Critical IllnessPhase 3EFFORTUSNCT04242966
The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Ultrasound a Sub-study
A Phase 3 study testing Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group and Ultrasound measure in people with Critical Illness and Malnutrition, run by Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General Hospital.
Trial summary
The investigators will evaluate the effects of of higher protein/amino acid dosing (≥2.2 g/kg/d) vs usual care of protein/amino acid dosing (≤1.2 g/kg/d) over muscle mass in nutritionally high risk ill patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Illness, Malnutrition
- What is being tested?
- Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group and Ultrasound measure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2020to 1 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- - ≥18 years old
- - Nutritionally 'high-risk' (meeting one of the below criteria)
- Low (≤25) or High BMI (≥35)
- Moderate to severe malnutrition (as defined by local assessments). We will document the means by which sites are making this determination and capture the elements of the assessment (history of weight loss, history of reduced oral intake, etc.).
- Frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale 5 or more from proxy)
- Sarcopenia- (SARC-F score of 4 or more from proxy)
- From point of screening, projected duration of mechanical ventilation >4 days
- - Requiring mechanical ventilation with actual or expected total duration of mechanical ventilation >48 hours
Who cannot join
- >96 continuous hours of mechanical ventilation before screening
- Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 7 days from screening
- Pregnant
- The responsible clinician feels that the patient either needs low or high protein
- Patient requires parenteral nutrition only and site does not have products to reach the high protein dose group.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Registry-based Randomized Trial: The EFFORT Ultrasound a Sub-study
The investigators will evaluate the effects of of higher protein/amino acid dosing (≥2.2 g/kg/d) vs usual care of protein/amino acid dosing (≤1.2 g/kg/d) over muscle mass in nutritionally high risk ill patients.
Read the detailed description
The EFFORT Ultrasound (US) is a sub study of the parent EFFORT trial; a multi-center, pragmatic, volunteer-driven, registry-based, randomized, clinical trial of 4000 nutritionally high-risk critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Patients will be randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups: a usual care prescription (≤1.2 g/kg/d) or a higher prescription (≥2.2 g/kg/d) of protein. Other than the protein amount the patient is randomized to, the remainder of care provided to randomized patient will be at the discretion of ICU providers.
In both groups, targets will be achieved through any combination of enteral nutrition (high protein content in high group if available), protein supplements, and parenteral nutrition or amino acids only (as clinically available). The only difference between the 2 groups is the protein targets that are set. Similar efforts should be used in both groups to achieve at least 80% of these targets. The remainder of care provided to eligible patients will be at the discretion of ICU providers.
Patients in the US sub-study will undergo the US measures at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done. To ensure standardization and quality in the measures, we have created high quality training materials and will have US films sent centrally to abstract all measurements. In the first 10 patients enrolled in the US sub-study, participating sites will conduct a run-in phase where their submitted data will be evaluated for quality and reliability (both intra and inter-rater reliability) to ensure subsequent measures are of high quality. Nutritional and clinical data for these patients will be included in the parent EFFORT trial but the US measures may be omitted if quality is poor.
The investigator has posed the following research question:
Primary Sub Study Research Question:
In critically ill patients with nutrition 'risk factors', what is the effect of prescribing a higher dose (≥2.2 grams/kg/day) of protein/amino acid administration compared to the usual care prescription (≤1.2 gram/kg/day) on muscle mass and quality, and 60 day mortality?
The proposed hypothesis:
Compared to receiving the usual care of protein/amino acids, the administration of a higher dose of protein/amino acids (a consequence of having a higher prescription) to nutritionally high-risk critically ill patients will be associated with greater muscle mass, improved survival and a quicker rate of recovery.
- Conditions
- Critical Illness, Malnutrition
- Being tested
- Usual Care, Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group, Ultrasound measure
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness, Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Usual CareOther
Protein targets will be set using pre-ICU dry actual weight. For patients with BMI >30, ideal body weight based on a BMI of 25 will be used. We will endorse the guidelines for energy targets set forth by ASPEN/SCCM, especially as it pertains to the obese patient.
Higher Protein/Amino Acid GroupOther
Protein targets will be set using pre-ICU dry actual weight. For patients with BMI >30, ideal body weight based on a BMI of 25 will be used. We will endorse the guidelines for energy targets set forth by ASPEN/SCCM, especially as it pertains to the obese patient.
Ultrasound measureOther
Patients will undergo the ultrasound measures at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, day 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Patients will receive a usual protein/amino acid dose (≤1.2 g/kg/d) Receives: Other: Usual Care; Other: Ultrasound measure |
| Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group | Active comparator | Patients will receive a higher protein/amino acid dose (≥2.2 g/kg/d). Receives: Other: Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group; Other: Ultrasound measure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of Muscle mass of the quadriceps from baseline to day 10 post randomization
Using ultrasound of quadriceps
Measured: at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, day 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done
Change of Muscle quality of the quadriceps from baseline to day 10 post randomization
Using ultrasound of quadriceps
Measured: at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, day 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2020
- Study start1 Nov 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Study never started. Operational issues prevented study from rolling out
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (75)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critical IllnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daren K. Heyland, Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General Hospital
- Investigators
- Daren K Heyland, MD, Principal investigator, Clinical Evaluation Research Unit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04242966
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- The EFFORT Ultrasound
- Acronym
- EFFORTUS
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 24 May 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hoffer LJ, Bistrian BR. Appropriate protein provision in critical illness: a systematic and narrative review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Sep;96(3):591-600. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.032078. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
PubMed 22811443Heyland DK, Cahill N, Day AG. Optimal amount of calories for critically ill patients: depends on how you slice the cake! Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2619-26. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318226641d.
PubMed 21705881Heyland DK, Weijs PJ, Coss-Bu JA, Taylor B, Kristof AS, O'Keefe GE, Martindale RG. Protein Delivery in the Intensive Care Unit: Optimal or Suboptimal? Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;32(1_suppl):58S-71S. doi: 10.1177/0884533617691245. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
PubMed 28388372James S, Rao SV, Granger CB. Registry-based randomized clinical trials--a new clinical trial paradigm. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 May;12(5):312-6. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.33. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
PubMed 25781411Frobert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M, Aasa M, Angeras O, Calais F, Danielewicz M, Erlinge D, Hellsten L, Jensen U, Johansson AC, Karegren A, Nilsson J, Robertson L, Sandhall L, Sjogren I, Ostlund O, Harnek J, James SK; TASTE Trial. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 24;369(17):1587-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308789. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
PubMed 23991656Jolly SS, Cairns JA, Yusuf S, Meeks B, Pogue J, Rokoss MJ, Kedev S, Thabane L, Stankovic G, Moreno R, Gershlick A, Chowdhary S, Lavi S, Niemela K, Steg PG, Bernat I, Xu Y, Cantor WJ, Overgaard CB, Naber CK, Cheema AN, Welsh RC, Bertrand OF, Avezum A, Bhindi R, Pancholy S, Rao SV, Natarajan MK, ten Berg JM, Shestakovska O, Gao P, Widimsky P, Dzavik V; TOTAL Investigators. Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 9;372(15):1389-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415098. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
PubMed 25853743Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Sevransky JE, Shanholtz C, Himmelfarb CR, Desai SV, Ciesla N, Herridge MS, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):849-59. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000040.
PubMed 24247473De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, Cerf C, Renaud E, Mesrati F, Carlet J, Raphael JC, Outin H, Bastuji-Garin S; Groupe de Reflexion et d'Etude des Neuromyopathies en Reanimation. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2859-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859.
PubMed 12472328Hermans G, Van Mechelen H, Clerckx B, Vanhullebusch T, Mesotten D, Wilmer A, Casaer MP, Meersseman P, Debaveye Y, Van Cromphaut S, Wouters PJ, Gosselink R, Van den Berghe G. Acute outcomes and 1-year mortality of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. A cohort study and propensity-matched analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 15;190(4):410-20. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2257OC.
PubMed 24825371Nicolo M, Heyland DK, Chittams J, Sammarco T, Compher C. Clinical Outcomes Related to Protein Delivery in a Critically Ill Population: A Multicenter, Multinational Observation Study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Jan;40(1):45-51. doi: 10.1177/0148607115583675. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
PubMed 25900319Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, Jeejeebhoy K, Day AG, Dhaliwal R, Heyland DK. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Oct;35(10):1728-37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1567-4. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
PubMed 19572118Heyland DK, Stephens KE, Day AG, McClave SA. The success of enteral nutrition and ICU-acquired infections: a multicenter observational study. Clin Nutr. 2011 Apr;30(2):148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
PubMed 20971534Liebau F, Sundstrom M, van Loon LJ, Wernerman J, Rooyackers O. Short-term amino acid infusion improves protein balance in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2015 Mar 12;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0844-6.
PubMed 25882298Hsieh LC, Chien SL, Huang MS, Tseng HF, Chang CK. Anti-inflammatory and anticatabolic effects of short-term beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in intensive care unit. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15(4):544-50.
PubMed 17077073Wei X, Day AG, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Heyland DK. The Association Between Nutritional Adequacy and Long-Term Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1569-79. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001000.
PubMed 25855901
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Registry-based Randomized Trial: The EFFORT Ultrasound a Sub-study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04242966
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFFORTUS / The EFFORT Ultrasound
- Conditions
- Critical Illness, Malnutrition
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study never started. Operational issues prevented study from rolling out
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will evaluate the effects of of higher protein/amino acid dosing (≥2.2 g/kg/d) vs usual care of protein/amino acid dosing (≤1.2 g/kg/d) over muscle mass in nutritionally high risk ill patients.
Detailed description
The EFFORT Ultrasound (US) is a sub study of the parent EFFORT trial; a multi-center, pragmatic, volunteer-driven, registry-based, randomized, clinical trial of 4000 nutritionally high-risk critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Patients will be randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups: a usual care prescription (≤1.2 g/kg/d) or a higher prescription (≥2.2 g/kg/d) of protein. Other than the protein amount the patient is randomized to, the remainder of care provided to randomized patient will be at the discretion of ICU providers.
In both groups, targets will be achieved through any combination of enteral nutrition (high protein content in high group if available), protein supplements, and parenteral nutrition or amino acids only (as clinically available). The only difference between the 2 groups is the protein targets that are set. Similar efforts should be used in both groups to achieve at least 80% of these targets. The remainder of care provided to eligible patients will be at the discretion of ICU providers.
Patients in the US sub-study will undergo the US measures at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done. To ensure standardization and quality in the measures, we have created high quality training materials and will have US films sent centrally to abstract all measurements. In the first 10 patients enrolled in the US sub-study, participating sites will conduct a run-in phase where their submitted data will be evaluated for quality and reliability (both intra and inter-rater reliability) to ensure subsequent measures are of high quality. Nutritional and clinical data for these patients will be included in the parent EFFORT trial but the US measures may be omitted if quality is poor.
The investigator has posed the following research question:
Primary Sub Study Research Question:
In critically ill patients with nutrition 'risk factors', what is the effect of prescribing a higher dose (≥2.2 grams/kg/day) of protein/amino acid administration compared to the usual care prescription (≤1.2 gram/kg/day) on muscle mass and quality, and 60 day mortality?
The proposed hypothesis:
Compared to receiving the usual care of protein/amino acids, the administration of a higher dose of protein/amino acids (a consequence of having a higher prescription) to nutritionally high-risk critically ill patients will be associated with greater muscle mass, improved survival and a quicker rate of recovery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Other: Usual Care, Other: Ultrasound measurePatients will receive a usual protein/amino acid dose (≤1.2 g/kg/d) |
| Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group | Active comparator | Other: Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group, Other: Ultrasound measurePatients will receive a higher protein/amino acid dose (≥2.2 g/kg/d). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- - ≥18 years old
- - Nutritionally 'high-risk' (meeting one of the below criteria)
- - Requiring mechanical ventilation with actual or expected total duration of mechanical ventilation >48 hours
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- >96 continuous hours of mechanical ventilation before screening
- Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 7 days from screening
- Pregnant
- The responsible clinician feels that the patient either needs low or high protein
- Patient requires parenteral nutrition only and site does not have products to reach the high protein dose group.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Usual CareProtein targets will be set using pre-ICU dry actual weight. For patients with BMI >30, ideal body weight based on a BMI of 25 will be used. We will endorse the guidelines for energy targets set forth by ASPEN/SCCM, especially as it pertains to the obese patient. | Other | Usual Care |
| Higher Protein/Amino Acid GroupProtein targets will be set using pre-ICU dry actual weight. For patients with BMI >30, ideal body weight based on a BMI of 25 will be used. We will endorse the guidelines for energy targets set forth by ASPEN/SCCM, especially as it pertains to the obese patient. | Other | Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group |
| Ultrasound measurePatients will undergo the ultrasound measures at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, day 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done. | Other | Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group, Usual Care |
Primary outcome
Change of Muscle mass of the quadriceps from baseline to day 10 post randomization
Time frame: at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, day 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done
Using ultrasound of quadriceps
Change of Muscle quality of the quadriceps from baseline to day 10 post randomization
Time frame: at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, day 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done
Using ultrasound of quadriceps
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2020.
- Background: PubMed 22811443Hoffer LJ, Bistrian BR. Appropriate protein provision in critical illness: a systematic and narrative review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Sep;96(3):591-600. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.032078. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
- Background: PubMed 21705881Heyland DK, Cahill N, Day AG. Optimal amount of calories for critically ill patients: depends on how you slice the cake! Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2619-26. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318226641d.
- Background: PubMed 28388372Heyland DK, Weijs PJ, Coss-Bu JA, Taylor B, Kristof AS, O'Keefe GE, Martindale RG. Protein Delivery in the Intensive Care Unit: Optimal or Suboptimal? Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;32(1_suppl):58S-71S. doi: 10.1177/0884533617691245. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
- Background: PubMed 25781411James S, Rao SV, Granger CB. Registry-based randomized clinical trials--a new clinical trial paradigm. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 May;12(5):312-6. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.33. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 23991656Frobert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M, Aasa M, Angeras O, Calais F, Danielewicz M, Erlinge D, Hellsten L, Jensen U, Johansson AC, Karegren A, Nilsson J, Robertson L, Sandhall L, Sjogren I, Ostlund O, Harnek J, James SK; TASTE Trial. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 24;369(17):1587-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308789. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
- Background: PubMed 25853743Jolly SS, Cairns JA, Yusuf S, Meeks B, Pogue J, Rokoss MJ, Kedev S, Thabane L, Stankovic G, Moreno R, Gershlick A, Chowdhary S, Lavi S, Niemela K, Steg PG, Bernat I, Xu Y, Cantor WJ, Overgaard CB, Naber CK, Cheema AN, Welsh RC, Bertrand OF, Avezum A, Bhindi R, Pancholy S, Rao SV, Natarajan MK, ten Berg JM, Shestakovska O, Gao P, Widimsky P, Dzavik V; TOTAL Investigators. Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 9;372(15):1389-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415098. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 24247473Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Sevransky JE, Shanholtz C, Himmelfarb CR, Desai SV, Ciesla N, Herridge MS, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):849-59. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000040.
- Background: PubMed 12472328De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, Cerf C, Renaud E, Mesrati F, Carlet J, Raphael JC, Outin H, Bastuji-Garin S; Groupe de Reflexion et d'Etude des Neuromyopathies en Reanimation. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2859-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859.
- Background: PubMed 24825371Hermans G, Van Mechelen H, Clerckx B, Vanhullebusch T, Mesotten D, Wilmer A, Casaer MP, Meersseman P, Debaveye Y, Van Cromphaut S, Wouters PJ, Gosselink R, Van den Berghe G. Acute outcomes and 1-year mortality of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. A cohort study and propensity-matched analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 15;190(4):410-20. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2257OC.
- Background: PubMed 25900319Nicolo M, Heyland DK, Chittams J, Sammarco T, Compher C. Clinical Outcomes Related to Protein Delivery in a Critically Ill Population: A Multicenter, Multinational Observation Study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Jan;40(1):45-51. doi: 10.1177/0148607115583675. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
- Background: PubMed 19572118Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, Jeejeebhoy K, Day AG, Dhaliwal R, Heyland DK. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Oct;35(10):1728-37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1567-4. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 20971534Heyland DK, Stephens KE, Day AG, McClave SA. The success of enteral nutrition and ICU-acquired infections: a multicenter observational study. Clin Nutr. 2011 Apr;30(2):148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Critical Illness
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
Active, not recruiting
Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit
Psychomotor Agitation, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Core Competencies in General Intensive Care Ultrasound (GenIUS): a Delphi Study
Critical Illness, Ultrasound
RecruitingObservational study
Predicting Extubation Failure Using Machine Learning
Extubation Failure, Critical Illness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daren K Heyland, MD principal investigator
Clinical Evaluation Research Unit
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Higher Protein/Amino Acid Group and Ultrasound measure in people with Critical Illness and Malnutrition, run by Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of Muscle mass of the quadriceps from baseline to day 10 post randomization (time frame: at baseline (within 24 hours of randomization, day 10 days post randomization (if still in hospital) and just prior to hospital discharge. In the event that hospital discharge is prior to day 10, the day 10 measure will not be done). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04242966, which also lists 75 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2020.