Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryNCT04201730
Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)in Gastrointestinal Cancer
A study testing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in people with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Gastrointestinal Cancer, run by Huashan Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
At present, there are more and more reports about enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)in China, but there is no ERAS treatment standard for gastrointestinal cancer, and there are many factors limiting the development of ERAS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Gastrointestinal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 356 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 25 Dec 2019to 1 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Sign the informed consent
- Preoperative pathology confirmed gastric cancer or colorectal cancer
- Age: 18-70 years, men or women
- According to NCCN guidelines, it is not Stage IV tumor
- Perform radical gastrectomy or radical colon cancer surgery (CME) or radical rectal cancer surgery (TME);
- ASA I-III
- Receive no radiotherapy or chemotherapy before operation
- The subjects can describe the symptoms objectively and keep the follow-up plan
Who cannot join
- Preoperative pathology confirmed no gastric cancer / no colorectal cancer (such as rectal neuroendocrine tumor, lymphoma, etc.)
- Stage IV or Radical resection can't be performed
- Emergency operation
- Can't cooperate with clinical data collection
- General condition is intolerable to operation
- Serious diseases, including heart function ≥ level II, respiratory function insufficiency, liver and kidney function insufficiency, and blood system diseases
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients participate in other clinical trials at the same time
- Pregnant or perinatal women
- Other malignant tumors
- History of mental illness
- Had a history of severe trauma within 4 weeks before admission
- Less than 6 months after other level 4 operations
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Single Center, Open, Randomized Clinical Trial:Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)in Gastrointestinal Cancer
At present, there are more and more reports about enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)in China, but there is no ERAS treatment standard for gastrointestinal cancer, and there are many factors limiting the development of ERAS. In recent years, due to the development of minimally invasive technology, the establishment of evidence-based medicine model and the development of MDT, it makes a good solid foundation for the clinical application of ERAS. The implementation of ERAS requires the cooperation of surgeons, anesthesia management, nursing, rehabilitation and other teams. As an individualized treatment mode, ERAS focuses on the optimization of treatment for different individuals in order to acquire the best benefit of patients. Therefore, the concept of ERAS is still in the process of continuous improvement and development in China, hoping to explore the Chinese ERAS clinical pathway for gastrointestinal cancer. The purpose of this study is to optimize the clinical pathway of ERAS in the perioperative period of gastrointestinal cancer, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ERAS in gastrointestinal cancer.
- Being tested
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
- Medical subject headings
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)Procedure or surgery
Preoperative education,Preoperative nutritional support,Preoperative bowel preparation,Preventative applying of antibiotics,Intraoperative warming,Goal-directed fluid therapy,Postoperative analgesia,Postoperative diet, drainage and activity management,Prevention of deep vein thrombosis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ERAS | Experimental | Perioperative intervention with individual Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Receives: Procedure: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hospitalization Days
Measured: Postoperative up to 2 weeks
Time of getting out of bed after operation
Measured: Postoperative 7 days
The time to first flatus
Measured: Postoperative 7 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Expenses on medical treatment, medicine and hospitalization
Measured: On discharge, Postoperative up to 2 weeks
Incidence of postoperative complications
Measured: Postoperative 3 months、6 months、1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2019
- Study start25 Dec 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020
- Study completion1 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Huashan HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Huashan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jianbin Xiang, Huashan Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04201730
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KY2018-396
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):473-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473. No abstract available.
PubMed 11222424Lee SM, Kang SB, Jang JH, Park JS, Hong S, Lee TG, Ahn S. Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3902-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3006-4. Epub 2013 May 25.
PubMed 23708720Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;396(5):585-90. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
PubMed 21468643Aarts MA, Okrainec A, Glicksman A, Pearsall E, Victor JC, McLeod RS. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay. Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):442-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1897-5. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
PubMed 22011937Jie B, Jiang ZM, Nolan MT, Zhu SN, Yu K, Kondrup J. Impact of preoperative nutritional support on clinical outcome in abdominal surgical patients at nutritional risk. Nutrition. 2012 Oct;28(10):1022-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
PubMed 22673593Li P, Fang F, Cai JX, Tang D, Li QG, Wang DR. Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9119-26. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9119.
PubMed 24379639Li YJ, Huo TT, Xing J, An JZ, Han ZY, Liu XN, Zhao QC. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3142-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2690-0.
PubMed 25228170Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3443-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4148-3. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PubMed 25801106Ni TG, Yang HT, Zhang H, Meng HP, Li B. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9209-16. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9209.
PubMed 26290648Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A, Kahokehr A, Hill AG. A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J. 2010 Jul 30;123(1319):61-70.
PubMed 20717178
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single Center, Open, Randomized Clinical Trial:Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)in Gastrointestinal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04201730
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KY2018-396
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Huashan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
At present, there are more and more reports about enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)in China, but there is no ERAS treatment standard for gastrointestinal cancer, and there are many factors limiting the development of ERAS. In recent years, due to the development of minimally invasive technology, the establishment of evidence-based medicine model and the development of MDT, it makes a good solid foundation for the clinical application of ERAS. The implementation of ERAS requires the cooperation of surgeons, anesthesia management, nursing, rehabilitation and other teams. As an individualized treatment mode, ERAS focuses on the optimization of treatment for different individuals in order to acquire the best benefit of patients. Therefore, the concept of ERAS is still in the process of continuous improvement and development in China, hoping to explore the Chinese ERAS clinical pathway for gastrointestinal cancer. The purpose of this study is to optimize the clinical pathway of ERAS in the perioperative period of gastrointestinal cancer, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ERAS in gastrointestinal cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ERAS | Experimental | Procedure: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)Perioperative intervention with individual Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Sign the informed consent
- Preoperative pathology confirmed gastric cancer or colorectal cancer
- Age: 18-70 years, men or women
- According to NCCN guidelines, it is not Stage IV tumor
- Perform radical gastrectomy or radical colon cancer surgery (CME) or radical rectal cancer surgery (TME);
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Preoperative pathology confirmed no gastric cancer / no colorectal cancer (such as rectal neuroendocrine tumor, lymphoma, etc.)
- Stage IV or Radical resection can't be performed
- Emergency operation
- Can't cooperate with clinical data collection
- General condition is intolerable to operation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)Preoperative education,Preoperative nutritional support,Preoperative bowel preparation,Preventative applying of antibiotics,Intraoperative warming,Goal-directed fluid therapy,Postoperative analgesia,Postoperative diet, drainage and activity management,Prevention of deep vein thrombosis. | Procedure or surgery | ERAS |
Primary outcome
Hospitalization Days
Time frame: Postoperative up to 2 weeks
Time of getting out of bed after operation
Time frame: Postoperative 7 days
The time to first flatus
Time frame: Postoperative 7 days
2 secondary outcomes
Expenses on medical treatment, medicine and hospitalization
Time frame: On discharge, Postoperative up to 2 weeks
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time frame: Postoperative 3 months、6 months、1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 11222424Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):473-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 23708720Lee SM, Kang SB, Jang JH, Park JS, Hong S, Lee TG, Ahn S. Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3902-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3006-4. Epub 2013 May 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 21468643Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;396(5):585-90. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 22011937Aarts MA, Okrainec A, Glicksman A, Pearsall E, Victor JC, McLeod RS. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay. Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):442-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1897-5. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 22673593Jie B, Jiang ZM, Nolan MT, Zhu SN, Yu K, Kondrup J. Impact of preoperative nutritional support on clinical outcome in abdominal surgical patients at nutritional risk. Nutrition. 2012 Oct;28(10):1022-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 24379639Li P, Fang F, Cai JX, Tang D, Li QG, Wang DR. Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9119-26. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9119.
- Results publication: PubMed 25228170Li YJ, Huo TT, Xing J, An JZ, Han ZY, Liu XN, Zhao QC. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3142-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2690-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 25801106Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3443-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4148-3. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 26290648Ni TG, Yang HT, Zhang H, Meng HP, Li B. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9209-16. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9209.
- Results publication: PubMed 20717178Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A, Kahokehr A, Hill AG. A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J. 2010 Jul 30;123(1319):61-70.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Esketamine Combined With Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Postoperative Recovery Quality After Elective Cesarean Section
Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585), Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section
Recruiting
Comparison of Post-operative Outcomes Between ERAS Protocol and Non-ERAS Local Regimen in Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy
Thyroid Diseases, Ambulation Time
Recruiting
Tramadol Versus Morphine for Postoperative Pain Relief Following Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
Multimodal Analgesia, Tramadol
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy Between Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block or Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus Intravenous Fentanyl for On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Intra and Post Operative Pain Management, Fast Track Program,(Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS))
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Anxiety and One-year Patient-reported Outcomes in Orthopedic Surgery Patients Receiving Enhanced Recovery After Surgery or Conventional Care
Preoperative Anxiety, Orthopedic Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in people with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Gastrointestinal Cancer, run by Huashan Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hospitalization Days (time frame: Postoperative up to 2 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04201730, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2021.