AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Childhood Development (ECD)NCT04114305

Evaluation of an Early Childhood Development Intervention Among Children Born to HIV-Infected Women in Eswatini

An observational study of Early Childhood Development (ECD), run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

With increased use of effective strategies to prevent HIV transmission from women to their infants, the number of HIV infected children has dramatically decreased. This has led to an increased number of children who have been exposed to HIV, but who are not themselves infected. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Early Childhood Development (ECD)
What is being tested?
ECD Intervention
How many people
431 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
18 Jan 2016to 27 Apr 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: HIV-infected pregnant women residing in Swaziland who were either being followed for antenatal care at clinics in which the m2m ECD intervention was being offered or at clinics where this intervention was not being offered.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years and over
  • HIV+ woman with confirmed HIV status recorded on a clinic chart or register
  • Visiting the PMTCT clinic in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy
  • Verified resident within the clinic-defined catchment area

Who cannot join

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Reported specific plan to move outside catchment area or switch HIV care to another site
  • Did not provide written consent to participate in the study or did not complete the enrollment questionnaire.
  • Please note that the infants born to these pregnant women were also enrolled. The following inclusion criterion applied to the infants:
  • Born to enrolled woman as a result of the pregnancy during which she was enrolled.

About this study

Official title: Evaluating Integration of Early Childhood Development Interventions Into the m2m Program in Swaziland

With increased use of effective strategies to prevent HIV transmission from women to their infants, the number of HIV infected children has dramatically decreased. This has led to an increased number of children who have been exposed to HIV, but who are not themselves infected. There is concern that exposure to HIV can lead to poorer health outcomes, including less optimal neurodevelopment. Because of this possibility in a growing population of HIV-exposed, but uninfected (HEU) children, there is a need to identify interventions to optimize their growth and development. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of a two-generation intervention, jointly targeting child neurodevelopment and maternal psychosocial wellbeing, integrated into antenatal care/prevention of maternal to child transmission (ANC/PMTCT) clinics.

The intervention was implemented by mothers2mothers (m2m), an organization based in South Africa with a long-standing program using peer mentors (Mentor Mothers) to support HIV-infected women and their families. The m2m ECD intervention provided by specially trained Mentor Mothers included home- and community based activities meant to assist mothers and other caregivers in building resilience and gaining skills to support their children's development. The primary intervention was an intensive program of home visits beginning during pregnancy and continuing until the child reached two years of age, with up to 46 home visits. At each visit, the ECD Mentor Mothers helped parents/caregivers to learn about ages and stages of growth (including pre-birth), and to facilitate responsive parenting and early learning opportunities for their children. Mentor Mothers also conducted parenting information play groups (PIPs) in each community for ECD clients and ECD information was integrated into the existing facility support groups provided at each health clinic. The intervention covered general areas of maternal and child health, nutrition, social services, support for primary caregivers and stimulation for early learning.

Read more

Since the intervention was targeted at two generations, the primary aims were two-fold: to assess the impact on pediatric neurodevelopment and on maternal psychosocial function. Secondary aims included assessment of maternal and child retention in care, maternal HIV outcomes and child mortality, health, growth and nutrition. Children were enrolled into one of two study arms: 1) the intervention arm included children from clinics where the m2m ECD program was being implemented, and 2) the comparison arm included children from government clinics that offered standard of care services but no m2m or ECD program.

Mothers were enrolled during antenatal care, in the third trimester of pregnancy. Children and their mothers were followed though 18 months of age and their evaluation included an assessment of development (Mullen Scale of Early Learning) at 9 and 18 months, as well as assessments of child growth, maternal psychosocial well-being, parenting practices and retention in care.

Read the detailed description

Intervention Methods

ECD Intervention. Mothers2mothers (m2m) was selected to pilot-test a parenting intervention integrated within the Eswatini standard integrated antenatal care and PMTCT program developed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) Option B+ recommendations. Each clinic selected for the pilot test had already implemented a m2m mentor mother (MM) peer support program at the facility, as well as defaulter follow-up in the community.

The parenting intervention strategy, known as "uMntfwana Wami, uMntfwana Wetfu"( "My Child, Our Child") was focused on peer support for pregnant women and parents/caregivers of young children to assist them in building resilience and gaining skills to support their children's development.

M2m's facility-based Mentor Mothers (MMs) recruited pregnant women at the ANC/PMTCT clinics. Both HIV-positive and HIV-negative women were eligible to participate in the m2m intervention. Community-based ECD MMs, who received five weeks of program-specific training, provided the parental training intervention.

Evaluation Methods

Evaluation Design. The independent evaluation was designed as a quasi-experimental comparison between clinic sites (and their surrounding communities) implementing the intervention and similar clinic sites not implementing the intervention.

Sample size calculations. A sample size of 416 participants (213 intervention arm, 203 comparison arm) was estimated to be sufficient to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 0.5 standard deviation (SD) on an age-normed Mullen scale, after allowing for potential 10% child mortality and 20% loss to follow-up, and accounting for clustering at the clinic level.

Enrollment of participants. At intervention arm clinics, m2m facility MMs referred ANC clients in the third trimester of pregnancy, residing in the clinic catchment area, and interested in participating in both intervention and study to the study team. At comparison arm clinics, nurses referred interested third trimester pregnant women to the study. A study research assistant based at each clinic conducted eligibility screening and obtained informed consent. Although women could participate in the parental training intervention irrespective of HIV status, the evaluation was designed to assess its effect only on the HIV-positive subgroup of mothers. Participant inclusion criteria were: a woman, aged at least 18, with confirmed HIV-positive status recorded on a clinic chart or register, visiting the PMTCT clinic in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, and verified resident within the clinic-defined catchment area. Participants who planned to move outside the catchment area or switch HIV care to another site, did not provide written consent to participate in the study or did not complete the enrollment questionnaire were excluded.

Data collection and follow up. Study participants were interviewed at enrollment to collect demographic and contact information, abstract patient-held HIV and maternal health cards, and carry out baseline assessments. Follow-up interviews and abstraction of the patient-held HIV, maternal health and well child care cards were targeted for two weeks after the baby's birth and when the baby reached three, six, nine and 18 months of age. A home visit and observation were conducted when the baby was between 12-15 months of age. If the mother was not reachable, the baby's primary caregiver was interviewed.

Primary outcomes assessment.

The primary pediatric outcome of cognitive development at nine and 18 months of age was assessed using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, administered by two assessors. The items were translated into siSwati as needed and adapted for and tested on emaSwati children in the relevant age groups. At the 18-month time point, inter-rater reliability was assessed by independently scoring a sample of 40 children.

The primary maternal outcome of psychosocial well-being was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), categorized dichotomously as depressive symptoms present (EPDS score >13) or absent (EPDS score ≤13). The cutoff was selected based on work in neighboring South Africa by Tomlinson et al (2017). Parenting self-confidence was also assessed, using the Maternal Self-Report Inventory (Short Form) (MSRI). These instruments were administered to women at enrollment and at nine and 18 months postpartum.

Secondary outcomes assessment. Length, weight, head circumference and mid-upper arm circumference were measured at the child's 9- and 18-month visits and compared to norms established by the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study..[ref 49]. Three separate anthropometric measurements were taken and the median value used. Retention in care and pediatric HIV testing was assessed based on health care visits and outcomes abstracted from multiple sources including: participant-held maternal health/ANC and HIV cards and child health and HIV cards, postnatal care and child welfare registers at the clinics, and the client management information system (CMIS) in some clinics, as well as self-report. Compliance with feeding recommendations was obtained by maternal or caregiver report. Mortality information was obtained by report from families.

Potential mediators. Information on routine caregiving practices and household characteristics was obtained by observation using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) Inventory [refs2 3] during a home visit at 12-15 months of age. Households were instructed to carry out everyday household activities during this observation visit. Study Research Assistants (RAs) completed classroom training on this instrument and then pilot-tested it in the field using non-participating households. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by having multiple observers score the pilot and then discuss discrepancies in scoring. Key, non-routine child stimulation practices were assessed by interview using the Family Care Indicator, a series of standardized questions developed as part of the UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) version 3 (2006), which was administered at baseline to all participating mothers who at the time had children under age five, and to all mothers and caregivers at the 9-month and 18-month assessments.

Potential confounding factors. Eswatini was affected by a drought during 2016-2017 and its impact was assessed at home visits (age 12-15 months), and at the 18-month interview using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS).

Contamination assessment. Participants in both arms were interviewed about their contact with m2m at each visit and at the 18-month assessment.

Statistical methods.

Mullen scores:

Scores from each domain (Visual Reception, Fine Motor skills, Receptive Language, Expressive Language and Gross Motor skills) were analyzed separately. For each domain, the within-sample means and standard deviations of the raw scores by arm were calculated. To facilitate understanding of the effect sizes, the Mullen scores in each domain were then transformed into within-study sample standardized scores (Z-scores), for which effect sizes represent unit changes in the distribution SD. Multivariable linear mixed effects regression models with a random effect for enrollment site were applied to test the difference in the standardized mean scores between the two study arms at each time point. Adjusters selected based on the literature included the child's actual age at the assessment date, the child's gender, and an indicator for stunting (length-for-age Z-score < 2) as a proxy for chronic malnutrition. Additional adjusters were included in the multivariate model based on their strong (p<=0.2) effects in bivariate analyses: the size of the mother's household at enrollment, the length of residence of the mother at her current location at enrollment, household asset-based socio-economic status of the mother at enrollment, the mother's number of other living children at enrollment, her number of previous miscarriages, and her years of education.

Other measures. Growth: Percentages of children with Z-scores of the WHO-standardized anthropometric measurements < -2 at the 9 month and 18 month assessments were reported. Maternal retention in HIV care: Time in care was calculated as days from the date of enrollment in the study to the last documented visit as found in the patient-held HIV cards, the chronic care file of the HIV clinic at the clinic where they enrolled, the CMIS and from self-report. A log-rank test for equality of mean retention between the two arms was conducted.

Socio-economic status: Principal components analysis was used to develop a composite score of socio-economic status based on reported household assets, which was divided into quintiles for analysis. Family Care Indicator. Performance on individual items was assessed and as well as through a combined score (possible range: 0-6) of activities that someone in the household was reported to have performed with the child: (1) "Read books or look at picture books" (2) "Sing songs" (3) "Tell stories" (4) "Play with" (5) "Take [the child] outside the home, compound, yard or enclosure" and (6) spend time naming, counting and/or drawing things."

Mediation analysis. The multivariable linear regression model used in the primary analysis of the 18-month timepoint was extended into a generalized structural equation model to evaluate a potential mediating effect of book-sharing with the child on the relationships between study arm and expressive language scores, and between study arm and visual reception scores. Robust variance estimation was used to adjust for site clustering The presence of book sharing was defined as a positive response to item (1) on the Family Care Indicator at the 18 month timepoint.

Being tested
ECD Intervention
Keywords
Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HIV-Exposed Uninfected Children, Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission of HIV, Orphans and Vulnerable Children, Mentor Mothers, Swaziland, eSwatini
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ECD InterventionBehavioural

    Also called My Child, Our Child

    Modeled on the Early Learning Resource Unit's Family \& Community Motivator home visiting program and Philani Mentor Mothers home visiting program in South Africa. Program provided stimulation in 5 domains: cognitive, receptive and expressive language, gross and fine motor skills, also covered topics in maternal and child health, nutrition and social services.

    Comprised primarily of home visits beginning during pregnancy and continuing until the child was 18 months. ECD MM taught the parent/caregiver about ages and stages of growth, helped facilitate responsive parenting and early learning opportunities for their children, demonstrated use of toys and books to stimulate the child, provided families with picture books, and taught caregivers to create toys and books for their child. Community parenting information play groups and educational talks on ECD at the clinic supplemented home visits.

Study groups in NCT04114305
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionHIV-infected pregnant women enrolled in ECD program implemented by m2m program; women followed during pregnancy and 18 months post-partum with their infants.
Receives: Behavioral: ECD Intervention
ControlHIV-infected pregnant women receiving routine care in clinics without ECD program; women followed during pregnancy and 18 months post-partum with their infants.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Child development

    The primary outcome of childhood development was assessed when the children were 9 and 18 months of age using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning. Scores from each domain (Visual Reception, Fine Motor skills, Receptive Language, Expressive Language and Gross Motor skills) were analyzed separately.

    Measured: Through 18 months of age

  2. Maternal Psychosocial Well-being

    The primary maternal outcome of psychosocial well-being was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), categorized dichotomously as depressive symptoms present (EPDS score >13) or absent (EPDS score ≤13). Parenting self-confidence was also assessed, using the Maternal Self-Report Inventory (Short Form) (MSRI). These instruments were administered to women at enrollment and at nine and 18 months postpartum.

    Measured: Assessed at 9 and 18 months postpartum

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Maternal Retention in HIV care

    Time from study enrollment to last reported HIV care visit

    Measured: 3, 6, 9 and 18 months postpartum

  2. Maternal CD4 count

    Most recent CD4 measurement during study enrollment, change between most recent and first recorded count

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 18 months postpartum

  3. Maternal HIV viral load

    Most recent measurement during study enrollment

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 18 months postpartum

  4. Child retention in well-child care

    Last well-child visit completed

    Measured: 3, 6, 9, 12-15 and 18 months after birth

  5. Pediatric hospitalizations

    From parental report

    Measured: 3, 6, 9, 12-15 and 18 months after birth

  6. Child mortality

    Deaths from family report

    Measured: 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 12-15 and 18 months postpartum

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Oct 2019
  2. Study start18 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion27 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion27 Apr 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
431 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04114305
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB 6298
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
1 Oct 2019
Last updated
29 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified data participant data will be made available per sponsor and country (Swaziland) requirements. Details are in development.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Early Childhood Development (ECD), run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Child development (time frame: Through 18 months of age). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in