Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)STEATO-POMPENCT04270656
Liver and Metabolic Effects of Insulin Pump Therapy in Diabetics Type 2 with Non-alcoholic Hepatic Steatosis
A study testing Insulin pump therapy and Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ). in people with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), run by Nantes University Hospital at 9 sites in France.
Trial summary
The prevalence of fatty liver disease (NAFLD: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or to a more severe degree NASH: Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis) reached 40-70% in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). NAFLD can be easily detected by performing a hepatic ultrasonography. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 37 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
- What is being tested?
- Insulin pump therapy and Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ).
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 5 Feb 2021to 23 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 37 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male / female 35/70 years (including ranges) with T2D ≥ 1 year
- Benefiting from the indication of use of the free Freestyle glucose meter
- Treatment with multi-injection insulin therapy comprising a daily injection of basal insulin (Glargine U100, Glargine U300, Degludec) and at least 2 daily injections of an insulin analogue (lispro, aspart or glulisine) +/- metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) at a dose stable for at least 3 months.
- For women of childbearing age, oestro-progestative pill, IUD, implant.
- 11% ≥ HbA1c ≥ 6.5%
- Presence of hepatic steatosis according to the ultrasonography
- Absence of chronic alcoholic intoxication
- Absence of chronic viral hepatitis or other chronic liver diseases (eg hemochromatosis ...)
Who cannot join
- Type 1 diabetes
- Contraindication to pump treatment
- Treatment with anti-diabetics or other than metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2)
- Treatment with basal inulin of Levemir
- Contraindication to performing MRI
- Chronic alcohol abuse (after alcohol consumption> 20g / day in men and> 10g / day in women) according to the medical examination
Show all 17Show fewer
- Chronic viral hepatitis based on HBV and HCV serology results
- Hemochromatosis according to the martial assessment
- Other toxic or drug hepatitis
- Severe hepatic pathology: hepatic cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma
- Severe renal insufficiency (MDRD <30 ml / min)
- Severe and progressive cardiovascular pathology
- Treatment (permanent or intermittent) with glucocorticoids
- Treatment known to improve hepatic steatosis (glitazone, vitamin E, orlistat)
- history or bariatric surgery project for the duration of the study
- Drug treatment likely to cause hepatic steatosis (amiodarone, carbamazepine, tamoxifen, valproate, clozapine, anti-retroviral drugs) unless the dose has been stable for ≥ 3 months
- Guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
France9 sites
CHU
Angers, 49933
CHU
Caen, 14033
CHU
Dijon, 21000
CHU
La Rochette, 17019
Hospices Civils
Lyon, 69495
Nantes UH
Nantes, 44093
CHU
Poitiers, 86000
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, 35203
CHU
Toulouse, 31059
About this study
Official title: Liver and Metabolic Effects of Insulin Pump Therapy in a Population of Type 2 Diabetics with Non-alcoholic Hepatic Steatosis
The prevalence of fatty liver disease (NAFLD: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or to a more severe degree NASH: Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis) reached 40-70% in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). NAFLD can be easily detected by performing a hepatic ultrasonography. The presence of a NAFLD is positively correlated with the severity of insulin resistance and dysglycemia in this population. The presence of NAFLD worsens the prognosis of T2D with an increased cardiovascular risk. This hepatic impairment would also increase the risk of microvascular complications, especially nephropathy. Conversely, T2D increases the risk of transition from NAFLD to NASH and then to hepatic fibrosis and its related complications (cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma). The risk of progression of liver steatosis to fibrosis is also more important as diabetes and insulin resistance are more severe.
In addition to diabetes and insulin resistance, other risk factors are associated with more severe liver damage such as changes in microbiota. Indeed, it has already been described a smaller amount of bacteroides in the microbiota of subjects with T2D and the most severe hepatic impairment. The treatment of NAFLD/NASH is poorly codified without approved drugs in this indication, while many phase 3 trials with candidate drugs are undergoing. Life-style measures (physical activity and low carbohydrate/calorie diet) can limit the progression from NAFLD to more severe liver fibrosis. Some bariatric surgery studies have also shown good results in this situation. Pharmacological interventions are also reported with proven efficacy of pioglitazone, vitamin E and orlistat.
Read more
The OPT2MISE study has recently shown the superiority of insulin pump (or continuous sub-cutaneous insulin infusion: CSII) compared to multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) to improve glycemic control in a population of patients with T2D in failure of well-titrated MDI. In addition, treatment with CSII showed a 45% decrease in insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA-IR) in a population of newly diagnosed T2D.
In light of these data, investigators hypothesize that the introduction of insulin pump treatment in a population of subjects with T2D and NAFLD, by improving insulin sensitivity, could reduce fatty liver content compared to standard MDI treatment.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
- Being tested
- Insulin pump therapy, Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ).
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Insulin pump therapyProcedure or surgery
5-day hospitalization in case of randomization in the insulin pump group (insulin pump establishing in according to the recommendations of the HAS)
Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ).Procedure or surgery
Corresponds to an outpatient visit if the patient is randomized into the multi-injection group
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin pump therapy | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Insulin pump therapy |
| Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ). | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Variation of hepatic steatosis, between the insulin pump therapy (CSII) vs Multi injection treatement (MDI) groups.
Change of fatty liver by MRI quantification
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (22)
In the CSII group : avantage of an insulin pump treatment on the fatty liver between inclusion and the 6th month,
Variation of hepatic steatosis (MRI quantization by gradient echo sequences \& centralized reading
Measured: 6 months
In the CSII group : avantage of an insulin pump treatment on the fatty liver (quantified by MRI), between inclusion and the 12th month,
Variation of hepatic steatosis (MRI quantization by gradient echo sequences \& centralized reading
Measured: 12 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months, on hepatic biological parameters and non-invasive biomarkers of fatty liver (FLI) and of fibrosis of the liver (FIB-4 and NAFLD Score),
Liver fonction (AST ; ALAT ; GGT ; PAL ; Ferritin) Test-fibrosis score criteria (FIB- 4 and NAFLD Score) ; FLI
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on insulin sensitivity
dosage of plasma adiponectin
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on insulin sensitivity
calculation of the modified HOMA-IR index (peptide C, blood sugar),
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on glycemic balance
HbA1c dosages
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on the total daily insulin dose
daily insulin dose record
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
total cholesterol
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
LDL-cholesterol
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
HDL-cholesterol
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
triglycerides (TG)
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
fatty-free acids
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
ApoB,
Measured: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on CRPus
Ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein (CRPus)
Measured: 6 months
Evaluation of quality of life
DTSQ
Measured: 6 months
Evaluation of quality of life
SF36
Measured: 6 months
Safety analysis at 6 months: comparison the first 6 months, in the CSII and MDI groups:
Reporting by patient of all severe hypoglycemia during the study
Measured: 6 months
Safety analysis at 6 months: comparison the first 6 months, in the CSII and MDI groups:
Reporting by the patient of all episode of ketoacidosis during the study
Measured: 6 months
Calculation of the sensitivity values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population,
quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Measured: 6 months
Calculation of the specificity values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Measured: 6 months
Calculation of the positive predictive values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Measured: 6 months
Calculation negative predictive values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2020
- Study start5 Feb 2021
- Primary completion23 Sep 2024
- Study completion23 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nantes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Angers
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04270656
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC19_0449
- Acronym
- STEATO-POMPE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 17 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Liver and Metabolic Effects of Insulin Pump Therapy in a Population of Type 2 Diabetics with Non-alcoholic Hepatic Steatosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04270656
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STEATO-POMPE / RC19_0449
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Angers
- Study start
- 5 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The prevalence of fatty liver disease (NAFLD: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or to a more severe degree NASH: Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis) reached 40-70% in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). NAFLD can be easily detected by performing a hepatic ultrasonography. The presence of a NAFLD is positively correlated with the severity of insulin resistance and dysglycemia in this population. The presence of NAFLD worsens the prognosis of T2D with an increased cardiovascular risk. This hepatic impairment would also increase the risk of microvascular complications, especially nephropathy. Conversely, T2D increases the risk of transition from NAFLD to NASH and then to hepatic fibrosis and its related complications (cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma). The risk of progression of liver steatosis to fibrosis is also more important as diabetes and insulin resistance are more severe.
In addition to diabetes and insulin resistance, other risk factors are associated with more severe liver damage such as changes in microbiota. Indeed, it has already been described a smaller amount of bacteroides in the microbiota of subjects with T2D and the most severe hepatic impairment. The treatment of NAFLD/NASH is poorly codified without approved drugs in this indication, while many phase 3 trials with candidate drugs are undergoing. Life-style measures (physical activity and low carbohydrate/calorie diet) can limit the progression from NAFLD to more severe liver fibrosis. Some bariatric surgery studies have also shown good results in this situation. Pharmacological interventions are also reported with proven efficacy of pioglitazone, vitamin E and orlistat.
The OPT2MISE study has recently shown the superiority of insulin pump (or continuous sub-cutaneous insulin infusion: CSII) compared to multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) to improve glycemic control in a population of patients with T2D in failure of well-titrated MDI. In addition, treatment with CSII showed a 45% decrease in insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA-IR) in a population of newly diagnosed T2D.
In light of these data, investigators hypothesize that the introduction of insulin pump treatment in a population of subjects with T2D and NAFLD, by improving insulin sensitivity, could reduce fatty liver content compared to standard MDI treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin pump therapy | Experimental | Procedure: Insulin pump therapy |
| Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ). | Active comparator | Procedure: Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 37 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Male / female 35/70 years (including ranges) with T2D ≥ 1 year
- Benefiting from the indication of use of the free Freestyle glucose meter
- Treatment with multi-injection insulin therapy comprising a daily injection of basal insulin (Glargine U100, Glargine U300, Degludec) and at least 2 daily injections of an insulin analogue (lispro, aspart or glulisine) +/- metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) at a dose stable for at least 3 months.
- For women of childbearing age, oestro-progestative pill, IUD, implant.
- 11% ≥ HbA1c ≥ 6.5%
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Type 1 diabetes
- Contraindication to pump treatment
- Treatment with anti-diabetics or other than metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2)
- Treatment with basal inulin of Levemir
- Contraindication to performing MRI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin pump therapy5-day hospitalization in case of randomization in the insulin pump group (insulin pump establishing in according to the recommendations of the HAS) | Procedure or surgery | Insulin pump therapy |
| Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ).Corresponds to an outpatient visit if the patient is randomized into the multi-injection group | Procedure or surgery | Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ). |
Primary outcome
Variation of hepatic steatosis, between the insulin pump therapy (CSII) vs Multi injection treatement (MDI) groups.
Time frame: 6 months
Change of fatty liver by MRI quantification
22 secondary outcomes
In the CSII group : avantage of an insulin pump treatment on the fatty liver between inclusion and the 6th month,
Time frame: 6 months
In the CSII group : avantage of an insulin pump treatment on the fatty liver (quantified by MRI), between inclusion and the 12th month,
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months, on hepatic biological parameters and non-invasive biomarkers of fatty liver (FLI) and of fibrosis of the liver (FIB-4 and NAFLD Score),
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on insulin sensitivity
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on insulin sensitivity
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on glycemic balance
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on the total daily insulin dose
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on CRPus
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 6 months
Safety analysis at 6 months: comparison the first 6 months, in the CSII and MDI groups:
Time frame: 6 months
Safety analysis at 6 months: comparison the first 6 months, in the CSII and MDI groups:
Time frame: 6 months
Calculation of the sensitivity values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population,
Time frame: 6 months
Calculation of the specificity values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Time frame: 6 months
Calculation of the positive predictive values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Time frame: 6 months
Calculation negative predictive values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Oct 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Insulin pump therapy and Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ). in people with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), run by Nantes University Hospital at 9 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Variation of hepatic steatosis, between the insulin pump therapy (CSII) vs Multi injection treatement (MDI) groups. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2024.