AzTrials
AzTrials

Trigger PointsNCT04179214

Thoracic Spine Manipulation on Pressure Pain Sensitivity of Active Myofascial Trigger Points in Rhomboid Muscle

A study testing Thoracic manipulation and conventional pt protocol in people with Trigger Points, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study intends to determine the effects of thoracic manipulation on pressure pain sensitivity in patients with rhomboid active trigger points. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Trigger Points
What is being tested?
Thoracic manipulation and conventional pt protocol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
22 Jul 2019to 30 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 to 30 years
  • Participants presented with interscapular pain
  • Forward head posture with active trigger points in rhomboid muscle
  • Segmental hypomobility in upper thoracic identified with positive springing test

Who cannot join

  • Participants who demonstrated contraindication to manipulation
  • Open wounds or Trauma to the area which occurred less than two months prior treatment
  • Any neurological compromise
  • Mid scapular pain due to degenerative process or osteoporosis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Women Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences

    Abbottabad, KPK, 22010

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on Pressure Pain Sensitivity of Active Myofascial Trigger Points in Rhomboid Muscle

This study intends to determine the effects of thoracic manipulation on pressure pain sensitivity in patients with rhomboid active trigger points.

Read the detailed description

This is a single blinded controlled trial and will be conducted at physiotherapy clinic of women institute of rehabilitation sciences Abbottabad. The "screw" manipulation is a fairly aggressive manipulative technique in which the transverse processes are forced into a posterior to anterior direction Individual will be screened out according to inclusion criteria. Individuals will be allocated randomly into two groups, 30 in thoracic manipulation group and 30 in conventional physiotherapy protocol group by sealed envelope method. Both groups will receive conventional physiotherapy protocol (manual pressure release technique and muscle imbalances exercises) for rhomboid trigger points in common and the experimental group will receive thoracic manipulation in addition to conventional protocol.

Assessment will be done on baseline and after 3 weeks. Data will be analyzed on SPSS version 21.

Conditions
Trigger Points
Being tested
Thoracic manipulation, conventional pt protocol
Keywords
Trigger Area

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Thoracic manipulationOther

    Session will be performed twice a week for a three week period if a pop sound occurred then the therapist moved on next procedure ,if not subject will be repositioned and technique will performed again. This procedure will be performed for maximum of two attempts. Approximately 3 minutes of time is required to complete thrust manipulation subjects assigned to thrust manipulation also received general exercise program and manual pressure release technique as the control group. General exercise group involve Stretching exercises for the pectoral muscles and resisted strengthening exercises for the scapular retractors and elevators and the glenohumeral abductors and external rotators were performed three times per week for 3 weeks.

  • conventional pt protocolOther

    This group will receive manual pressure release technique along with general exercises program. General exercise group involve Stretching exercises for the pectoral muscles and resisted strengthening exercises for the scapular retractors and elevators and the glenohumeral abductors and external rotators were performed three times per week for 3 weeks.

Study groups in NCT04179214
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group I Experimental: thoracic manipulationExperimentalThe experimental group will receive thoracic manipulation along with conventional pt protocol.
Receives: Other: Thoracic manipulation
Group II ControlActive comparatorthis group of participant will receive Conventional physical therapy protocol
Receives: Other: conventional pt protocol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)

    Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11 point (0-10) Scale used to measure pain. Patient verbally select value between (0-10) on the basis of intensity of pain. (0) means No pain and (10) means maximum pain experienced at baseline and after 3 weeks

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)

    Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11 point (0-10) Scale used to measure pain. Patient verbally select value between (0-10) on the basis of intensity of pain. (0) means No pain and (10) means maximum pain experienced at baseline and after 3 weeks

    Measured: post 3 weeks

  3. Pain pressure threshold

    It is measured with the help of an instrument called Algometer. The readings of Algometer are both in pounds and kilograms and it gauges the pressure at which patient feels pain.

    Measured: baseline

  4. Pain pressure threshold

    It is measured with the help of an instrument called Algometer. The readings of Algometer are both in pounds and kilograms and it gauges the pressure at which patient feels pain.

    Measured: post 3 weeks

  5. Thoracic ROM

    A thoraxic range of motion (TROM) inclinometer will be use to assess thoracic range of motion in flexion and extension.. Participants will be seated or standing upright and asked to actively move their trunk in forward and backward direction

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Thoracic ROM

    A thoraxic range of motion (TROM) inclinometer will be use to assess thoracic range of motion in flexion and extension.. Participants will be seated or standing upright and asked to actively move their trunk in forward and backward direction

    Measured: post 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a questionnaire designed to assess how neck pain has affected patient's ability to manage in everyday life. It has total 10 sections, For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated and converted into percentages. The maximum Score of Neck Disability Index (NDI) is 50. It is measured at Baseline before Intervention and after end of treatment session that is 3 weeks

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a questionnaire designed to assess how neck pain has affected patient's ability to manage in everyday life. It has total 10 sections, For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated and converted into percentages. The maximum Score of Neck Disability Index (NDI) is 50. It is measured at Baseline before Intervention and after end of treatment session that is 3 weeks

    Measured: post 3 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2019
  2. Study start22 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Both experimental and control groups will be treated simultaneously with one treatment option common to both groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04179214
Sponsor's protocol ID
RiphahIU Bibi Haleema
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
25 Nov 2019
Last updated
3 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Schiller L. Effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy in the treatment of mechanical thoracic spine pain: a pilot randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Jul-Aug;24(6):394-401. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.116420.

    PubMed 11514816
  • Ruiz-Saez M, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Blanco CR, Martinez-Segura R, Garcia-Leon R. Changes in pressure pain sensitivity in latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle after a cervical spine manipulation in pain-free subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Oct;30(8):578-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.07.014.

    PubMed 17996549
  • Dunning JR, Cleland JA, Waldrop MA, Arnot CF, Young IA, Turner M, Sigurdsson G. Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jan;42(1):5-18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3894. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

    PubMed 21979312
  • Nilsson N, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J. The effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Jun;20(5):326-30.

    PubMed 9200048
  • Cleland JA, Glynn P, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL, MacDonald C, Childs JD. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2007 Apr;87(4):431-40. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060217. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

    PubMed 17341509
  • Haleema B, Riaz H. Effects of thoracic spine manipulation on pressure pain sensitivity of rhomboid muscle active trigger points: A randomized controlled trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Jul;71(7):1720-1724. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.02-256.

    PubMed 34410234

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Thoracic manipulation and conventional pt protocol in people with Trigger Points, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04179214, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in