Diabetic Macular EdemaPhase 2LOADEXNCT04116398
Pilot and Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy of a Treatment Protocol With Dexamethasone Implant Loading Dose in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema (LOADEX)
A Phase 2 study testing Dexamethasone with 2 loading doses followed by PRN regimen. in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 16 sites in France.
Trial summary
Nowadays, steroids and anti-VEGF are the first line treatment for diabetic macular edema. Ozurdex is the most frequently used steroid and has label for both first and second line treatment. Ozurdex treatment paradigm for patients with diabetic macular edema is to inject patient only in case of huge recurrence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- What is being tested?
- Dexamethasone with 2 loading doses followed by PRN regimen.
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 30 Nov 2020to 3 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient > 40 years old
- Patients with a significant DME : Macular thickening secondary to DME involving the center of the fovea, as measured by SD-OCT, with Central Subfield Thickness (CST) ≥ 285 μm measured on Spectralis/topcon or ≥ 275 μm, as measured on Cirrus, at screening and VA between 20/32 and 20/320 (between 23 and 78 letters ETDRS) using the ETDRS protocol at the initial testing distance of 4 meters at inclusion
- Patient for which a dexamethasone implant is chosen
- 100% naive eyes (no history of steroids or anti-VEGF)
- Pseudophakic for at least 3 months
- HBA1c < 10%
Show all 11Show fewer
- Blood pressure < 160/95
- Patient who give voluntary signed informed consent
- Patient affiliated with the French universal health care system or similar
- Patient able to participated in all visits and medical examinations during the study
- If both eyes have to be treated, only one eye will be included : the eye with the lowest visual acuity at the baseline
Who cannot join
- Aphatic eye without posterior lens capsule.
- Study eye with implant anterior chamber of the eye or intraocular implant with iris fixated or transsclerally or ruptured posterior lens capsule.
- Study eye with lens implant ARTISAN®
- Ocular or periocular infection active or suspected in the study eye including most viral diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva, epithelial keratitis active Herpes simplex (dendritic keratitis), vaccinia, chickenpox, mycobacterial infections and mycoses
- At inclusion, delay after cataract surgery < 3 months in the study eye
- Delay after last session of panretineal Photocoagulation laser < 1 month in the study eye
Show all 31Show fewer
- Delay after last focal laser session of the posterior pole < 1 month in the study eye
- Vitreomacular traction syndrome, associated ERM in the study eye
- History of macular grid laser in the study eye
- Focal laser only if the scars are located within 750 microns of the center (1/2 Papillary Diameter) in the study eye
- Ischemic maculopathy (increase of more than 2 times the surface of the central avascular zone)
- Proliferative diabetic Retinopathy in the study eye
- Hypertension or Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) treated by dual therapy eye drops or more
- Patients with a systemic pathology that could interfere in the evolution of the Diabetic Macular Edema and treated by with immunosuppressive drugs, systemic steroids, anti-aldosterone or systemic anti-VEGF.
- Patients with systemic treatment with a toxic effect on the lens, retina or optic nerve: deferoxime, chloroquine / hydroxychloroquine, tamoxifen, phenothiazines and ethambutol; in progress or within 6 months of inclusion
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients and to anesthetic or hypotonizing eye drops
- History of any pathology, metabolic disease, or any serious suspicion of disease at clinical or laboratory examination that contraindicates the use of the intra-retinal dexamethasone implant, could affect the interpretation of the results of the study or cause significant risks of complication for the subject
- Infectious conjunctivitis and/or active or suspected appendix infection
- Any eye condition or condition that the investigator believes may require intraocular surgery within 12 months
- Eye contralateral that studied with visual acuity < 23 letters
- Pregnant and breastfeeding woman
- Female of reproductive age, sexually active, who does not want to commit to using adequate and highly effective contraception during the study and up to 6 months after the last administration of the study treatment:
- Combined hormonal contraception (containing estrogens and progestins) aimed at inhibiting ovulation (oral, intravaginal or transdermal);
- Hormonal contraception containing only a progestin intended to inhibit ovulation (oral, injectable or implantable);
- Intrauterine device (IUD);
- Intrauterine Hormone Release System (IUS);
- Ovariectomy with hysterectomy, bilateral tubal obstruction or total hysterectomy for at least 6 weeks before inclusion (for women included) or vasectomy for at least 6 months before inclusion (for partners of a patient included);
- Sexual abstinence. A woman will be considered to be of childbearing age from her first period and until the menopause, unless she is sterile or has had an oophorectomy type surgery with hysterectomy, bilateral tubal obstruction or hysterectomy total at least 6 weeks before inclusion. A post-menopausal state is defined as the absence of spontaneous menstruation (that is to say without any other medical treatment, in particular of the hormonal contraceptive type or hormone replacement therapy) for 12 months
- Major patient protected under the terms of the law (Public Health Code)
- Patient's ongoing participation in another interventional clinical trial (study eye and/or untreated eye)
- Follow-up impossible for 24 months, the judgment of the investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country.
16 sites in 1 country
France16 sites
APHP - Hôpital Avicenne
Bobigny, 93000
CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, 33000
Centre Rétine Gallien
Bordeaux
Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil
Créteil, 94010
CHU Dijon
Dijon, 21079
CHRU Lille - Hôpital Huriez
Lille, 59037
Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69003
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hopital de la Croix Rousse
Lyon, 69004
Centre Monticelli Paradis d'ophtalmologie
Marseille, 13008
APHM - Hôpital Nord
Marseille, 13015
Clinique Juge
Marseille
APHP - Hôpital Lariboisière
Paris, 75010
Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des XV XX
Paris, 75012
CHU de Poitiers - La miletrie
Poitiers, 86000
Clinique Mathilde
Rouen
CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet
Toulouse, 31059
About this study
Official title: Pilot and Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy of a Treatment Protocol With Dexamethasone Implant Loading Dose in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
Nowadays, steroids and anti-VEGF are the first line treatment for diabetic macular edema. Ozurdex is the most frequently used steroid and has label for both first and second line treatment. Ozurdex treatment paradigm for patients with diabetic macular edema is to inject patient only in case of huge recurrence. The risk of this scheme is a progressive loss of vision due to photoreceptors loss. A more pro-active regimen, as it already exists for anti-VEGF treatment, would allow a better patient management. A new treatment paradigm consisting in a loading dose of 2 injections within 12 weeks, followed by a PRN (Pro Re Nata) regimen with strict retreatment criteria and minimal time limit of 12 weeks between two injections should result in a better visual acuity gain and a limited augmentation of the number of injections (which will remain lower than the number observed for anti-VEGF treatment).
The investigators have therefore chosen a pilot study to investigate the impact on efficacy and on the number of intravitreal injections (IVI) of such a scheme.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Being tested
- Dexamethasone with 2 loading doses followed by PRN regimen.
- Keywords
- dexamethasone,, loading dose,, diabetic macular edema, pseudophakic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dexamethasone with 2 loading doses followed by PRN regimen.Drug
- Loading dose with 2 systematic intravitreal injections (IVI) of ozurdex at the baseline and 12 weeks.Followed by a PRN regimen with strict retreatment criteria (already used and published in the Prediamex study, Bellocq,Kodjikian et al Ophthalmology Retina 2017)
- Retreatment criteria: Reduction in VA ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters; and/or CSMT ≥ 275 microns by OCT-Cirrus® or ≥ 285 microns by OCT Spectralis®/Topcon; and/or increase of CSMT > 50 microns; and/or onset of recurrent retinal cysts; and/or residual edema considered by the practitioner to be clinically significant.
- Minimal time limit between two IVI : 12 weeks
- Visits: monthly during 1 year (to check efficacy and safety) and then for the 2nd-year only at Month18 (M18) and Month 24 (M24)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ozurdex®, 700µg dexamethasone intravitreal injection | Experimental | Intravitreal injection of dexamethasone (Ozurdex®) Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone with 2 loading doses followed by PRN regimen. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity) change (best improvement) from baseline (during one year of treatment)
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the ETDRS scale at an initial distance of 4 meters.
Measured: 52 weeks
Secondary outcomes (37)
The time required to obtain the best BCVA
average, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum
Measured: 52 weeks
The number of injections required to obtain the best BCVA
average, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum
Measured: 52 weeks
the maximum best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change (best improvement) measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the ETDRS scale at an initial distance of 4 meters.
Measured: between the baseline and 1,5 years and between the baseline and 2 years
values of Visual Acuity (VA) at each visit
Measured: all visits during 2 years
Area under the curve (AUC) of VA
AUC calculated with the values of VA at each visit
Measured: between the baseline and 52 weeks and between the baseline and 2 years
Description of Visual acuity (VA)
categorized change of VA (>=+15 ; +10 -> +15 ; +5 -> +10 ; -5 -> +5 (stable) ; -5 -> -10 ; -10 -> -15 ; > -15)
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
Number of IVI
Measured: 1 year
Number of IVI
Measured: 2 years
OCT parameters: Central Subfield Mean Thickness (CSMT)
average, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters: Central Fovea Thickness
average, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of interruptions of the ellipsoid line
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of continuous external limiting membrane
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of disorganization of the internal retinal layers
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of intraretinal cysts
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of vitreomacular traction
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtain the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of epiretinal membrane
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of macular exudates
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : persistance of foveolar depression
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of intraretinal fluid
Measured: at each visit
Proportion of patients with macular edema resolution
A macular edema resolution will be defined as absence of intraretinal fluid for at least 6 months after the last
Measured: at 1 year
Proportion of patients with macular edema resolution
A macular edema resolution will be defined as absence of intraretinal fluid for at least 6 months after the last
Measured: at 2 years
Retinopathy parameters : presence of intraretinal or subretinal macular hemorrhage
on stereoscopic 7-field color fundus photographs
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Retinopathy parameters: presence of microaneurisms
on stereoscopic 7-field color fundus photographs
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Retinopathy parameters : presence of macular exudates
on stereoscopic 7-field color fundus photographs
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Severity evolution (improvement, no change, worsening) of diabetic retinopathy graded by 2 evaluators on stereoscopic 7-field color fundus photographs
Using the Stadification Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS), 5 levels: No apparent retinopathy, Mild Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR), Moderate NPDR,severe NDPR and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Quantitative OCT-angiography analysis : the size of non-perfusion zones
The mean (and standard deviation) the median (minimum-maximum) of the size of non-perfusion
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Quantitative OCT-angiography analysis : the size of central avascular zones
The mean (and standard deviation) the median (minimum-maximum) of the size of central avascular zones compared with baseline
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Qualitative OCT-angiography analysis : presence of macular ischemia
the number of macular ischemia
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Qualitative OCT-angiography analysis : Evolution of macular ischemia compared to the baseline
Types of evolution compared to baseline : appearance / disappearance / stability of the macular ischemia.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Qualitative OCT-angiography analysis : presence of preretineal neovessels
the number of preretineal neovessels,
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Qualitative OCT-angiography analysis : evolution of preretineal neovessels compared to the baseline
Types of evolution : appearance / disappearance / stability.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Biomicroscopy: the number and the percentage by categories of the condition of the implant
conditions : clear, opacified , integrity, open, performed capsulotomy
Measured: all visits during 2 years
Biomicroscopy: presence of the state of the posterior capsule
absence or presence of the posterior capsule
Measured: all visits during 2 years
Variation of the intraocular pressure
Measured: all visits during 2 years
proportion of patients using hypotonic eye treatment
Measured: all visits during 2 years
Number of adverse events
All adverse events will be coded using the Meddra system organ class and cases of patients stopping or switching drugs will be described (causes, new drugs,..)
Measured: all visits during 2 years
Level of discomfort felt by the patient
Discomfort felt by the patient measured by a visual analog scale (EVA between 0 and 10 (0 = no discomfort))
Measured: all visits during 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2019
- Study start30 Nov 2020
- Primary completion28 Aug 2025
- Study completion3 Sep 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic Macular EdemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04116398
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 69HCL19_0588
- Other IDs
- 2019-003092-18, 2024-514362-39-00, 2019
- Acronym
- LOADEX
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot and Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy of a Treatment Protocol With Dexamethasone Implant Loading Dose in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04116398
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LOADEX / 69HCL19_0588
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Keywords
- dexamethasone,, loading dose,, diabetic macular edema, pseudophakic
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Nowadays, steroids and anti-VEGF are the first line treatment for diabetic macular edema. Ozurdex is the most frequently used steroid and has label for both first and second line treatment. Ozurdex treatment paradigm for patients with diabetic macular edema is to inject patient only in case of huge recurrence. The risk of this scheme is a progressive loss of vision due to photoreceptors loss. A more pro-active regimen, as it already exists for anti-VEGF treatment, would allow a better patient management. A new treatment paradigm consisting in a loading dose of 2 injections within 12 weeks, followed by a PRN (Pro Re Nata) regimen with strict retreatment criteria and minimal time limit of 12 weeks between two injections should result in a better visual acuity gain and a limited augmentation of the number of injections (which will remain lower than the number observed for anti-VEGF treatment).
The investigators have therefore chosen a pilot study to investigate the impact on efficacy and on the number of intravitreal injections (IVI) of such a scheme.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ozurdex®, 700µg dexamethasone intravitreal injection | Experimental | Drug: Dexamethasone with 2 loading doses followed by PRN regimen.Intravitreal injection of dexamethasone (Ozurdex®) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patient > 40 years old
- Patients with a significant DME : Macular thickening secondary to DME involving the center of the fovea, as measured by SD-OCT, with Central Subfield Thickness (CST) ≥ 285 μm measured on Spectralis/topcon or ≥ 275 μm, as measured on Cirrus, at screening and VA between 20/32 and 20/320 (between 23 and 78 letters ETDRS) using the ETDRS protocol at the initial testing distance of 4 meters at inclusion
- Patient for which a dexamethasone implant is chosen
- 100% naive eyes (no history of steroids or anti-VEGF)
- Pseudophakic for at least 3 months
Key exclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Aphatic eye without posterior lens capsule.
- Study eye with implant anterior chamber of the eye or intraocular implant with iris fixated or transsclerally or ruptured posterior lens capsule.
- Study eye with lens implant ARTISAN®
- Ocular or periocular infection active or suspected in the study eye including most viral diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva, epithelial keratitis active Herpes simplex (dendritic keratitis), vaccinia, chickenpox, mycobacterial infections and mycoses
- At inclusion, delay after cataract surgery < 3 months in the study eye
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dexamethasone with 2 loading doses followed by PRN regimen.* Loading dose with 2 systematic intravitreal injections (IVI) of ozurdex at the baseline and 12 weeks.Followed by a PRN regimen with strict retreatment criteria (already used and published in the Prediamex study, Bellocq,Kodjikian et al Ophthalmology Retina 2017) * Retreatment criteria: Reduction in VA ≥ 5 ETDRS Letters; and/or CSMT ≥ 275 microns by OCT-Cirrus® or ≥ 285 microns by OCT Spectralis®/Topcon; and/or increase of CSMT > 50 microns; and/or onset of recurrent retinal cysts; and/or residual edema considered by the practitioner to be clinically significant. * Minimal time limit between two IVI : 12 weeks * Visits: monthly during 1 year (to check efficacy and safety) and then for the 2nd-year only at Month18 (M18) and Month 24 (M24) | Drug | Ozurdex®, 700µg dexamethasone intravitreal injection |
Primary outcome
Maximum BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity) change (best improvement) from baseline (during one year of treatment)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the ETDRS scale at an initial distance of 4 meters.
37 secondary outcomes
The time required to obtain the best BCVA
Time frame: 52 weeks
The number of injections required to obtain the best BCVA
Time frame: 52 weeks
the maximum best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change (best improvement) measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale
Time frame: between the baseline and 1,5 years and between the baseline and 2 years
values of Visual Acuity (VA) at each visit
Time frame: all visits during 2 years
Area under the curve (AUC) of VA
Time frame: between the baseline and 52 weeks and between the baseline and 2 years
Description of Visual acuity (VA)
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
Number of IVI
Time frame: 1 year
Number of IVI
Time frame: 2 years
OCT parameters: Central Subfield Mean Thickness (CSMT)
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters: Central Fovea Thickness
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of interruptions of the ellipsoid line
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of continuous external limiting membrane
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of disorganization of the internal retinal layers
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of intraretinal cysts
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of vitreomacular traction
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtain the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of epiretinal membrane
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of macular exudates
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : persistance of foveolar depression
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 years, 2 years and the visit which obtained the BCVA
OCT parameters : presence of intraretinal fluid
Time frame: at each visit
Proportion of patients with macular edema resolution
Time frame: at 1 year
Proportion of patients with macular edema resolution
Time frame: at 2 years
Retinopathy parameters : presence of intraretinal or subretinal macular hemorrhage
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Retinopathy parameters: presence of microaneurisms
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Retinopathy parameters : presence of macular exudates
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Severity evolution (improvement, no change, worsening) of diabetic retinopathy graded by 2 evaluators on stereoscopic 7-field color fundus photographs
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Quantitative OCT-angiography analysis : the size of non-perfusion zones
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Quantitative OCT-angiography analysis : the size of central avascular zones
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Qualitative OCT-angiography analysis : presence of macular ischemia
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Qualitative OCT-angiography analysis : Evolution of macular ischemia compared to the baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Qualitative OCT-angiography analysis : presence of preretineal neovessels
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Qualitative OCT-angiography analysis : evolution of preretineal neovessels compared to the baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks,36 weeks,52 weeks, 1.5 year and 2 years
Biomicroscopy: the number and the percentage by categories of the condition of the implant
Time frame: all visits during 2 years
Biomicroscopy: presence of the state of the posterior capsule
Time frame: all visits during 2 years
Variation of the intraocular pressure
Time frame: all visits during 2 years
proportion of patients using hypotonic eye treatment
Time frame: all visits during 2 years
Number of adverse events
Time frame: all visits during 2 years
Level of discomfort felt by the patient
Time frame: all visits during 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Diabetic Macular Edema
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of RGX-314 Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space for Participants With and Without Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy, DR
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Trial for Intravitreal Injection of 4D-150 in Adults With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
COMO: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Dexamethasone with 2 loading doses followed by PRN regimen. in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 16 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity) change (best improvement) from baseline (during one year of treatment) (time frame: 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.