AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic StrokeOMCASNCT04156490

Osmotic Agent Use in Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke

An observational study of Ischemic Stroke and MCA Infarction, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a retrospective chart review of patients that were admitted with large MCA stroke to the Fairview system hospitals between December 2017-December 2018. Patients ischemic stroke volumes will be measured by taking the area of the infarction and multiplying it by the thickness of each CT or MRI slice, the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Ischemic Stroke, MCA Infarction
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
10 Feb 2018to 30 Jun 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Ischemic Stroke patients with large MCA territory Stroke of 70 CC or larger.

Who may be able to join

  • MCA stroke greater than 70cc in size.
  • Patients with a midline shift > 1 mm
  • Age 18-80 years old

Who cannot join

  • Hemorrhagic conversion (PH2 or higher. )
  • Hemicraniectomy within 6 hours from initiation of hypertonic therapy
  • Hemicraniectomy with no repeat CT imaging prior to the operation
  • Hemicraniectomy emergently without hypertonic therapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Osmotic Agents Will Improve the Midline Shift in Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Larger Than 70 cc by 1 mm

This is a retrospective chart review of patients that were admitted with large MCA stroke to the Fairview system hospitals between December 2017-December 2018. Patients ischemic stroke volumes will be measured by taking the area of the infarction and multiplying it by the thickness of each CT or MRI slice, the summation of these volumes is the final volume of the ischemic lesion in cubic centimeters. Patients with stroke volumes greater than 70 cc will be included in the study. Patient midline shift will be measured in millimeters at the level of foramen of Monroe anytime during their initial admission and all patients with a shift greater than 1mm will be included. The midline shift will be documented on the first follow-up brain scan (CT or MRI) at least six hours after the initiation of osmotic therapy. Data will be collected from patient charts including: Age, sex, NIHSS on presentation and discharge, history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease. The type of osmotherapy, along with change in serum sodium or osmolality and dose, will also be documented. In patients that did not receive osmotherapy, midline shift will be documented on the first 24-hour scan and every subsequent scan in 24-hour intervals. Death during a hospital stay will also be recorded.

The investigators will use the SAS statistical suite to analyze this data.

Read the detailed description

MCA Stroke is a fatal disease with reported mortality of about 80% of cases without decompressive craniectomy. Osmotic agents like hypertonic saline \& mannitol have been used in acute MCA stroke cases without no evidence of benefit. Its use in elevated ICP can be only justified as a bridge to the definitive therapy however the presumption that hypertonics will decrease the edema and thus improve shift. Cerebral edema that occurs in stroke is cytotoxic in nature \& does not improve by osmotic agents. Animal studies have shown that use of osmotic agents in acute stroke might cause decrease in size of the normal brain tissue \& presumably worsen the midline shift. The aim of this study is to quantitatively study the effect of hypertonic therapy on midline shift in MCA strokes.

Cerebrovascular disease is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. In 2005, the global incidence of death, due to stroke, was approximately 5.7 million, which is expected to increase to 7.8 million cases by 2030. Specifically, MCA territory stroke accounts for 90% of all infarcts and 70% of all first-time strokes. In addition, approximately half of all MCA stroke survivors never regain functional independence.

Malignant MCA syndrome is defined by an infarction of a large area of the MCA territory accompanied by a space-occupying mass effect that develops during the first 5-days after presentation. Malignant MCA infarction is found in up to 10% of all patients with supratentorial ischemia. Malignant Cerebral Infarction (MCI) typically denotes a large infarction in the MCA territory that presents with acute brain swelling in the first 48 h after stroke, with or without involvement of the ipsilateral anterior and posterior cerebral artery territories. Development of an MCI can be predicted with a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 94% when ischemia affects more than two thirds of the MCA territory.

Malignant MCA syndrome is associated with 80% mortality in the first week despite optimal medical therapy. Death usually results from progressive swelling of the infarcted brain tissue, causing midline shift, increase in intracranial pressure (ICP), extension of ischemia to adjacent vascular territories, and eventual brain herniation. The strongest predictor of mortality is the NIHSS score. In addition, characteristics associated with mortality include: age, arrival mode, history of atrial fibrillation, previous stroke, previous myocardial infarction, carotid stenosis, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, history of dyslipidemia, current smoking and weekend or night admission.

In malignant MCA syndrome, standard medical therapy is directed at reducing edema and thus preventing a cascade of tissue shift, increase in ICP, and herniation. The cornerstone of medical management is osmotherapy including: mannitol and hypertonic saline, although clinical trials have shown them to be ineffective in MCA syndrome. In fact, translational studies suggest that osmotherapy may, in fact, increase the volume of infarct or midline shift and thus should be avoided. Treatment with mannitol has been associated with hypovolemia, hypotension and nephrotoxicity. Animal studies have also shown that the use of osmotic agents in acute stroke causes a decrease in the size of the normal brain tissue and thus presumably worsens the midline shift. An exclusion to these findings would include patients exhibiting signs and symptoms of mass effect, such as diminished level of arousal or nausea, and vomiting; as they are appropriate candidates for osmotherapy.

Alternatively, decompressive craniectomy (DC) has shown to significantly improve mortality outcomes from 78% to 29%. Patients 60-years-of-age or younger, that underwent DC within 48 hours of malignant stroke, had significantly reduced mortality, compared with the best medical treatment. The distribution of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 1 year was also significantly different: mRS of 4 or less was achieved by 75% of the patients in the group treated with DC, comparatively to only 24% in the nonoperative group. The European Stroke Organization (ESO) guidelines for the management of ischemic stroke (published in 2008) recommend DC within 48-hours after symptom onset in patients up to 60-years-of-age with evolving MCI. Overall, the goal of this study is to evaluate the osmotherapy on midline shift, a proxy for MCI related edema.

Being tested
No intervention is planned, this will be a purely retrospective trial.
Keywords
Ischemic stroke, midline shift
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No intervention is planned, this will be a purely retrospective trial.Other

    Osmotic Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Midline shift

    Change of midline shift in millimeters at foramen of Monroe level, at six hours or after osmotherapy in the Acute MCA syndrome of greater than 70cc in volume

    Measured: Six hour or after administration of hyperosmolar therapy

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. In-Hospital Mortality

    Death during the hospitalization

    Measured: Length of hospital stay, 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2019
  2. Study start10 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04156490
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00001221
Acronym
OMCAS
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
6 Feb 2018
Last updated
7 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No IPD will be shared.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ischemic Stroke and MCA Infarction, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Midline shift (time frame: Six hour or after administration of hyperosmolar therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in