Vascular DiseasesPhase 2/3NCT04238923
Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin for Vascular Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis
A Phase 2/3 study testing Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound) in people with Vascular Diseases and Peripheral Vascular Disease, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's.
Trial summary
Many patients who undergo vascular surgery to improve the blood flow to their legs are at risk of developing an infection in the surgical site and are then at risk of serious complications such as hospital readmission, failure of the surgical procedure and lower limb amputation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Vascular Diseases, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Surgical Site Infection
- What is being tested?
- Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 356 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 May 2020to 1 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients identified as requiring lower extremity bypass for peripheral arterial disease by their consultant surgeon with high-risk features for vascular surgical site infection including,
- BMI >30
- Dialysis dependence
- Redo surgery
- Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2)
- Tissue loss (ischemic ulceration or gangrene of the feet)
Who cannot join
- Patient does not provide informed consent for surgery or study
- Patient received antibiotics for an active infection within 7 days prior to surgery
- Patient has an allergy to gentamicin or vancomycin
- Patient has a pre-existing infection of the surgical site
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Vascular Surgery
Many patients who undergo vascular surgery to improve the blood flow to their legs are at risk of developing an infection in the surgical site and are then at risk of serious complications such as hospital readmission, failure of the surgical procedure and lower limb amputation. Surgical site infections may be reduced in high-risk patients by applying two commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin and vancomycin) into the surgical incision at the end of the surgical procedure. This will be compared to the standard of care treatment at London Health Sciences Center.
Read the detailed description
Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most common complications to develop following peripheral vascular surgery and increase the patient's risk for major amputation, graft failure and increase healthcare resource utilization. SSI are defined by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) as infections occurring within 30-90 days of a surgical procedure, or 1 year if a prosthetic implant was placed, and are divided into superficial, deep and organ space based on depth of microbial invasion.
The incidence of SSI in patients undergoing limb saving vascular surgery has consistently been found to exceed the CDC average of 2.1% for other clean surgical procedures, despite the routine use of perioperative antibiotics and aggressive wound care. A recent review of SSI in vascular surgery showed rates as high as 30%, and the investigators' institution has reported a SSI rate of 20%. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus species are the most frequent isolates from SSI following peripheral vascular surgery, with the highly virulent organism, MRSA becoming increasingly prevalent. Gram-negative organisms account for another 20-30% of SSI, with Pseudomonas isolates commonly identified, particularly in the groin. Several procedure- and patient-related factors have emerged as important predictors of SSI following peripheral vascular surgery, among the most important of which are obesity, tissue loss, redo surgery, dialysis dependence and diabetes mellitus. Obesity has been found to double the risk of SSI. Obese patients are shown to have lower tissue concentrations of antibiotics, which would place them at higher risk of developing SSI. Patients with tissue loss secondary to critical limb ischemia also are at increased risk of SSI resulting from bacterial spread from contaminated ulcers and poor vascular supply to the wound. As well, patients undergoing redo surgery face an increased risk of wound and graft infection secondary to the impaired vascular supply and healing potential of scar tissue. Diabetes mellitus and dialysis dependence are also independent risk factors for SSI following infrainguinal bypass due to a multitude of disease factors, especially immunologic dysfunction and impaired blood supply to the healing tissue.
Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics are the only intervention thus far consistently found to effectively prevent SSI in patients undergoing vascular surgery, however because of the aforementioned factors such measures are less effective in high-risk patients. Data to support other perioperative practices to prevent wound infections in vascular surgery are sparse. Among other surgical disciplines, topical antibiotics are re-emerging as a valid strategy to prevent SSI based on improved understanding of the mechanisms of drug delivery and identification of high-risk patients. In particular, vancomycin applied directly to surgical wounds has shown promise in preventing SSI. Topical vancomycin is believed to prevent gram-positive SSI, particularly those caused by MRSA, while minimizing adverse events related to systemic exposure to vancomycin such as nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity by virtue of limited absorption from the tissue bed. There is one retrospective study in the vascular surgery literature of 454 patients undergoing aortofemoral or infrainguinal procedures that showed reduction of 30-day SSI rates with use of topical vancomycin compared to controls (25.1 vs. 17.2%, p=0.049). More extensive data regarding the use of topical vancomycin prophylaxis comes from the orthopaedic literature. A recent review of orthopaedic studies, although mostly retrospective, highlighted benefits in spine surgery, total joint arthroplasty, foot and ankle surgery and elbow surgery. Further, 8 spine meta-analyses since 2014 have shown reduction in SSI rates with topical vancomycin administration.
Local gentamicin applied to surgical wounds has also been found effective, particularly in the prevention of gram-negative SSI, providing broad gram-negative coverage including Pseudomonas species. One randomized controlled trial assessing the prophylactic use of collagen gentamicin sponge in 40 patients undergoing prosthetic femoropopliteal bypass found significant reduction in groin SSI with use of a collagen gentamicin sponge (Collatamp G). An additional prospective cohort study and case series data also show favorable results in small patient samples of patients An additional prospective cohort study and case series data also show favorable results in small patient samples of patients undergoing various vascular operations. Cardiac surgeons have reported effective use of this antibiotic locally in prevention of sternal wound infections. Notably, a large randomized, double blinded-controlled trial of 1950 patients undergoing cardiac surgery through median sternotomy demonstrated decreased SSI rates at 60 days with the use of gentamicin containing collagen implants compared to controls (4.3 vs. 9.0%, p<0.001). The ability of gentamicin eluting sponges to prevent SSI in sternal wounds was confirmed in a recent meta-analysis. These sponges achieve high local levels of gentamicin for 36 hours with minimal systemic absorption in addition to accelerating hemostasis. Recently, wound closure using topical vancomycin paste and gentamicin irrigation has been shown in a retrospective study to reduce SSI in cardiac surgery sternotomy wounds by almost two thirds.
In this trial, an aggressive prophylactic approach using selective administration of topical vancomycin and gentamicin to the surgical wounds of patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization at high-risk for SSI based on an elevated body mass index (BMI) >30, tissue loss, redo surgery, diabetes mellitus or renal failure will be compared to similar patients receiving standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and wound care to evaluate the impact on 90-day SSI rates.
- Conditions
- Vascular Diseases, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Surgical Site Infection, Bypass Complication
- Being tested
- Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound)
- Medical subject headings
- Vascular Diseases, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Surgical Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound)Drug
Topical vancomycin paste and gentamicin-eluting collagen sponge will be applied directly to the deep layers of the wound following reconstruction, prior to closure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin | Experimental | Immediately prior to closure of the incision, 1g of vancomycin will be mixed in 4mL of normal saline and applied as a paste directly to the muscle, fascia and subcutaneous tissue. Gentamicin-eluting collagen sponges will be cut to the appropriate size to cover the defect and applied after application of vancomycin. Following closure, the surgical site will be covered with a sterile dressing and left in place for 48hrs. Receives: Drug: Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound) |
| Control | No intervention | The surgical wound is closed in the standard fashion with 3 layer closure with staples for skin. Following closure, the surgical site will be covered with a sterile dressing and left in place for 48hrs. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with surgical site infection (%)
Per CDC definition and according to Szilagyi classification
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Length of stay
In-hospital following initial surgery
Measured: Perioperative period
Number of Emergency Department Visits
Between discharge and first post-operative follow-up appointment
Measured: 90 days
Number of participants dying of any cause
Any cause
Measured: 90 days
Number of participants requiring re-operation
For graft failure
Measured: 90 days
Number of participants requiring major lower limb amputation
Above ankle
Measured: 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2020
- Study start1 May 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Vascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Luc Dubois, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, London Health Sciences Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04238923
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 115156
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nguyen LL, Brahmanandam S, Bandyk DF, Belkin M, Clowes AW, Moneta GL, Conte MS. Female gender and oral anticoagulants are associated with wound complications in lower extremity vein bypass: an analysis of 1404 operations for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1191-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.053.
PubMed 18154995Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Pomposelli FB, Wyers MC, Siracuse JJ, Schermerhorn ML. Body mass index: surgical site infections and mortality after lower extremity bypass from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2007. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;24(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
PubMed 19619975Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Mell MW. Predictors of surgical site infection after open lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
PubMed 21458203Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Carson JL, Haser PB, Lowry SF, Graham AM. Infectious complications after elective vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):122-9; discussion 129-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
PubMed 19954920Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):152S-157S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-z.
PubMed 1656747Turtiainen J, Hakala T. Surgical wound infections after peripheral vascular surgery. Scand J Surg. 2014 Dec;103(4):226-31. doi: 10.1177/1457496913514384. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
PubMed 24737857Bandyk DF. Vascular surgical site infection: risk factors and preventive measures. Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;21(3):119-23. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2008.05.008.
PubMed 18774446Pevzner L, Swank M, Krepel C, Wing DA, Chan K, Edmiston CE Jr. Effects of maternal obesity on tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):877-882. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820b95e4.
PubMed 21422859Ott E, Bange FC, Sohr D, Teebken O, Mattner F. Risk factors associated with surgical site infections following vascular surgery at a German university hospital. Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Jun;141(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1017/S095026881200180X. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
PubMed 22906362Siracuse JJ, Nandivada P, Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, Chaikof EL, Pomposelli FB, Schermerhorn ML. Prosthetic graft infections involving the femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.049. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
PubMed 23312940Virkkunen J, Heikkinen M, Lepantalo M, Metsanoja R, Salenius JP; Finnvasc Study Group. Diabetes as an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications in critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Oct;40(4):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.040.
PubMed 15472606Ramdev P, Rayan SS, Sheahan M, Hamdan AD, Logerfo FW, Akbari CM, Campbell DR, Pomposelli FB Jr. A decade experience with infrainguinal revascularization in a dialysis-dependent patient population. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Nov;36(5):969-74. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.128297.
PubMed 12422107Khan NR, Thompson CJ, DeCuypere M, Angotti JM, Kalobwe E, Muhlbauer MS, Camillo FX, Klimo P Jr. A meta-analysis of spinal surgical site infection and vancomycin powder. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):974-83. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE1445. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
PubMed 25259555Mohammed S, Pisimisis GT, Daram SP, Bechara CF, Barshes NR, Lin PH, Kougias P. Impact of intraoperative administration of local vancomycin on inguinal wound complications. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):1079-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.073. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
PubMed 23313181Fleischman AN, Austin MS. Local Intra-wound Administration of Powdered Antibiotics in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Bone Jt Infect. 2017 Jan 1;2(1):23-28. doi: 10.7150/jbji.16649. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28529861
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Vascular Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04238923
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 115156
- Conditions
- Vascular Diseases, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Surgical Site Infection, Bypass Complication
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many patients who undergo vascular surgery to improve the blood flow to their legs are at risk of developing an infection in the surgical site and are then at risk of serious complications such as hospital readmission, failure of the surgical procedure and lower limb amputation. Surgical site infections may be reduced in high-risk patients by applying two commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin and vancomycin) into the surgical incision at the end of the surgical procedure. This will be compared to the standard of care treatment at London Health Sciences Center.
Detailed description
Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most common complications to develop following peripheral vascular surgery and increase the patient's risk for major amputation, graft failure and increase healthcare resource utilization. SSI are defined by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) as infections occurring within 30-90 days of a surgical procedure, or 1 year if a prosthetic implant was placed, and are divided into superficial, deep and organ space based on depth of microbial invasion.
The incidence of SSI in patients undergoing limb saving vascular surgery has consistently been found to exceed the CDC average of 2.1% for other clean surgical procedures, despite the routine use of perioperative antibiotics and aggressive wound care. A recent review of SSI in vascular surgery showed rates as high as 30%, and the investigators' institution has reported a SSI rate of 20%. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus species are the most frequent isolates from SSI following peripheral vascular surgery, with the highly virulent organism, MRSA becoming increasingly prevalent. Gram-negative organisms account for another 20-30% of SSI, with Pseudomonas isolates commonly identified, particularly in the groin. Several procedure- and patient-related factors have emerged as important predictors of SSI following peripheral vascular surgery, among the most important of which are obesity, tissue loss, redo surgery, dialysis dependence and diabetes mellitus. Obesity has been found to double the risk of SSI. Obese patients are shown to have lower tissue concentrations of antibiotics, which would place them at higher risk of developing SSI. Patients with tissue loss secondary to critical limb ischemia also are at increased risk of SSI resulting from bacterial spread from contaminated ulcers and poor vascular supply to the wound. As well, patients undergoing redo surgery face an increased risk of wound and graft infection secondary to the impaired vascular supply and healing potential of scar tissue. Diabetes mellitus and dialysis dependence are also independent risk factors for SSI following infrainguinal bypass due to a multitude of disease factors, especially immunologic dysfunction and impaired blood supply to the healing tissue.
Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics are the only intervention thus far consistently found to effectively prevent SSI in patients undergoing vascular surgery, however because of the aforementioned factors such measures are less effective in high-risk patients. Data to support other perioperative practices to prevent wound infections in vascular surgery are sparse. Among other surgical disciplines, topical antibiotics are re-emerging as a valid strategy to prevent SSI based on improved understanding of the mechanisms of drug delivery and identification of high-risk patients. In particular, vancomycin applied directly to surgical wounds has shown promise in preventing SSI. Topical vancomycin is believed to prevent gram-positive SSI, particularly those caused by MRSA, while minimizing adverse events related to systemic exposure to vancomycin such as nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity by virtue of limited absorption from the tissue bed. There is one retrospective study in the vascular surgery literature of 454 patients undergoing aortofemoral or infrainguinal procedures that showed reduction of 30-day SSI rates with use of topical vancomycin compared to controls (25.1 vs. 17.2%, p=0.049). More extensive data regarding the use of topical vancomycin prophylaxis comes from the orthopaedic literature. A recent review of orthopaedic studies, although mostly retrospective, highlighted benefits in spine surgery, total joint arthroplasty, foot and ankle surgery and elbow surgery. Further, 8 spine meta-analyses since 2014 have shown reduction in SSI rates with topical vancomycin administration.
Local gentamicin applied to surgical wounds has also been found effective, particularly in the prevention of gram-negative SSI, providing broad gram-negative coverage including Pseudomonas species. One randomized controlled trial assessing the prophylactic use of collagen gentamicin sponge in 40 patients undergoing prosthetic femoropopliteal bypass found significant reduction in groin SSI with use of a collagen gentamicin sponge (Collatamp G). An additional prospective cohort study and case series data also show favorable results in small patient samples of patients An additional prospective cohort study and case series data also show favorable results in small patient samples of patients undergoing various vascular operations. Cardiac surgeons have reported effective use of this antibiotic locally in prevention of sternal wound infections. Notably, a large randomized, double blinded-controlled trial of 1950 patients undergoing cardiac surgery through median sternotomy demonstrated decreased SSI rates at 60 days with the use of gentamicin containing collagen implants compared to controls (4.3 vs. 9.0%, p<0.001). The ability of gentamicin eluting sponges to prevent SSI in sternal wounds was confirmed in a recent meta-analysis. These sponges achieve high local levels of gentamicin for 36 hours with minimal systemic absorption in addition to accelerating hemostasis. Recently, wound closure using topical vancomycin paste and gentamicin irrigation has been shown in a retrospective study to reduce SSI in cardiac surgery sternotomy wounds by almost two thirds.
In this trial, an aggressive prophylactic approach using selective administration of topical vancomycin and gentamicin to the surgical wounds of patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization at high-risk for SSI based on an elevated body mass index (BMI) >30, tissue loss, redo surgery, diabetes mellitus or renal failure will be compared to similar patients receiving standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and wound care to evaluate the impact on 90-day SSI rates.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin | Experimental | Drug: Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound)Immediately prior to closure of the incision, 1g of vancomycin will be mixed in 4mL of normal saline and applied as a paste directly to the muscle, fascia and subcutaneous tissue. Gentamicin-eluting collagen sponges will be cut to the appropriate size to cover the defect and applied after application of vancomycin. Following closure, the surgical site will be covered with a sterile dressing and left in place for 48hrs. |
| Control | No intervention | –The surgical wound is closed in the standard fashion with 3 layer closure with staples for skin. Following closure, the surgical site will be covered with a sterile dressing and left in place for 48hrs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients identified as requiring lower extremity bypass for peripheral arterial disease by their consultant surgeon with high-risk features for vascular surgical site infection including,
- BMI >30
- Dialysis dependence
- Redo surgery
- Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient does not provide informed consent for surgery or study
- Patient received antibiotics for an active infection within 7 days prior to surgery
- Patient has an allergy to gentamicin or vancomycin
- Patient has a pre-existing infection of the surgical site
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound)Topical vancomycin paste and gentamicin-eluting collagen sponge will be applied directly to the deep layers of the wound following reconstruction, prior to closure. | Drug | Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with surgical site infection (%)
Time frame: 90 days
Per CDC definition and according to Szilagyi classification
5 secondary outcomes
Length of stay
Time frame: Perioperative period
Number of Emergency Department Visits
Time frame: 90 days
Number of participants dying of any cause
Time frame: 90 days
Number of participants requiring re-operation
Time frame: 90 days
Number of participants requiring major lower limb amputation
Time frame: 90 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2020.
- Background: PubMed 18154995Nguyen LL, Brahmanandam S, Bandyk DF, Belkin M, Clowes AW, Moneta GL, Conte MS. Female gender and oral anticoagulants are associated with wound complications in lower extremity vein bypass: an analysis of 1404 operations for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1191-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.053.
- Background: PubMed 19619975Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Pomposelli FB, Wyers MC, Siracuse JJ, Schermerhorn ML. Body mass index: surgical site infections and mortality after lower extremity bypass from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2007. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;24(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 21458203Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Mell MW. Predictors of surgical site infection after open lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 19954920Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Carson JL, Haser PB, Lowry SF, Graham AM. Infectious complications after elective vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):122-9; discussion 129-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
- Background: PubMed 1656747Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):152S-157S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-z.
- Background: PubMed 24737857Turtiainen J, Hakala T. Surgical wound infections after peripheral vascular surgery. Scand J Surg. 2014 Dec;103(4):226-31. doi: 10.1177/1457496913514384. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
- Background: PubMed 18774446Bandyk DF. Vascular surgical site infection: risk factors and preventive measures. Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;21(3):119-23. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2008.05.008.
- Background: PubMed 21422859Pevzner L, Swank M, Krepel C, Wing DA, Chan K, Edmiston CE Jr. Effects of maternal obesity on tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):877-882. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820b95e4.
- Background: PubMed 22906362Ott E, Bange FC, Sohr D, Teebken O, Mattner F. Risk factors associated with surgical site infections following vascular surgery at a German university hospital. Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Jun;141(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1017/S095026881200180X. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 23312940Siracuse JJ, Nandivada P, Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, Chaikof EL, Pomposelli FB, Schermerhorn ML. Prosthetic graft infections involving the femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.049. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
- Background: PubMed 15472606Virkkunen J, Heikkinen M, Lepantalo M, Metsanoja R, Salenius JP; Finnvasc Study Group. Diabetes as an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications in critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Oct;40(4):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.040.
- Background: PubMed 12422107Ramdev P, Rayan SS, Sheahan M, Hamdan AD, Logerfo FW, Akbari CM, Campbell DR, Pomposelli FB Jr. A decade experience with infrainguinal revascularization in a dialysis-dependent patient population. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Nov;36(5):969-74. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.128297.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Vascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luc Dubois, MD, MSc principal investigator
London Health Sciences Centre
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound) in people with Vascular Diseases and Peripheral Vascular Disease, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dominic S LeBlanc, MD (5196858500 ext. 13846, dominic.leblanc@lhsc.on.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with surgical site infection (%) (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04238923, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2020.