GlaucomaNCT04271709
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT)
A study testing Enhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators in people with Glaucoma and Vision Impairment and Blindness, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators are conducting a 5-year prospective, 2:1 cluster-randomized controlled trial, funded by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which provides vision screenings to underserved New York City residents living in affordable housing buildings in Harlem and Washington Heights. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Glaucoma, Vision Impairment and Blindness, Cataract
- What is being tested?
- Enhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 749 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2019to 29 Sep 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals over age 40
- Living independently in NYCHA housing building or attending DFTA Senior Center
- Willing to answer COVID-19 symptom questions
- Willing to consent for 2 vision screening visits at baseline and 12-month follow-up
Who cannot join
- Self-reported terminal illness with life expectancy less than 1 year
- Inability to provide informed consent due to dementia or other reasons
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT)
The investigators are conducting a 5-year prospective, 2:1 cluster-randomized controlled trial, funded by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which provides vision screenings to underserved New York City residents living in affordable housing buildings in Harlem and Washington Heights.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to increase engagement, detection and management of glaucoma, vision impairment, cataracts, and other eye diseases in vulnerable populations living in New York City. This study considers disparities by race, ethnicity, gender, geography, and socioeconomic status using innovative approaches such as patient navigators. Individuals over the age of 40 living in New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) Housing buildings are eligible.
- Being tested
- Enhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators, Usual Care
- Keywords
- Vision Screening, Follow-up Eye Care, Vulnerable Populations, New York City
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma, Vision Disorders, Blindness, Cataract, Diabetic Retinopathy, Eye Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enhanced Intervention Using Patient NavigatorsBehavioural
Enhanced support by patient navigators assisted with follow-up eye exam appointment scheduling and arranging transportation over a 1-year period.
Usual CareOther
Usual Care subjects who failed the screening and needed vision correction were given an eyeglasses prescription and a list of optical shops within 1 mile from their home. These subjects did not receive enhanced support. Scheduling this initial appointment will allow tracking of adherence.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Intervention | Active comparator | Consented subjects living in buildings randomized to the Patient Navigator Intervention arm who failed the screening and needed vision correction received free eyeglasses, which were fitted by an optician at the housing building. If they were referred to an ophthalmologist for a follow-up eye exam, they received enhanced support with patient navigators to assist with follow-up eye exams at Columbia Ophthalmology or Harlem Hospital, specifically eye exam appointment scheduling and arranging transportation over a 1-year period. Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators |
| Usual Care | Placebo comparator | Consented subjects living in buildings randomized to Usual Care arm who failed the screening and needed vision correction were given an eyeglasses prescription and a list of optical shops within 1 mile from their home. These subjects who are referred to an ophthalmologist for a follow-up eye exam were only scheduled for their initial appointment at either Columbia Ophthalmology or Harlem Hospital. They did not receive enhanced support. Scheduling this initial appointment allowed tracking of adherence. Receives: Other: Usual Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Subjects with Visual Acuity Worse than 20/40
Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of the spatial resolution of the visual processing system. Visual acuity will be measured in each eye and measured as ≤20/40 or >20/40. Since there are two best corrected distance visual acuity measurements per person (right eye and left eye), the visual acuity in the worse eye will be used in the analysis and reported at the patient level, rather than the eye level. Visual acuity analysis will be handled as a dichotomous variable and the proportion of subjects with visual acuity 20/40 or worse will be considered abnormal.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2020
- Study start30 Sep 2019
- Primary completion29 Sep 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion29 Sep 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GlaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Columbia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 2:1 randomization by housing development
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 749 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lisa Hark, PhD, MBA, Columbia University
- Investigators
- Lisa A. Hark, PhD, RD, Principal investigator, Columbia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04271709
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAAR9162
- Other IDs
- U01DP006436
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sapru S, Berktold J, Crews JE, Katz LJ, Hark L, Girkin CA, Owsley C, Francis B, Saaddine JB. Applying RE-AIM to evaluate two community-based programs designed to improve access to eye care for those at high-risk for glaucoma. Eval Program Plann. 2017 Dec;65:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PubMed 28689028Hark L, Acito M, Adeghate J, Henderer J, Okudolo J, Malik K, Molineaux J, Eburuoh R, Zhan T, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Ocular Findings at Two Health Centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(4):1400-1415. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0103.
PubMed 30449754Pizzi LT, Waisbourd M, Hark L, Sembhi H, Lee P, Crews JE, Saaddine JB, Steele D, Katz LJ. Costs of a community-based glaucoma detection programme: analysis of the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;102(2):225-232. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310078. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
PubMed 28655730Waisbourd M, Shafa A, Delvadia R, Sembhi H, Molineaux J, Henderer J, Pizzi LT, Myers JS, Hark LA, Katz LJ. Bilateral Same-day Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. J Glaucoma. 2016 Oct;25(10):e821-e825. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000409.
PubMed 26950579Hark LA, Radakrishnan A, Madhava M, Anderson-Quinones C, Fudemberg S, Robinson D, Myers JS, Zhan T, Adeghate J, Hegarty S, Leite S, Leiby BE, Stempel S, Katz LJ. Awareness of ocular diagnosis, transportation means, and barriers to ophthalmology follow-up in the Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study. Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Aug;58(7):651-664. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1614711. Epub 2019 May 23.
PubMed 31120381Hark LA, Adeghate J, Katz LJ, Ulas M, Waisbourd M, Maity A, Zhan T, Hegarty S, Leiby BE, Pasquale LR, Leite S, Saaddine JB, Haller JA, Myers JS. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study: Cataract Classifications Following Eye Screening. Telemed J E Health. 2020 Aug;26(8):992-1000. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0170. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
PubMed 31721654Adeghate JO, Hark LA, Brown H, Henderer JD, Waisbourd M, Molineaux J, Malik K, Maity A, Chuang D, Donches K, Heres C, Eburuoh R, Schardt M, Yu D, Ramsey F, Myers JS, Katz LJ. Philadelphia glaucoma detection and treatment project: ocular outcomes and adherence to follow-up at a single health centre. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;54(6):717-722. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
PubMed 31836105Hark LA, Myers JS, Pasquale LR, Razeghinejad MR, Maity A, Zhan T, Hegarty SE, Leiby BE, Waisbourd M, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Henderer JD, Haller JA, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Intraocular Pressure Measurements Found in a Population at High Risk for Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2019 Apr;28(4):294-301. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001207.
PubMed 30946709Hark LA, Myers JS, Ines A, Jiang A, Rahmatnejad K, Zhan T, Leiby BE, Hegarty S, Fudemberg SJ, Mantravadi AV, Waisbourd M, Henderer JD, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Pizzi LT, Murchison AP, Saaddine J, Pasquale LR, Haller JA, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: confirmation between eye screening and comprehensive eye examination diagnoses. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;103(12):1820-1826. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313451. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
PubMed 30770354Hark LA, Katz LJ, Myers JS, Waisbourd M, Johnson D, Pizzi LT, Leiby BE, Fudemberg SJ, Mantravadi AV, Henderer JD, Zhan T, Molineaux J, Doyle V, Divers M, Burns C, Murchison AP, Reber S, Resende A, Bui TDV, Lee J, Crews JE, Saaddine JB, Lee PP, Pasquale LR, Haller JA. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Methods and Screening Results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;181:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
PubMed 28673747Leiby BE, Hegarty SE, Zhan T, Myers JS, Katz LJ, Haller JA, Waisbourd M, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Henderer J, Brodowski C, Hark LA. A Randomized Trial to Improve Adherence to Follow-up Eye Examinations Among People With Glaucoma. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 May 20;18:E52. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200567.
PubMed 34014814Newman-Casey PA, Hark LA, Rhodes LA. It Is Time to Rethink Adult Glaucoma Screening Recommendations. J Glaucoma. 2023 Feb 1;32(2):69-71. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002146. Epub 2022 Nov 25. No abstract available.
PubMed 36696354De Moraes CG, Hark LA, Saaddine J. Screening and Interventions for Glaucoma and Eye Health Through Telemedicine (SIGHT) Studies. J Glaucoma. 2021 May 1;30(5):369-370. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001782. No abstract available.
PubMed 33428354Hark LA, Kresch YS, De Moraes CG, Horowitz JD, Park L, Auran JD, Gorroochurn P, Stempel S, Maruri SC, Stidham EM, Banks AZ, Saaddine JB, Lambert BC, Pizzi LT, Sapru S, Price S, Williams OA, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JM. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study in Vulnerable Populations (NYC-SIGHT): Design and Methodology. J Glaucoma. 2021 May 1;30(5):388-394. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001795.
PubMed 33492894Hark LA, Lin WV, Hirji S, Gorroochurn P, Horowitz JD, Diamond DF, Park L, Wang Q, Auran JD, Maruri SC, Henriquez DR, Sharma T, Valenzuela I, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA, Friedman DS, Harizman N. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Subanalysis of Referral to Ophthalmology. Curr Eye Res. 2024 Feb;49(2):197-206. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2023.2269614. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
PubMed 37812506
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04271709
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AAAR9162
- Keywords
- Vision Screening, Follow-up Eye Care, Vulnerable Populations, New York City
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 749 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Sep 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 29 Sep 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators are conducting a 5-year prospective, 2:1 cluster-randomized controlled trial, funded by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which provides vision screenings to underserved New York City residents living in affordable housing buildings in Harlem and Washington Heights.
Detailed description
This study aims to increase engagement, detection and management of glaucoma, vision impairment, cataracts, and other eye diseases in vulnerable populations living in New York City. This study considers disparities by race, ethnicity, gender, geography, and socioeconomic status using innovative approaches such as patient navigators. Individuals over the age of 40 living in New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) Housing buildings are eligible.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 2:1 randomization by housing development
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: Enhanced Intervention Using Patient NavigatorsConsented subjects living in buildings randomized to the Patient Navigator Intervention arm who failed the screening and needed vision correction received free eyeglasses, which were fitted by an optician at the housing building. If they were referred to an ophthalmologist for a follow-up eye exam, they received enhanced support with patient navigators to assist with follow-up eye exams at Columbia Ophthalmology or Harlem Hospital, specifically eye exam appointment scheduling and arranging transportation over a 1-year period. |
| Usual Care | Placebo comparator | Other: Usual CareConsented subjects living in buildings randomized to Usual Care arm who failed the screening and needed vision correction were given an eyeglasses prescription and a list of optical shops within 1 mile from their home. These subjects who are referred to an ophthalmologist for a follow-up eye exam were only scheduled for their initial appointment at either Columbia Ophthalmology or Harlem Hospital. They did not receive enhanced support. Scheduling this initial appointment allowed tracking of adherence. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Individuals over age 40
- Living independently in NYCHA housing building or attending DFTA Senior Center
- Willing to answer COVID-19 symptom questions
- Willing to consent for 2 vision screening visits at baseline and 12-month follow-up
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Self-reported terminal illness with life expectancy less than 1 year
- Inability to provide informed consent due to dementia or other reasons
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Intervention Using Patient NavigatorsEnhanced support by patient navigators assisted with follow-up eye exam appointment scheduling and arranging transportation over a 1-year period. | Behavioural | Enhanced Intervention |
| Usual CareUsual Care subjects who failed the screening and needed vision correction were given an eyeglasses prescription and a list of optical shops within 1 mile from their home. These subjects did not receive enhanced support. Scheduling this initial appointment will allow tracking of adherence. | Other | Usual Care |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Subjects with Visual Acuity Worse than 20/40
Time frame: 2 years
Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of the spatial resolution of the visual processing system. Visual acuity will be measured in each eye and measured as ≤20/40 or >20/40. Since there are two best corrected distance visual acuity measurements per person (right eye and left eye), the visual acuity in the worse eye will be used in the analysis and reported at the patient level, rather than the eye level. Visual acuity analysis will be handled as a dichotomous variable and the proportion of subjects with visual acuity 20/40 or worse will be considered abnormal.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28689028Sapru S, Berktold J, Crews JE, Katz LJ, Hark L, Girkin CA, Owsley C, Francis B, Saaddine JB. Applying RE-AIM to evaluate two community-based programs designed to improve access to eye care for those at high-risk for glaucoma. Eval Program Plann. 2017 Dec;65:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
- Background: PubMed 30449754Hark L, Acito M, Adeghate J, Henderer J, Okudolo J, Malik K, Molineaux J, Eburuoh R, Zhan T, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Ocular Findings at Two Health Centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(4):1400-1415. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0103.
- Background: PubMed 28655730Pizzi LT, Waisbourd M, Hark L, Sembhi H, Lee P, Crews JE, Saaddine JB, Steele D, Katz LJ. Costs of a community-based glaucoma detection programme: analysis of the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;102(2):225-232. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310078. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 26950579Waisbourd M, Shafa A, Delvadia R, Sembhi H, Molineaux J, Henderer J, Pizzi LT, Myers JS, Hark LA, Katz LJ. Bilateral Same-day Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. J Glaucoma. 2016 Oct;25(10):e821-e825. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000409.
- Background: PubMed 31120381Hark LA, Radakrishnan A, Madhava M, Anderson-Quinones C, Fudemberg S, Robinson D, Myers JS, Zhan T, Adeghate J, Hegarty S, Leite S, Leiby BE, Stempel S, Katz LJ. Awareness of ocular diagnosis, transportation means, and barriers to ophthalmology follow-up in the Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study. Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Aug;58(7):651-664. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1614711. Epub 2019 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 31721654Hark LA, Adeghate J, Katz LJ, Ulas M, Waisbourd M, Maity A, Zhan T, Hegarty S, Leiby BE, Pasquale LR, Leite S, Saaddine JB, Haller JA, Myers JS. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study: Cataract Classifications Following Eye Screening. Telemed J E Health. 2020 Aug;26(8):992-1000. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0170. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 31836105Adeghate JO, Hark LA, Brown H, Henderer JD, Waisbourd M, Molineaux J, Malik K, Maity A, Chuang D, Donches K, Heres C, Eburuoh R, Schardt M, Yu D, Ramsey F, Myers JS, Katz LJ. Philadelphia glaucoma detection and treatment project: ocular outcomes and adherence to follow-up at a single health centre. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;54(6):717-722. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
- Background: PubMed 30946709Hark LA, Myers JS, Pasquale LR, Razeghinejad MR, Maity A, Zhan T, Hegarty SE, Leiby BE, Waisbourd M, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Henderer JD, Haller JA, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Intraocular Pressure Measurements Found in a Population at High Risk for Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2019 Apr;28(4):294-301. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001207.
- Background: PubMed 30770354Hark LA, Myers JS, Ines A, Jiang A, Rahmatnejad K, Zhan T, Leiby BE, Hegarty S, Fudemberg SJ, Mantravadi AV, Waisbourd M, Henderer JD, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Pizzi LT, Murchison AP, Saaddine J, Pasquale LR, Haller JA, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: confirmation between eye screening and comprehensive eye examination diagnoses. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;103(12):1820-1826. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313451. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 28673747Hark LA, Katz LJ, Myers JS, Waisbourd M, Johnson D, Pizzi LT, Leiby BE, Fudemberg SJ, Mantravadi AV, Henderer JD, Zhan T, Molineaux J, Doyle V, Divers M, Burns C, Murchison AP, Reber S, Resende A, Bui TDV, Lee J, Crews JE, Saaddine JB, Lee PP, Pasquale LR, Haller JA. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Methods and Screening Results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;181:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 34014814Leiby BE, Hegarty SE, Zhan T, Myers JS, Katz LJ, Haller JA, Waisbourd M, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Henderer J, Brodowski C, Hark LA. A Randomized Trial to Improve Adherence to Follow-up Eye Examinations Among People With Glaucoma. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 May 20;18:E52. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200567.
- Background: PubMed 36696354Newman-Casey PA, Hark LA, Rhodes LA. It Is Time to Rethink Adult Glaucoma Screening Recommendations. J Glaucoma. 2023 Feb 1;32(2):69-71. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002146. Epub 2022 Nov 25. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Glaucoma
Recruiting
Timing of Glaucoma Drainage Device With Boston Keratoprosthesis
Corneal Transplantation, Glaucoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Iopidine to Decrease Intraocular Pressure Rise After Injections
Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
VGFTe-(HD)-OD-2566: Adjunctive Aflibercept Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AAA) Study
Glaucoma
Recruiting
Inflammatory Mediators of Glaucoma After Corneal Transplantation (AH-Tears)
Glaucoma, Corneal Transplantation
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study About the Safety of ASP2767 and Whether it Helps People With Glaucoma-Related Optic Nerve Damage
Glaucoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisa A. Hark, PhD, RD principal investigator
Columbia University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Enhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators in people with Glaucoma and Vision Impairment and Blindness, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Subjects with Visual Acuity Worse than 20/40 (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04271709, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2026.