Airway MorbiditySDLMvsTCLMNCT04244565
Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies
An observational study of Airway Morbidity and Nurse's Role, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents Introduction Airway crisis situations in ICUs (Intensive Care Units) are common, complex, dynamic and time-sensitive contexts, that pose a significant threat to patient… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Airway Morbidity, Nurse's Role, Airway Obstruction
- What is being tested?
- Self-directed model of clinical learning for nurses
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2020to 1 Aug 2021
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: A convenience sample of 60 male and female Critically Care Nurses who are working in the selected Intensive Care Unit
Who may be able to join
- Willing to participate in this study.
- Working for at least one month in the current position.
- Maximum two years of experience in critical care.
Who cannot join
- Nurses who attended any educational courses in Airway management in last 6 months, will be excluded.
- Nurses planning to leave work 6 months later, will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents
Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents
Introduction Airway crisis situations in ICUs (Intensive Care Units) are common, complex, dynamic and time-sensitive contexts, that pose a significant threat to patient safety, and are a major source of preventable errors. Airway management has the highest priority in patient care, it is the first step in the (ABCDE) approach. The concept of Airway management in nursing perspective includes any nursing procedures and techniques required to keep the airway open and prevent aspiration. Adult learning is a practice in which adults engage in systematic and sustained learning activities in order to gain new forms of knowledge, skills or values. Most adult education is voluntary; therefore, the participants are generally self-motivated. Continuing education (CE) of nurses is increasingly necessary to keep abreast of rapid changes in patient care due to advancements in knowledge and technology and improve their ability to serve the patients safely. Although nursing care has been changed significantly over the past 30 years, methods for clinical training nurses have not. A popular or traditional model for clinical teaching of nurses, including but not limited to; integrating lectures, skills laboratory training and supervised clinical experience. A benefit of this model is the opportunity to assist nurses to integrate the concept learned in class or skill lab in patient care. Also, the instructor can select clinical activities that best meet nurses' needs and are consistent with hospital goals. While, Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of modern approaches of clinical learning, the concept of SDL originates from the Adult Learning Theory, it is a process in which the instructors play a facilitating role while, learners actively participate in identifying their own learning needs, learning goals, allocating resources \& decide whether learning method can be used, and engaging in self-reflection \& evaluation. The positive outcomes of SDL including but not limited to, greater self-control, self-confidence, autonomy, and lifelong learning skills. In essence the aim of this study will be examining the effect of Self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize airway related incidents.
Read more
Research Hypothesis H1: Critically care nurses who will approach self-directed clinical learning model (μ1) will have a higher level of Airway management skills (μ2), (H1: μ1 > μ2).
H1: Intensive care units who will approach self-directed clinical learning model to learn their working nurses (μ1) will have a lower frequency of patients' airway-related incidents (μ2), (H1: μ1 < μ2).
Subjects and Methods True experimental, prospective, and comparative research design will be utilized in the current study. This study will be conducted at selected two Adult Intensive Care Units, A convenience sample of 60 male and female Critically Care Nurses who are working in the selected Intensive Care Unit, will be recruited to the study. The sample size estimated by (G Power analysis) (independent t tests - One tail, Effect size = 0.65, α = 0.05, Power (1-β) = 0.80, balanced allocation ratio 1:1). The total sample size will be divided into two groups (study and control). All nurses should be corresponded to specific inclusion criteria.
Five tools will be formulated to collect data pertinent to the study.
Procedure The study will be conducted through three phases; preparation \& designation, implementation, and follow up \& evaluation phase. The 1st Part will be initiated by allocating the selected ICUs randomly into two paired settings, one for applying traditional learning (control ICU) and the other for self-directed learning experimentation (study ICU). the nurses who are working in selected ICUs and correspond to the inclusion criteria, will be randomly distributed into two equal groups (30 nurses in each group). The nurses who are working in study ICU will be asked to fill out the nurses' readiness assessment sheet to learn independently. The nurses who will demonstrate a high readiness score (>80%) for independent learning will be included. Once implantation is complete, the follow-up and evaluation phase will be initiated by daily monitoring of the occurrence of patients' airway related incidents in both control and study ICUs for a continuous three months. Then, the nurses' knowledge and practices (in the control group) will be evaluated two times, 1st time will be 1 month after the implementation phase, and the second time will be after 3 months from the 1st evaluation (to measure the retention of given education and training). Upon completion of data collection, descriptive and inferential statistics will be utilized to test for differences among the study and control group subjects.
Read the detailed description
Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents
Introduction
Airway crisis situations in ICUs (Intensive Care Units) are common, complex, dynamic and time-sensitive contexts, that pose a significant threat to patient safety, and are a major source of preventable errors [1]. Although, only a few studies have demonstrated the airway incidents in ICUs, 7.04% of ICU patients developed airway incidents [2]. The UK National Reporting and Learning Centre identified that 82% of ICU airway incidents occurred in patient with ETT, with 25% contributing to the patient's death [3]. The concept of Airway management in nursing perspective includes any nursing procedures and techniques required to keep the airway open and prevent aspiration [4]. In fact, Airway management has the highest priority in patient care, it is the first step in the (ABCDE) approach. Several nursing related factors that can directly or indirectly cause a patient to have airway crises either patient intubated or even non-intubated, such factors include a partial or complete airway obstruction, injury or infection [5,6]. However, Airway management procedures and techniques (Table 1) are rapidly changing, there is a need for structured innovative training models related to Airway management education for critical care nurses to develop nurses' competences and subsequently will enhance patients' outcomes [7,8,9].
Adult learning has specific characteristics, adult education is a practice in which adults engage in systematic and sustained learning activities in order to gain new forms of knowledge, skills or values. Adults have already accumulated knowledge and work experience which can add to their learning experience. Most adult education is voluntary; therefore, the participants are generally self-motivated. Furthermore, adults apply their knowledge in a practical fashion to learn effectively. They must have a reasonable expectation that the knowledge they gain will indeed help them further their goals [10].
Continuing education (CE) of nurses is increasingly necessary to keep abreast of rapid changes in patient care due to advancements in knowledge and technology, nurses also should be well motivated to enroll in CE hospital activity to upgrade their professional skills and knowledge to remain current in their professional practices and improve their ability to serve the patients safely [11]. Clinical placements provide opportunities for nurses to learn experientially. To create a constructive learning environment nursing staff, need to be friendly, approachable, available and willing to learn. Also, CE should be providing adequate opportunities for nurses to develop confidence and competence in clinical skill with a focus on nurses' learning needs rather than service needs of the facilities [12].
Although nursing care has been changed significantly over the past 30 years, methods for clinical training nurses have not [13]. A popular or traditional model for clinical teaching of nurses, including but not limited to; integrating lectures, skills laboratory training and supervised clinical experience. A benefit of this model is the opportunity to assist nurses to integrate the concept learned in class or skill lab in patient care. Also, the instructor can select clinical activities that best meet nurses' needs and are consistent with hospital goals [14]. In addition, the low confidant nurses prefer this type of clinical teaching because they feel more secure [15]. On the other side, the traditional model for clinical teaching contributes to poor critical thinking and reasoning development among nurses and results in task-oriented approaches to teaching and learning. Consequently, nurses may lack the capacity to think through interventions that lead to positive patient outcomes [16]. Therefore, there is a need to find innovative approaches to effectively train nurses to better prepare them for today's health care environment. These innovative approaches may increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the clinical nursing education system [13].
Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of these modern approaches of clinical learning, the concept of SDL originates from the Adult Learning Theory. This theory suggests that adults are pragmatic and problem-focused individuals whose learning are mainly affected by experiential rather than passive approaches [17]. Self-directed learning was applied and examined on nursing students as well as working nurses who are engaged in an on-going continuing training [18]. Self-directed learning is a process in which the instructors play a facilitating role while, learners actively participate in identifying their own learning needs, learning goals, allocating resources \& decide whether learning method can be used, and engaging in self-reflection \& evaluation. The positive outcomes of SDL including but not limited to, greater self-control, self-confidence, autonomy, and lifelong learning skills [17]. While, SDL may helpful, there is an increasing awareness that SDL is not universally applicable to all learners and all situations. Also, the majority of nurses not familiar with SDL approach of learning they preferred and felt more secure with traditional teacher-centered approach as they usually learned in schools [19]. Self-directed learning can be challenging, even for the brightest and most motivated nurses. Therefore, it should apply in a systematic way to maximize the benefits. four key stages to apply SDL; being ready to learn independently, setting learning goals, engaging in the learning process by understanding themselves and their needs (the discrepancy between the present level of competence and the required level of competency), and evaluating learning [20, 21].
Successful independent study requires certain responsibilities or roles of both nurses and instructor. It is useful for both to communicate as to whether each feels the other is fulfilling their share of the responsibility. nurses' roles include; self-assess readiness to learn, define your learning goals, monitor learning process, be self-motivated, re-evaluate and alter goals as required, consult with instructor as required. While, instructors' roles; Build a co-operative learning environment, help to motivate and direct the nurses' learning experience, facilitate learning, be available for consultations as appropriate during the learning process, serve as an advisor rather than a formal instructor [22]. In essence the aim of this study will be examining the effect of Self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize airway related incidents.
Research Hypothesis H1: Critically care nurses who will approach self-directed clinical learning model (μ1) will have a higher level of Airway management skills (μ2), (H1: μ1 > μ2).
H1: Intensive care units who will approach self-directed clinical learning model to learn their working nurses (μ1) will have a lower frequency of patients' airway-related incidents (μ2), (H1: μ1 < μ2).
Subjects and Methods
Research Design:
True experimental, prospective, and comparative research design will be utilized in the current study. The study will be conducting a nursing self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize patients' airway related incidents.
Ethical Consideration:
An official permission to conduct the proposed study will be obtained from the ethical committee. Also. Participation in the study is voluntary; each subject has the right to withdraw from the study when he or she wants. Informed consent will be obtained from the subjects. Confidentiality and anonymity of the subjects are assured through coding of all data; subjects will be assured that these data will not be reused in another research without their permission, collected data will be used for the purpose of the research only and The entire needed sample in the study will be followed until been analyzed. All information taken will be protected and will not affect their annual appraisal by any mean. The formulated database and the result of the current study will be raising the awareness of all health professionals and incorporating in the future plan of care.
Procedure:
The study will be conducted through three phases; preparation \& designation, implementation, and follow up \& evaluation phase. The preparation \& designation phase will be concerned with taken the official permission and ethical approval. Also, it includes a recent review of related literatures, and preparation of the different (constructed and adapted) study tools and formulate the latest evidenced educational content and materials related to airway nursing management. These tools and educational content will be revised by medical and nursing expert to ensure its content validity.
Once the official permission and ethical approval are granted to proceed the proposed study, the implementation phase will be applied in two parts:
The 1st Part will be initiated by allocating the selected ICUs randomly into two paired settings, one for applying traditional learning (control ICU) and the other for self-directed learning experimentation (study ICU). the nurses who are working in selected ICUs and correspond to the inclusion criteria, will be randomly distributed into two equal groups (30 nurses in each group). The nurses who are working in study ICU will be asked to fill out the nurses' readiness assessment sheet to learn independently (tool 4). The nurses who will demonstrate a high readiness score (>80%) for independent learning will be included. if the nurses number exceeding the intended number (30 nurses), the highest scores will be selected.
Self-directed clinical learning model:
The concept of Airway management will be nominated for participant nurses to be an area of investigation. each nurse will be asked to fulfill the pre-structured Learning contract between nurses and instructors within one week, the contract will include the following items.
- Goals for the area of learning (the researcher will confirm the congruence with the expected goals).
- Structure and sequence of activities.
- Timeline for completion of activities (maximum one month).
- Details about resource materials for each goal.
- Feedback and evaluation as each goal is completed.
- Meeting plan with the instructors.
- Self-reflection and self-evaluation methods. the researchers will facilitate all nurses' stated resources incorporation with hospital manager such as (Sill lab., computer lab., internet, hard books, digital books, clinical instructions, or Egyptian Knowledge Bank).
Traditional clinical learning model It will concern the Airway management competencies; it will be given within one month and it will take place during working hours.
- the researcher will divide the participant (30 nurses) into two main groups (15 nurses in each), each group will be given pre-scheduled integrated lectures related to theoretical background of Airway management. Four lectures will be given once per-week, 2 hours long, written handouts will be given.
- After each driven lecture, the researcher will give a supportive four hours skill laboratory training by traditional 2 stages, methods ("see one, do one"). This traditional "2-stage approach" was standard for improving clinical practices.
- Then, the researchers will provide a clinical supervision and guidance for the participant nurses to ensure that they will able to apply what they learned in real settings.
Once implantation is complete, the follow-up and evaluation phase will be initiated by daily monitoring of the occurrence of patients' airway related incidents in both control and study ICUs for a continuous three months (tool 3). Then, the nurses' knowledge and practices (in the control group) will be evaluated two times, 1st time will be 1 month after the implementation phase, and the second time will be after 3 months from the 1st evaluation (to measure the retention of given education and training), tools (1, 2) will be utilized, and it will be completed by blinded assessors (who were not part of the research team). On the other side, the study group of self-directed learning will be self-evaluated by using tools (1, 2) and also will be evaluated two times like control group. Finally, the researcher will compare the results (outcome given by self-directed learning) to the collected baseline data (control group) which will be given as usual ongoing traditional learning.
- Being tested
- Self-directed model of clinical learning for nurses
- Keywords
- Self-directed, Traditional Clinical Learning
- Medical subject headings
- Airway Obstruction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Self-directed model of clinical learning for nursesBehavioural
Also called compared to the traditional models
the instructors play a facilitating role while, learners actively participate in identifying their own learning needs, learning goals, allocating resources \& decide whether learning method can be used, and engaging in self-reflection \& evaluation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Self-directed clinical learning | examining the effect of Self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize airway related incidents. Receives: Behavioral: Self-directed model of clinical learning for nurses |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Structured questionnaire schedule to assess nurses' knowledge (Level) regarding Airway management related issues.
Nurses' Airway management competencies need a wide theoretical background aimed to practice based on rational and evidence. Airway management has the highest priority in patient care. Nurses' knowledge regarding Airway management consists of different issues such as; (1) Causes of Airway obstructions (2) Ways to maintain Airway clear (3) Management of ETT cuff pressure. (4) Airway assessment items. This questionnaire will be self-administrated for the group who will be applied self-directed clinical learning model. While, it will be conducted by the clinical instructor by interview for the group who will be applying the traditional clinical learning model. The tool consists of 20 MCQ questions, each right answer will be given one score, total scores will be 20 grades. Those who obtained > 80% will be considered as having a satisfactory knowledge level.
Measured: 5 months
Structured observational checklist to monitor the nurses' practices (Level) regarding Airway management skills
Nurses' Airway management skills include different nursing procedures or maneuvers aimed to maintain airway clear. Airway management has the highest priority in patient care. Nurses' airway management skills such as; (1) Suction to remove secretion (2) Airway maneuvers e.g. head-tilt and chin-lift (3) Proper fixation and care of ETT (4) Management of ETT cuff pressure (5) Oral care (6) Airway assessment skills. This tool will be self-administrated for the group who will be applied self-directed clinical learning model. While, it will be conducted by the clinical instructor by direct observation for the group who will be applying the traditional clinical learning model. The tool consists of 50 items, each item checked as; done complete and correct was given two scores, done incomplete was given one score, and not done or done incorrect was given zero, eventually, those who obtained > 80% will be considered as having a satisfactory practical level.
Measured: 3 months
Patients' Airway Related Incidents (Rate)
Patients' airway related Incidents defined as any airway safety problems or events for either intubated or non-intubated patients, which led to partial or complete airway obstruction, injury or infection. Such as; accumulation of secretion, aspiration or edema. the researcher will be assessed the incidents by pre-structured Patients' airway related Incidents assessment checklist which collect and categorize the incidents (events) within the planned time frame.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2020
- Primary completion31 Jul 2021
- Study completion1 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Airway MorbidityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 3 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sameh Elhabashy, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Gaber, Principal investigator, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04244565
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FWA00019803
- Acronym
- SDLMvsTCLM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Nguyen LHP, Bank I, Fisher R, Mascarella M, Young M. Managing the airway catastrophe: longitudinal simulation-based curriculum to teach airway management. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Feb 19;48(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0332-0.
PubMed 30782200Chatterjee, A., Islam, S., & Divatia, J. V. (2004). Airway accidents in an intensive care unit.
Higgs A, Cook TM, McGrath BA. Airway management in the critically ill: the same, but different. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117 Suppl 1:i5-i9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew055. Epub 2016 May 4. No abstract available.
PubMed 27147544da Silva LFM, Pascoal LM, Nunes SFL, de Sousa Freire VEC, de Araujo Almeida AG, Gontijo PVC, Neto MS. Ineffective Airway Clearance in Surgical Patients: Evaluation of Nursing Interventions and Outcomes. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2019 Oct;30(4):251-256. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12242. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
PubMed 30916452Divatia, J. V., & Bhowmick, K. (2005). Complications of endotracheal intubation and other airway management procedures. Indian J Anaesth, 49(4), 308-18
Holbery, N., & Newcombe, P. (2016). Emergency nursing at a glance. John Wiley & Sons.
Huitink, J. M., & Bretschneider, J. H. (2015). Airway Management Academy: A global initiative to increase patient safety during airway management by medical education. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 5(1), 42-47
Spaliaras, J., Streiff, A., Mann, G., & Straker, T. (2019). Teaching and training in airway management: Time to evaluate the current model?. Airway, 2(1), 28
Lindkaer Jensen NH, Cook TM, Kelly FE. A national survey of practical airway training in UK anaesthetic departments. Time for a national policy? Anaesthesia. 2016 Nov;71(11):1273-1279. doi: 10.1111/anae.13567. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
PubMed 27679501Ni C, Hua Y, Shao P, Wallen GR, Xu S, Li L. Continuing education among Chinese nurses: a general hospital-based study. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Apr;34(4):592-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
PubMed 23931929Croxon L, Maginnis C. Evaluation of clinical teaching models for nursing practice. Nurse Educ Pract. 2009 Jul;9(4):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
PubMed 18722161Niederhauser V, Schoessler M, Gubrud-Howe PM, Magnussen L, Codier E. Creating innovative models of clinical nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Nov;51(11):603-8. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20121011-02. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
PubMed 23061436Shellenbarger, T., Gaberson, K., & Oermann, M. (2018). Clinical teaching strategies in nursing. Springer publishing company.5th ed
Luhanga, F. L. (2018). Learning in the traditional-faculty supervised teaching model: part 1-the nursing students' perspective. J Nurs Educ Pract, 8, 89-102
Hill, L., & Williams, E. P. (2017). Contemporary Models for Clinical Nursing Education
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04244565
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SDLMvsTCLM / FWA00019803
- Keywords
- Self-directed, Traditional Clinical Learning
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents
Introduction Airway crisis situations in ICUs (Intensive Care Units) are common, complex, dynamic and time-sensitive contexts, that pose a significant threat to patient safety, and are a major source of preventable errors. Airway management has the highest priority in patient care, it is the first step in the (ABCDE) approach. The concept of Airway management in nursing perspective includes any nursing procedures and techniques required to keep the airway open and prevent aspiration. Adult learning is a practice in which adults engage in systematic and sustained learning activities in order to gain new forms of knowledge, skills or values. Most adult education is voluntary; therefore, the participants are generally self-motivated. Continuing education (CE) of nurses is increasingly necessary to keep abreast of rapid changes in patient care due to advancements in knowledge and technology and improve their ability to serve the patients safely. Although nursing care has been changed significantly over the past 30 years, methods for clinical training nurses have not. A popular or traditional model for clinical teaching of nurses, including but not limited to; integrating lectures, skills laboratory training and supervised clinical experience. A benefit of this model is the opportunity to assist nurses to integrate the concept learned in class or skill lab in patient care. Also, the instructor can select clinical activities that best meet nurses' needs and are consistent with hospital goals. While, Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of modern approaches of clinical learning, the concept of SDL originates from the Adult Learning Theory, it is a process in which the instructors play a facilitating role while, learners actively participate in identifying their own learning needs, learning goals, allocating resources \& decide whether learning method can be used, and engaging in self-reflection \& evaluation. The positive outcomes of SDL including but not limited to, greater self-control, self-confidence, autonomy, and lifelong learning skills. In essence the aim of this study will be examining the effect of Self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize airway related incidents.
Research Hypothesis H1: Critically care nurses who will approach self-directed clinical learning model (μ1) will have a higher level of Airway management skills (μ2), (H1: μ1 > μ2).
H1: Intensive care units who will approach self-directed clinical learning model to learn their working nurses (μ1) will have a lower frequency of patients' airway-related incidents (μ2), (H1: μ1 < μ2).
Subjects and Methods True experimental, prospective, and comparative research design will be utilized in the current study. This study will be conducted at selected two Adult Intensive Care Units, A convenience sample of 60 male and female Critically Care Nurses who are working in the selected Intensive Care Unit, will be recruited to the study. The sample size estimated by (G Power analysis) (independent t tests - One tail, Effect size = 0.65, α = 0.05, Power (1-β) = 0.80, balanced allocation ratio 1:1). The total sample size will be divided into two groups (study and control). All nurses should be corresponded to specific inclusion criteria.
Five tools will be formulated to collect data pertinent to the study.
Procedure The study will be conducted through three phases; preparation \& designation, implementation, and follow up \& evaluation phase. The 1st Part will be initiated by allocating the selected ICUs randomly into two paired settings, one for applying traditional learning (control ICU) and the other for self-directed learning experimentation (study ICU). the nurses who are working in selected ICUs and correspond to the inclusion criteria, will be randomly distributed into two equal groups (30 nurses in each group). The nurses who are working in study ICU will be asked to fill out the nurses' readiness assessment sheet to learn independently. The nurses who will demonstrate a high readiness score (>80%) for independent learning will be included. Once implantation is complete, the follow-up and evaluation phase will be initiated by daily monitoring of the occurrence of patients' airway related incidents in both control and study ICUs for a continuous three months. Then, the nurses' knowledge and practices (in the control group) will be evaluated two times, 1st time will be 1 month after the implementation phase, and the second time will be after 3 months from the 1st evaluation (to measure the retention of given education and training). Upon completion of data collection, descriptive and inferential statistics will be utilized to test for differences among the study and control group subjects.
Detailed description
Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents
Introduction
Airway crisis situations in ICUs (Intensive Care Units) are common, complex, dynamic and time-sensitive contexts, that pose a significant threat to patient safety, and are a major source of preventable errors [1]. Although, only a few studies have demonstrated the airway incidents in ICUs, 7.04% of ICU patients developed airway incidents [2]. The UK National Reporting and Learning Centre identified that 82% of ICU airway incidents occurred in patient with ETT, with 25% contributing to the patient's death [3]. The concept of Airway management in nursing perspective includes any nursing procedures and techniques required to keep the airway open and prevent aspiration [4]. In fact, Airway management has the highest priority in patient care, it is the first step in the (ABCDE) approach. Several nursing related factors that can directly or indirectly cause a patient to have airway crises either patient intubated or even non-intubated, such factors include a partial or complete airway obstruction, injury or infection [5,6]. However, Airway management procedures and techniques (Table 1) are rapidly changing, there is a need for structured innovative training models related to Airway management education for critical care nurses to develop nurses' competences and subsequently will enhance patients' outcomes [7,8,9].
Adult learning has specific characteristics, adult education is a practice in which adults engage in systematic and sustained learning activities in order to gain new forms of knowledge, skills or values. Adults have already accumulated knowledge and work experience which can add to their learning experience. Most adult education is voluntary; therefore, the participants are generally self-motivated. Furthermore, adults apply their knowledge in a practical fashion to learn effectively. They must have a reasonable expectation that the knowledge they gain will indeed help them further their goals [10].
Continuing education (CE) of nurses is increasingly necessary to keep abreast of rapid changes in patient care due to advancements in knowledge and technology, nurses also should be well motivated to enroll in CE hospital activity to upgrade their professional skills and knowledge to remain current in their professional practices and improve their ability to serve the patients safely [11]. Clinical placements provide opportunities for nurses to learn experientially. To create a constructive learning environment nursing staff, need to be friendly, approachable, available and willing to learn. Also, CE should be providing adequate opportunities for nurses to develop confidence and competence in clinical skill with a focus on nurses' learning needs rather than service needs of the facilities [12].
Although nursing care has been changed significantly over the past 30 years, methods for clinical training nurses have not [13]. A popular or traditional model for clinical teaching of nurses, including but not limited to; integrating lectures, skills laboratory training and supervised clinical experience. A benefit of this model is the opportunity to assist nurses to integrate the concept learned in class or skill lab in patient care. Also, the instructor can select clinical activities that best meet nurses' needs and are consistent with hospital goals [14]. In addition, the low confidant nurses prefer this type of clinical teaching because they feel more secure [15]. On the other side, the traditional model for clinical teaching contributes to poor critical thinking and reasoning development among nurses and results in task-oriented approaches to teaching and learning. Consequently, nurses may lack the capacity to think through interventions that lead to positive patient outcomes [16]. Therefore, there is a need to find innovative approaches to effectively train nurses to better prepare them for today's health care environment. These innovative approaches may increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the clinical nursing education system [13].
Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of these modern approaches of clinical learning, the concept of SDL originates from the Adult Learning Theory. This theory suggests that adults are pragmatic and problem-focused individuals whose learning are mainly affected by experiential rather than passive approaches [17]. Self-directed learning was applied and examined on nursing students as well as working nurses who are engaged in an on-going continuing training [18]. Self-directed learning is a process in which the instructors play a facilitating role while, learners actively participate in identifying their own learning needs, learning goals, allocating resources \& decide whether learning method can be used, and engaging in self-reflection \& evaluation. The positive outcomes of SDL including but not limited to, greater self-control, self-confidence, autonomy, and lifelong learning skills [17]. While, SDL may helpful, there is an increasing awareness that SDL is not universally applicable to all learners and all situations. Also, the majority of nurses not familiar with SDL approach of learning they preferred and felt more secure with traditional teacher-centered approach as they usually learned in schools [19]. Self-directed learning can be challenging, even for the brightest and most motivated nurses. Therefore, it should apply in a systematic way to maximize the benefits. four key stages to apply SDL; being ready to learn independently, setting learning goals, engaging in the learning process by understanding themselves and their needs (the discrepancy between the present level of competence and the required level of competency), and evaluating learning [20, 21].
Successful independent study requires certain responsibilities or roles of both nurses and instructor. It is useful for both to communicate as to whether each feels the other is fulfilling their share of the responsibility. nurses' roles include; self-assess readiness to learn, define your learning goals, monitor learning process, be self-motivated, re-evaluate and alter goals as required, consult with instructor as required. While, instructors' roles; Build a co-operative learning environment, help to motivate and direct the nurses' learning experience, facilitate learning, be available for consultations as appropriate during the learning process, serve as an advisor rather than a formal instructor [22]. In essence the aim of this study will be examining the effect of Self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize airway related incidents.
Research Hypothesis H1: Critically care nurses who will approach self-directed clinical learning model (μ1) will have a higher level of Airway management skills (μ2), (H1: μ1 > μ2).
H1: Intensive care units who will approach self-directed clinical learning model to learn their working nurses (μ1) will have a lower frequency of patients' airway-related incidents (μ2), (H1: μ1 < μ2).
Subjects and Methods
Research Design:
True experimental, prospective, and comparative research design will be utilized in the current study. The study will be conducting a nursing self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize patients' airway related incidents.
Ethical Consideration:
An official permission to conduct the proposed study will be obtained from the ethical committee. Also. Participation in the study is voluntary; each subject has the right to withdraw from the study when he or she wants. Informed consent will be obtained from the subjects. Confidentiality and anonymity of the subjects are assured through coding of all data; subjects will be assured that these data will not be reused in another research without their permission, collected data will be used for the purpose of the research only and The entire needed sample in the study will be followed until been analyzed. All information taken will be protected and will not affect their annual appraisal by any mean. The formulated database and the result of the current study will be raising the awareness of all health professionals and incorporating in the future plan of care.
Procedure:
The study will be conducted through three phases; preparation \& designation, implementation, and follow up \& evaluation phase. The preparation \& designation phase will be concerned with taken the official permission and ethical approval. Also, it includes a recent review of related literatures, and preparation of the different (constructed and adapted) study tools and formulate the latest evidenced educational content and materials related to airway nursing management. These tools and educational content will be revised by medical and nursing expert to ensure its content validity.
Once the official permission and ethical approval are granted to proceed the proposed study, the implementation phase will be applied in two parts:
The 1st Part will be initiated by allocating the selected ICUs randomly into two paired settings, one for applying traditional learning (control ICU) and the other for self-directed learning experimentation (study ICU). the nurses who are working in selected ICUs and correspond to the inclusion criteria, will be randomly distributed into two equal groups (30 nurses in each group). The nurses who are working in study ICU will be asked to fill out the nurses' readiness assessment sheet to learn independently (tool 4). The nurses who will demonstrate a high readiness score (>80%) for independent learning will be included. if the nurses number exceeding the intended number (30 nurses), the highest scores will be selected.
Self-directed clinical learning model:
The concept of Airway management will be nominated for participant nurses to be an area of investigation. each nurse will be asked to fulfill the pre-structured Learning contract between nurses and instructors within one week, the contract will include the following items.
- Goals for the area of learning (the researcher will confirm the congruence with the expected goals).
- Structure and sequence of activities.
- Timeline for completion of activities (maximum one month).
- Details about resource materials for each goal.
- Feedback and evaluation as each goal is completed.
- Meeting plan with the instructors.
- Self-reflection and self-evaluation methods. the researchers will facilitate all nurses' stated resources incorporation with hospital manager such as (Sill lab., computer lab., internet, hard books, digital books, clinical instructions, or Egyptian Knowledge Bank).
Traditional clinical learning model It will concern the Airway management competencies; it will be given within one month and it will take place during working hours.
- the researcher will divide the participant (30 nurses) into two main groups (15 nurses in each), each group will be given pre-scheduled integrated lectures related to theoretical background of Airway management. Four lectures will be given once per-week, 2 hours long, written handouts will be given.
- After each driven lecture, the researcher will give a supportive four hours skill laboratory training by traditional 2 stages, methods ("see one, do one"). This traditional "2-stage approach" was standard for improving clinical practices.
- Then, the researchers will provide a clinical supervision and guidance for the participant nurses to ensure that they will able to apply what they learned in real settings.
Once implantation is complete, the follow-up and evaluation phase will be initiated by daily monitoring of the occurrence of patients' airway related incidents in both control and study ICUs for a continuous three months (tool 3). Then, the nurses' knowledge and practices (in the control group) will be evaluated two times, 1st time will be 1 month after the implementation phase, and the second time will be after 3 months from the 1st evaluation (to measure the retention of given education and training), tools (1, 2) will be utilized, and it will be completed by blinded assessors (who were not part of the research team). On the other side, the study group of self-directed learning will be self-evaluated by using tools (1, 2) and also will be evaluated two times like control group. Finally, the researcher will compare the results (outcome given by self-directed learning) to the collected baseline data (control group) which will be given as usual ongoing traditional learning.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Self-directed clinical learning | – | Behavioral: Self-directed model of clinical learning for nursesexamining the effect of Self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize airway related incidents. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- A convenience sample of 60 male and female Critically Care Nurses who are working in the selected Intensive Care Unit
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Willing to participate in this study.
- Working for at least one month in the current position.
- Maximum two years of experience in critical care.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Nurses who attended any educational courses in Airway management in last 6 months, will be excluded.
- Nurses planning to leave work 6 months later, will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Self-directed model of clinical learning for nursesAlso: compared to the traditional modelsthe instructors play a facilitating role while, learners actively participate in identifying their own learning needs, learning goals, allocating resources \& decide whether learning method can be used, and engaging in self-reflection \& evaluation. | Behavioural | Self-directed clinical learning |
Primary outcome
Structured questionnaire schedule to assess nurses' knowledge (Level) regarding Airway management related issues.
Time frame: 5 months
Nurses' Airway management competencies need a wide theoretical background aimed to practice based on rational and evidence. Airway management has the highest priority in patient care. Nurses' knowledge regarding Airway management consists of different issues such as; (1) Causes of Airway obstructions (2) Ways to maintain Airway clear (3) Management of ETT cuff pressure. (4) Airway assessment items. This questionnaire will be self-administrated for the group who will be applied self-directed clinical learning model. While, it will be conducted by the clinical instructor by interview for the group who will be applying the traditional clinical learning model. The tool consists of 20 MCQ questions, each right answer will be given one score, total scores will be 20 grades. Those who obtained > 80% will be considered as having a satisfactory knowledge level.
Structured observational checklist to monitor the nurses' practices (Level) regarding Airway management skills
Time frame: 3 months
Nurses' Airway management skills include different nursing procedures or maneuvers aimed to maintain airway clear. Airway management has the highest priority in patient care. Nurses' airway management skills such as; (1) Suction to remove secretion (2) Airway maneuvers e.g. head-tilt and chin-lift (3) Proper fixation and care of ETT (4) Management of ETT cuff pressure (5) Oral care (6) Airway assessment skills. This tool will be self-administrated for the group who will be applied self-directed clinical learning model. While, it will be conducted by the clinical instructor by direct observation for the group who will be applying the traditional clinical learning model. The tool consists of 50 items, each item checked as; done complete and correct was given two scores, done incomplete was given one score, and not done or done incorrect was given zero, eventually, those who obtained > 80% will be considered as having a satisfactory practical level.
Patients' Airway Related Incidents (Rate)
Time frame: 3 months
Patients' airway related Incidents defined as any airway safety problems or events for either intubated or non-intubated patients, which led to partial or complete airway obstruction, injury or infection. Such as; accumulation of secretion, aspiration or edema. the researcher will be assessed the incidents by pre-structured Patients' airway related Incidents assessment checklist which collect and categorize the incidents (events) within the planned time frame.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 30782200Nguyen LHP, Bank I, Fisher R, Mascarella M, Young M. Managing the airway catastrophe: longitudinal simulation-based curriculum to teach airway management. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Feb 19;48(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0332-0.
- BackgroundChatterjee, A., Islam, S., & Divatia, J. V. (2004). Airway accidents in an intensive care unit.
- Background: PubMed 27147544Higgs A, Cook TM, McGrath BA. Airway management in the critically ill: the same, but different. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117 Suppl 1:i5-i9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew055. Epub 2016 May 4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30916452da Silva LFM, Pascoal LM, Nunes SFL, de Sousa Freire VEC, de Araujo Almeida AG, Gontijo PVC, Neto MS. Ineffective Airway Clearance in Surgical Patients: Evaluation of Nursing Interventions and Outcomes. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2019 Oct;30(4):251-256. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12242. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
- BackgroundDivatia, J. V., & Bhowmick, K. (2005). Complications of endotracheal intubation and other airway management procedures. Indian J Anaesth, 49(4), 308-18
- BackgroundHolbery, N., & Newcombe, P. (2016). Emergency nursing at a glance. John Wiley & Sons.
- BackgroundHuitink, J. M., & Bretschneider, J. H. (2015). Airway Management Academy: A global initiative to increase patient safety during airway management by medical education. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 5(1), 42-47
- BackgroundSpaliaras, J., Streiff, A., Mann, G., & Straker, T. (2019). Teaching and training in airway management: Time to evaluate the current model?. Airway, 2(1), 28
- Background: PubMed 27679501Lindkaer Jensen NH, Cook TM, Kelly FE. A national survey of practical airway training in UK anaesthetic departments. Time for a national policy? Anaesthesia. 2016 Nov;71(11):1273-1279. doi: 10.1111/anae.13567. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 23931929Ni C, Hua Y, Shao P, Wallen GR, Xu S, Li L. Continuing education among Chinese nurses: a general hospital-based study. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Apr;34(4):592-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
- Background: PubMed 18722161Croxon L, Maginnis C. Evaluation of clinical teaching models for nursing practice. Nurse Educ Pract. 2009 Jul;9(4):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 23061436Niederhauser V, Schoessler M, Gubrud-Howe PM, Magnussen L, Codier E. Creating innovative models of clinical nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Nov;51(11):603-8. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20121011-02. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Airway Morbidity
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Laryngeal Mask Cuff Shape on Pharyngeal Stress
Anesthesia, General, Airway Management
Not yet recruitingObservational study
eCPAP Follow-up at School Age
Lung Function
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Can the "Face Index"; an Anthropometric Measurement, Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation?
Anesthesia Intubation Complication, Laryngoscopy
Recruiting
Automated Oxygen Control in Preterms on Non-invasive Ventilation
Infant, Premature
Recruiting
Cost Effective Air Filtration Intervention in Low-Income Housing to Reduce Asthma Morbidity
Asthma Attack, Lung Function
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gaber principal investigator
Cairo University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Airway Morbidity and Nurse's Role, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Structured questionnaire schedule to assess nurses' knowledge (Level) regarding Airway management related issues. (time frame: 5 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04244565, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2023.