AzTrials
AzTrials

Laparoscopic SurgeryNCT04146090

Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A study testing Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in people with Laparoscopic Surgery and Pneumoperitoneum, run by Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background. Many studies have demonstrated reduced postoperative pain in patients undergoing lower pneumoperitoneum pressure level during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, most of them has shown a high risk of bias and low or very low quality of evidence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
What is being tested?
Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
23 Oct 2019to 10 Feb 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with an ASA physical status I or II, who will be scheduled to undergo LC

Who cannot join

  • (i) refusal to participate; (ii) altered level of consciousness or inability to communicate; (iii) presented with a contraindication to any of the drugs used in the present study; (iv) history of alcohol or drug abuse; (v) a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40; (vi) presence of chronic pain or using opioid; (vii) history of complicated gallstone diseases like acute cholecystiitis, cholangitis or pancreatitis. Reasons for exclusion following randomization will include; (i) protocol violations, such as the use of medications not contemplated in the study protocol; (ii) conversion to an open surgical technique

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Eduardo T Moro

    Araçoiaba da Serra, São Paulo, 18190-000

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Quality of Recovery Measured by QoR-40

Background. Many studies have demonstrated reduced postoperative pain in patients undergoing lower pneumoperitoneum pressure level during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, most of them has shown a high risk of bias and low or very low quality of evidence. Considering the need to evaluate, not only the postoperative pain, but the effect of anesthesia and surgery on patient recovery and satisfaction, we have designed a prospective, randomised and double-blinded study to evaluate the quality of recovery, using the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40), in patients undergoing LC under low-pressure or standard pressure pneumoperitoneum. Methods. Eighty patients aged 18 to 65 years of age will be randomised into 2 groups: LP (low-pressure - 10mmHg) or S (standard - 14 mmHg) enrolled in the study. Anesthesia will be induced with remifentanil, propofol and rocuronium and the maintenance will be achieved with sevoflurane and remifentanil Anesthesiologists and surgeons will not have access to insufflation pressure display. The primary outcome will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40) which is a 40-item quality of recovery scoring system. In addition, the intraoperative rocuronium consumption, time to eye opening (time from the discontinuation of anesthetics to eye opening), post-operative nausea and vomiting, pain score, analgesic use, and length of PACU stay (time to Aldrete score ≥ 9) will be recorded.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. Although it is generally a procedure of short duration and a growing number of patients are being treated on an outpatient basis, post-operative pain remains a major reason for prolonged hospital stay, and readmission.1 A number of trials have evaluated methods to prevent postoperative pain after LC. One of the most tested was low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (7-10 mmHg) when compared to standard-pressure (12-16 mmHg).2-10 It is well known that carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum provides adequate working space and organ visualization but this may cause several physiologic changes. Many studies have demonstrated reduced postoperative pain in patients undergoing lower pneumoperitoneum pressure level. However, a recent Cochrane systematic review have shown a high risk of bias and low or very low quality of evidence in 20 trials from 21 evaluated. Additionally, the decrease in the effective working space provided by lower intra-abdominal pressure may increase the technical difficulty, the incidence the procedure-related injuries and the operative time. 11 Considering the measurements that assess quality of life from the patient's perspective are increasingly recognized as an important quality metric in perioperative clinical trials, and the need to evaluate, not only the postoperative pain, but the effect of anesthesia and surgery on patient recovery and satisfaction, we have designed a prospective, randomised and double-blinded study to evaluate the quality of recovery, using the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40) 12, in patients undergoing LC under low-pressure or standard pressure pneumoperitoneum. Additionally, clinical variables, including time to eye opening, procedural time, cumulative dose of rocuronium, conversion to open surgery, surgeons' satisfaction, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting, pain score, use of analgesics, and length of Post Anesthetic Care Unit (PACU) stay was determined.

METHODS

Study Population This randomised trial was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Medical and Health Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (Sorocaba, São Paulo - Brazil), on 13 August 2019, 18245019.6.0000.5373 (Chairperson Prof. J.A. Costa). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Eighty patients aged 18 to 65 years of age, with an AmericanSociety of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, who will be scheduled to undergo LC at Santa Lucida Hospital, will be enrolled in the study. Exclusion criteria prior to randomization will include: (i) refusal to participate; (ii) altered level of consciousness or inability to communicate; (iii) presented with a contraindication to any of the drugs used in the present study; (iv) history of alcohol or drug abuse; (v) a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40; (vi) presence of chronic pain or using opioid; (vii) history of complicated gallstone diseases like acute cholecystitis, cholangitis or pancreatitis. Reasons for exclusion following randomization will include; (i) protocol violations, such as the use of medications not contemplated in the study protocol; (ii) conversion to an open surgical technique. Subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio (www.random.org) into 2 groups: LP (low-pressure) or S (standard). Group assignments will be sealed in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes that will be opened after patient inclusion into the study. All care providers, researchers, and patients will be blinded to group assignments.

Anesthetic and Surgical Management Premedication will not be administered. Patients will arrive at operation room (OR) after an 8-hour fast. Standard ASA monitors will be applied upon entry into the operating room and anesthesia will be induced with remifentanil 0.5 mcg. kg-1.min-1 over 3 min followed by propofol 2.0 mg.kg-1 and rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 before tracheal intubation. Anesthetic maintenance will be achieved with sevoflurane 1% - 3% and remifentanil 0.3 mcg.kg-1min-1 whenever necessary to keep mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart hate (HR) within ± 20% baseline values. Ventilation will be controlled mechanically to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration of 30-40 mmHg. Oxygen and air will be administered in a ratio of 50%. Insufflation pressure will be maintained in 14 mmHg (group S) or 10 mmHg (group LP). Anesthesiologists and surgeons will not have access to insufflation pressure display (it will be covered by an opaque paper and will be set by operating room personnel). Patients who exhibited reductions in systolic arterial pressure (SAP) greater than 30% will be given ephedrine (10 mg). Normal saline will be used for fluid replacement therapy at a rate of 500 mL throughout the first 30 minutes, and, then, 2 mL.kg-1.h-1 until the end of the surgical procedure. All participants will be given dexamethasone (8 mg) and ketoprofen (100 mg) at the onset of surgery and ondansetron (4 mg) 15 minutes prior the end of the procedure. Atropine (0.01 mg. kg-1) and neostigmine (0.015 mg. kg-1) will be used to achieve T4/T1>0.9 on the Train-of-four (TOF) monitor prior to extubation. At the end of surgery, intra-abdominal irrigation with normal saline will be performed and the pneumoperitoneum will be carefully evacuated by manual compression. A total of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.75% will be injected to the subcutaneous tissue, fascia and parietal peritoneum through the port sites by the surgeon. The surgical working conditions will be scored according to an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (extremely poor conditions), 2 (poor conditions), 3 (acceptable conditions), 4 (good conditions) and 5 (optimal conditions). 13 All surgical procedures will be performed by the same team composed of three experienced surgeons.

The primary outcome will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40) which is a 40-item quality of recovery scoring system. In addition, the intraoperative rocuronium consumption, time to eye opening (time from the discontinuation of anesthetics to eye opening), post-operative nausea and vomiting, pain score, analgesic use, and length of PACU stay (time to Aldrete score ≥ 9) will be recorded. Pain will be assessed (at rest and after asking to cough) using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS), where zero means no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Analgesia will be provided with IV morphine every 5 minutes to maintain a pain score below 4 (2 mg when the pain score was <7 and 3 mg when it was ≥7). Following discharge from the PACU (minimum stay 60 minutes and Aldrete score ≥ 9), all of the participants will be given IV ketoprofen (100 mg) every 12 hours and oral dipyrone every six hours. Whenever patients judge their analgesia to be insufficient, oral tramadol (100 mg) will be administered at eight-hour minimum intervals. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be treated with dimenhydrinate (30 mg) intravenously. An investigator who will be blinded to group assignment will collect all postoperative outcome data 24 hours following the surgical procedure. The severity of pain was measured at 15-min intervals during PACU stay and at 4, 6, and 24 h after surgery. Tramadol consumption and the occurrence of nausea and vomiting episodes will be also recorded. These findings will be confirmed with the ward nursing staff. All study patients will be admitted to the hospital for a minimum of 24 hours.

Data Collection The baseline QoR-40 questionnaire will be provided to subjects after informed consent is obtained in the preoperative holding area, 12 hours after surgery and in the next day by a blinded investigator. The QoR-40 questionnaire assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR-40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery).

Statistical Analysis The sample size will be calculated considering 90% power to detect a 10-point difference in QoR-40, which indicates the need to include 31 participants in each group.

A 10-point difference represents a 15% improvement in the quality of recovery on the basis of previously reported values of the QoR-40.12,14 Taking possible losses into consideration, the final sample will include 80 patients.

Being tested
Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum, Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum
Medical subject headings
Pneumoperitoneum, Cholecystitis, Choledocholithiasis, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Postoperative, Patient Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Low-pressure pneumoperitoneumOther

    Pneumoperitoneum will be maintained in 10 mmHg

  • Standard pressure pneumoperitoneumOther

    Pneumoperitoneum will be maintained in 14 mmHg

Study groups in NCT04146090
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Low-pressureActive comparatorForty patients aged 18 to 65 years, with an ASA physical status I or II, who will be scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Receives: Other: Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum
Standard pressurePlacebo comparatorForty patients aged 18 to 65 years, with an ASA physical status I or II, who will be scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Receives: Other: Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of recovery

    The primary outcome will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40) which is a 40-item quality of recovery scoring system

    Measured: 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Postoperative pain

    Pain will be assessed (at rest and after asking to cough) using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS), where zero means no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.

    Measured: The severity of pain was measured at 15-min intervals during PACU stay and at 4, 6, and 24 hours after surgery

  2. Postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Occurrence of nausea and vomiting

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Intraoperative rocuronium consumption

    Rocuronium consumption in mg/kg

    Measured: Intraoperative

  4. Time to eye opening

    Time from the discontinuation of anesthetics to eye opening

    Measured: Intraoperative (During recovery in operation room)

  5. Surgical working conditions

    Surgeon will score surgical conditions according to an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (extremely poor conditions), 2 (poor conditions), 3 (acceptable conditions), 4 (good conditions) and 5 (optimal conditions)

    Measured: Intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Oct 2019
  2. Study start23 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion6 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion10 Feb 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Double blinded, randomised controlled trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04146090
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAAE 18245019.6.0000.5373
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
29 Oct 2019
Last updated
2 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in people with Laparoscopic Surgery and Pneumoperitoneum, run by Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of recovery (time frame: 24 hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in