Low Back PainNCT04266366
Cost- Effectiveness of a Face-to-Face Rehabilitation Program vs an Telemedicine Program in Chronic Low Back Pain
A study testing Face-to-Face Rehabilitation program and Telemedicine program in people with Low Back Pain, run by Universidad de Almeria at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Perform a cost-utility analysis in patients with chronic low back pain through electroanalgesia treatment and exercises administered by telemedicine program versus face-to-face program Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 67 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Face-to-Face Rehabilitation program and Telemedicine program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 540 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2020to 1 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 67 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Low back pain ≥ 3 months.
- Age between 30 and 67 years old.
- Not being receiving physical therapy.
Who cannot join
- Presence of lumbar stenosis.
- Diagnosis of spondylolisthesis.
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
- Treatment with corticosteroids or oral medication in recent weeks.
- History of spine surgery.
- Contraindication of analgesic electrical therapy.
- Have previously received a treatment of electrical analgesia or exercise.
- Central or peripheral nervous system disease.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Cost and Cost- Effectiveness of a Face-to-Face Rehabilitation Program vs an Telemedicine Program on Disability, Pain, Fear of Movement, Quality of Life and Spinal Mobility in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Perform a cost-utility analysis in patients with chronic low back pain through electroanalgesia treatment and exercises administered by telemedicine program versus face-to-face program
Read the detailed description
A double blind clinical trial will be developed in a sample of 80 subjects with chronic low back pain. Patients will receive 3 weekly sessions of electroanalgesia and an exercise program for 8 weeks, for a total of 24 sessions. The aim is to analyze the cost- effectiveness of a face-to- face rehabilitation program vs a telemedicine program on disability, pain, fear of movement, quality of life, resistance of the trunk flexors, lumbar mobility in flexion and muscular electrical activity.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Face-to-Face Rehabilitation program, Telemedicine program
- Keywords
- Low back pain, Electroanalgesia, McKenzie Method, Telemedicine, Study protocol for a Randomized clinical trial
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Face-to-Face Rehabilitation programOther
In each hospital, two trained therapists will carry out a face-to-face rehabilitation program consisting of electroanalgesia and an exercise program that follows the Mckenzie method. The physiotherapists place the electrodes in the patients, for this they use 5x9 cm electrodes, which they place at the bilateral paravertebral level, in the patients who present with radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The duration will be sufficient to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal periarticular components of the spine.
Telemedicine programOther
It consists in an e-Health rehabilitation program through a web platform performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the Mckenzie method. Patients will be instructed in the use of the TENS device using 5x9cm electrodes at the bilateral paravertebral level, the patients that present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The realization of exercises will be through the application of an Mckezie protocol. The duration will be the same as that used to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal components periarticular of the spine.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Face-to Face rehabilitation program | Active comparator | Electroanalgesia therapy and the McKenzie exercise protocol will be applied by six therapists with more than 10 years of experience. This program will be developed in the rehabilitation service of the study health centers. Patients will perform the treatment 3 times per week, for 4 weeks, with a total of 24 sessions Receives: Other: Face-to-Face Rehabilitation program |
| Telemedicine Program | Experimental | It consists in a support system for the treatment of chronic low back pain based on web technologies. The system can register a subject and provide a treatment of electroanalgesia and exercise through the Mckenzie method. Video applications of electroanalgesia and exercises will be shown to patients who use their computer or mobile device to access the platform through the Internet. The treatments will be recommended by the system based on the database that is configured to accommodate the application of electroanalgesia and McKenzie exercises based on the diagnosis according to the McKenzie method.patients will perform the treatment 3 times per week, for 8 weeks, with a total of 24 sessions Receives: Other: Telemedicine program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).
This is a self-reported questionnaire consisting in 24 items reflecting limitations in different activities of daily living attributed to low back pain including walking, vending over, sitting, lying down, dressing, sleeping, self-care and daily activities.Ranging from 0 points- better to 24 points- worse disability
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change from baseline in disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Idex.
It has 10 items associated to activities of daily living, each ítem has a puntuation fron 0 to 5 points.The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months.
Change from baseline in pain intensity. Visual analogue scale.
A 10-point Numerical Pain Scale (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) assesses the intensity of pain. Range from no pain 0 to maximum pain 10 points
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in Fear of Movement. Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia.
Is a 17-item questionnaire that measures the fear of movement and (re)injury.Patient rate beliefs about their kinesiophobia on a 4-point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline on Quality of Life. SF-36 Health questionnaire.
SF-36 Health questionnaire scores range from 0 to 100% and indicate the self-perceived health-related quality of life.
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from Mcquade Test
It measures the isometric endurance of trunk flexion muscles.
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in lumbar mobility flexion.
For the quantification of lumbar flexion an angular inclinometer is used (Fleximeter UM 8320-3 RJ Code Research Institute, Brazil).
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Changes from baseline in Lumbar electromyography.
The degree of electromyographic activation of the lumbar paravertebral musculature will be carried out by using a set of electrodes of 3x7 dimensions that will be applied uniformly in the lumbar region from the spinal level from L2 to L5.
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baselina in range of motion
This variable is quantified using the SpinalMouse ® device (Phisiotech, Spain). It is an electronic computer-aided measuring device that measures sagittal spinal amplitude of movement (ROM) and intersegmental angles in a non-invasive way.
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baselina in lumbar segmental mobility
This variable is quantified using the SpinalMouse ® device (Phisiotech, Spain). It is an electronic computer-aided measuring device that measures sagittal spinal amplitude of movement (ROM) and intersegmental angles in a non-invasive way.
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in indirect non-medical costs
sick leave days due to low back pain and labor absenteeism costs in terms of workdays lost due to illness at salary level.
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in direct medical costs
costs of visits to primary care, emergency visits, home help received as a result of disability related to LBP, diagnostic tests and pharmaceutical products
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline direct non-medical costs
The patient expenses in transportation
Measured: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2020
- Primary completion1 Mar 2022
- Study completion1 Oct 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Study protocol for a double blinded two-arm randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 540 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de Almeria
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Junta de Andalucia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, Universidad de Almeria
- Investigators
- Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, PhD, Principal investigator, Almería University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04266366
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CE-IP00562
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Von Korff M, Moore JC. Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):911-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-9_part_2-200105011-00016.
PubMed 11346328Schaafsma FG, Whelan K, van der Beek AJ, van der Es-Lambeek LC, Ojajarvi A, Verbeek JH. Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD001822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822.pub3.
PubMed 23990391Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Strauch K, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Baum E, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Kochen MM, Donner-Banzhoff N. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):1714-20. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181cd656f.
PubMed 21374895Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005.
PubMed 18164449GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.
PubMed 27733282Froud R, Patterson S, Eldridge S, Seale C, Pincus T, Rajendran D, Fossum C, Underwood M. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people's lives. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Feb 21;15:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-50.
PubMed 24559519Palacin-Marin F, Esteban-Moreno B, Olea N, Herrera-Viedma E, Arroyo-Morales M. Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome assessments for low back pain in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):947-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318281a36c.
PubMed 23238489Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1. No abstract available.
PubMed 16550448Jensen CE, Riis A, Petersen KD, Jensen MB, Pedersen KM. Economic evaluation of an implementation strategy for the management of low back pain in general practice. Pain. 2017 May;158(5):891-899. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000851.
PubMed 28114182Petersen T, Kryger P, Ekdahl C, Olsen S, Jacobsen S. The effect of McKenzie therapy as compared with that of intensive strengthening training for the treatment of patients with subacute or chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Aug 15;27(16):1702-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208150-00004.
PubMed 12195058Khadilkar A, Milne S, Brosseau L, Robinson V, Saginur M, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells G. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub2.
PubMed 16034883Castro-Sanchez AM, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Gomez-Garcia S, Garcia-Lopez H, Andronis L, Albornoz-Cabello M, Lara Palomo IC. Study protocol randomised controlled trial comparison of cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of a face-to-face rehabilitation programme versus a telemedicine programme in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e040633. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040633.
PubMed 33310802
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Cost and Cost- Effectiveness of a Face-to-Face Rehabilitation Program vs an Telemedicine Program on Disability, Pain, Fear of Movement, Quality of Life and Spinal Mobility in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04266366
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CE-IP00562
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- Low back pain, Electroanalgesia, McKenzie Method, Telemedicine, Study protocol for a Randomized clinical trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 540 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de AlmeriaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Junta de Andalucia
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Perform a cost-utility analysis in patients with chronic low back pain through electroanalgesia treatment and exercises administered by telemedicine program versus face-to-face program
Detailed description
A double blind clinical trial will be developed in a sample of 80 subjects with chronic low back pain. Patients will receive 3 weekly sessions of electroanalgesia and an exercise program for 8 weeks, for a total of 24 sessions. The aim is to analyze the cost- effectiveness of a face-to- face rehabilitation program vs a telemedicine program on disability, pain, fear of movement, quality of life, resistance of the trunk flexors, lumbar mobility in flexion and muscular electrical activity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Study protocol for a double blinded two-arm randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Face-to Face rehabilitation program | Active comparator | Other: Face-to-Face Rehabilitation programElectroanalgesia therapy and the McKenzie exercise protocol will be applied by six therapists with more than 10 years of experience. This program will be developed in the rehabilitation service of the study health centers. Patients will perform the treatment 3 times per week, for 4 weeks, with a total of 24 sessions |
| Telemedicine Program | Experimental | Other: Telemedicine programIt consists in a support system for the treatment of chronic low back pain based on web technologies. The system can register a subject and provide a treatment of electroanalgesia and exercise through the Mckenzie method. Video applications of electroanalgesia and exercises will be shown to patients who use their computer or mobile device to access the platform through the Internet. The treatments will be recommended by the system based on the database that is configured to accommodate the application of electroanalgesia and McKenzie exercises based on the diagnosis according to the McKenzie method.patients will perform the treatment 3 times per week, for 8 weeks, with a total of 24 sessions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 67 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Low back pain ≥ 3 months.
- Age between 30 and 67 years old.
- Not being receiving physical therapy.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Presence of lumbar stenosis.
- Diagnosis of spondylolisthesis.
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
- Treatment with corticosteroids or oral medication in recent weeks.
- History of spine surgery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Face-to-Face Rehabilitation programIn each hospital, two trained therapists will carry out a face-to-face rehabilitation program consisting of electroanalgesia and an exercise program that follows the Mckenzie method. The physiotherapists place the electrodes in the patients, for this they use 5x9 cm electrodes, which they place at the bilateral paravertebral level, in the patients who present with radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The duration will be sufficient to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal periarticular components of the spine. | Other | Face-to Face rehabilitation program |
| Telemedicine programIt consists in an e-Health rehabilitation program through a web platform performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the Mckenzie method. Patients will be instructed in the use of the TENS device using 5x9cm electrodes at the bilateral paravertebral level, the patients that present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The realization of exercises will be through the application of an Mckezie protocol. The duration will be the same as that used to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal components periarticular of the spine. | Other | Telemedicine Program |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
This is a self-reported questionnaire consisting in 24 items reflecting limitations in different activities of daily living attributed to low back pain including walking, vending over, sitting, lying down, dressing, sleeping, self-care and daily activities.Ranging from 0 points- better to 24 points- worse disability
12 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Idex.
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months.
Change from baseline in pain intensity. Visual analogue scale.
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in Fear of Movement. Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia.
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline on Quality of Life. SF-36 Health questionnaire.
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from Mcquade Test
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in lumbar mobility flexion.
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Changes from baseline in Lumbar electromyography.
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baselina in range of motion
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baselina in lumbar segmental mobility
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in indirect non-medical costs
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in direct medical costs
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline direct non-medical costs
Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 11346328Von Korff M, Moore JC. Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):911-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-9_part_2-200105011-00016.
- Background: PubMed 23990391Schaafsma FG, Whelan K, van der Beek AJ, van der Es-Lambeek LC, Ojajarvi A, Verbeek JH. Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD001822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 21374895Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Strauch K, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Baum E, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Kochen MM, Donner-Banzhoff N. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):1714-20. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181cd656f.
- Background: PubMed 18164449Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005.
- Background: PubMed 27733282GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.
- Background: PubMed 24559519Froud R, Patterson S, Eldridge S, Seale C, Pincus T, Rajendran D, Fossum C, Underwood M. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people's lives. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Feb 21;15:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-50.
- Background: PubMed 23238489Palacin-Marin F, Esteban-Moreno B, Olea N, Herrera-Viedma E, Arroyo-Morales M. Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome assessments for low back pain in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):947-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318281a36c.
- Background: PubMed 16550448Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28114182Jensen CE, Riis A, Petersen KD, Jensen MB, Pedersen KM. Economic evaluation of an implementation strategy for the management of low back pain in general practice. Pain. 2017 May;158(5):891-899. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000851.
- Background: PubMed 12195058Petersen T, Kryger P, Ekdahl C, Olsen S, Jacobsen S. The effect of McKenzie therapy as compared with that of intensive strengthening training for the treatment of patients with subacute or chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Aug 15;27(16):1702-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208150-00004.
- Background: PubMed 16034883Khadilkar A, Milne S, Brosseau L, Robinson V, Saginur M, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells G. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33310802Castro-Sanchez AM, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Gomez-Garcia S, Garcia-Lopez H, Andronis L, Albornoz-Cabello M, Lara Palomo IC. Study protocol randomised controlled trial comparison of cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of a face-to-face rehabilitation programme versus a telemedicine programme in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e040633. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040633.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, PhD principal investigator
Almería University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Face-to-Face Rehabilitation program and Telemedicine program in people with Low Back Pain, run by Universidad de Almeria at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). (time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04266366, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2022.