AzTrials
AzTrials

Venous ThrombosesPhase 2ARIVANCT04128956

Aspirin® Plus Rivaroxaban Versus Rivaroxaban Alone for the Prevention of Venous Stent Thrombosis in Patients With PTS

A Phase 2 study testing Aspirin 100mg in people with Venous Thromboses and Stent Stenosis, run by University of Zurich at 6 sites in 3 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To show if a combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus Aspirin® is more efficient (superiority testing) as rivaroxaban alone in the prevention of early venous stent thrombosis in patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome in the first 6 months following endovascular therapy To demonstrate tolerability of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Venous Thromboses, Stent Stenosis
What is being tested?
Aspirin 100mg
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
172 participants
Where
6 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
11 Mar 2020to 21 Feb 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent form and data protection declaration obtained prior to any trial-specific procedures
  • Patient aged ≥18 years
  • Confirmed diagnosis of post-thrombotic syndrome defined as Villalta score > 4 points prior to enrolment and venous stent intervention
  • Confirmed stenosis of inferior vena cava, iliac vein, or common femoral vein by duplex ultrasound or cross-sectional imaging (CT venography or MR venography) prior to enrolment and venous stent intervention
  • Successfully conducted venous stent intervention involving either:
  • inferior vena cava
Show all 9Show fewer
  • iliac vein or
  • common femoral vein
  • Patients either on active treatment with rivaroxaban or patients planned for treatment with rivaroxaban after intervention

Who cannot join

  • Previous venous intervention in target vessels
  • Any contraindication for antithrombotic therapy (e.g. active gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, bleeding disorder with increased tendency of bleedings)
  • Patients with a recent (3 months) clinically significant bleeding and / or active or recent (3 months) ulcerative or inflammatory gastrointestinal disease
  • Ongoing antiplatelet therapy or previous antiplatelet therapy within 7 days prior to Visit 1
  • Acute thrombosis (venous thromboembolism events < 3 months prior to Visit 1)
  • Pre-existing coagulopathy
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (< 12 months prior to Visit 1)
  • Pregnancy, breast feeding, or planned pregnancy within the trial period or women of childbearing potential not using an adequate method of contraception
  • Severe heart, liver or kidney disease
  • Severe somatopathic, neurological and / or psychiatric disease(s)
  • Malignant growth (concurrent or previous cancer with a relapse-free and treatment-free interval of less than 5 years before Visit 1)
  • Known hypersensitivity to acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin® cardio or Aspirin® protect and / or its excipients), to other antiphlogistic drugs or to analgesics or anti-fever drugs
  • Concomitant intake of Methotrexat > 15 mg per week
  • Parallel participation in another clinical trial, participation in a clinical trial within less than 6 weeks prior to the Screening visit or previous participation in this clinical trial
  • Known to be, or suspected of being unable to comply with the trial protocol (e.g. no permanent address, history of drug abuse, known to be non-compliant or presenting an unstable psychiatric history)
  • Legal incapacity and / or other circumstances rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible impact of the study
  • Custody by juridical or official order
  • Evidence of an uncooperative attitude
  • Difficulties in understanding the language in which the patient information is given
  • Patients dependent from the investigator or sponsor (e.g. close relatives of the investigator, employees of the clinic, the sponsor or involved CRO(s))

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 3 countries.

6 sites in 3 countries

Germany4 sites
  • Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen

    Aachen, 52074

  • Klinikum Arnsberg - Karolinen Hospital

    Arnsberg, 59759

  • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg

    Bad Krozingen, 79189

  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

Other trials in Germany

Austria1 site
  • Medizinische Universität Wien

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital Zurich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Aspirin® Plus Rivaroxaban Versus Rivaroxaban Alone for the Prevention of Venous Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Post-thrombotic Syndrome a Multi-center, International, Randomized, Open Label, Controlled Trial

To show if a combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus Aspirin® is more efficient (superiority testing) as rivaroxaban alone in the prevention of early venous stent thrombosis in patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome in the first 6 months following endovascular therapy To demonstrate tolerability of combination therapy of Aspirin® plus rivaroxaban in long-term treatment.

Read the detailed description

Deep vein thrombosis is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. It is the most frequent type of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and responsible for approximately 800.000 deaths per year in the European Union and the United States combined. The post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a frequent long-term complication of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which occurs in up to 50% of patients despite adequate anticoagulation therapy and compression stockings. Patients with DVT of the inferior vena cava or iliac veins are at highest risk for the development of PTS. Inadequate recanalization and persistent venous outflow obstruction promotes the development of venous hypertension, secondary valve damage, valvular reflux, and the clinical manifestation of PTS, which consists of a similar set of signs and symptoms as in superficial venous insufficiency. Symptoms may include leg edema, pruritus, dysesthesia, leg pain on standing, skin changes, venous claudication with limited exercise capacity, and leg ulcers. Venous ulcers occur in approximately 10% of patients with iliofemoral DVT after 3 years.

The diagnosis of PTS is made based on the presence of its clinical features, a prior history of proximal DVT, and the results of imaging studies. Clinical scores, such as the Villalta score, can function as a tool to stage severity of disease. PTS in classified as mild if the Villalta score is 5-9, moderate if the Villalta score is 10-14, and severe if the Villata score exceeds 15 points. Disabling venous claudication can be diagnosed by treadmill exercise tests. Magnetic resonance imaging venography can be used in addition to duplex ultrasound to objectify central venous obstruction, and unmark underlying strategic compression sides (e.g. May-Thurner syndrome).

Recommendations by the American Heart Association for endovascular treatment of PTS suggest percutaneous recanalization including the implantation of stents for symptomatic patients) Endovascular therapy with provisional stent placement shows promising clinical outcomes to improve PTS-associated symptoms, including leg ulcers. However, there is significant risk for early stent thrombosis, estimated as high as 21% after 12 months.

Antithrombotic therapy is the corner stone of the prevention of stent thrombosis, but there is great inconsistency in the use of antithrombotic agents. The value of extended anticoagulation therapy in PTS patients beyond the durations recommended in VTE management guidelines is controversial, and it has not been specifically investigated in the presence of venous stent implants. Although oral anticoagulants are accepted as the main therapy regimen, the benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) in the early phase after venous stent implantation is unclear.

According to a recent international survey completed by 106 experts, one third reported to use life-long anticoagulation with a vitamin-K antagonist (VKA), and another 19% chose life-long anticoagulation with direct anticoagulant (DOAC) for a presented case scenario of a PTS patients treated with venous stents. The use of APT following stent placement alone or in combination with an anticoagulant was reported in 7% and 13%, respectively, whereas 25% reported use of APT following discontinuation of ACT.

Conventionally, antiplatelet agents, such as acetylsalicylic acid, are regarded as drugs that prevent arterial thrombosis, as platelet adhesion predominates clotting in high-flow, high-sheer circulation.

There is compelling evidence that Aspirin® is effective in the prevention of arterial stent thrombosis, but it is unclear, whether it can prevent venous stent thrombosis.

Being tested
Aspirin 100mg
Keywords
Aspirin plus rivaroxaban vs. rivaroxaban for the prevention
Medical subject headings
Venous Thrombosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aspirin 100mgDrug

    Also called Aspirin

    Aspirin® cardio (CH) or Aspirin® protect (DE, AT) Film coated tablets Acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg Once daily oral intake for 6 months

Study groups in NCT04128956
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aspirin®ExperimentalTo show if a combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus Aspirin® is more efficient (superiority testing) as rivaroxaban alone in the prevention of early venous stent thrombosis in patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome in the first 6 months following endovascular therapy. To demonstrate tolerability of combination therapy of Aspirin® plus rivaroxaban in long-term treatment.
Receives: Drug: Aspirin 100mg
Control groupNo interventionObservational study of standard of care anticoagulation (rivarobaban dosis defined in the clinical routine).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 6 months

    The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 6 months (=Visit 3), i.e. without the occurrence of either i) occlusion of at least a part of the stent segment or ii.) a re-intervention to maintain patency of the treated segment.

    Measured: 6 month

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Primary patency rate after 3 months

    The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 3 months (=Visit 2), i.e. without the occurrence of either i) occlusion of at least a part of the stent segment or ii.) a re-intervention to maintain patency of the treated segment.

    Measured: 3 month

  2. Secondary patency rate after 3 and 6 months

    Secondary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success and without the occurrence of occlusion of at least a part of the stent segment, irrespective of any re-intervention

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  3. Primary sustained clinical success after 3 and 6 months (=Visit 2 and Visit 3)

    Primary sustained clinical success, defined as the absence of post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta score 0-4 points) without the need for repeated intervention assessed at the latest routine follow-up visit (at the latest available follow-up).

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  4. Difference between treatment groups in the incidence of patients with open stents but >50% residual stenosis according Duplex criteria

    Difference between treatment groups in the incidence of patients with open stents but >50% residual stenosis according Duplex criteria

    Measured: 3 month

  5. Difference of limb circumference

    Difference of limb circumference of the affected leg in comparison to the contralateral leg at 3 and 6 months (= Visit 2 \& 3), respectively, compared to baseline (for patients with only one affected leg)

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  6. Quality of life using the CIVIQ-20 (chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire)

    Quality of life using the CIVIQ-20 (chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire) at 3 and 6 months (= Visit 2 \& 3), respectively, compared to baseline.

    Value range: 20-100 points; Higher scores mean worse outcome

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  7. Change in Villalta score

    Change in Villalta score with and without "ulcus cruris assessment" for the affected leg from baseline to 3 and 6 months (= Visit 2 \& 3), respectively.

    Value range: 0-48 points; Higher scores mean worse outcome

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  8. Revised venous clinical severity score (rVCSS)

    Revised venous clinical severity score (rVCSS) for the affected leg from baseline to 3 and 6 months (= Visit 2 \& 3), respectively.

    Value range: 0-30 points; Higher scores mean worse outcome

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2019
  2. Study start11 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion21 Feb 2024
  4. Study completion21 Feb 2024

Why it stopped: Recommendation by DSMB

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
a multi-center, international, randomized, open label, controlled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
172 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04128956
Sponsor's protocol ID
18524
Other IDs
2019-001723-12, 2019
Acronym
ARIVA
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
14 Oct 2019
Last updated
1 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Barco S, Jalaie H, Sebastian T, Wolf S, Fumagalli RM, Lichtenberg M, Zeller T, Erbel C, Schlager O, Kucher N. Aspirin Plus Rivaroxaban Versus Rivaroxaban Alone for the Prevention of Venous Stent Thrombosis Among Patients With Post-Thrombotic Syndrome: The Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Open-Label ARIVA Trial. Circulation. 2025 Mar 25;151(12):835-846. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.073050. Epub 2025 Jan 28.

    PubMed 39874026

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Aspirin 100mg in people with Venous Thromboses and Stent Stenosis, run by University of Zurich at 6 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Germany, Austria, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Recommendation by DSMB). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary patency rate is defined as the percentage of patients with primary treatment success after 6 months (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04128956, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in