MalnutritionNOSNCT04168814
Nutritional Status in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer Patients in Spain: the NutriOncoSearch (NOS) Study
An observational study of Malnutrition and Oncologic Complications, run by Universidad Pontificia Comillas at 11 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Malnutrition is a common medical problem in oncology patients. It is well known that the presence of malnutrition negatively affects patients' evolution and their quality of life, increasing the incidence of infection, hospital stay, and mortality. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malnutrition, Oncologic Complications, Oncology
- What is being tested?
- Observational test
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 586 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 10 Jun 2020to 15 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Total number of subjects to be enrolled: 610 subjects, counting lost. * Number of study or comparison groups: two. * The study will be performed on multiple different days: the recruitment will be concomitant and limited to a minimum of 30 patients depending on the number of patients the center deals with. The estimation is that each center will dedicate from an estimation of twelve weeks to recruit the total number of patients.
Who may be able to join
- Outpatients, over 18 years old, with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors (with the idea of homogenizing the sample as far as possible and in line with what has been published up to now, also stratified in line with Globocan).
- Patients under immunotherapy treatment either exclusively or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Immunotherapy defined by checkpoint treatments inhibitors PD-1, PDL-1 y CTLA-4. At least 12 weeks of treatment.
Who cannot join
- Estimated survival below 12 weeks (palliative criteria).
- Patients that meet diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV and ICD-10) of nervous anorexia and bulimia.
- Patients with severe psychiatric disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
Spain11 sites
Hospital Virgen de los Lirios
Alcoy, Alicante
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona
Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron
Barcelona
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Madrid, 28015
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Hospital Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca
Clínica Universidad de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre
Hospital Universitario Quirón Madrid
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid
Hospital Universitario Donosti
San Sebastián
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Santa Cruz de Tenerife
Hospital Virgen del Rocío
Seville
About this study
Official title: An Observational Study of the Nutritional Status in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer Patients While Receiving Immunotherapy in Spain: the NutriOncoSearch (NOS) Study
Malnutrition is a common medical problem in oncology patients. It is well known that the presence of malnutrition negatively affects patients' evolution and their quality of life, increasing the incidence of infection, hospital stay, and mortality.
The new knowledge of cancer biology has made it possible to know the mechanisms of cancer progression.
Read more
New treatments have been developed thanks to this knowledge including molecular target treatments aimed at these cancer mechanics and to reverse the antitumor capacity of the immune system. However, these treatments have different toxicities than classic and anachronistic treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including alterations in glucose metabolism, endocrinopathies, rhabdomyolysis, etc. that can alter both the patient's nutritional status and quality of life. Additionally, a deficient nutritional status can have an impact on the intestinal microbiota, compromising the efficacy of the new antitumor treatments.
The principal objective of this study is to characterize the nutritional status of the cancer outpatient receiving immunotherapy through a screening performed in Hospital consultations in Spain.
Secondary Endpoints are (a). To describe the percentage of patients that receive nutritional counseling or nutritional support (enteral and/or parenteral nutrition) among those diagnosed as malnourished or at risk. And (b) to categorize the percentage and descriptive characteristics of cancer patients with mild, moderate, or severe malnutrition that goes to a hospital consultation in Spain and describe the percentage and descriptive characteristics of patients with malnutrition according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
Read the detailed description
Study Title:
An observational study of the Nutritional status in locally advanced or metastatic solid cancer patients while receiving immunotherapy in Spain: the NutriOncoSearch (NOS) study.
Research Question:
What is the current nutritional status in advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapy or any other targeted therapies in Spain?
Study Background \& Rationale:
Malnutrition is a common medical problem in oncology patients. Between 15 and 40% of patients with cancer present weight loss at diagnosis and the incidence of malnutrition increases over the course of the disease until 80% of all cancer patients. It is well known that the presence of malnutrition negatively affects patients' evolution and their quality of life, increasing the incidence of infection, hospital stay, and mortality.
The new knowledge of cancer biology has made it possible to know the mechanisms of cancer progression. These mechanisms include:
- Self-sufficiency in growth signals.
- Insensitivity to anti-growth signals.
- Evading apoptosis.
- No breaks in the replicate potential
- Sustained angiogenesis. New treatments have been developed thanks to this knowledge including molecular target treatments aimed at these cancer mechanics and to reverse the anti-tumor capacity of the immune system. However, these treatments have different toxicities than classic and anachronistic treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including alterations in glucose metabolism, endocrinopathies, rhabdomyolysis, etc. that can alter both the patient's nutritional status and quality of life. Additionally, a deficient nutritional status can have an impact on the intestinal microbiota, compromising the efficacy of the new anti-tumor treatments.
Regarding the nutritional status of cancer patients, some studies have been developed. In France, a 1-day prospective prevalence survey was carried out in 154 public or private hospital wards in 24 French cities. The investigators were to include all patients with cancer who were present at the hospital on the day of the survey and who agreed to participate. The results of this study showed a high prevalence of malnutrition (39%) and a high rate of malnourished patients not receiving nutrition support (42.4%). Recently, the PreMio study (Italy) assessed the nutritional status of cancer patients on their first visit for care. Findings showed that first-visit PreMiO patients were often malnourished or at risk for malnutrition when they entered the study- 40% to 80% of patients had signs and indicators of nutritional impairment- even in early disease stages, particularly in gastroesophageal, pancreatic, head and neck, and colorectal cancer patients.
In Spain, two old studies analyzed the nutritional situation of Spanish oncology patients. The first one is a multicentric study published in 2005 with data from outpatients and hospitalized patients. In this study, the scored PG-SGA indicated that 52% of the patients were moderately or severely malnourished and, of the total population analyzed, 97.6% required some form of nutritional recommendation to prevent, or reverse malnutrition. Since then, only the sub-analysis of the PREDYCES study gave information on the nutritional status of cancer patients (hospitalized) in our country (8). This analysis revealed that 36.4% of hospitalized oncology patients were at nutritional risk at the time of hospital discharge. It also demonstrated its significant association with longer hospital stays and higher healthcare costs. Despite all of this, only 1/3 of patients at nutritional risk received nutritional support. There are little data on the nutritional status of non-hospitalized oncology patients and, to our knowledge, none of them analyzed the effects of new target therapies. As these new therapies represent the future of oncology, it´s of most importance to understand what this effect is. The aim of this observational study is to determine the prevalence of malnutrition (or risk of malnutrition) in the Spanish population of outpatients that receive immunotherapy or any other targeted therapies For that end the investigators would like to explore nutritional status using validated tools like NutriScore, and Global Subjective assessment, Spanish version.
Study Design
Study Type: Clinical Non-Interventional
Condition to be studied and incidence: Nutritional status
Due to the epidemiologic characteristics of this study, the investigators don´t ask about adverse events or their relationship with specific drugs: the investigators will ask for generic groups of agents or treatments.
Study Population (ages, gender, relevant disease states): Adult patients, both sexes, Stages III-IV all solid cancers.
Duration of subject participation: This a descriptive, prospective and analytic study. Patients will be asked once, and no more.
The total number of subjects to be enrolled: 610 subjects.
- The number of study or comparison groups: two 2:1 relation. 408 patients with immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy or radiotherapy and 204 with chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone, both of them in the first line of treatment,
- The study will be performed on multiple different days: the recruitment will be concomitant and limited to a minimum of 30 and a maximum of 70 patients depending on the number of patients the center deals with. The estimation is that each center will dedicate from one to two weeks to recruit the total number of patients.
Specific details of Treatment/Intervention: (prescription and/or therapy, devices, equipment, solutions, product to be used in conducting the study:
Not applicable.
Efficacy Assessments Not applicable.
Statistical Methods (for analyzing primary \& secondary endpoints):
Descriptive statistics like clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the studied population will be expressed by means and SDs for the continuous variables and frequency distribution for the qualitative variables. The investigators will use the ӽ2 test and Fisher exact test for the qualitative data set and Student t-test for quantitative data, with a significance level of .05 and a confidence interval of 95%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and odds ratios can be efficiently conducted as a measure of statistical correlation to link nutrition status and associated factors.
Based on the number of cancer diagnoses in 2019 in Spain (REDECAN), there will be an incidence of 277.234 new cases, with a prevalence of 772.853 cases (5-years projection). With this population the investigators calculate a proportion estimation, with a confidence interval 1-α of 99%, d= 3%, p= 0,5, the sample size is 504, with an expected loss of (R=)15% sample size is 610 subjects. Investigators propose a stratification in two groups, in a 2:1 proportion, 408 patients in the immunotherapy-only group and 204 patients in the control, chemotherapy-in-combination group.
- Conditions
- Malnutrition, Oncologic Complications, Oncology, Quality of Life
- Being tested
- Observational test
- Keywords
- Nutritional status, Oncology Patients, Anticancer treatments, Quality of Life
- Medical subject headings
- Malnutrition, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Observational testOther
Nutritional risk (NutriScore), based on weight, weight loss, tumor location, and treatment, Nutritional status (VGS, Global Subjective Assessment Valoración Global Subjetiva, in Spanish), ECOG performance status; nutritional therapy (oral nutritional supplements, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, dietary advice); type of treatment: chemo, type of chemo, adjuvant, neoadjuvant, palliative, curative endocrine therapy, targeted therapy +-immunotherapy vs QQT/RT therapy; cancer site. Covid-19 diagnosis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Oncology patients (Immunotherapy alone or in combination)) | 1. Outpatients, over 18 years old, with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors (with the idea of homogenizing the sample as far as possible and in line with what has been published up to now, also stratified in line with Globocan).
2. Patients under targeted active treatment either exclusively or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Targeted therapy (immunotherapy) defined with: PD1, PDL1 inhibitors. At least 12 weeks of treatment. Receives: Other: Observational test | |
| Oncology Patients (Chemo-Radiotherapy group). | 1. Outpatients, over 18 years old, with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors (with the idea of homogenizing the sample as far as possible and in line with what has been published up to now, also stratified in line with Globocan).
2. Patients under active treatment either in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. At least 12 weeks of treatment. Receives: Other: Observational test |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nutritional status
To characterize the nutritional status of the cancer outpatient receiving either immunotherapies or any other targeted therapies through a screening performed in Hospital consultations in Spain.
Measured: Six months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Nutritional counselling
To describe the percentage of patients that receive nutritional counselling or nutritional support (enteral and/or parenteral nutrition) among those diagnosed as malnourished or at risk.
Measured: Six months
Descriptive characteristic mild, moderate or severe malnutrition
To categorize the percentage and descriptive characteristic of cancer patients with mild, moderate or severe malnutrition that goes to a hospital consultation in Spain and describe the percentage and descriptive characteristic of patients with malnutrition according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics (type of tumor and TNM stage).
Measured: Six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Nov 2019
- Study start10 Jun 2020
- Primary completion9 Oct 2020
- Study completion15 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalnutritionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 586 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Pontificia Comillas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation, IQVIA Pty Ltd, SPANISH SOCIETY OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Julio C. de la Torre-Montero, Universidad Pontificia Comillas
- Investigators
- Julio C de la Torre-Montero, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Comillas Pontifical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04168814
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SEEO-19-01-NOS
- Acronym
- NOS
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 23 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Dissemination in biomedical research journals
Publications
de Las Penas R, Majem M, Perez-Altozano J, Virizuela JA, Cancer E, Diz P, Donnay O, Hurtado A, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Ocon MJ. SEOM clinical guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients (2018). Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Jan;21(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-02009-3. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
PubMed 30617923Arribas L, Hurtos L, Sendros MJ, Peiro I, Salleras N, Fort E, Sanchez-Migallon JM. NUTRISCORE: A new nutritional screening tool for oncological outpatients. Nutrition. 2017 Jan;33:297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
PubMed 27751743Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013.
PubMed 21376230Escortell Sanchez R, Reig Garcia-Galbis M. [ENTERAL NUTRITION ON THE NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF CANCER]. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Oct 1;32(4):1408-16. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.32.4.9227. Spanish.
PubMed 26545500Gomez-Candela C, Luengo LM, Cos AI, Martinez-Roque V, Iglesias C, Zamora P, Gonzalez-Baron R. [Subjective global assessment in neoplastic patients]. Nutr Hosp. 2003 Nov-Dec;18(6):353-7. Spanish.
PubMed 14682183Hebuterne X, Lemarie E, Michallet M, de Montreuil CB, Schneider SM, Goldwasser F. Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 Feb;38(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/0148607113502674.
PubMed 24748626Segura A, Pardo J, Jara C, Zugazabeitia L, Carulla J, de Las Penas R, Garcia-Cabrera E, Luz Azuara M, Casado J, Gomez-Candela C. An epidemiological evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition in Spanish patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Clin Nutr. 2005 Oct;24(5):801-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.05.001.
PubMed 15993517Muscaritoli M, Lucia S, Farcomeni A, Lorusso V, Saracino V, Barone C, Plastino F, Gori S, Magarotto R, Carteni G, Chiurazzi B, Pavese I, Marchetti L, Zagonel V, Bergo E, Tonini G, Imperatori M, Iacono C, Maiorana L, Pinto C, Rubino D, Cavanna L, Di Cicilia R, Gamucci T, Quadrini S, Palazzo S, Minardi S, Merlano M, Colucci G, Marchetti P; PreMiO Study Group. Prevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: the PreMiO study. Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 10;8(45):79884-79896. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20168. eCollection 2017 Oct 3.
PubMed 29108370Planas M, Alvarez-Hernandez J, Leon-Sanz M, Celaya-Perez S, Araujo K, Garcia de Lorenzo A; PREDyCES(R) researchers. Prevalence of hospital malnutrition in cancer patients: a sub-analysis of the PREDyCES(R) study. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):429-435. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2813-7. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
PubMed 26099900
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Observational Study of the Nutritional Status in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer Patients While Receiving Immunotherapy in Spain: the NutriOncoSearch (NOS) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04168814
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NOS / SEEO-19-01-NOS
- Conditions
- Malnutrition, Oncologic Complications, Oncology, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Nutritional status, Oncology Patients, Anticancer treatments, Quality of Life
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 586 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Pontificia ComillasUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation, IQVIA Pty Ltd, SPANISH SOCIETY OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
- Study start
- 10 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Malnutrition is a common medical problem in oncology patients. It is well known that the presence of malnutrition negatively affects patients' evolution and their quality of life, increasing the incidence of infection, hospital stay, and mortality.
The new knowledge of cancer biology has made it possible to know the mechanisms of cancer progression.
New treatments have been developed thanks to this knowledge including molecular target treatments aimed at these cancer mechanics and to reverse the antitumor capacity of the immune system. However, these treatments have different toxicities than classic and anachronistic treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including alterations in glucose metabolism, endocrinopathies, rhabdomyolysis, etc. that can alter both the patient's nutritional status and quality of life. Additionally, a deficient nutritional status can have an impact on the intestinal microbiota, compromising the efficacy of the new antitumor treatments.
The principal objective of this study is to characterize the nutritional status of the cancer outpatient receiving immunotherapy through a screening performed in Hospital consultations in Spain.
Secondary Endpoints are (a). To describe the percentage of patients that receive nutritional counseling or nutritional support (enteral and/or parenteral nutrition) among those diagnosed as malnourished or at risk. And (b) to categorize the percentage and descriptive characteristics of cancer patients with mild, moderate, or severe malnutrition that goes to a hospital consultation in Spain and describe the percentage and descriptive characteristics of patients with malnutrition according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
Detailed description
Study Title:
An observational study of the Nutritional status in locally advanced or metastatic solid cancer patients while receiving immunotherapy in Spain: the NutriOncoSearch (NOS) study.
Research Question:
What is the current nutritional status in advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapy or any other targeted therapies in Spain?
Study Background \& Rationale:
Malnutrition is a common medical problem in oncology patients. Between 15 and 40% of patients with cancer present weight loss at diagnosis and the incidence of malnutrition increases over the course of the disease until 80% of all cancer patients. It is well known that the presence of malnutrition negatively affects patients' evolution and their quality of life, increasing the incidence of infection, hospital stay, and mortality.
The new knowledge of cancer biology has made it possible to know the mechanisms of cancer progression. These mechanisms include:
- Self-sufficiency in growth signals.
- Insensitivity to anti-growth signals.
- Evading apoptosis.
- No breaks in the replicate potential
- Sustained angiogenesis. New treatments have been developed thanks to this knowledge including molecular target treatments aimed at these cancer mechanics and to reverse the anti-tumor capacity of the immune system. However, these treatments have different toxicities than classic and anachronistic treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including alterations in glucose metabolism, endocrinopathies, rhabdomyolysis, etc. that can alter both the patient's nutritional status and quality of life. Additionally, a deficient nutritional status can have an impact on the intestinal microbiota, compromising the efficacy of the new anti-tumor treatments.
Regarding the nutritional status of cancer patients, some studies have been developed. In France, a 1-day prospective prevalence survey was carried out in 154 public or private hospital wards in 24 French cities. The investigators were to include all patients with cancer who were present at the hospital on the day of the survey and who agreed to participate. The results of this study showed a high prevalence of malnutrition (39%) and a high rate of malnourished patients not receiving nutrition support (42.4%). Recently, the PreMio study (Italy) assessed the nutritional status of cancer patients on their first visit for care. Findings showed that first-visit PreMiO patients were often malnourished or at risk for malnutrition when they entered the study- 40% to 80% of patients had signs and indicators of nutritional impairment- even in early disease stages, particularly in gastroesophageal, pancreatic, head and neck, and colorectal cancer patients.
In Spain, two old studies analyzed the nutritional situation of Spanish oncology patients. The first one is a multicentric study published in 2005 with data from outpatients and hospitalized patients. In this study, the scored PG-SGA indicated that 52% of the patients were moderately or severely malnourished and, of the total population analyzed, 97.6% required some form of nutritional recommendation to prevent, or reverse malnutrition. Since then, only the sub-analysis of the PREDYCES study gave information on the nutritional status of cancer patients (hospitalized) in our country (8). This analysis revealed that 36.4% of hospitalized oncology patients were at nutritional risk at the time of hospital discharge. It also demonstrated its significant association with longer hospital stays and higher healthcare costs. Despite all of this, only 1/3 of patients at nutritional risk received nutritional support. There are little data on the nutritional status of non-hospitalized oncology patients and, to our knowledge, none of them analyzed the effects of new target therapies. As these new therapies represent the future of oncology, it´s of most importance to understand what this effect is. The aim of this observational study is to determine the prevalence of malnutrition (or risk of malnutrition) in the Spanish population of outpatients that receive immunotherapy or any other targeted therapies For that end the investigators would like to explore nutritional status using validated tools like NutriScore, and Global Subjective assessment, Spanish version.
Study Design
Study Type: Clinical Non-Interventional
Condition to be studied and incidence: Nutritional status
Due to the epidemiologic characteristics of this study, the investigators don´t ask about adverse events or their relationship with specific drugs: the investigators will ask for generic groups of agents or treatments.
Study Population (ages, gender, relevant disease states): Adult patients, both sexes, Stages III-IV all solid cancers.
Duration of subject participation: This a descriptive, prospective and analytic study. Patients will be asked once, and no more.
The total number of subjects to be enrolled: 610 subjects.
- The number of study or comparison groups: two 2:1 relation. 408 patients with immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy or radiotherapy and 204 with chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone, both of them in the first line of treatment,
- The study will be performed on multiple different days: the recruitment will be concomitant and limited to a minimum of 30 and a maximum of 70 patients depending on the number of patients the center deals with. The estimation is that each center will dedicate from one to two weeks to recruit the total number of patients.
Specific details of Treatment/Intervention: (prescription and/or therapy, devices, equipment, solutions, product to be used in conducting the study:
Not applicable.
Efficacy Assessments Not applicable.
Statistical Methods (for analyzing primary \& secondary endpoints):
Descriptive statistics like clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the studied population will be expressed by means and SDs for the continuous variables and frequency distribution for the qualitative variables. The investigators will use the ӽ2 test and Fisher exact test for the qualitative data set and Student t-test for quantitative data, with a significance level of .05 and a confidence interval of 95%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and odds ratios can be efficiently conducted as a measure of statistical correlation to link nutrition status and associated factors.
Based on the number of cancer diagnoses in 2019 in Spain (REDECAN), there will be an incidence of 277.234 new cases, with a prevalence of 772.853 cases (5-years projection). With this population the investigators calculate a proportion estimation, with a confidence interval 1-α of 99%, d= 3%, p= 0,5, the sample size is 504, with an expected loss of (R=)15% sample size is 610 subjects. Investigators propose a stratification in two groups, in a 2:1 proportion, 408 patients in the immunotherapy-only group and 204 patients in the control, chemotherapy-in-combination group.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Oncology patients (Immunotherapy alone or in combination)) | – | Other: Observational test1. Outpatients, over 18 years old, with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors (with the idea of homogenizing the sample as far as possible and in line with what has been published up to now, also stratified in line with Globocan). 2. Patients under targeted active treatment either exclusively or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Targeted therapy (immunotherapy) defined with: PD1, PDL1 inhibitors. At least 12 weeks of treatment. |
| Oncology Patients (Chemo-Radiotherapy group). | – | Other: Observational test1. Outpatients, over 18 years old, with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors (with the idea of homogenizing the sample as far as possible and in line with what has been published up to now, also stratified in line with Globocan). 2. Patients under active treatment either in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. At least 12 weeks of treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Total number of subjects to be enrolled: 610 subjects, counting lost. * Number of study or comparison groups: two. * The study will be performed on multiple different days: the recruitment will be concomitant and limited to a minimum of 30 patients depending on the number of patients the center deals with. The estimation is that each center will dedicate from an estimation of twelve weeks to recruit the total number of patients.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Outpatients, over 18 years old, with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors (with the idea of homogenizing the sample as far as possible and in line with what has been published up to now, also stratified in line with Globocan).
- Patients under immunotherapy treatment either exclusively or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Immunotherapy defined by checkpoint treatments inhibitors PD-1, PDL-1 y CTLA-4. At least 12 weeks of treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Estimated survival below 12 weeks (palliative criteria).
- Patients that meet diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV and ICD-10) of nervous anorexia and bulimia.
- Patients with severe psychiatric disorders.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Observational testNutritional risk (NutriScore), based on weight, weight loss, tumor location, and treatment, Nutritional status (VGS, Global Subjective Assessment Valoración Global Subjetiva, in Spanish), ECOG performance status; nutritional therapy (oral nutritional supplements, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, dietary advice); type of treatment: chemo, type of chemo, adjuvant, neoadjuvant, palliative, curative endocrine therapy, targeted therapy +-immunotherapy vs QQT/RT therapy; cancer site. Covid-19 diagnosis. | Other | Oncology Patients (Chemo-Radiotherapy group)., Oncology patients (Immunotherapy alone or in combination)) |
Primary outcome
Nutritional status
Time frame: Six months
To characterize the nutritional status of the cancer outpatient receiving either immunotherapies or any other targeted therapies through a screening performed in Hospital consultations in Spain.
2 secondary outcomes
Nutritional counselling
Time frame: Six months
Descriptive characteristic mild, moderate or severe malnutrition
Time frame: Six months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2022.
- Background: PubMed 30617923de Las Penas R, Majem M, Perez-Altozano J, Virizuela JA, Cancer E, Diz P, Donnay O, Hurtado A, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Ocon MJ. SEOM clinical guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients (2018). Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Jan;21(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-02009-3. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
- Background: PubMed 27751743Arribas L, Hurtos L, Sendros MJ, Peiro I, Salleras N, Fort E, Sanchez-Migallon JM. NUTRISCORE: A new nutritional screening tool for oncological outpatients. Nutrition. 2017 Jan;33:297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
- Background: PubMed 21376230Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013.
- Background: PubMed 26545500Escortell Sanchez R, Reig Garcia-Galbis M. [ENTERAL NUTRITION ON THE NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF CANCER]. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Oct 1;32(4):1408-16. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.32.4.9227. Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 14682183Gomez-Candela C, Luengo LM, Cos AI, Martinez-Roque V, Iglesias C, Zamora P, Gonzalez-Baron R. [Subjective global assessment in neoplastic patients]. Nutr Hosp. 2003 Nov-Dec;18(6):353-7. Spanish.
- Results publication: PubMed 24748626Hebuterne X, Lemarie E, Michallet M, de Montreuil CB, Schneider SM, Goldwasser F. Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 Feb;38(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/0148607113502674.
- Results publication: PubMed 15993517Segura A, Pardo J, Jara C, Zugazabeitia L, Carulla J, de Las Penas R, Garcia-Cabrera E, Luz Azuara M, Casado J, Gomez-Candela C. An epidemiological evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition in Spanish patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Clin Nutr. 2005 Oct;24(5):801-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.05.001.
- Results publication: PubMed 29108370Muscaritoli M, Lucia S, Farcomeni A, Lorusso V, Saracino V, Barone C, Plastino F, Gori S, Magarotto R, Carteni G, Chiurazzi B, Pavese I, Marchetti L, Zagonel V, Bergo E, Tonini G, Imperatori M, Iacono C, Maiorana L, Pinto C, Rubino D, Cavanna L, Di Cicilia R, Gamucci T, Quadrini S, Palazzo S, Minardi S, Merlano M, Colucci G, Marchetti P; PreMiO Study Group. Prevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: the PreMiO study. Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 10;8(45):79884-79896. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20168. eCollection 2017 Oct 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 26099900Planas M, Alvarez-Hernandez J, Leon-Sanz M, Celaya-Perez S, Araujo K, Garcia de Lorenzo A; PREDyCES(R) researchers. Prevalence of hospital malnutrition in cancer patients: a sub-analysis of the PREDyCES(R) study. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):429-435. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2813-7. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
- SEOM, Las cifras del cáncer en España. Cancer database in Spain, year 2019.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Dissemination in biomedical research journals
Related trials for Malnutrition
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Maternal Probiotic Intervention to Improve Gut Health-Trial II-Pakistan
Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), Stunting
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Biomarkers in EV Associated With Marrow Adiposity in Anorexia
Anorexia Nervosa Restricting Type, Anorexia Nervosa (DSM-IV Revised Criteria)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julio C de la Torre-Montero, Ph.D principal investigator
Comillas Pontifical University
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Malnutrition and Oncologic Complications, run by Universidad Pontificia Comillas at 11 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nutritional status (time frame: Six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04168814, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2022.