AzTrials
AzTrials

Core StabilityNCT04220385

Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Wii Fit Plus and Core Exercise Program in Improving Core Stability in Adults

A study testing Group A and Group B in people with Core Stability, run by Dow University of Health Sciences at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will compare the effectiveness of core stability and Wii fit plus exercise in improving core stability. Group A will perform Wii fit plus exercises and group B will perform core stability exercise. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 29 years
Conditions the study is for
Core Stability
What is being tested?
Group A and Group B
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
3 Feb 2020to 21 Nov 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 29 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 to 29 years
  • Male and female subjects
  • Trunk flexor endurance less than 144 seconds in male and 149 seconds in female subjects
  • Trunk extensor endurance less than 146 seconds in male and 189 seconds in female subjects
  • Flexibility less than 24 cm in male and 27 cm in female.

Who cannot join

  • Weight more than or equal to 150 kg because it is the maximum limit for balance board
  • Spinal surgery history,
  • Current low back pain
  • Performing exercise in routine
  • Acute or chronic cardiovascular disease
  • Acute or chronic musculoskeletal disease
  • Acute or chronic neurological disease.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    Karachi, Sindh

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

This study will compare the effectiveness of core stability and Wii fit plus exercise in improving core stability. Group A will perform Wii fit plus exercises and group B will perform core stability exercise.

Conditions
Core Stability
Being tested
Group A, Group B
Keywords
Virtual reality exercise, Exercise Therapy/methods, Health Promotion Physical Endurance/physiology, Core Stability

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Group AOther

    Also called Wii fit Plus

    Subjects will perform following exercises, Single Leg Extension, Arm and Leg Lift, Balance Bridge, Single-Leg Twist, Single Leg Reach, Sideways Leg Lift, Single Arm Stand, Torso Twists and Plank exercise with minimum one set and maximum two sets. 30 seconds will be rest time between each set. Subjects will be encouraged to increase the number of repetitions after every 2 weeks, except in Plank exercise in which holding position time will be initially 30 seconds in each set and will be encouraged to increase holding time after every 2 weeks.

  • Group BOther

    Also called Core Stability

    Subjects will perform Side Bridge, Bird Dog and Beginner Curl-up exercise in the first three weeks and Side Bridge, Bird Dog and Intermediate Curl-up exercise in the last three weeks. Repetitions per set will be 5, 4, 3 in first two weeks, 7, 6, 5 in third and fourth weeks and 9, 8, 7 in last two weeks. 8-10 seconds will be holding time in each repetition. 30 seconds will be rest time between each set

Study groups in NCT04220385
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Wii fit PlusActive comparatorThis study group will perform the following Wii fit plus exercises * Single-Leg Extension * Arm and Leg Lift * Balance Bridge * Single-Leg Twist * Single-Leg Reach * Sideways Leg Lift * Single Arm Stand * Torso Twists * Plank
Receives: Other: Group A
Core StabilityActive comparatorThis study group will perform the following exercises. * Curl-up * Side Bridge * Bird Dog
Receives: Other: Group B

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in trunk flexor endurance test

    It is expressed in seconds, subject will sit on the test bench and place the upper body against a support with an angle of 60 ° from the test bed. Both the knees and hips will be flexed to 90 °.The arms will be folded across the chest with the hands placed on the opposite shoulder and toes will be placed under toe straps. Subjects will be instructed to maintain the body position while the supporting wedge will be pulled back 10 cm to begin the test. The test will end when the upper body fell below the 60 ° angle.

    Measured: Base line and 6 weeks

  2. Change in trunk extensor endurance test

    It is recorded in seconds. Subjects will laid prone with the lower body fixed to the test bed at the ankles, knees, and hips and the upper body extended in a cantelevered fashion over the edge of the test bench. The test bench surface will be approximately 25 cm above the surface of the floor. Subjects will rest their upper bodies on the floor before the exertion. At the beginning of the exertion the upper limbs will be held across the chest with the hands resting on the opposite shoulders, and the upper body will be lifted off the floor until the upper torso will be horizontal to the floor. Subjects will be instructed to maintain the horizontal position as long as possible.

    Measured: Base line and 6 weeks

  3. Change in sit and reach test

    It is expressed in cm.The subject sits without shoes and the soles of the feet flat against a sit-and reach box with the zero mark at the 26 cm. Inner edges of the soles should be 15.2 cm apart.. The subject should slowly reach forward with both hands as far as possible, holding this position approximately 2 s.

    Measured: Base line and 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2020
  2. Study start3 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion21 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion21 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04220385
Sponsor's protocol ID
DUHS/SC/2019/08
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
4 Jan 2020
Last updated
28 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Akuthota V, Ferreiro A, Moore T, Fredericson M. Core stability exercise principles. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2008 Feb;7(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/01.CSMR.0000308663.13278.69.

    PubMed 18296944
  • Willson JD, Dougherty CP, Ireland ML, Davis IM. Core stability and its relationship to lower extremity function and injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Sep;13(5):316-25. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200509000-00005.

    PubMed 16148357
  • Reiman MP, Krier AD, Nelson JA, Rogers MA, Stuke ZO, Smith BS. Comparison of different trunk endurance testing methods in college-aged individuals. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Oct;7(5):533-9.

    PubMed 23091786
  • Sihawong R, Janwantanakul P, Jiamjarasrangsi W. A prospective, cluster-randomized controlled trial of exercise program to prevent low back pain in office workers. Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):786-93. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3212-3. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

    PubMed 24492949
  • McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):941-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90087-4.

    PubMed 10453772
  • Lopez-Minarro PA, Andujar PS, Rodrnguez-Garcna PL. A comparison of the sit-and-reach test and the back-saver sit-and-reach test in university students. J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Mar 1;8(1):116-22. eCollection 2009.

    PubMed 24150564
  • Zadro JR, Shirley D, Simic M, Mousavi SJ, Ceprnja D, Maka K, Sung J, Ferreira P. Video-Game-Based Exercises for Older People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlledtable Trial (GAMEBACK). Phys Ther. 2019 Jan 1;99(1):14-27. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy112.

    PubMed 30247715
  • Bakar Y, Tugral A, Ozel A, Altuntas YD. Comparison of a 12-Week Whole-Body Exergaming Program on Young Adults: Differentiation in Flexibility, Muscle Strength, Reaction Time, and Walking Speed Between Sexes. Clin Nurs Res. 2020 Sep;29(7):424-432. doi: 10.1177/1054773818797881. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

    PubMed 30188176
  • Neumann S, Meidert U, Barbera-Guillem R, Poveda-Puente R, Becker H. Effects of an Exergame Software for Older Adults on Fitness, Activities of Daily Living Performance, and Quality of Life. Games Health J. 2018 Oct;7(5):341-346. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0079.

    PubMed 30325234
  • Sato K, Kuroki K, Saiki S, Nagatomi R. Improving Walking, Muscle Strength, and Balance in the Elderly with an Exergame Using Kinect: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Games Health J. 2015 Jun;4(3):161-7. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2014.0057. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

    PubMed 26182059
  • Lee D, Lee S, Park J. Effects of indoor horseback riding and virtual reality exercises on the dynamic balance ability of normal healthy adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Dec;26(12):1903-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1903. Epub 2014 Dec 25.

    PubMed 25540494
  • Siriphorn A, Chamonchant D. Wii balance board exercise improves balance and lower limb muscle strength of overweight young adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jan;27(1):41-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.41. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

    PubMed 25642034
  • Nitz JC, Kuys S, Isles R, Fu S. Is the Wii Fit a new-generation tool for improving balance, health and well-being? A pilot study. Climacteric. 2010 Oct;13(5):487-91. doi: 10.3109/13697130903395193.

    PubMed 19905991
  • Schilling JF, Murphy JC, Bonney JR, Thich JL. Effect of core strength and endurance training on performance in college students: randomized pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013 Jul;17(3):278-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

    PubMed 23768270

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Group A and Group B in people with Core Stability, run by Dow University of Health Sciences at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in trunk flexor endurance test (time frame: Base line and 6 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04220385, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in