allocation of grouping

Who cannot join

  • Strabismus and binocular vision abnormalities in either eye
  • Ocular abnormalities in either eye or other systemic abnormalities
  • Prior treatment of myopia control, e.g. drugs, orthokeratology, progressive addition lenses, bifocal lenses, etc in either eye
  • Other contraindications in either eye

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

China4 sites
  • Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

    Changsha, Hunan, 410008

  • The Second People's Hospital of Foshan

    Foshan, Guangdong, 528000

  • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060

  • Shenzhen Children's Hospital

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518038

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Clinical Trial of Myopia Control in Schoolchildren Using the Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine if repeated low-level red-light therapy can slow myopia progression in Chinese schoolchildren.

Read the detailed description

Low level light therapy (LLLT) is an innovative and non-invasive therapeutic treatment for a variety of eye diseases. Its potential mechanisms of improving choroidal metabolic rate and circulation may improve scleral hypoxia, thus slowing down the progression of myopia. The investigator's preliminary case-series study suggested that repeated low-level red-light therapy was effective in slowing myopia progression without any clinically observable side effects. Using a randomized clinical trial design, the purpose of this study is to determine if repeated low-level red-light therapy can slow myopia progression in Chinese schoolchildren. Study subjects will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group (receive repeated low-level red-light therapy) or the control group (wearing ordinary single vision lenses). Axial length and cycloplegic refraction will be monitored over one year (1st month, 3rd month, 6th month and 12th month), after which changes in axial length and refractive errors in the two groups will be compared. An interim analysis will be performed at the 3rd month, at which the data will be reported and presented. Appropriate adjustment of the p-value and decision on the continuation of the study will be made.

Being tested
Low-level Red-light Therapy
Medical subject headings
Myopia, Refractive Errors, Eye Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Low-level Red-light TherapyDevice

    In addition to wearing single vision spectacle lens with power for correcting distance refraction, low-level red-light therapy is performed twice per school day at home with an interval of at least 4 hours, each treatment lasting 3 minutes.

Study groups in NCT04073238
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single vision spectacle lensNo interventionSingle vision lens with power for correcting distance refraction.
Repeated low-level red-light therapyExperimentalSingle vision lens \& repeated low-level red-light therapy
Receives: Device: Low-level Red-light Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Axial length change (mm)

    Axial length change (mm) is characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and baseline values. The IOLMaster is used to measure axial length (mm).

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent change (Diopter)

    Cycloplegic spherical equivalent change (Diopter, D) is characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and baseline values. Cycloplegia is induced with one drop of Alcaine 0.5% followed by two drops of 1% cyclopentolate administered at 0, 5th to each eye. The third drop of cyclopentolate is used if the light reflex exists after 20 minute. The light reflex and pupil dilation is checked after an additional 15 minutes. Dilation and light reflex status is recorded and full cycloplegia is justified if the pupil dilates to 6 millimeters or greater and the light reflex is absent. Refraction is performed with an auto-refractor. The data on spherical and cylindrical power and axis is automatically extracted from the auto-refractor. The spherical equivalent power (D) is calculated as the spherical power (D) plus half of the cylindrical power (D).

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year

  2. Corneal curvature change (mm)

    Corneal curvature (mm) is characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and baseline values. The IOLMaster is used to measure corneal curvature (mm).

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year

  3. Anterior chamber depth change (mm)

    Anterior chamber depth (mm) is characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and baseline values. The IOLMaster is used to measure anterior chamber depth (mm).

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year

  4. White to white change (mm)

    White to white (mm) is characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and baseline values. The IOLMaster is used to measure white to white (mm).

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year

  5. Visual acuity change

    Visual acuity change is characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and baseline values. An ETDRS chart (Precision vision, Villa Park, Illinois, USA) with standard illumination is used to measure distance visual acuity. Visual acuity measurement is performed at a distance of 4 meters. Uncorrected visual acuity is measured for all children.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year

  6. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events

    Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events is the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events over a specified period for subjects in the intervention arm. Subjects are asked to report any treatment-emergent adverse events, including but not limited to glare, flash blindness, and afterimages.

    Measured: 1 month

  7. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events

    Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events is the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events over a specified period for subjects in the intervention arm. Subjects are asked to report any treatment-emergent adverse events, including but not limited to glare, flash blindness, and afterimages.

    Measured: 3 months

  8. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events

    Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events is the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events over a specified period for subjects in the intervention arm. Subjects are asked to report any treatment-emergent adverse events, including but not limited to glare, flash blindness, and afterimages.

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events

    Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events is the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events over a specified period for subjects in the intervention arm. Subjects are asked to report any treatment-emergent adverse events, including but not limited to glare, flash blindness, and afterimages.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Aug 2019
  2. Study start23 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
264 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04073238
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019KYPJ093
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
18 Aug 2019
Last updated
6 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Wang W, Jiang Y, Zhu Z, Zhang S, Xuan M, Tan X, Kong X, Zhong H, Bulloch G, Xiong R, Yuan Y, Chen Y, Zhang J, Zeng J, Morgan IG, He M. Axial Shortening in Myopic Children after Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):1223-1237. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00671-7. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

    PubMed 36790672
  • Xiong R, Zhu Z, Jiang Y, Wang W, Zhang J, Chen Y, Bulloch G, Yuan Y, Zhang S, Xuan M, Zeng J, He M. Longitudinal Changes and Predictive Value of Choroidal Thickness for Myopia Control after Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy. Ophthalmology. 2023 Mar;130(3):286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

    PubMed 36240954

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Low-level Red-light Therapy in people with Myopia and Refractive Errors, run by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University at 4 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Axial length change (mm) (time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04073238, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in