Neurologic DisorderSIMADAPT1NCT04171973
Evaluation of Electric Wheelchair Driving Performance in Simulator Compared to Driving in Real-life Situations
A study testing Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition and Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition in people with Neurologic Disorder, run by Pôle Saint Hélier at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The device that is the subject of this investigation is a solution for driving simulation of an electric wheelchair. It is intended to enable patients who are likely to acquire an electric wheelchair to train in a virtual environment, favorable to the safety of training, to its repetition, and to produce more varied… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neurologic Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition and Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 14 Jan 2020to 29 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, over 18 years old,
- Having freely consented to participate in the study,
- With neurological degenerative disorders including cerebrovascular accident and head trauma or neurodegeneration including Parkinson's disease and related syndromes, multiple sclerosis, myopathy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,
- Having benefited from an electric wheelchair prescription and traveling in electric wheelchair for more than 3 months,
- Whose electric wheelchair is the main mode of travel,
- The physical measurements (weight, size) are compatible with the use of the physical simulator chosen for the development of the robotic assistance module, according to manufacturer's data 140 kg max and 51 cm max of seat width .
Who cannot join
- Understanding difficulties preventing the realization of the protocol,
- Motor disorders of the upper limb requiring additional driving technical assistance,
- Patient having expressed difficulties impacting his safety of sedan and / or external, objectified by a negative answer to more than one item on the self-questionnaire WST QF for the items pertaining to driving (6 to 12 and 17 to 28):
- inability to perform certain driving tasks (answer "no")
- or insecure to achieve them (answer "not at all").
- pregnant, parturient or nursing mother,
Show all 10Show fewer
- Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons under psychiatric care or admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research,
- Minor,
- Major under legal protection or unable to express his consent,
- Person in emergency situation who can not express their prior consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Electric Wheelchair Driving Performance in Simulator Compared to Driving in a Real-life Situation, in a Population of Regular Drivers With Neurological Disorders
The device that is the subject of this investigation is a solution for driving simulation of an electric wheelchair. It is intended to enable patients who are likely to acquire an electric wheelchair to train in a virtual environment, favorable to the safety of training, to its repetition, and to produce more varied, rich training environments and more tailored to specific and individualized needs. These solutions will make it easier to access real-world driving for patients who are currently experiencing learning difficulties.
It is expected that this investigation demonstrates the reproducibility of driving performance in electric wheelchair driving simulator compared to the real world.
Read the detailed description
As part of this investigation, it is expected to develop a driving simulator that could contribute to improving the learning of electric wheelchair driving and access to electric wheelchair for people who can not currently claim for physical risks and weak psychology for the participant in the research.
The present clinical investigation aims at evaluating the performances, the safety and the satisfaction of the users with regard to a simulator of driving of electric wheelchair in virtual reality.
The main objective is to evaluate the feasibility of a virtual electric wheelchair driving training, comparing driving performance in virtual reality versus reality, in identical real and virtual standardized circuits, in regular users of electric wheelchairs with neurological disorders.
- Conditions
- Neurologic Disorder
- Being tested
- Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition, Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition
- Medical subject headings
- Nervous System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Driving an electric wheelchair in real conditionDevice
For the control group, 3 test circuits of pipes in real condition of increasing difficulty are tested. Patients perform 2 passes in this condition.
Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual conditionDevice
For the virtual reality group, the circuits have been digitized. Patients perform 2 passes in this condition.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition | Other | In order to be able to evaluate the feasibility of virtual reality driving training, the driving performance will be evaluated on the same 3 standardized circuits: for the control group, 3 circuits of test of pipes in real condition of increasing difficulty are tested. Patients perform 2 passes in this condition. Receives: Device: Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition |
| Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition | Experimental | In order to be able to evaluate the feasibility of driving training in virtual reality, the driving performance will be evaluated on the same 3 standardized circuits: for the virtual reality group, the circuits have been digitized. Patients perform 2 passes in this condition. Receives: Device: Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of collision
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
Measured: Day 1
Number of collision
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
Measured: Day 8
Number of collision
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
Measured: Day 15
Secondary outcomes (8)
Driving Speed
Speed measured by the completion time of the course on the different circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
Measured: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Wheelchair Skill Test (WST)
Driving performance measured by the Wheelchair Skill Test items corresponding to the different courses in real condition versus virtual condition
Measured: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
NASA-Task Load Index
The cognitive load of tests under both conditions will be measured by the NASA-Task Load Index. It is in the form of six scales where the participant must assign a score between zero and one hundred to each of them, score indicating a growing level of intensity. Three dimensions relate to the demands imposed on the subject (mental, physical and temporal demands) and three to the interaction of a subject with the task (effort, frustration and performance)
Measured: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Ease of Use Questionnaire
The satisfaction of the use of the electric wheelchair under the conditions will be evaluated by the self-questionnaire Ease of Use Questionnaire. It measures the subjective usability of a product or service. It is a 30-item survey that examines four dimensions of usability: usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction. The questionnaires were constructed as seven-point Likert rating scales. Users were asked to rate agreement with the statements, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7).
Measured: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Unified theory of acceptance of technology questionnaire (UTAUT)
Questionnaire of acceptability / acceptance of the tool and its use by patients based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT).
Measured: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ)
The IPQ comprises 14 items rated on a seven-point Likert Scale ranging from -3 to 3. The general item assesses the general "sense of being there", and has high loadings on all three factors, with an especially strong loading on Spatial Presence. The Spatial Presence sub-scale is related to the sense of being physically inside the virtual environment. The involvement sub-scale is directed to evaluate the attention devoted to the virtual environment. The realness sub-scale evaluates the sense of reality attributed to the virtual environment.
Measured: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
The learning effect
The learning effect on the virtual circuit and on the real circuit, will be evaluated by progression / stabilization of the time of realization during the sequence of repetitions.
Measured: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Graybiel score
Assessment of discomfort and motion sickness to quantify the intensity of different symptoms during motion sickness.
Measured: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2019
- Study start14 Jan 2020
- Primary completion29 Jan 2020
- Study completion29 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neurologic DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- It is a pilot, prospective, monocentric, controlled, randomized, open-arms, open-ended, minimal risk and minimal constraint study (RIPH category 2).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pôle Saint Hélier
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- INSA Rennes
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philippe Gallien, Doctor, Principal investigator, Pôle Saint Hélier
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04171973
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-A01903-54
- Acronym
- SIMADAPT1
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fraudet B, Leblong E, Piette P, Nicolas B, Gouranton V, Babel M, Devigne L, Pasteau F, Gallien P. Evaluation of power wheelchair driving performance in simulator compared to driving in real-life situations: the SIMADAPT (simulator ADAPT) project-a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 23;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01354-5.
PubMed 38654367
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Electric Wheelchair Driving Performance in Simulator Compared to Driving in a Real-life Situation, in a Population of Regular Drivers With Neurological Disorders
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04171973
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SIMADAPT1 / 2019-A01903-54
- Conditions
- Neurologic Disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pôle Saint HélierUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- INSA Rennes
- Study start
- 14 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The device that is the subject of this investigation is a solution for driving simulation of an electric wheelchair. It is intended to enable patients who are likely to acquire an electric wheelchair to train in a virtual environment, favorable to the safety of training, to its repetition, and to produce more varied, rich training environments and more tailored to specific and individualized needs. These solutions will make it easier to access real-world driving for patients who are currently experiencing learning difficulties.
It is expected that this investigation demonstrates the reproducibility of driving performance in electric wheelchair driving simulator compared to the real world.
Detailed description
As part of this investigation, it is expected to develop a driving simulator that could contribute to improving the learning of electric wheelchair driving and access to electric wheelchair for people who can not currently claim for physical risks and weak psychology for the participant in the research.
The present clinical investigation aims at evaluating the performances, the safety and the satisfaction of the users with regard to a simulator of driving of electric wheelchair in virtual reality.
The main objective is to evaluate the feasibility of a virtual electric wheelchair driving training, comparing driving performance in virtual reality versus reality, in identical real and virtual standardized circuits, in regular users of electric wheelchairs with neurological disorders.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- It is a pilot, prospective, monocentric, controlled, randomized, open-arms, open-ended, minimal risk and minimal constraint study (RIPH category 2).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition | Other | Device: Driving an electric wheelchair in real conditionIn order to be able to evaluate the feasibility of virtual reality driving training, the driving performance will be evaluated on the same 3 standardized circuits: for the control group, 3 circuits of test of pipes in real condition of increasing difficulty are tested. Patients perform 2 passes in this condition. |
| Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition | Experimental | Device: Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual conditionIn order to be able to evaluate the feasibility of driving training in virtual reality, the driving performance will be evaluated on the same 3 standardized circuits: for the virtual reality group, the circuits have been digitized. Patients perform 2 passes in this condition. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female, over 18 years old,
- Having freely consented to participate in the study,
- With neurological degenerative disorders including cerebrovascular accident and head trauma or neurodegeneration including Parkinson's disease and related syndromes, multiple sclerosis, myopathy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,
- Having benefited from an electric wheelchair prescription and traveling in electric wheelchair for more than 3 months,
- Whose electric wheelchair is the main mode of travel,
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Understanding difficulties preventing the realization of the protocol,
- Motor disorders of the upper limb requiring additional driving technical assistance,
- Patient having expressed difficulties impacting his safety of sedan and / or external, objectified by a negative answer to more than one item on the self-questionnaire WST QF for the items pertaining to driving (6 to 12 and 17 to 28):
- pregnant, parturient or nursing mother,
- Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons under psychiatric care or admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Driving an electric wheelchair in real conditionFor the control group, 3 test circuits of pipes in real condition of increasing difficulty are tested. Patients perform 2 passes in this condition. | Device | Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition |
| Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual conditionFor the virtual reality group, the circuits have been digitized. Patients perform 2 passes in this condition. | Device | Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition |
Primary outcome
Number of collision
Time frame: Day 1
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
Number of collision
Time frame: Day 8
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
Number of collision
Time frame: Day 15
The primary judgment criterion is the number of collisions on different standardized circuits in real condition versus virtual condition
8 secondary outcomes
Driving Speed
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Wheelchair Skill Test (WST)
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
NASA-Task Load Index
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Ease of Use Questionnaire
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Unified theory of acceptance of technology questionnaire (UTAUT)
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ)
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
The learning effect
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Graybiel score
Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38654367Fraudet B, Leblong E, Piette P, Nicolas B, Gouranton V, Babel M, Devigne L, Pasteau F, Gallien P. Evaluation of power wheelchair driving performance in simulator compared to driving in real-life situations: the SIMADAPT (simulator ADAPT) project-a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 23;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01354-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neurologic Disorder
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe Gallien, Doctor principal investigator
Pôle Saint Hélier
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Driving an electric wheelchair in real condition and Driving an electric wheelchair in virtual condition in people with Neurologic Disorder, run by Pôle Saint Hélier at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of collision (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04171973, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2020.