AzTrials
AzTrials

Skin MicrobiomeNCT04231500

The Skin Microbiome in Graft Versus Host Disease

An observational study of Skin Microbiome and Graft Versus Host Disease, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Based on the evidence on the impact of the intestinal microbiome on the Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) after allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT), it is hypothesized that the skin-microbiome may play a role in cutaneous GVHD as well. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Skin swabs, Skin punch biopsies and additional blood sampling
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
1 Mar 2023to 31 Mar 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients undergoing allo-HSCT at the University Hospital Basel

Who may be able to join

  • undergoing allo-HSCT at the University Hospital Basel

Who cannot join

  • missing ability to judge
  • illiteracy or lack of German, French or English language

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Department of Dermatology; University Hospital Basel

    Basel, 4031

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: The Skin Microbiome in Graft Versus Host Disease Dynamics of the Skin-microbiota After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation - a Predictive Marker for Graft Versus Host Disease?

Based on the evidence on the impact of the intestinal microbiome on the Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) after allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT), it is hypothesized that the skin-microbiome may play a role in cutaneous GVHD as well. Therefore, this study aims at investigating the skin-microbiota of patients with GVHD after allo-HSCT and of patients without GVHD after allo-HSCT.

Being tested
Skin swabs, Skin punch biopsies, additional blood sampling
Keywords
allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Medical subject headings
Graft vs Host Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Skin swabsDiagnostic test

    Pre-moistened skin swabs will be collected before the patient starts the conditioning regimens (before conditioning; start of HSCT = day 0, on the day of the transplantation an the repeated in week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 after allo-HSCT. The first swab serves as baseline reference (ideally taken at the earliest one week after a systemic antibiotic treatment). Swabs will be taken from the neck, back, right hip, buccal oral cavity and the genital mucosae. In patients who develop acute or chronic skin-GVHD additional swabs will be taken from affected skin at the time of diagnosis and then again according to the schedule of the non-lesioned skin swabs.

  • Skin punch biopsiesDiagnostic test

    During the first visit, a single skin punch biopsy will be taken to state the skin condition and microbiome before allo-HSCT. Further biopsies will only be taken in case of acute or chronic cutaneous GVHD. A 4-6 mm punch biopsy will be taken from the affected skin area and a second one from a nearby unaffected part of the skin. Before the biopsy, skin disinfection will be performed to avoid contamination with surface bacteria.

  • additional blood samplingDiagnostic test

    an additional tube of blood (2.7ml) and an additional tube of serum (6ml) will be taken and frozen during visits 1, 2, 3 and 7 in the course of blood collection, in order to be able to carry out any later laboratory tests that may prove to be useful depending on the course of the study.

Study groups in NCT04231500
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients with GVHD after allo-HSCTExploration of the skin-microbiota in patients with GVHD after allo-HSCT by sampling of skin swabs and a skin punch biopsy before conditioning procedure and additional skin biopsies from affected and healthy skin sites in case of GVHD
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Skin swabs; Diagnostic Test: Skin punch biopsies; Diagnostic Test: additional blood sampling
patients without GVHD after allo-HSCTExploration of the skin-microbiota in patients without GVHD after allo-HSCT by sampling of skin swabs and a skin punch biopsy before conditioning procedure
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Skin swabs; Diagnostic Test: Skin punch biopsies; Diagnostic Test: additional blood sampling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determination of the bacterial microbiome of patients with GVHD after allo-HSCT vs. patients without GVHD after allo-HSCT

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: at week 4 after transplantation

  2. Determination of the bacterial microbiome of patients with GVHD after allo-HSCT vs. patients without GVHD after allo-HSCT

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: at week 12 after transplantation

  3. Determination of the bacterial microbiome of patients with GVHD after allo-HSCT vs. patients without GVHD after allo-HSCT

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: at week 24 after transplantation

  4. Determination of the bacterial microbiome of patients with GVHD after allo-HSCT vs. patients without GVHD after allo-HSCT

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: at week 36 after transplantation

  5. Determination of the bacterial microbiome of patients with GVHD after allo-HSCT vs. patients without GVHD after allo-HSCT

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: at week 52 after transplantation

  6. Change in skin-microbiota in lesional vs. non-lesional skin of patients with GVHD

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change in inter-individual skin-microbiota in allo-HSCT patients

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

  2. Change in intra-individual skin-microbiota in allo-HSCT patients

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

  3. Change of the skin-microbiota in correlation with the frequency and type of posttransplant infections (e.g. episodes of bacteraemia).

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

  4. Change of the composition of skin-microbiota in correlation with the severity of GVHD

    After lysis of the microbiota, the DNA is extracted for phylogenetic 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (standard illumina protocol), which is considered the current gold standard to determine the bacterial microbiome

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

  5. Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

    There are 10 questions, covering the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, treatment. Each question refers to the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week. Each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range form 0 (meaning no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life).

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

  6. Change in Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WINRS)

    Single-item numerical rating scale anchored at 0 and 10, on which 0 represents "no itching" and 10 represents "worst itch imaginable". The patient indicates the overall severity of itching attributable to his or her psoriatic skin condition by circling the number that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

  7. Change in Eppendorf Itch Questionnaire (EIQ)

    The questionnaire consists of two pages, which are filled in by the patient. Form 1 presents 80 randomized descriptors. Sensory items are grouped on the left side and more affective or emotional items of different intensity values are found on the right side. Every item is scored within the range of 0 ('not true') to 4 ('describes exactly my itch sensation'). Statistically evaluable intensities can be derived from form 1 for every item. Form 2 deals with temporary and topographic aspects. Anti-itch ('pruritofensive') measures are grouped here and itch intensity is rated on a visual analog scale.

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

  8. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    The HADS is a fourteen item scale that generates ordinal data. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. Scores of greater than or equal to 11 on either scale indicate a definitive case.

    Measured: before transplantation and at week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36 and at week 52 after transplantation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2020
  2. Study start1 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04231500
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-01939; sp19Mueller5
Other IDs
2019
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
13 Jan 2020
Last updated
3 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Skin Microbiome and Graft Versus Host Disease, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determination of the bacterial microbiome of patients with GVHD after allo-HSCT vs. patients without GVHD after allo-HSCT (time frame: at week 4 after transplantation). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in