Venous ThrombosesPhase 2ARIVANCT04128956
Aspirin® Plus Rivaroxaban Versus Rivaroxaban Alone for the Prevention of Venous Stent Thrombosis in Patients With PTS
A Phase 2 study testing Aspirin 100mg in people with Venous Thromboses and Stent Stenosis, run by University of Zurich at 6 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
To show if a combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus Aspirin® is more efficient (superiority testing) as rivaroxaban alone in the prevention of early venous stent thrombosis in patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome in the first 6 months following endovascular therapy To demonstrate tolerability of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Venous Thromboses, Stent Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Aspirin 100mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 172 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Mar 2020to 21 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent form and data protection declaration obtained prior to any trial-specific procedures
- Patient aged ≥18 years
- Confirmed diagnosis of post-thrombotic syndrome defined as Villalta score > 4 points prior to enrolment and venous stent intervention
- Confirmed stenosis of inferior vena cava, iliac vein, or common femoral vein by duplex ultrasound or cross-sectional imaging (CT venography or MR venography) prior to enrolment and venous stent intervention
- Successfully conducted venous stent intervention involving either:
- inferior vena cava
Show all 9Show fewer
- iliac vein or
- common femoral vein
- Patients either on active treatment with rivaroxaban or patients planned for treatment with rivaroxaban after intervention
Who cannot join
- Previous venous intervention in target vessels
- Any contraindication for antithrombotic therapy (e.g. active gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, bleeding disorder with increased tendency of bleedings)
- Patients with a recent (3 months) clinically significant bleeding and / or active or recent (3 months) ulcerative or inflammatory gastrointestinal disease
- Ongoing antiplatelet therapy or previous antiplatelet therapy within 7 days prior to Visit 1
- Acute thrombosis (venous thromboembolism events < 3 months prior to Visit 1)
- Pre-existing coagulopathy
Show all 20Show fewer
- Prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (< 12 months prior to Visit 1)
- Pregnancy, breast feeding, or planned pregnancy within the trial period or women of childbearing potential not using an adequate method of contraception
- Severe heart, liver or kidney disease
- Severe somatopathic, neurological and / or psychiatric disease(s)
- Malignant growth (concurrent or previous cancer with a relapse-free and treatment-free interval of less than 5 years before Visit 1)
- Known hypersensitivity to acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin® cardio or Aspirin® protect and / or its excipients), to other antiphlogistic drugs or to analgesics or anti-fever drugs
- Concomitant intake of Methotrexat > 15 mg per week
- Parallel participation in another clinical trial, participation in a clinical trial within less than 6 weeks prior to the Screening visit or previous participation in this clinical trial
- Known to be, or suspected of being unable to comply with the trial protocol (e.g. no permanent address, history of drug abuse, known to be non-compliant or presenting an unstable psychiatric history)
- Legal incapacity and / or other circumstances rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible impact of the study
- Custody by juridical or official order
- Evidence of an uncooperative attitude
- Difficulties in understanding the language in which the patient information is given
- Patients dependent from the investigator or sponsor (e.g. close relatives of the investigator, employees of the clinic, the sponsor or involved CRO(s))
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 3 countries.
6 sites in 3 countries
Germany4 sites
Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen
Aachen, 52074
Klinikum Arnsberg - Karolinen Hospital
Arnsberg, 59759
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Bad Krozingen, 79189
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
About this study
Official title: Aspirin® Plus Rivaroxaban Versus Rivaroxaban Alone for the Prevention of Venous Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Post-thrombotic Syndrome a Multi-center, International, Randomized, Open Label, Controlled Trial
To show if a combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus Aspirin® is more efficient (superiority testing) as rivaroxaban alone in the prevention of early venous stent thrombosis in patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome in the first 6 months following endovascular therapy To demonstrate tolerability of combination therapy of Aspirin® plus rivaroxaban in long-term treatment.
Read the detailed description
Deep vein thrombosis is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. It is the most frequent type of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and responsible for approximately 800.000 deaths per year in the European Union and the United States combined. The post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a frequent long-term complication of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which occurs in up to 50% of patients despite adequate anticoagulation therapy and compression stockings. Patients with DVT of the inferior vena cava or iliac veins are at highest risk for the development of PTS. Inadequate recanalization and persistent venous outflow obstruction promotes the development of venous hypertension, secondary valve damage, valvular reflux, and the clinical manifestation of PTS, which consists of a similar set of signs and symptoms as in superficial venous insufficiency. Symptoms may include leg edema, pruritus, dysesthesia, leg pain on standing, skin changes, venous claudication with limited exercise capacity, and leg ulcers. Venous ulcers occur in approximately 10% of patients with iliofemoral DVT after 3 years.
The diagnosis of PTS is made based on the presence of its clinical features, a prior history of proximal DVT, and the results of imaging studies. Clinical scores, such as the Villalta score, can function as a tool to stage severity of disease. PTS in classified as mild if the Villalta score is 5-9, moderate if the Villalta score is 10-14, and severe if the Villata score exceeds 15 points. Disabling venous claudication can be diagnosed by treadmill exercise tests. Magnetic resonance imaging venography can be used in addition to duplex ultrasound to objectify central venous obstruction, and unmark underlying strategic compression sides (e.g. May-Thurner syndrome).
Recommendations by the American Heart Association for endovascular treatment of PTS suggest percutaneous recanalization including the implantation of stents for symptomatic patients) Endovascular therapy with provisional stent placement shows promising clinical outcomes to improve PTS-associated symptoms, including leg ulcers. However, there is significant risk for early stent thrombosis, estimated as high as 21% after 12 months.
Antithrombotic therapy is the corner stone of the prevention of stent thrombosis, but there is great inconsistency in the use of antithrombotic agents. The value of extended anticoagulation therapy in PTS patients beyond the durations recommended in VTE management guidelines is controversial, and it has not been specifically investigated in the presence of venous stent implants. Although oral anticoagulants are accepted as the main therapy regimen, the benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) in the early phase after venous stent implantation is unclear.
According to a recent international survey completed by 106 experts, one third reported to use life-long anticoagulation with a vitamin-K antagonist (VKA), and another 19% chose life-long anticoagulation with direct anticoagulant (DOAC) for a presented case scenario of a PTS patients treated with venous stents. The use of APT following stent placement alone or in combination with an anticoagulant was reported in 7% and 13%, respectively, whereas 25% reported use of APT following discontinuation of ACT.
Conventionally, antiplatelet agents, such as acetylsalicylic acid, are regarded as drugs that prevent arterial thrombosis, as platelet adhesion predominates clotting in high-flow, high-sheer circulation.
There is compelling evidence that Aspirin® is effective in the prevention of arterial stent thrombosis, but it is unclear, whether it can prevent venous stent thrombosis.
- Conditions
- Venous Thromboses, Stent Stenosis
- Being tested
- Aspirin 100mg
- Keywords
- Aspirin plus rivaroxaban vs. rivaroxaban for the prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thrombosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Aspirin 100mgDrug
Also called Aspirin
Aspirin® cardio (CH) or Aspirin® protect (DE, AT) Film coated tablets Acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg Once daily oral intake for 6 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aspirin® | Experimental | To show if a combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus Aspirin® is more efficient (superiority testing) as rivaroxaban alone in the prevention of early venous stent thrombosis in patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome in the first 6 months following endovascular therapy.
To demonstrate tolerability of combination therapy of Aspirin® plus rivaroxaban in long-term treatment. Receives: Drug: Aspirin 100mg |
| Control group | No intervention | Observational study of standard of care anticoagulation (rivarobaban dosis defined in the clinical routine). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 6 months
The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 6 months (=Visit 3), i.e. without the occurrence of either i) occlusion of at least a part of the stent segment or ii.) a re-intervention to maintain patency of the treated segment.
Measured: 6 month
Secondary outcomes (8)
Primary patency rate after 3 months
The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 3 months (=Visit 2), i.e. without the occurrence of either i) occlusion of at least a part of the stent segment or ii.) a re-intervention to maintain patency of the treated segment.
Measured: 3 month
Secondary patency rate after 3 and 6 months
Secondary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success and without the occurrence of occlusion of at least a part of the stent segment, irrespective of any re-intervention
Measured: 3 and 6 months
Primary sustained clinical success after 3 and 6 months (=Visit 2 and Visit 3)
Primary sustained clinical success, defined as the absence of post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta score 0-4 points) without the need for repeated intervention assessed at the latest routine follow-up visit (at the latest available follow-up).
Measured: 3 and 6 months
Difference between treatment groups in the incidence of patients with open stents but >50% residual stenosis according Duplex criteria
Difference between treatment groups in the incidence of patients with open stents but >50% residual stenosis according Duplex criteria
Measured: 3 month
Difference of limb circumference
Difference of limb circumference of the affected leg in comparison to the contralateral leg at 3 and 6 months (= Visit 2 \& 3), respectively, compared to baseline (for patients with only one affected leg)
Measured: 3 and 6 months
Quality of life using the CIVIQ-20 (chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire)
Quality of life using the CIVIQ-20 (chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire) at 3 and 6 months (= Visit 2 \& 3), respectively, compared to baseline.
Value range: 20-100 points; Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: 3 and 6 months
Change in Villalta score
Change in Villalta score with and without "ulcus cruris assessment" for the affected leg from baseline to 3 and 6 months (= Visit 2 \& 3), respectively.
Value range: 0-48 points; Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: 3 and 6 months
Revised venous clinical severity score (rVCSS)
Revised venous clinical severity score (rVCSS) for the affected leg from baseline to 3 and 6 months (= Visit 2 \& 3), respectively.
Value range: 0-30 points; Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: 3 and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2019
- Study start11 Mar 2020
- Primary completion21 Feb 2024
- Study completion21 Feb 2024
Why it stopped: Recommendation by DSMB
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Venous ThrombosesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ZurichThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- a multi-center, international, randomized, open label, controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 172 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Zurich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Medical University of Vienna, RWTH Aachen University, Klinikum Arnsberg, University Hospital Freiburg
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nils Kucher, Prof.Dr.med., Study chair, University Hospital, Zürich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04128956
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18524
- Other IDs
- 2019-001723-12, 2019
- Acronym
- ARIVA
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Barco S, Jalaie H, Sebastian T, Wolf S, Fumagalli RM, Lichtenberg M, Zeller T, Erbel C, Schlager O, Kucher N. Aspirin Plus Rivaroxaban Versus Rivaroxaban Alone for the Prevention of Venous Stent Thrombosis Among Patients With Post-Thrombotic Syndrome: The Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Open-Label ARIVA Trial. Circulation. 2025 Mar 25;151(12):835-846. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.073050. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
PubMed 39874026
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aspirin® Plus Rivaroxaban Versus Rivaroxaban Alone for the Prevention of Venous Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Post-thrombotic Syndrome a Multi-center, International, Randomized, Open Label, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04128956
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARIVA / 18524
- Conditions
- Venous Thromboses, Stent Stenosis
- Keywords
- Aspirin plus rivaroxaban vs. rivaroxaban for the prevention
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Recommendation by DSMB
- Enrolment
- 172 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ZurichUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Medical University of Vienna, RWTH Aachen University, Klinikum Arnsberg, University Hospital Freiburg
- Study start
- 11 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Feb 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To show if a combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus Aspirin® is more efficient (superiority testing) as rivaroxaban alone in the prevention of early venous stent thrombosis in patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome in the first 6 months following endovascular therapy To demonstrate tolerability of combination therapy of Aspirin® plus rivaroxaban in long-term treatment.
Detailed description
Deep vein thrombosis is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. It is the most frequent type of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and responsible for approximately 800.000 deaths per year in the European Union and the United States combined. The post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a frequent long-term complication of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which occurs in up to 50% of patients despite adequate anticoagulation therapy and compression stockings. Patients with DVT of the inferior vena cava or iliac veins are at highest risk for the development of PTS. Inadequate recanalization and persistent venous outflow obstruction promotes the development of venous hypertension, secondary valve damage, valvular reflux, and the clinical manifestation of PTS, which consists of a similar set of signs and symptoms as in superficial venous insufficiency. Symptoms may include leg edema, pruritus, dysesthesia, leg pain on standing, skin changes, venous claudication with limited exercise capacity, and leg ulcers. Venous ulcers occur in approximately 10% of patients with iliofemoral DVT after 3 years.
The diagnosis of PTS is made based on the presence of its clinical features, a prior history of proximal DVT, and the results of imaging studies. Clinical scores, such as the Villalta score, can function as a tool to stage severity of disease. PTS in classified as mild if the Villalta score is 5-9, moderate if the Villalta score is 10-14, and severe if the Villata score exceeds 15 points. Disabling venous claudication can be diagnosed by treadmill exercise tests. Magnetic resonance imaging venography can be used in addition to duplex ultrasound to objectify central venous obstruction, and unmark underlying strategic compression sides (e.g. May-Thurner syndrome).
Recommendations by the American Heart Association for endovascular treatment of PTS suggest percutaneous recanalization including the implantation of stents for symptomatic patients) Endovascular therapy with provisional stent placement shows promising clinical outcomes to improve PTS-associated symptoms, including leg ulcers. However, there is significant risk for early stent thrombosis, estimated as high as 21% after 12 months.
Antithrombotic therapy is the corner stone of the prevention of stent thrombosis, but there is great inconsistency in the use of antithrombotic agents. The value of extended anticoagulation therapy in PTS patients beyond the durations recommended in VTE management guidelines is controversial, and it has not been specifically investigated in the presence of venous stent implants. Although oral anticoagulants are accepted as the main therapy regimen, the benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) in the early phase after venous stent implantation is unclear.
According to a recent international survey completed by 106 experts, one third reported to use life-long anticoagulation with a vitamin-K antagonist (VKA), and another 19% chose life-long anticoagulation with direct anticoagulant (DOAC) for a presented case scenario of a PTS patients treated with venous stents. The use of APT following stent placement alone or in combination with an anticoagulant was reported in 7% and 13%, respectively, whereas 25% reported use of APT following discontinuation of ACT.
Conventionally, antiplatelet agents, such as acetylsalicylic acid, are regarded as drugs that prevent arterial thrombosis, as platelet adhesion predominates clotting in high-flow, high-sheer circulation.
There is compelling evidence that Aspirin® is effective in the prevention of arterial stent thrombosis, but it is unclear, whether it can prevent venous stent thrombosis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- a multi-center, international, randomized, open label, controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aspirin® | Experimental | Drug: Aspirin 100mgTo show if a combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus Aspirin® is more efficient (superiority testing) as rivaroxaban alone in the prevention of early venous stent thrombosis in patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome in the first 6 months following endovascular therapy. To demonstrate tolerability of combination therapy of Aspirin® plus rivaroxaban in long-term treatment. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Observational study of standard of care anticoagulation (rivarobaban dosis defined in the clinical routine). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Signed informed consent form and data protection declaration obtained prior to any trial-specific procedures
- Patient aged ≥18 years
- Confirmed diagnosis of post-thrombotic syndrome defined as Villalta score > 4 points prior to enrolment and venous stent intervention
- Confirmed stenosis of inferior vena cava, iliac vein, or common femoral vein by duplex ultrasound or cross-sectional imaging (CT venography or MR venography) prior to enrolment and venous stent intervention
- Successfully conducted venous stent intervention involving either:
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Previous venous intervention in target vessels
- Any contraindication for antithrombotic therapy (e.g. active gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, bleeding disorder with increased tendency of bleedings)
- Patients with a recent (3 months) clinically significant bleeding and / or active or recent (3 months) ulcerative or inflammatory gastrointestinal disease
- Ongoing antiplatelet therapy or previous antiplatelet therapy within 7 days prior to Visit 1
- Acute thrombosis (venous thromboembolism events < 3 months prior to Visit 1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aspirin 100mgAlso: AspirinAspirin® cardio (CH) or Aspirin® protect (DE, AT) Film coated tablets Acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg Once daily oral intake for 6 months | Drug | Aspirin® |
Primary outcome
The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 6 months
Time frame: 6 month
The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 6 months (=Visit 3), i.e. without the occurrence of either i) occlusion of at least a part of the stent segment or ii.) a re-intervention to maintain patency of the treated segment.
8 secondary outcomes
Primary patency rate after 3 months
Time frame: 3 month
Secondary patency rate after 3 and 6 months
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Primary sustained clinical success after 3 and 6 months (=Visit 2 and Visit 3)
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Difference between treatment groups in the incidence of patients with open stents but >50% residual stenosis according Duplex criteria
Time frame: 3 month
Difference of limb circumference
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Quality of life using the CIVIQ-20 (chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire)
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Change in Villalta score
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Revised venous clinical severity score (rVCSS)
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recommendation by DSMB). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39874026Barco S, Jalaie H, Sebastian T, Wolf S, Fumagalli RM, Lichtenberg M, Zeller T, Erbel C, Schlager O, Kucher N. Aspirin Plus Rivaroxaban Versus Rivaroxaban Alone for the Prevention of Venous Stent Thrombosis Among Patients With Post-Thrombotic Syndrome: The Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Open-Label ARIVA Trial. Circulation. 2025 Mar 25;151(12):835-846. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.073050. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Venous Thromboses
RecruitingPhase 2
SBRT With Immunotherapy and Atezo-Bev in HCC With Major Portal Vein Thrombosis
HCC
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nils Kucher, Prof.Dr.med. study chair
University Hospital, Zürich
6 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Aspirin 100mg in people with Venous Thromboses and Stent Stenosis, run by University of Zurich at 6 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Germany, Austria, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recommendation by DSMB). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 6 months (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04128956, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2024.