AzTrials
AzTrials

FibromyalgiaPbRENCT04084873

An Emotional Regulation Brief Procedure (PbRE) for Fibromyalgia Using ICT's

A study testing PBrE in people with Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain, run by Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aims is to test the efficacy of an emotional regulation procedure for fibromyalgia patients using Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs). This procedure is based in a task that implies exposition to emotional words. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain
What is being tested?
PBrE
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
7 Oct 2019to Oct 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 research classification criteria for FM (Wolfe et al., 2010, 2011); as confirmed by a rheumatologist
  • A minimum of 18 years of age
  • Showed adequate reading comprehension
  • Were able to use a smartphone
  • Were able to sign an informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Had any mental disorder treated by a psychiatrist
  • Were scheduled for surgery in the next 3 months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Miguel A. Vallejo

    Madrid, 28040

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Emotional Regulation Brief Procedure for Fibromyalgia, Through the Internet

The study aims is to test the efficacy of an emotional regulation procedure for fibromyalgia patients using Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs). This procedure is based in a task that implies exposition to emotional words. The principal hypothesis is that exposition will improve the clinical symptomatology because the procedure restore an adequate emotional regulation.

Read the detailed description

Previous studies have demonstrated that FM patients have difficulties to process emotional words when they are compared to normal subjects (Mercado et al., 2013). This dysfunctional emotion regulation could show attentional bias and it could be a way to increase FM symptomatology as pain, and fatigue (Duscheck et al., 2014).

The emotion generation and its regulation through an experimental task as reading words is a well stablished procedure (Lang, Bradley y Cuthbert, 1997). This paradigm has been shown efficacy in clinical context, to reduce anxiety in social phobia (Masia et al., 1999; Baños, Quero y Botella, 2008), generalized anxiety disorders (Fracalanza, Kroner y Antony, 2014), personality disorders (Arntz et al., 2012), and depression (Chuang et al., 2016). To address the gap between the experimental results of this form of emotional regulation in FM patients, and its clinical application, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a Brief Procedure of Emotional Regulation for Fibromyalgia (PbRE)

PbRE is a word reading task implementing through an App developed for smartphones. The patient will choose emotional positive and negative words related to personal and clinical characteristics. This exercise has been shown useful in analogous tasks in relational frame theory (Hussey y Barnes-Holmes (2012) or in bias computer training (Salemink et al., 2014).

Being tested
PBrE, PBrE-Control, Control
Medical subject headings
Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PBrEBehavioural

    PbRE is a word reading task implementing through an App developed for smartphones. The patient will choose emotional positive and negative words related to personal and clinical characteristics.

  • PBrE-ControlBehavioural

    Participants are exposed to several neutral words. These words do not have any emotional content and there are no reasons to think that they have any effect over the emotional regulation.

  • ControlBehavioural

    Participants do not receive the intervention.

Study groups in NCT04084873
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental PBrEExperimentalParticipants are exposed to several words of emotional contents (positive, and negative). The differences between these words will allow the regulation and counter regulation of emotional processes (Schwager y Rothermund, 2013). The words are related to clinical and personal characteristics of the patients and they will promote an emotional identification that improve the emotional regulation (Kashdan, Barret y McKnight, 2015).
Receives: Behavioral: PBrE
Control PBrEPlacebo comparatorParticipants are exposed to several neutral words. These words do not have any emotional content and there are no reasons to think that they have any effect over the emotional regulation.
Receives: Behavioral: PBrE-Control
ControlOtherParticipants do not receive the intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Combined Index of Severity in Fibromyalgia (ICAF). Change is being assessed

    The Combined Index of Severity in Fibromyalgia (ICAF) is a questionnaire that allows the classification of patients by severity in clinical practice. This analysis is a self-report questionnaire of 59 items constructed with the most common clinical manifestations of FM (Vallejo, Rivera, \& Esteve-Vives, 2010). The ICAF questionnaire offers total scores, where higher scores indicate a more severe disease. This questionnaire also provides four factors: emotional, physical (pain, fatigue, sleep quality and functional capacity), active coping, and passive coping. Similar to the total score, higher scores on each factor indicate greater severity, with the exception of the active coping factor, where higher scores indicate a better way to cope with the disease.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Change is being assessed

    The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) (Burckhardt, Clark, \& Bennett, 1991; Rivera \& González, 2004) is a self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of the FM on the life of the patient. This 10-item questionnaire is widely used and covers the principal areas of interest, including physical functioning, pain, sleep, mental health, and fatigue. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a more severe impact of the disease.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. EuroQol-5D-5L

    The EuroQol-5D-L questionnaire (Herdman et al., 2011) is divided into 2 sections. The first section contains 5 questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Five levels for answering are included (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems), ranging from 1 to 5. The second part is a VAS score, which records the responder's self-evaluated health, where 0 is worst imaginable health and 100 is best imaginable health.

    Measured: Through treatment completion, an average of 6 weeks

  2. Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)

    Patients' expectancy of treatment will be assessed with the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) (Devilly and Borkovec, 2010). Both factors (credibility and expectancy) have been shown to be stable across different populations with high internal consistency within each factor. The scale consists of six questions, with answer options rated on a 10-point scale and on a 1-100 % scale.

    Measured: Through treatment completion, an average of 6 weeks

  3. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

    The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, in its 8-item version (CSQ-8; Larsen et al. 1979), has been used most commonly to assess satisfaction in mental health services. This tool includes a brief standardized scale with good psychometric properties that provides an overall assessment of satisfaction. We used the Spanish version of the CSQ-8 (Vázquez et al., 2017).

    Measured: Through treatment completion, an average of 6 weeks

  4. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Sullivan, Bishop, \& Pivik, 1995) is a 13-item scale used to assess pain catastrophizing. Participants rated the frequency of 13 negative pain-related thoughts and feelings on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). The range of scores is 0 to 54. Higher scores indicate greater catastrophizing. We used the Spanish version of the PCS (García Campayo et al., 2008).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II

    Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II (Bond et al., 2011; Ruiz, et al., 2013). The AAQ-II is a general measure of experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility. It consists of 7 items which are responded to by using a 7-point Likert scale. The items reflect an unwillingness to experience unwanted emotions and thoughts.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Short Form 12 Health Survey

    The Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) (Vilagut et al., 2008; Ware \& Keller, 1996) is a generic instrument used to assess health-related quality of life. It is a self-report survey of 12 items grouped into eight dimensions: physical functioning, physical role, body pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role and mental health. The score ranges from 0 to 100 for every scale, where higher scores indicate better health.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  7. Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

    The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross \& John, 2003; Cabello, Salgero, Fernández-Berrocal \& Gross, 2013) consist of 10 items which are responded to by using a 7-point Likert scale. The items are grouped into two dimensions: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2019
  2. Study start7 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completionMay 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04084873
Sponsor's protocol ID
iTCC55
Acronym
PbRE
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
4 Sep 2019
Last updated
6 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Arntz A, Hawke LD, Bamelis L, Spinhoven P, Molendijk ML. Changes in natural language use as an indicator of psychotherapeutic change in personality disorders. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Mar;50(3):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

    PubMed 22317755
  • Bennett MP, Meulders A, Baeyens F, Vlaeyen JW. Words putting pain in motion: the generalization of pain-related fear within an artificial stimulus category. Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 30;6:520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00520. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25983704
  • Duschek S, Werner NS, Limbert N, Winkelmann A, Montoya P. Attentional bias toward negative information in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain Med. 2014 Apr;15(4):603-12. doi: 10.1111/pme.12360. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

    PubMed 24447855
  • Mercado F, Gonzalez JL, Barjola P, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Lopez-Lopez A, Alonso M, Gomez-Esquer F. Brain correlates of cognitive inhibition in fibromyalgia: emotional intrusion of symptom-related words. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 May;88(2):182-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

    PubMed 23557844
  • Montoya P, Sitges C, Garcia-Herrera M, Izquierdo R, Truyols M, Blay N, Collado D. Abnormal affective modulation of somatosensory brain processing among patients with fibromyalgia. Psychosom Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;67(6):957-63. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000188401.55394.18.

    PubMed 16314601
  • Schwager S, Rothermund K. Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing. Cogn Emot. 2013;27(5):839-55. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.750599. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

    PubMed 23237331

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PBrE in people with Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain, run by Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Combined Index of Severity in Fibromyalgia (ICAF). Change is being assessed (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04084873, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in