Solid TumorCardioSwitchNCT04260269
Feasibility of Switching Fluoropyrimidine Due to Cardiotoxicity Study
An observational study of Solid Tumor, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 13 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate cardiotoxicity during re-challenge of a different modality of fluoropyrimidine (primary end-point S-1 and secondary any other fluoropyrimidine) after having perceived cardiotoxicity with a fluoropyrimidine based regimen previously. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Solid Tumor
- What is being tested?
- Fluoropyrimidine
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2018to Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All consecutive patients who fulfil the following inclusion criteria will be included in the database until the target number of patients has been included: * Solid tumor * Cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during fluoropyrimidine-based treatment * Re-challenge with a different fluoropyrimidine-based treatment. Primary endpoint is switch to S-1 and secondary any fluoropyrimidine population.
Who may be able to join
- Solid tumor
- Cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during fluoropyrimidine-based treatment
- Re-challenge with a different fluoropyrimidine-based therapy
Who cannot join
- Participation in a trial with experimental drugs
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 7 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
13 sites in 7 countries
Finland4 sites
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00290
Oulu university hospital
Oulu
Department of Oncology
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, 33520
Turku university hospital
Turku
Sweden4 sites
Skone university hospital
Lund
Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm
Sundsvall hospital
Sundsvall
Uppsala academic hospital
Uppsala
About this study
Official title: Feasibility of Switching Fluoropyrimidine Due to Cardiotoxicity in Patients with Solid Tumors: a Retrospective, International and Non-interventional Study
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate cardiotoxicity during re-challenge of a different modality of fluoropyrimidine (primary end-point S-1 and secondary any other fluoropyrimidine) after having perceived cardiotoxicity with a fluoropyrimidine based regimen previously. The patient population is being treated for solid tumors.
Read the detailed description
Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy agents, such as 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, are occasionally associated with cardiotoxicity that may manifest as chest pain, ECG alterations, cardiac arrhythmia, and rarely myocardial infarction and sudden death. Clinical fluoropyrimidine cardiotoxicity is infrequent (1-8% of patients), but subclinical toxicity may be much more common (up to one third of patients). The underlying mechanisms are not well understood, but they may include abnormal coronary artery contractility or spasm, and myocardial toxicity. Cardiotoxicity may be less frequent with S-1 (a combination of tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1) as compared with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, but head-to-head comparisons are lacking.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that patients who have cardiotoxicity on other fluoropyrimidines may be successfully treated with S-1. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare different 5-fluorouracil-based dosing modalities and S-1, and compare cardiotoxicity during these treatments.
The patient population was treated for solid tumors with a 5-fluorouracil based regimen and had a cardiac event grade 1-4. All patients were re-challenged with a different fluoropyrimidine or S-1 and assessed for cardiotoxicity during re-challenge.
- Conditions
- Solid Tumor
- Being tested
- Fluoropyrimidine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FluoropyrimidineDrug
Also called S-1 / Teysuno, capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, tegafur
This is the assessment of a specific evaluation of cardiac safety for patients with solid tumors who have experienced cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during treatment with a fluoropyrimidine based treatment and are re-challenged with a different fluoropyrimidine.
This multicentre, retrospective database is built to assess the impact on the cardiac and global safety of two different fluoropyrimidine based treatment regimens, of which the first has caused cardiotoxicity grade 1-4.
Cardiac data will be collected by medical record review from initiation of first fluoropyrimidine-based treatment and switch to second fluoropyrimidine-based treatment until death or last follow-up. Basic demographics, cancer and treatment information from the whole course of cancer until death or last follow-up.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to S-1 based treatment
Cardiac tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE following cardiotoxicity initiated switch of fluoropyrimidine to S-1
Measured: After switch to and during one line of S-1 based chemotherapy (average 6 months)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to any fluoropyrimidine
Cardiac tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE following cardiotoxicity initiated switch of fluoropyrimidine to another fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy
Measured: After switch to and during one line of another fluoropyrimidine regimen (average 6 months)
Cardiac symptoms during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy
Frequency and severity according to NCI-CTCAE of cardiac symptoms during different fluoropyrimidines and the correlation with other added cytotoxics or biologics
Measured: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)
Diagnostic work-up
Diagnostic work-up for cardiotoxicity in real world data
Measured: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)
Time-lines for cardiotoxicity
Time-lines for appearance of cardiotoxicity during fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy
Measured: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)
Dose-intensity
Dose-intensity of the therapy at the cycle causing cardiotoxicity
Measured: During one cycle (average 3 weeks) of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy causing cardiac toxicity
Alteration in cardiac functional parameters during fluoropyrimidine treatment induced cardiotoxicity
The alterations of (if evaluated), graded as normal, non-significant abnormalities or significant abnormalities.:
- ECG abnormalities
- Ejection fraction in %
- Coronary artery status on angiogram
- Cardiac arrhythmias in ECG, Holter or cardiac monitor registration
- Plasma troponin concentration and other cardiac enzymes and other laboratory tests as within reference range ro abnormal
- Serum alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL) concentration
Measured: During one cycle (average 3 weeks) of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy causing cardiac toxicity
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Jun 2018
- Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Solid TumorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Helsinki University Central HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tampere University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pia Osterlund, Tampere University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04260269
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R18045
- Acronym
- CardioSwitch
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kwakman JJM, Baars A, van Zweeden AA, de Mol P, Koopman M, Kok WEM, Punt CJA. Case series of patients treated with the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 after capecitabine-induced coronary artery vasospasm. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Aug;81:130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 28623776Kwakman JJ, Simkens LH, Mol L, Kok WE, Koopman M, Punt CJ. Incidence of capecitabine-related cardiotoxicity in different treatment schedules of metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis of the CAIRO studies of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;76:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
PubMed 28286287Winther SB, Zubcevic K, Qvortrup C, Vestermark LW, Jensen HA, Krogh M, Sorbye H, Pfeiffer P; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare). Experience with S-1 in older Caucasian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Findings from an observational chart review. Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):881-5. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1161825. Epub 2016 May 16.
PubMed 27181284Ye JX, Liu AQ, Ge LY, Zhou SZ, Liang ZG. Effectiveness and safety profile of S-1-based chemotherapy compared with capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced gastric and colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2014 May;7(5):1271-1278. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1576. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
PubMed 24940424Yeh ET, Bickford CL. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 16;53(24):2231-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.050.
PubMed 19520246Deboever G, Hiltrop N, Cool M, Lambrecht G. Alternative treatment options in colorectal cancer patients with 5-fluorouracil- or capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013 Mar;12(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
PubMed 23102544Polk A, Vaage-Nilsen M, Vistisen K, Nielsen DL. Cardiotoxicity in cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine: a systematic review of incidence, manifestations and predisposing factors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Dec;39(8):974-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
PubMed 23582737Osterlund P, Kinos S, Pfeiffer P, Salminen T, Kwakman JJM, Frodin JE, Shah CH, Sorbye H, Ristamaki R, Halonen P, Soveri LM, Heerva E, Algars A, Barlund M, Hagman H, McDermott R, O'Reilly M, Rockert R, Liposits G, Kallio R, Flygare P, Teske AJ, van Werkhoven E, Punt CJA, Glimelius B. Continuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment with S-1 after cardiotoxicity on capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil-based therapy in patients with solid tumours: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study. ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100427. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100427. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
PubMed 35798468
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility of Switching Fluoropyrimidine Due to Cardiotoxicity in Patients with Solid Tumors: a Retrospective, International and Non-interventional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04260269
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CardioSwitch / R18045
- Conditions
- Solid Tumor
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Helsinki University Central HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tampere University Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate cardiotoxicity during re-challenge of a different modality of fluoropyrimidine (primary end-point S-1 and secondary any other fluoropyrimidine) after having perceived cardiotoxicity with a fluoropyrimidine based regimen previously. The patient population is being treated for solid tumors.
Detailed description
Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy agents, such as 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, are occasionally associated with cardiotoxicity that may manifest as chest pain, ECG alterations, cardiac arrhythmia, and rarely myocardial infarction and sudden death. Clinical fluoropyrimidine cardiotoxicity is infrequent (1-8% of patients), but subclinical toxicity may be much more common (up to one third of patients). The underlying mechanisms are not well understood, but they may include abnormal coronary artery contractility or spasm, and myocardial toxicity. Cardiotoxicity may be less frequent with S-1 (a combination of tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1) as compared with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, but head-to-head comparisons are lacking.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that patients who have cardiotoxicity on other fluoropyrimidines may be successfully treated with S-1. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare different 5-fluorouracil-based dosing modalities and S-1, and compare cardiotoxicity during these treatments.
The patient population was treated for solid tumors with a 5-fluorouracil based regimen and had a cardiac event grade 1-4. All patients were re-challenged with a different fluoropyrimidine or S-1 and assessed for cardiotoxicity during re-challenge.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All consecutive patients who fulfil the following inclusion criteria will be included in the database until the target number of patients has been included: * Solid tumor * Cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during fluoropyrimidine-based treatment * Re-challenge with a different fluoropyrimidine-based treatment. Primary endpoint is switch to S-1 and secondary any fluoropyrimidine population.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Solid tumor
- Cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during fluoropyrimidine-based treatment
- Re-challenge with a different fluoropyrimidine-based therapy
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participation in a trial with experimental drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FluoropyrimidineAlso: S-1 / Teysuno, capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, tegafurThis is the assessment of a specific evaluation of cardiac safety for patients with solid tumors who have experienced cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during treatment with a fluoropyrimidine based treatment and are re-challenged with a different fluoropyrimidine. This multicentre, retrospective database is built to assess the impact on the cardiac and global safety of two different fluoropyrimidine based treatment regimens, of which the first has caused cardiotoxicity grade 1-4. Cardiac data will be collected by medical record review from initiation of first fluoropyrimidine-based treatment and switch to second fluoropyrimidine-based treatment until death or last follow-up. Basic demographics, cancer and treatment information from the whole course of cancer until death or last follow-up. | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to S-1 based treatment
Time frame: After switch to and during one line of S-1 based chemotherapy (average 6 months)
Cardiac tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE following cardiotoxicity initiated switch of fluoropyrimidine to S-1
6 secondary outcomes
Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to any fluoropyrimidine
Time frame: After switch to and during one line of another fluoropyrimidine regimen (average 6 months)
Cardiac symptoms during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy
Time frame: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)
Diagnostic work-up
Time frame: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)
Time-lines for cardiotoxicity
Time frame: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)
Dose-intensity
Time frame: During one cycle (average 3 weeks) of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy causing cardiac toxicity
Alteration in cardiac functional parameters during fluoropyrimidine treatment induced cardiotoxicity
Time frame: During one cycle (average 3 weeks) of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy causing cardiac toxicity
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 28623776Kwakman JJM, Baars A, van Zweeden AA, de Mol P, Koopman M, Kok WEM, Punt CJA. Case series of patients treated with the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 after capecitabine-induced coronary artery vasospasm. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Aug;81:130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28286287Kwakman JJ, Simkens LH, Mol L, Kok WE, Koopman M, Punt CJ. Incidence of capecitabine-related cardiotoxicity in different treatment schedules of metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis of the CAIRO studies of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;76:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
- Background: PubMed 27181284Winther SB, Zubcevic K, Qvortrup C, Vestermark LW, Jensen HA, Krogh M, Sorbye H, Pfeiffer P; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare). Experience with S-1 in older Caucasian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Findings from an observational chart review. Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):881-5. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1161825. Epub 2016 May 16.
- Background: PubMed 24940424Ye JX, Liu AQ, Ge LY, Zhou SZ, Liang ZG. Effectiveness and safety profile of S-1-based chemotherapy compared with capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced gastric and colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2014 May;7(5):1271-1278. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1576. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
- Background: PubMed 19520246Yeh ET, Bickford CL. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 16;53(24):2231-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.050.
- Background: PubMed 23102544Deboever G, Hiltrop N, Cool M, Lambrecht G. Alternative treatment options in colorectal cancer patients with 5-fluorouracil- or capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013 Mar;12(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 23582737Polk A, Vaage-Nilsen M, Vistisen K, Nielsen DL. Cardiotoxicity in cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine: a systematic review of incidence, manifestations and predisposing factors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Dec;39(8):974-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35798468Osterlund P, Kinos S, Pfeiffer P, Salminen T, Kwakman JJM, Frodin JE, Shah CH, Sorbye H, Ristamaki R, Halonen P, Soveri LM, Heerva E, Algars A, Barlund M, Hagman H, McDermott R, O'Reilly M, Rockert R, Liposits G, Kallio R, Flygare P, Teske AJ, van Werkhoven E, Punt CJA, Glimelius B. Continuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment with S-1 after cardiotoxicity on capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil-based therapy in patients with solid tumours: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study. ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100427. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100427. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK043 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor
Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Safety and Efficacy Extension Study of Pertuzumab in Patients With Solid Tumors Previously Enrolled in a Hoffmann-La Roche-Sponsored Pertuzumab Clinical Trial
Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-12 Genetically Engineered Myeloid Cells in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory Solid Tumors
Relapsed Solid Tumor Malignancies, Refractory Solid Tumor Malignancies
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity Risk Prediction in Solid Tumors
Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
13 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Solid Tumor, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 13 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Ireland and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to S-1 based treatment (time frame: After switch to and during one line of S-1 based chemotherapy (average 6 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04260269, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2024.