Frailty SyndromeNCT04190329
Feasibility of an Extended Test Battery and Influencing Factors for Detecting Frailty
An observational study of Frailty Syndrome, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The aim of the prospective study is to assess the feasibility of a screening and baseline measurement protocol that is planned for a main study (PRÄP-GO) in a collective of 30 patients ageing 70+ scheduled for elective surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Frailty Syndrome
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 18 Dec 2019to 20 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing elective surgery aged ≥70 years, including 10 patients without Frailty, 10 patients with Pre-Frailty and 10 patients with Frailty.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 70 years
- Male and female patients
- Patient eligible for inclusion: by the patient, preoperatively
- elective surgery
- Expected anesthesia duration> 60min
Who cannot join
- Severe cardiological or pulmonary disease (NYHA IV, Gold IV)
- Intracranial interventions
- Moribund patients (palliative situation)
- Not enough language skills
- Non-consenting patients
- Participation in another prospective intervention study for study inclusion or throughout the study period.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 13353
About this study
The aim of the prospective study is to assess the feasibility of a screening and baseline measurement protocol that is planned for a main study (PRÄP-GO) in a collective of 30 patients ageing 70+ scheduled for elective surgery. Comprehensive geriatric assessment scores and modified Fried frailty phenotype component evaluation are performed in all patients at baseline before elective surgery. The assessment of cognitive tests is conducted with a battery of neuropsychological tests, computer-based tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery [CANTAB®] and non-computer based tests. Frailty scores from 0 to 5 (i.e., 1 point for each component; 0 = best to 5 = worst) represent robust (0), pre-frail (1-2), and frail (3-5) health status. 10 patients without Frailty, 10 patients with Pre-Frailty and 10 patients with Frailty should be analyzed in this study and receive further comprehensive geriatric assessment testing up to seven days after surgery/discharge (before 7 postoperative days).
- Conditions
- Frailty Syndrome
- Medical subject headings
- Frailty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 10 non-frail (robust) study patients | Patients fulfill 0 criteria according to modified Fried frailty score. | |
| 10 pre-frail study patients | Patients fulfill 1-2 criteria criteria according to modified Fried frailty score. | |
| 10 frail study patients | Patients fulfill 3, 4 or 5 criteria according to modified Fried frailty score. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration to run the test battery
The duration of the screening test battery is measured with a stopwatch.
Measured: 1 day (Once only at screening)
Secondary outcomes (16)
Acceptance of test battery
The study patient´s acceptance of the screening test battery is measured with a questionnaire.
Measured: 1 day (Once only at screening)
Problems to conduct the test battery
Problems while performing the test battery are categorized according to a standardized protocol.
Measured: 1 day (Once only at screening)
Change in pain
Pain is measured with a pain score, a higher score indicates more pain.
Measured: Baseline, day 3 after surgery and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Intelligibility of the patient Diary 1
Number of completed items
Measured: Up to day 7 after surgery
Intelligibility of the patient Diary 2
Number of completed days
Measured: Up to day 7 after surgery
Intelligibility of the patient Diary 3
Coherence of the diary with clinical patient record
Measured: Up to day 7 after surgery
Implementation rate of the patient Diary 3
Measured: Up to day 7 after surgery
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength measured using a Dynamometer.
Measured: Baseline, day 3 after surgery and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Mobility
Mobility is measured using the Charité Mobilitäts-Index (CHARMI®).
Measured: Baseline, day 3 after the operation and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Nutritional status 1
Nutritional status 1 is measured using serum albumin.
Measured: Baseline and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Nutritional status 2
Nutritional status 2 is measured using arm circumference.
Measured: Baseline and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Nutritional status 3
Nutritional status 3 is measured using calf circumference.
Measured: Baseline and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Nutritional status 4
Nutritional status 4 is measured using the Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (MNA®-SF).
Measured: Baseline and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Intra- and postoperative organ complications
Measured: Up to 7 days after surgery
Length of intensive care unit stay
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 day.
Length of stay
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Dec 2019
- Study start18 Dec 2019
- Primary completion16 Jul 2020
- Study completion20 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Frailty SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charite University, Berlin, GermanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Investigators
- Claudia Spies, MD Prof., Study director, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité Univerisitätsmedizin Berlin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04190329
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Frailty-Testing
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility of an Extended Test Battery and Influencing Factors for Detecting Frailty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04190329
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Frailty-Testing
- Conditions
- Frailty Syndrome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the prospective study is to assess the feasibility of a screening and baseline measurement protocol that is planned for a main study (PRÄP-GO) in a collective of 30 patients ageing 70+ scheduled for elective surgery. Comprehensive geriatric assessment scores and modified Fried frailty phenotype component evaluation are performed in all patients at baseline before elective surgery. The assessment of cognitive tests is conducted with a battery of neuropsychological tests, computer-based tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery [CANTAB®] and non-computer based tests. Frailty scores from 0 to 5 (i.e., 1 point for each component; 0 = best to 5 = worst) represent robust (0), pre-frail (1-2), and frail (3-5) health status. 10 patients without Frailty, 10 patients with Pre-Frailty and 10 patients with Frailty should be analyzed in this study and receive further comprehensive geriatric assessment testing up to seven days after surgery/discharge (before 7 postoperative days).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 10 non-frail (robust) study patients | – | –Patients fulfill 0 criteria according to modified Fried frailty score. |
| 10 pre-frail study patients | – | –Patients fulfill 1-2 criteria criteria according to modified Fried frailty score. |
| 10 frail study patients | – | –Patients fulfill 3, 4 or 5 criteria according to modified Fried frailty score. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing elective surgery aged ≥70 years, including 10 patients without Frailty, 10 patients with Pre-Frailty and 10 patients with Frailty.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 70 years
- Male and female patients
- Patient eligible for inclusion: by the patient, preoperatively
- elective surgery
- Expected anesthesia duration> 60min
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Severe cardiological or pulmonary disease (NYHA IV, Gold IV)
- Intracranial interventions
- Moribund patients (palliative situation)
- Not enough language skills
- Non-consenting patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Duration to run the test battery
Time frame: 1 day (Once only at screening)
The duration of the screening test battery is measured with a stopwatch.
16 secondary outcomes
Acceptance of test battery
Time frame: 1 day (Once only at screening)
Problems to conduct the test battery
Time frame: 1 day (Once only at screening)
Change in pain
Time frame: Baseline, day 3 after surgery and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Intelligibility of the patient Diary 1
Time frame: Up to day 7 after surgery
Intelligibility of the patient Diary 2
Time frame: Up to day 7 after surgery
Intelligibility of the patient Diary 3
Time frame: Up to day 7 after surgery
Implementation rate of the patient Diary 3
Time frame: Up to day 7 after surgery
Handgrip strength
Time frame: Baseline, day 3 after surgery and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Mobility
Time frame: Baseline, day 3 after the operation and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Nutritional status 1
Time frame: Baseline and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Nutritional status 2
Time frame: Baseline and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Nutritional status 3
Time frame: Baseline and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Nutritional status 4
Time frame: Baseline and discharge or day 7 after surgery
Intra- and postoperative organ complications
Time frame: Up to 7 days after surgery
Length of intensive care unit stay
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 day.
Length of stay
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Frailty Syndrome
Recruiting
Comparıson of the Effıcacy of Conventıonal Exercıse and Pılates ın Pre-fraıl and Fraıl Older Adults
Frailty Syndrome, Prefrail Elderly
Active, not recruiting
Prehabilitation in Pancreatic Surgery
Pancreatic Cancer, Periampullary Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Animation-Based Digital Education on Risk Knowledge and Frailty in Older Adults
Aging, Frail Elderly
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Functional-Nutritional Status in Older Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Surgery on Oral Frailty and Dysphagia in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
OSA - Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Dysphagia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claudia Spies, MD Prof. study director
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité Univerisitätsmedizin Berlin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Frailty Syndrome, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration to run the test battery (time frame: 1 day (Once only at screening)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.