Psoriatic ArthritisNCT04110522
Psoriatic Arthritis D2P Screening
A study testing Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Jessica Walsh at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The overarching goal of this study is to develop a direct-to-patient screening approach that will improve early Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) detection in patients with psoriasis. Previously developed screening questionnaires were intended for use in the setting of a doctor's office to assist providers with referral… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18,000 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Jul 2019to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code diagnosis of psoriasis but without a confirmed diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis prior to study initiation
- Be age 18 or older
- Be geographically located within a reasonable proximity to the Rheumatology study site
Who cannot join
- Have psoriasis and a confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis made or confirmed by a rheumatologist
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
About this study
Official title: Accelerating Psoriatic Arthritis Detection in Patients With Psoriasis: Direct-to-patient Administration of Screening Questionnaires (D2P Screening)
The overarching goal of this study is to develop a direct-to-patient screening approach that will improve early Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) detection in patients with psoriasis. Previously developed screening questionnaires were intended for use in the setting of a doctor's office to assist providers with referral decisions. However, these screening questionnaires are infrequently used in routine practice because of limitations with time and resources. The study will aim to develop a practical screening strategy that does not require involvement from dermatologists (or other non-rheumatology providers) and can systematically reach a broad range of psoriasis patients, including patients not attending dermatology clinics. The researchers hypothesize that disseminating questionnaires directly to patients outside of a clinic setting (direct-to-patient approach) will educate patients about their PsA risk and improve early PsA diagnoses.
Read the detailed description
Electronic medical record (EMR) systems will be used to identify psoriasis patients without a PsA diagnosis. Patients will be randomized to receive a PsA screening questionnaire (intervention group) or not receive a questionnaire (control group). Rates of rheumatologic evaluations and new PsA diagnoses will be compared between the groups, using EMRs to longitudinally track outcomes.
Intervention group patients who through the completion of the PsA Screening questionnaire positively self-screen for an elevated PsA risk will either be randomly invited to directly access a rheumatology appointment or instructed to talk with their doctor about a rheumatology referral. We will compare rates of rheumatologic evaluations and new PsA diagnoses between these groups to identify the best method for accessing rheumatology appointments.
To determine if PsA patients diagnosed after receiving a screening questionnaire differ from patients diagnosed via usual care; investigators will examine disease duration, severity, and comorbidities in patients receiving and not receiving the screening questionnaire.
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Being tested
- Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire
- Keywords
- Psoriasis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic, Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Direct to patient PsA Screening QuestionnaireOther
Patients randomized to an intervention group will be asked to complete and score the 5-item Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) questionnaire. Those patients with an elevated score (PEST ≥3 out of 5) will be advised to complete a rheumatologic evaluation for PsA.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist | Experimental | Psoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to receive intervention PsA questionnaire, including instructions on how to directly schedule a rheumatologic evaluation Receives: Other: Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire |
| Intervention with Standard of Care Referral | Experimental | Psoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to receive intervention PsA questionnaire, including instructions to talk with their doctor about a referral to a rheumatologist Receives: Other: Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire |
| Control | No intervention | Psoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to not receive an intervention PsA questionnaire |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of patients with a new PsA diagnosis
The percentage of psoriasis patients with a new diagnosis of PsA will be compared between the Experimental Arms and the Control Arm, and compared between the two Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral)
Measured: 6 months
Symptom duration
Average duration of baseline symptoms prior to PsA diagnosis in the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) will be compared to the average duration of baseline symptoms prior to PsA diagnosis in the Control Arm
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Percentage of patients who complete a rheumatologic evaluation
The percentage of psoriasis patients who complete a rheumatologic evaluation will be compared between the Experimental Arms and the Control Arm, and compared between the two Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral)
Measured: 6 months
Time to initial PsA diagnosis after questionnaire dissemination
The average time to PsA diagnosis after dissemination of the questionnaire in the Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist arm compared to the Intervention with Standard of Care Referral Arm
Measured: 6 months
Time to rheumatologic evaluation after questionnaire dissemination
The average time to rheumatologic evaluation after dissemination of the questionnaire in the Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist arm compared to the Intervention with Standard of Care Referral Arm
Measured: 6 months
Severity of PsA Disability
Average work disability in PsA, as measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire score will be compared between the Experimental ams (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm
Measured: 6 months
Physical function level in PsA
Average physical function level in PsA, as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) questionnaire score will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.
Measured: 6 months
Severity of PsA radiographic damage
Average number of psoriatic arthritis inflammatory changes per rheumatology provider's judgement after review of all relevant available imaging data using scale of yes/no/unsure will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.
Measured: 6 months
PsA Activity by Joint Count
Average number of swollen/tender joints in PsA using the 66/68 joint count assessment by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.
Measured: 6 months
PsA Activity by Enthesitis
Average number of joint insertions with enthesitis in PsA as determined by the Leeds enthesitis index as assessed by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.
Measured: 6 months
PsA Activity by Dactilitis Count
Average number of digits with dactylitis in PsA using a dactylitis count (yes/no for each finger or toe) as assessed by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2019
- Study start22 Jul 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Psoriatic ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jessica Walsh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jessica Walsh, University of Utah
- Investigators
- Jessica Walsh, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Utah
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04110522
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB_00117215
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 14 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Accelerating Psoriatic Arthritis Detection in Patients With Psoriasis: Direct-to-patient Administration of Screening Questionnaires (D2P Screening)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04110522
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB_00117215
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Keywords
- Psoriasis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 18,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Jessica WalshUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overarching goal of this study is to develop a direct-to-patient screening approach that will improve early Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) detection in patients with psoriasis. Previously developed screening questionnaires were intended for use in the setting of a doctor's office to assist providers with referral decisions. However, these screening questionnaires are infrequently used in routine practice because of limitations with time and resources. The study will aim to develop a practical screening strategy that does not require involvement from dermatologists (or other non-rheumatology providers) and can systematically reach a broad range of psoriasis patients, including patients not attending dermatology clinics. The researchers hypothesize that disseminating questionnaires directly to patients outside of a clinic setting (direct-to-patient approach) will educate patients about their PsA risk and improve early PsA diagnoses.
Detailed description
Electronic medical record (EMR) systems will be used to identify psoriasis patients without a PsA diagnosis. Patients will be randomized to receive a PsA screening questionnaire (intervention group) or not receive a questionnaire (control group). Rates of rheumatologic evaluations and new PsA diagnoses will be compared between the groups, using EMRs to longitudinally track outcomes.
Intervention group patients who through the completion of the PsA Screening questionnaire positively self-screen for an elevated PsA risk will either be randomly invited to directly access a rheumatology appointment or instructed to talk with their doctor about a rheumatology referral. We will compare rates of rheumatologic evaluations and new PsA diagnoses between these groups to identify the best method for accessing rheumatology appointments.
To determine if PsA patients diagnosed after receiving a screening questionnaire differ from patients diagnosed via usual care; investigators will examine disease duration, severity, and comorbidities in patients receiving and not receiving the screening questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist | Experimental | Other: Direct to patient PsA Screening QuestionnairePsoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to receive intervention PsA questionnaire, including instructions on how to directly schedule a rheumatologic evaluation |
| Intervention with Standard of Care Referral | Experimental | Other: Direct to patient PsA Screening QuestionnairePsoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to receive intervention PsA questionnaire, including instructions to talk with their doctor about a referral to a rheumatologist |
| Control | No intervention | –Psoriasis patients with no prior diagnosis of PsA randomized to not receive an intervention PsA questionnaire |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Have an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code diagnosis of psoriasis but without a confirmed diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis prior to study initiation
- Be age 18 or older
- Be geographically located within a reasonable proximity to the Rheumatology study site
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Have psoriasis and a confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis made or confirmed by a rheumatologist
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Direct to patient PsA Screening QuestionnairePatients randomized to an intervention group will be asked to complete and score the 5-item Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) questionnaire. Those patients with an elevated score (PEST ≥3 out of 5) will be advised to complete a rheumatologic evaluation for PsA. | Other | Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist, Intervention with Standard of Care Referral |
Primary outcome
Percentage of patients with a new PsA diagnosis
Time frame: 6 months
The percentage of psoriasis patients with a new diagnosis of PsA will be compared between the Experimental Arms and the Control Arm, and compared between the two Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral)
Symptom duration
Time frame: 6 months
Average duration of baseline symptoms prior to PsA diagnosis in the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) will be compared to the average duration of baseline symptoms prior to PsA diagnosis in the Control Arm
9 secondary outcomes
Percentage of patients who complete a rheumatologic evaluation
Time frame: 6 months
Time to initial PsA diagnosis after questionnaire dissemination
Time frame: 6 months
Time to rheumatologic evaluation after questionnaire dissemination
Time frame: 6 months
Severity of PsA Disability
Time frame: 6 months
Physical function level in PsA
Time frame: 6 months
Severity of PsA radiographic damage
Time frame: 6 months
PsA Activity by Joint Count
Time frame: 6 months
PsA Activity by Enthesitis
Time frame: 6 months
PsA Activity by Dactilitis Count
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Psoriatic Arthritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing Risankizumab to Placebo in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Including Those Who Have a History of Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic Therapy(Ies)
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
RecruitingObservational study
PsoBest - The German Psoriasis Registry
Psoriasis, Psoriatic-arthritis
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment Effectiveness in People With axSpA or PsA Starting Treatment With Bimekizumab, Risankizumab, Guselkumab, Upadacitinib, or a TNF Inhibitor
Axial Spondylarthritis (axSpA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis (LATITUDE PsA NeXt)
Psoriatic Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Bimekizumab in Pediatric Study Participants With Active Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Subtypes Enthesitis-related Arthritis (Including Juvenile-onset Ankylosing Spondylitis) and Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Enthesitis-related Arthritis, Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jessica Walsh, M.D. principal investigator
University of Utah
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Jessica Walsh at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of patients with a new PsA diagnosis (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.