Primary Total Knee ArthroplastyNCT04258241
The Efficacy of Local Infiltration Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty
A study testing Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic, Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic and Needle in people with Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty, run by Lithuanian University of Health Sciences at 1 site in Lithuania.
Trial summary
This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study evaluates the effects of peripheral nerve blocks with and without local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management after primary total knee arthroplasty. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
- What is being tested?
- Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic, Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic and Needle
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteLithuania
- Study dates
- 6 Mar 2020to Feb 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia;
- Age 18 - 90 years;
- Patients conformed to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III in preoperative assessment;
- Ability to follow the study protocol.
Who cannot join
- Inability or refusal to follow the study protocol.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of IV or higher.
- Coagulopathy.
- Pre-exiting lower extremity neuromuscular disorders.
- Local infection over injection site.
- Allergy or contraindications to the drugs used in the study (local anesthetics, NSAIDs, opioids).
- Chronic opioid use.
- Other type of anesthesia.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Lithuania1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Department of Anesthesiology
Kaunas
Arunas Gelmanas, MDPhDAssProf, +37068046865, arunas.gelmanas@kaunoklinikos.lt
Inna Jaremko, MD, +37064857386, inna.jaremko@kaunoklinikos.lt
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy of Local Infiltration Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Peripheral Nerve Blocks With and Without Local Infiltration Analgesia
This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study evaluates the effects of peripheral nerve blocks with and without local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management after primary total knee arthroplasty. There are no any studies that show the demand for local infiltration analgesia when together peripheral nerve blocks are performed. Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty will be randomly assigned to receive local infiltration analgesia with or without (placebo group) local anesthetic. All patients will receive peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia: femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks. Comparison of these two groups of patients will be based on the effects on postoperative pain control, the extent of motor blockade, the ability of early leg motion and ambulation, patients satisfaction rates over the time of clinical recovery.
Consequently, the investigators hypothesized that peripheral nerve blocks (femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks) with and without local infiltration analgesia provide similar postoperative pain relieving effects and the ability of early mobilization after total knee arthroplasty.
Read the detailed description
The aim: to evaluate peripheral nerve blocks with and without local infiltration analgesia regarding the postoperative analgesic efficacy, the ability of early motion and ambulation in patients following primary total knee arthroplasty.
Primary Hypothesis: peripheral nerve blocks with (LIA+) and without (LIA-) local infiltration analgesia provide similar postoperative pain relieving effects after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Secondary Effects: peripheral nerve blocks with (LIA+) and without (LIA-) local infiltration analgesia provide similar ability to recover after primary total knee arthroplasty.
The objectives:
- To compare postoperative pain control effects between LIA+ and LIA- groups of patients after primary total knee joint replacement surgery.
- To assess the ability of early motion and ambulation after total knee joint replacement surgery between the LIA+ and LIA- groups.
- To estimate opioid consumption and its adverse effects in LIA+ and LIA- groups of patients after primary total knee arthroplasty.
- To compare the patient's postoperative satisfaction rates in LIA+ and LIA- groups of patients after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Methods:
The prospective, double-blinded study includes American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients, aged 18-90 years, admitted for primary total knee arthroplasty. Preoperatively patients will be blindly randomized into one of two groups: LIA+ (peripheral nerve blocks with local infiltration analgesia) and LIA- (placebo group, peripheral nerve blocks without local infiltration analgesia). Group assignment will be concealed by opaque envelopes that will be opened only after enrollment. The anesthesiologist performing the block will be aware of the treatment, but the participant and outcomes assessor will be blinded to group assignment.
The anesthesiologist will perform peripheral nerve blocks under the guidance of a linear ultrasound transducer probe. The femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks will be performed. The femoral triangle block will be performed at the level where the medial border of the sartorius muscle intersects the medial border of the adductor longus muscle with an injection of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. A local anesthetic will be injected laterally to the femoral artery. The distal adductor canal block will be performed at the level where the femoral vessels (artery and vein) dive deeper from the sartorius muscle with an injection of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. A local anesthetic will be injected under the femoral artery. The orthopedic surgeon will perform local infiltration analgesia with 150 mg of bupivacaine, 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 90 ml of normal saline in LIA+ group and with 0.3 mg of epinephrine together with 120 ml of normal saline in LIA- group.
At the perioperative period, all patients from both groups will receive a standardized anesthetic and analgesic. Premedication of midazolam 2.5-5 mg and dexamethasone 4 mg will be given to all patients and a slow fluid infusion of crystalloids with 1 g of tranexamic acid and 10 mg of ketamine started once an intravenous cannula will be placed. Spinal anesthesia after identification of the subarachnoid space will be performed with 15 mg of levobupivacaine. After that, peripheral nerve blocks will be performed under the ultrasound guidance. Patients will be sedated with intravenously administered propofol during the surgery. At the end of the operation, local infiltration with or without bupivacaine (depending on the group of patients) will be performed. After the surgery, patients will be transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
At the postoperative period for analgesia NSAIDs will be available to both groups of patients. NSAIDs such as dexketoprofen 50 mg, acetaminophen 1 g - 3 times per day and dexketoprofen/tramadol 25/75 mg will be administered after the surgery. Opioids will also be available to patients as intramuscular boluses of pethidine 50 mg or morphine 10 mg without restriction and administered for moderate or severe pain (VAS pain score of 5 or greater out of 10).
The postoperative pain control efficacy will be assessed at 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours after the surgery using the visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (0 - no pain, 10 - worst imaginable pain) at rest, during active and passive 45-degree knee flexion. All the requirements of additional analgesics and their adverse effects will be recorded.
The extent of motor blockade and the ability of early motion will be evaluated at 3, 6, 24, 48 hours after the surgery. Patients will be asked to flex the foot, flex the knee and to lift the straight leg. The possible motion at 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively will be assessed with the Bromage scale grades: Grade I - free movement of legs and feet; Grade II - just able to flex knees with free movement of feet; Grade III - unable to flex knees, but with free movement of feet; Grade IV - unable to move legs or feet.
The patients ability of early ambulation will be evaluated using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test at 24 and 48 hours after the surgery. To do the TUG test, patients will have to sit down on the bed, get up from the bed, walk 3 meters forward, turn, walk back 3 meters to the bed and sit down. The time taken by a patient to perform this test will be calculated with a chronometer.
After the conversation with each patient and assessment of the postoperative pain control efficacy, the ability of early postoperative motion and ambulation, the rate of patient satisfaction will be evaluated using a 10 point scale from 0 (completely unsatisfied) to 10 (totally satisfied) at 3, 6, 24, 48 hours after the surgery.
According to the study protocol, both groups of patients will be compared in terms of postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, early motion and ambulation ability, the incidence of complications (if any), and patients satisfaction rates over time of clinical recovery.
- Conditions
- Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Being tested
- Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic, Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic, Needle, Solution with local anesthetic, Solution without local anesthetic
- Keywords
- Local infiltration analgesia, Primary knee arthroplasty, Postoperative pain management, Postoperative recovery, Adductor canal block, Femoral triangle block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Local infiltration analgesia with local anestheticProcedure or surgery
The orthopedic surgeon will perform local infiltration analgesia at the end of the surgery. The knee joint capsule, periarticular and subcutaneous tissues will be infiltrated with 150 mg of bupivacaine, 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 90 ml of normal saline.
Local infiltration analgesia without local anestheticProcedure or surgery
The orthopedic surgeon will perform local infiltration analgesia at the end of the surgery. The knee joint capsule, periarticular and subcutaneous tissues will be infiltrated with 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 120 ml of normal saline.
NeedleDevice
18-gauge 40 mm Sterican needle (B. Braun Medical Inc., Melsungen, Germany) will be used to perform local infiltration analgesia.
Solution with local anestheticDrug
Also called Containing bupivacaine
Solution of 150 mg of bupivacaine, 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 90 ml of normal saline will be used to perform local infiltration analgesia.
Solution without local anestheticDrug
Also called Without bupivacaine
Solution of 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 120 ml of normal saline will be used to perform local infiltration analgesia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic (LIA+) | Active comparator | Local infiltration analgesia will be performed at the end of the surgery by injection of 150 mg of bupivacaine, 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 90 ml of normal saline. Receives: Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic; Device: Needle; Drug: Solution with local anesthetic |
| Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic (LIA-) | Placebo comparator | Local infiltration analgesia will be performed at the end of the surgery by injection of 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 120 ml of normal saline. Receives: Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic; Device: Needle; Drug: Solution without local anesthetic |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in postoperative pain intensity and pain control: VAS pain scale
Postoperative pain will be assessed in both groups using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS pain scale (numerical rating scale) consists of a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher score indicate greater pain intensity. Interpretation: 0 (no pain); 1-3 (mild pain); 4-6 (moderate pain); 7-10 (severe pain). Pain control will be assessed at rest, during active and passive 45 degree knee flexion at 3, 6, 24, 48 hours after the surgery.
Measured: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Extent of motor blockade.
The extent of postoperative motor blockade and the ability of early motion will be evaluated using the Bromage scale: Grade I - free movement of legs and feet; Grade II - just able to flex knees with free movement of feet; Grade III - unable to flex knees, but with free movement of feet; Grade IV - unable to move legs or feet. It will be assessed at 3, 6, 24, 48 hours after the surgery.
Measured: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Postoperative ability of early ambulation.
The postoperative ability of early ambulation will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The TUG test measures the time it takes the patient to get up from a bed, walk 3 m, turn, walk back to the bed and sit down. The TUG test results will be evaluated at 24 and 48 hours after the surgery.
Measured: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Opioid consumption.
The need of additional opioid consumption will be recorded at 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours after the surgery in both groups.
Measured: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Rate of patients satisfaction: 10 point scale
Patients satisfaction rates will be evaluated using a 10 point scale from 0 (completely unsatisfied) to 10 (totally satisfied) at 3, 6, 24, 48 hours after the surgery.
Measured: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Number of participants with postoperative complications.
The total number of postoperative complications (medication toxicity, falls) will be counted in both groups.
Measured: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2020
- Study start6 Mar 2020
- Primary completionFeb 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Primary Total Knee ArthroplastyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Inna Jaremko, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
- Investigators
- Arunas Gelmanas, MDPhDAssProf, Study chair, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04258241
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BEC-MF-36
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Mont MA, Beaver WB, Dysart SH, Barrington JW, Del Gaizo DJ. Local Infiltration Analgesia With Liposomal Bupivacaine Improves Pain Scores and Reduces Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
PubMed 28802777Andersen LO, Kehlet H. Analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;113(3):360-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu155. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
PubMed 24939863Beswick AD, Dennis J, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom AW, Wylde V. Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e028093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028093.
PubMed 31494601Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. The Optimal Analgesic Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):711-719. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000485.
PubMed 27685346
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy of Local Infiltration Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Peripheral Nerve Blocks With and Without Local Infiltration Analgesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04258241
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEC-MF-36
- Conditions
- Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Keywords
- Local infiltration analgesia, Primary knee arthroplasty, Postoperative pain management, Postoperative recovery, Adductor canal block, Femoral triangle block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Lithuanian University of Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study evaluates the effects of peripheral nerve blocks with and without local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management after primary total knee arthroplasty. There are no any studies that show the demand for local infiltration analgesia when together peripheral nerve blocks are performed. Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty will be randomly assigned to receive local infiltration analgesia with or without (placebo group) local anesthetic. All patients will receive peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia: femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks. Comparison of these two groups of patients will be based on the effects on postoperative pain control, the extent of motor blockade, the ability of early leg motion and ambulation, patients satisfaction rates over the time of clinical recovery.
Consequently, the investigators hypothesized that peripheral nerve blocks (femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks) with and without local infiltration analgesia provide similar postoperative pain relieving effects and the ability of early mobilization after total knee arthroplasty.
Detailed description
The aim: to evaluate peripheral nerve blocks with and without local infiltration analgesia regarding the postoperative analgesic efficacy, the ability of early motion and ambulation in patients following primary total knee arthroplasty.
Primary Hypothesis: peripheral nerve blocks with (LIA+) and without (LIA-) local infiltration analgesia provide similar postoperative pain relieving effects after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Secondary Effects: peripheral nerve blocks with (LIA+) and without (LIA-) local infiltration analgesia provide similar ability to recover after primary total knee arthroplasty.
The objectives:
- To compare postoperative pain control effects between LIA+ and LIA- groups of patients after primary total knee joint replacement surgery.
- To assess the ability of early motion and ambulation after total knee joint replacement surgery between the LIA+ and LIA- groups.
- To estimate opioid consumption and its adverse effects in LIA+ and LIA- groups of patients after primary total knee arthroplasty.
- To compare the patient's postoperative satisfaction rates in LIA+ and LIA- groups of patients after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Methods:
The prospective, double-blinded study includes American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients, aged 18-90 years, admitted for primary total knee arthroplasty. Preoperatively patients will be blindly randomized into one of two groups: LIA+ (peripheral nerve blocks with local infiltration analgesia) and LIA- (placebo group, peripheral nerve blocks without local infiltration analgesia). Group assignment will be concealed by opaque envelopes that will be opened only after enrollment. The anesthesiologist performing the block will be aware of the treatment, but the participant and outcomes assessor will be blinded to group assignment.
The anesthesiologist will perform peripheral nerve blocks under the guidance of a linear ultrasound transducer probe. The femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks will be performed. The femoral triangle block will be performed at the level where the medial border of the sartorius muscle intersects the medial border of the adductor longus muscle with an injection of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. A local anesthetic will be injected laterally to the femoral artery. The distal adductor canal block will be performed at the level where the femoral vessels (artery and vein) dive deeper from the sartorius muscle with an injection of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. A local anesthetic will be injected under the femoral artery. The orthopedic surgeon will perform local infiltration analgesia with 150 mg of bupivacaine, 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 90 ml of normal saline in LIA+ group and with 0.3 mg of epinephrine together with 120 ml of normal saline in LIA- group.
At the perioperative period, all patients from both groups will receive a standardized anesthetic and analgesic. Premedication of midazolam 2.5-5 mg and dexamethasone 4 mg will be given to all patients and a slow fluid infusion of crystalloids with 1 g of tranexamic acid and 10 mg of ketamine started once an intravenous cannula will be placed. Spinal anesthesia after identification of the subarachnoid space will be performed with 15 mg of levobupivacaine. After that, peripheral nerve blocks will be performed under the ultrasound guidance. Patients will be sedated with intravenously administered propofol during the surgery. At the end of the operation, local infiltration with or without bupivacaine (depending on the group of patients) will be performed. After the surgery, patients will be transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
At the postoperative period for analgesia NSAIDs will be available to both groups of patients. NSAIDs such as dexketoprofen 50 mg, acetaminophen 1 g - 3 times per day and dexketoprofen/tramadol 25/75 mg will be administered after the surgery. Opioids will also be available to patients as intramuscular boluses of pethidine 50 mg or morphine 10 mg without restriction and administered for moderate or severe pain (VAS pain score of 5 or greater out of 10).
The postoperative pain control efficacy will be assessed at 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours after the surgery using the visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (0 - no pain, 10 - worst imaginable pain) at rest, during active and passive 45-degree knee flexion. All the requirements of additional analgesics and their adverse effects will be recorded.
The extent of motor blockade and the ability of early motion will be evaluated at 3, 6, 24, 48 hours after the surgery. Patients will be asked to flex the foot, flex the knee and to lift the straight leg. The possible motion at 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively will be assessed with the Bromage scale grades: Grade I - free movement of legs and feet; Grade II - just able to flex knees with free movement of feet; Grade III - unable to flex knees, but with free movement of feet; Grade IV - unable to move legs or feet.
The patients ability of early ambulation will be evaluated using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test at 24 and 48 hours after the surgery. To do the TUG test, patients will have to sit down on the bed, get up from the bed, walk 3 meters forward, turn, walk back 3 meters to the bed and sit down. The time taken by a patient to perform this test will be calculated with a chronometer.
After the conversation with each patient and assessment of the postoperative pain control efficacy, the ability of early postoperative motion and ambulation, the rate of patient satisfaction will be evaluated using a 10 point scale from 0 (completely unsatisfied) to 10 (totally satisfied) at 3, 6, 24, 48 hours after the surgery.
According to the study protocol, both groups of patients will be compared in terms of postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, early motion and ambulation ability, the incidence of complications (if any), and patients satisfaction rates over time of clinical recovery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic (LIA+) | Active comparator | Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic, Device: Needle, Drug: Solution with local anestheticLocal infiltration analgesia will be performed at the end of the surgery by injection of 150 mg of bupivacaine, 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 90 ml of normal saline. |
| Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic (LIA-) | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic, Device: Needle, Drug: Solution without local anestheticLocal infiltration analgesia will be performed at the end of the surgery by injection of 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 120 ml of normal saline. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia;
- Age 18 - 90 years;
- Patients conformed to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III in preoperative assessment;
- Ability to follow the study protocol.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Inability or refusal to follow the study protocol.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of IV or higher.
- Coagulopathy.
- Pre-exiting lower extremity neuromuscular disorders.
- Local infection over injection site.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Local infiltration analgesia with local anestheticThe orthopedic surgeon will perform local infiltration analgesia at the end of the surgery. The knee joint capsule, periarticular and subcutaneous tissues will be infiltrated with 150 mg of bupivacaine, 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 90 ml of normal saline. | Procedure or surgery | Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic (LIA+) |
| Local infiltration analgesia without local anestheticThe orthopedic surgeon will perform local infiltration analgesia at the end of the surgery. The knee joint capsule, periarticular and subcutaneous tissues will be infiltrated with 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 120 ml of normal saline. | Procedure or surgery | Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic (LIA-) |
| Needle18-gauge 40 mm Sterican needle (B. Braun Medical Inc., Melsungen, Germany) will be used to perform local infiltration analgesia. | Device | Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic (LIA+), Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic (LIA-) |
| Solution with local anestheticAlso: Containing bupivacaineSolution of 150 mg of bupivacaine, 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 90 ml of normal saline will be used to perform local infiltration analgesia. | Drug | Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic (LIA+) |
| Solution without local anestheticAlso: Without bupivacaineSolution of 0.3 mg of epinephrine and 120 ml of normal saline will be used to perform local infiltration analgesia. | Drug | Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic (LIA-) |
Primary outcome
Changes in postoperative pain intensity and pain control: VAS pain scale
Time frame: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Postoperative pain will be assessed in both groups using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS pain scale (numerical rating scale) consists of a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher score indicate greater pain intensity. Interpretation: 0 (no pain); 1-3 (mild pain); 4-6 (moderate pain); 7-10 (severe pain). Pain control will be assessed at rest, during active and passive 45 degree knee flexion at 3, 6, 24, 48 hours after the surgery.
5 secondary outcomes
Extent of motor blockade.
Time frame: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Postoperative ability of early ambulation.
Time frame: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Opioid consumption.
Time frame: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Rate of patients satisfaction: 10 point scale
Time frame: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Number of participants with postoperative complications.
Time frame: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 28802777Mont MA, Beaver WB, Dysart SH, Barrington JW, Del Gaizo DJ. Local Infiltration Analgesia With Liposomal Bupivacaine Improves Pain Scores and Reduces Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
- Background: PubMed 24939863Andersen LO, Kehlet H. Analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;113(3):360-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu155. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 31494601Beswick AD, Dennis J, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom AW, Wylde V. Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e028093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028093.
- Background: PubMed 27685346Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. The Optimal Analgesic Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):711-719. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000485.
Related trials for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Multimorbidity and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis, Multimorbidity
Active, not recruiting
ATTUNE® Revision- Complex Primary in Total Knee Arthroplasty Population
Primary Knee Arthroplasty
Active, not recruiting
Pivotal Study on the NOVABLOC System for Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Oral Tranexamic Acid After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound Guided Combined Adductor Canal, Superior Genicular Nerves and Anterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerves Blocks in Comparison With Periarticular Local Anesthesia Infiltration in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Total Knee Anthroplasty
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arunas Gelmanas, MDPhDAssProf study chair
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Local infiltration analgesia with local anesthetic, Local infiltration analgesia without local anesthetic and Needle in people with Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty, run by Lithuanian University of Health Sciences at 1 site in Lithuania.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Lithuania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Arunas Gelmanas, MDPhDAssProf (+37068046865, arunas.gelmanas@kaunoklinikos.lt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in postoperative pain intensity and pain control: VAS pain scale (time frame: First 48 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04258241, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2020.