AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary EmbolismPETEPNCT04179539

Ga68 V/Q PET/CT for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study vs CT Pulmonary Angiography

A study testing V/Q PET/CT and CTPA in people with Pulmonary Embolism, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) of V/Q PET/CT for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), using CT pulmonary angiography as a reference standard. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Embolism
What is being tested?
V/Q PET/CT and CTPA
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
6 Dec 2019to 6 Nov 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with suspected first episode of acute PE,
  • Age ≥ 18 years .
  • Insured patient.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a clinically suspected massive PE.
  • Contraindication to contrast media (including renal insufficiency with creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min).
  • Inability to perform CTPA and V/Q PET/CT within 24 hours.
  • History of deep vein thrombosis or PE
  • Unable/unwilling to give informed consent.
  • Pregnancy / breast-feeding.
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHRU de BREST

    Brest

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Gallium68 Ventilation/Perfusion PET/CT for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study vs CT Pulmonary Angiography

This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) of V/Q PET/CT for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), using CT pulmonary angiography as a reference standard.

Read the detailed description

V/Q PET/CT imaging is now possible by substituting 99mTc with 68Ga, a positron-emitting radionuclide, using the same carrier molecules as conventional V/Q imaging. Ventilation imaging can be performed with 68Ga-carbon nanoparticles using the same synthesis device as Technegas. Perfusion imaging can be performed with 68Ga-macroaggregated albumin (68Ga-MAA).Technical advantages of PET compared to SPECT include higher sensitivity, higher spatial and temporal resolution and superior quantitative capability. This offers the opportunity to improve the accuracy of V/Q imaging in patients with suspected PE, while decreasing the acquisition time.

The aim is to perform a formal diagnostic accuracy study of V/Q PET/CT for PE, using CTPA as a reference standard.

Patients with suspected acute PE undergo CTPA and V/Q PET/CT imaging within 24 hours.

V/Q PET/CT images are not used for patients management.

After completion of inclusion, central readings of scans will be conducted independently.

Being tested
V/Q PET/CT, CTPA
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Embolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • V/Q PET/CTDiagnostic test

    Ventilation images are acquired after inhalation of Galligas prepared using a Technegas generator (Cyclopharm, Sydney, Australia). The patients is placed in a supine position and inhaled Galligas using the standard ventilation technique. Ventilation images are then acquired. Without the patient moving, 68Ga-MAA are then injected. Perfusion PET images are then acquired

  • CTPADiagnostic test

    CTPA will be done according to the usual protocol in the radiology department of the investigator center

Study groups in NCT04179539
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalPatients with suspected acute PE undergo CTPA and V/Q PET/CT imaging within 24 hours. V/Q PET/CT images are not used for patients management. After completion of inclusion, central readings will be independently conducted: * CTPA will be interpreted by two radiologists, blinded to the results of any clinical information or imaging test results. The results of this interpretation will be used as a reference standard. * V/Q PET/CT will be interpreted by two independant nuclear medicine physicians, blinded to the results of any clinical information or imaging test results (including the reference standard).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: V/Q PET/CT; Diagnostic Test: CTPA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity of V/Q PET/CT for PE diagnosis

    Proportion of patients with a positive V/Q PET/CT among patients with PE according to the reference standard (CTPA).

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Specificity of V/Q PET/CT for PE diagnosis

    Proportion of patients with a negative V/Q PET/CT among patients without PE according to the reference standard (CTPA).

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2019
  2. Study start6 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion6 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion6 Nov 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04179539
Sponsor's protocol ID
PETEP (29BRC18.0275)
Other IDs
2018-004723-36, 2018
Acronym
PETEP
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
12 Nov 2019
Last updated
3 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All collected data that underlie results in a publication

Publications

  • Blanc-Beguin F, Elies P, Robin P, Tripier R, Kervarec N, Lemarie CA, Hennebicq S, Tromeur C, Cogulet V, Salaun PY, Le Roux PY. 68Ga-Labelled Carbon Nanoparticles for Ventilation PET/CT Imaging: Physical Properties Study and Comparison with Technegas(R). Mol Imaging Biol. 2021 Feb;23(1):62-69. doi: 10.1007/s11307-020-01532-6. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

    PubMed 32886302

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing V/Q PET/CT and CTPA in people with Pulmonary Embolism, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity of V/Q PET/CT for PE diagnosis (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04179539, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in