Low Back PainPNMESlowbackNCT04243915
Percutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
A study of Low Back Pain, run by Universidad Rey Juan Carlos at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Chronic low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition affects the general population. Low back pain constitutes a major burden to health care system and society. Several authors have found that the deep abdominal muscles and multifidus are affected in low back pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 10 Apr 2021to 10 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Low back pain more than 90 days of evolution
Who cannot join
- Spondylarthrosis
- History of fractures, luxations, surgery and/or musculoskeletal disorders in low back and lower limb.
- Leg pain or neuropathic pain (LANSS <12).
- Neurological disorders, inflammatory and/or degenerative diseases.
- Having received as treatment techniques that involve needles on the previous 6 months to study enrollment or having received percutaneous electrical stimulation as a treatment before.
- Physiotherapy treatment in the last 4 weeks.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Specific lumbar pathology, fibromyalgia, unstable cardiovascular diseases, pregnant women or under suspect of pregnancy.
- Contraindications of needle's insertions: anticoagulant therapy, needle phobia, diabetes, hypothyroidism, lymphoedema, muscular diseases).
- Contraindications of electrical current.
- Drugs: morphine or opioids drugs.
- Depression
- Judicial dispute
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922
Josue Fernández-Carnero, PhD, +34914888949, josue.fernandez@urjc.es
Josue Fernandez-Carnero, PhD
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Percutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Lumbar Multifidus in Combination With a Protocol of Motor Control Exercises in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition affects the general population. Low back pain constitutes a major burden to health care system and society. Several authors have found that the deep abdominal muscles and multifidus are affected in low back pain. Dry needling has shown improve the cross-sectional area of the multifidus. Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation has shown reduce pain in several conditions. There are not studies that had investigated the impact of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) in the deep muscles in patients with chronic low back pain.
Hypothesis: PNMES in the multifidus muscle plus motor control exercise program in patients with chronic low back pain is better than sham PNMES plus exercise and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) plus exercise
Read the detailed description
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial, using percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES). PNMES is technique to provide a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation current throughout needling filaments place close to the nerve.
Study Aims:
Aim #1: The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PNMES on muscle activation (increased cross-sectional area in activation) and the function of multifidus and abdominal transverse muscle in patients with chronic low back pain with random assignment to four treatments: PENS plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program or Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program.
Aim #2: The secondary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PNMES on pain as measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire, pressure pain threshold (PPT), area and distribution of pain, conditioned pain modulation and temporal summation in patients with chronic low back pain with random assignment to four treatments: PNMES plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program or Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program.
Aim #3: To compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PNMES on disability as measured by Oswestry Disability Index, strength and quality of life with random assignment to four treatments: PENS plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program or Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program.
Aim #4: To estimate the immediate effects of the PNMES technique after the first session.
Aim #5: To determine if psychological factors (anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophism) change with any of the treatments and if is related with the primary and secondary outcomes.
Aim #6: To evaluate the change perceived by the patient measured with Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC).
Aim Aim #7: Validation of placebo groups by assessing patient blindness
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) plus motor control exercise program, Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program, TENS plus motor control exercise program, Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program
- Keywords
- Percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, Percutaneous electrical stimulation, Motor control exercise, Multifidus, Abdominal transverse, Non-specific chronic low back pain, Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, Exercise therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) plus motor control exercise programOther
Also called Percutaneous electric nerve stimulation (PENS)
The technique consists of a muscular stimulation of the deep lumbar multifidus by means of a TENS current applied through four dry needling or acupuncture needles introduced by ultrasound guidance in said muscle 30 minutes. This will add to a protocol of motor control exercises for deep abdominal and lumbar muscles.
Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise programOther
Also called Sham PENS
The same procedure will be performed as in the experimental treatment, but in this case, the electric current will be placebo and only the first 15 seconds will slightly notice it. This will add to a protocol of motor control exercises for deep abdominal and lumbar muscles.
TENS plus motor control exercise programOther
Also called TENS
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation will be applied through 4 patches / adhesives placed in your lower back for 30 minutes. This will add to a protocol of motor control exercises for deep abdominal and lumbar muscles.
Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise programOther
Also called Sham PENS
The same procedure will be performed as in the experimental treatment, but in this case, the needle will not be inserted and the electric current will be placebo and only the first 15 seconds will slightly notice it. This will add to a protocol of motor control exercises for deep abdominal and lumbar muscles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PNMES plus exercise | Experimental | 6-week intervention program with 3 treatment sessions of PNMES and motor control exercise program. Receives: Other: Percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) plus motor control exercise program |
| Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus exercise | Sham comparator | Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program Receives: Other: Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program |
| TENS plus exercise | Active comparator | 6-week intervention program with 3 treatment sessions of TENS plus motor control exercise program. Receives: Other: TENS plus motor control exercise program |
| Placebo PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus exercise | Placebo comparator | 6-week intervention program with 3 treatment sessions of placebo PNMES (without inserting the needle) and exercise Receives: Other: Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Increased cross-sectional area in activation
The increase in height from the resting position to the submaximal contraction in the lumbar multifidus will be measured
Measured: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Changes in the measurements of the multifidus and tranverse of the abdomen at rest.
Changes in the height of the multifidus at rest
Measured: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Secondary outcomes (14)
Intensity of Pain
Will be measure with a line of 100 mmm (0 - no pain to 100- the worst pain) at rest and his best and worst pain in the last 24 hours.
Measured: (Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1 (only at rest), 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Pressure pain threshold using an algometer
Measurement of pressure pain threshold in the paravertebral muscles, in the spinous process of L4, and the tibialis anterior muscle.
Measured: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Temporal summation
Ten consecutives pressure pain stimulus will be conducted, pain intensity in the first, fifth and tenth will be asked. The difference from 1 to 10 will be the value that reports on the state of excitability of the posterior horn of the medulla
Measured: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Conditioned pain modulation
First, pressure pain stimulus (test stimulus) will be conducted in the distal phalanx of the thumb. Second, occlusion cuff will be inflated around the arm of patient until the patient feeling a painful intensity (conditioned stimulus) of 6/10. Finally, after 30 seconds the stimulus will be done. The difference in the mean value of the initial algometry with the mean value of algometry during the conditioning stimulus will indicate the state of the descending pain inhibitory system.
Measured: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Pain Grade Questionnaire
The scale assesses two dimensions: the intensity of pain and pain related to disability. It can be used in any chronic pathology including musculoskeletal problems and low back pain. It allows the graduation of the severity of chronic pain and the subsequent analysis of the qualitative changes for that pain. The scale has 7 items, which are of the Likert type of 11 points, with a total range of 0 to 70 points.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Oswestry Disability Index or Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated, self-reported instrument used by clinicians and researchers to quantify disability for low back pain.
The self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel. Each topic category is followed by 6 statements describing different potential scenarios in the patient's life relating to the topic. The patient then checks the statement which most closely resembles their situation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Short form 12 (SF-12) health survey (health-related quality of life)
The SF-12 is a validated, health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP). Mental health-related scales include Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). The instrument has been validated across a number of chronic diseases and conditions. The response options of the SF-12 v2 form Likert-type scales that evaluate intensity or frequency. The number of answer options ranges from three to six, depending on the item, and each question is given a value which is then transformed into a scale from 0 to 100.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Kinesiophobia
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. To assess the fear of movement and pain-related fear. The 11 items are scored 1-4, with total scores ranging from 11 to 44. The addition of all the points obtained from each of the items results in the level of kinesiophobia, with higher scores indicating greater perceived kinesiophobia
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Pain catastrophizing
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). This tool is a 13-item questionnaire designed to measure the three components of pain-related catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness, resulting in a unique score. Each item is responded to on a 5-point scale (0 not at all, 4 all the time) relating the degree to which the individual experiences a thought or feeling of a painful situation.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
The Becks Depression Inventory-II
The Becks Depression Inventory-II is a validated, self-administered questionnaire consisting of 21 multiple choice questions. It is one of the most commonly used instruments to measure the severity of a depression. Possible scores range from 0 (no depression) to 63 (severe depression).
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Anxiety
The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) is a questionnaire that measures trait anxiety (a personality factor that predisposes the patient to suffer from anxiety) and the state of anxiety (environmental factors that protect or generate anxiety). Each of the two sub-scales (trait anxiety and state anxiety) consists of 20 items, ranging from 0 (nothing) to 3 (a lot).
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Global Rating of Change Scale
Global Rating of Change (GRoC) scales provide a means of measuring self-perceived change in health status. Possible scores range from -5 (very much worse), through 0 (unchanged) to +5 (completely recovered).
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Blinding the patient
The patients of the sham groups will be asked after the interventions of PNMES if they belonged to the group of deep electro-stimulation, being able to content: Sure that yes, moderately that yes, I do not know, moderately that no or sure that no.
Measured: 1 hour from baseline after the PNMES treatment 1, 2 weeks from baseline after the second PNMES treatment and 4 weeks from baseline after the third PNMES treatment
Central Sensitization Inventory
The Spanish version of the Central Sensitisation Inventory will be used to identify symptoms related to central sensitisation. It is a self-report questionnaire that assesses a total of 25 sensitisation-associated symptoms on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where >40/100 points suggest the presence of sensitisation-associated symptoms. It has been found to have high reliability and validity.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2020
- Study start10 Apr 2021
- Primary completion10 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Josue Fernandez Carnero, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
- Investigators
- Josue Fernández-Carnero, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04243915
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC 01/2019
- Acronym
- PNMESlowback
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 15 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Percutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Lumbar Multifidus in Combination With a Protocol of Motor Control Exercises in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04243915
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PNMESlowback / EC 01/2019
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- Percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, Percutaneous electrical stimulation, Motor control exercise, Multifidus, Abdominal transverse, Non-specific chronic low back pain, Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Rey Juan CarlosUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition affects the general population. Low back pain constitutes a major burden to health care system and society. Several authors have found that the deep abdominal muscles and multifidus are affected in low back pain. Dry needling has shown improve the cross-sectional area of the multifidus. Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation has shown reduce pain in several conditions. There are not studies that had investigated the impact of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) in the deep muscles in patients with chronic low back pain.
Hypothesis: PNMES in the multifidus muscle plus motor control exercise program in patients with chronic low back pain is better than sham PNMES plus exercise and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) plus exercise
Detailed description
Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial, using percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES). PNMES is technique to provide a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation current throughout needling filaments place close to the nerve.
Study Aims:
Aim #1: The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PNMES on muscle activation (increased cross-sectional area in activation) and the function of multifidus and abdominal transverse muscle in patients with chronic low back pain with random assignment to four treatments: PENS plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program or Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program.
Aim #2: The secondary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PNMES on pain as measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire, pressure pain threshold (PPT), area and distribution of pain, conditioned pain modulation and temporal summation in patients with chronic low back pain with random assignment to four treatments: PNMES plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program or Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program.
Aim #3: To compare the effect of the short, medium and long-term of PNMES on disability as measured by Oswestry Disability Index, strength and quality of life with random assignment to four treatments: PENS plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program or Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) plus motor control exercise program or Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program.
Aim #4: To estimate the immediate effects of the PNMES technique after the first session.
Aim #5: To determine if psychological factors (anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophism) change with any of the treatments and if is related with the primary and secondary outcomes.
Aim #6: To evaluate the change perceived by the patient measured with Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC).
Aim Aim #7: Validation of placebo groups by assessing patient blindness
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PNMES plus exercise | Experimental | Other: Percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) plus motor control exercise program6-week intervention program with 3 treatment sessions of PNMES and motor control exercise program. |
| Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus exercise | Sham comparator | Other: Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise programSham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise program |
| TENS plus exercise | Active comparator | Other: TENS plus motor control exercise program6-week intervention program with 3 treatment sessions of TENS plus motor control exercise program. |
| Placebo PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus exercise | Placebo comparator | Other: Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise program6-week intervention program with 3 treatment sessions of placebo PNMES (without inserting the needle) and exercise |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Low back pain more than 90 days of evolution
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Spondylarthrosis
- History of fractures, luxations, surgery and/or musculoskeletal disorders in low back and lower limb.
- Leg pain or neuropathic pain (LANSS <12).
- Neurological disorders, inflammatory and/or degenerative diseases.
- Having received as treatment techniques that involve needles on the previous 6 months to study enrollment or having received percutaneous electrical stimulation as a treatment before.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) plus motor control exercise programAlso: Percutaneous electric nerve stimulation (PENS)The technique consists of a muscular stimulation of the deep lumbar multifidus by means of a TENS current applied through four dry needling or acupuncture needles introduced by ultrasound guidance in said muscle 30 minutes. This will add to a protocol of motor control exercises for deep abdominal and lumbar muscles. | Other | PNMES plus exercise |
| Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus motor control exercise programAlso: Sham PENSThe same procedure will be performed as in the experimental treatment, but in this case, the electric current will be placebo and only the first 15 seconds will slightly notice it. This will add to a protocol of motor control exercises for deep abdominal and lumbar muscles. | Other | Sham PNMES (introducing the needle) plus exercise |
| TENS plus motor control exercise programAlso: TENSTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation will be applied through 4 patches / adhesives placed in your lower back for 30 minutes. This will add to a protocol of motor control exercises for deep abdominal and lumbar muscles. | Other | TENS plus exercise |
| Sham PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus motor control exercise programAlso: Sham PENSThe same procedure will be performed as in the experimental treatment, but in this case, the needle will not be inserted and the electric current will be placebo and only the first 15 seconds will slightly notice it. This will add to a protocol of motor control exercises for deep abdominal and lumbar muscles. | Other | Placebo PNMES (without inserting the needle) plus exercise |
Primary outcome
Increased cross-sectional area in activation
Time frame: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
The increase in height from the resting position to the submaximal contraction in the lumbar multifidus will be measured
Changes in the measurements of the multifidus and tranverse of the abdomen at rest.
Time frame: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Changes in the height of the multifidus at rest
14 secondary outcomes
Intensity of Pain
Time frame: (Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1 (only at rest), 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Pressure pain threshold using an algometer
Time frame: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Temporal summation
Time frame: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Conditioned pain modulation
Time frame: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Pain Grade Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Oswestry Disability Index or Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Short form 12 (SF-12) health survey (health-related quality of life)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Kinesiophobia
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Pain catastrophizing
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
The Becks Depression Inventory-II
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Anxiety
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Global Rating of Change Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Blinding the patient
Time frame: 1 hour from baseline after the PNMES treatment 1, 2 weeks from baseline after the second PNMES treatment and 4 weeks from baseline after the third PNMES treatment
Central Sensitization Inventory
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Josue Fernández-Carnero, PhD principal investigator
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Low Back Pain, run by Universidad Rey Juan Carlos at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alberto Arribas-Roamno, MsC (635937520, albertoarribasromano@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Increased cross-sectional area in activation (time frame: Baseline, one hour from baseline after PNMES treatment 1, 6 weeks from baseline, 18 weeks from baseline and 30 weeks from baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2023.