Spinal Cord InjuryNCT04271904
Effect of Sham Anti-inflammatory Diet on Inflammation After Spinal Cord Injury
A study of Spinal Cord Injury and Inflammation, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This pilot study will evaluate the effects of a placebo anti-inflammatory diet in individuals with spinal cord injury. It is being performed to ensure that the placebo diet does not induce reductions in inflammation and also adequately conceals group allocation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury, Inflammation
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2020to 3 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent obtained prior to any study-related activities
- A spinal cord injury at least 6 months duration, nonprogressive for at least 6 months
- Dosing of other pain medications (NSAIDs, opioids, non-opioid analgesics, anti-epileptic drugs, antidepressants) should be stable for at least 1 month prior to study entry.
Who cannot join
- Current infection of any kind.
- Presence of other neurologic conditions, medical conditions or pain that could confound the assessment of neuropathic pain after SCI
- Currently enrolled in another clinical trial
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study, may influence the result of the study, or affect the patient's ability to participate in the study
- Following a physical examination, the patient has any abnormalities that, in the opinion of the investigator would prevent the patient from safe participation in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of a Sham Anti-inflammatory Diet on Inflammation and Participant Blinding in Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study
This pilot study will evaluate the effects of a placebo anti-inflammatory diet in individuals with spinal cord injury. It is being performed to ensure that the placebo diet does not induce reductions in inflammation and also adequately conceals group allocation.
Read the detailed description
Anti-inflammatory diet is a novel treatment that may be beneficial for managing chronic inflammation and neuropathic pain (NP) after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). NP is a common complication following SCI that significantly decreases quality of life. Treatment options are limited, and current treatments can have significant side effects. Those with SCI have identified a need for additional treatment options, particularly those that are not medications.
As pain is a subjective outcome, awareness of group allocation could influence treatment expectations and participant rated scores of neuropathic pain. It is therefore important to ensure that an adequate placebo intervention is utilized. This pilot study will assess whether the placebo diet to be used in an upcoming RCT provides sufficient group allocation concealment (i.e. ensure participants are unaware of whether they are on the anti-inflammatory diet or placebo diet). This pilot study will also assess whether the placebo diet is in fact inflammation neutral (ie. induces no reductions in inflammation).
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Inflammation
- Being tested
- Placebo Diet
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placebo DietOther
The dietitian will assist in developing a diet that is isocaloric to the anti-inflammatory diet and healthy (for the sake of the participants' well-being, and to blind participants), while allowing many foods that are (counterintuitively) pro-inflammatory (e.g. whole wheat bread, white beans, oats, soy, eggplant, raspberries, pumpkin seeds, popcorn, etc). Occasional "cheat" foods are built into the placebo diet but with more pro-inflammatory options (e.g. two glasses of wine per week).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo Diet | Sham comparator | Participants on the placebo diet will be given a meal plan and recipes by the study dietitian. The dietitian will assist in developing a diet that is isocaloric to the anti-inflammatory diet and healthy (for the sake of the participants' well-being, and to blind participants), while allowing many foods that are (counterintuitively) pro-inflammatory (e.g. whole wheat bread, white beans, oats, soy, eggplant, raspberries, pumpkin seeds, popcorn, etc). There are many counter-intuitive restrictions in the anti-inflammatory diet that we will be using (banned foods include white beans, soy, eggplant, oats, raspberries, strawberries, prunes, walnuts, cashews, soy milk. Allowed foods include maple syrup, honey, lean beef, lamb, brown rice, feta cheese, butter). Therefore, even fairly astute and educated participants may have trouble discerning which diet they are consuming (anti-inflammatory or placebo). Receives: Other: Placebo Diet |
| Non-dieting Control | No intervention | Those in the non-dieting control condition will not be asked to alter their diet in any way. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
C-Reactive Protein
Change in plasma C-reactive protein from baseline to post intervention.
Measured: Baseline and Week-5 (post measures collected following 1-week group allocation period and 4-week intervention)
Diet Compliance
Diet compliance will be assessed following the intervention. Compliance to the specific diet will be assessed by a detailed analysis of all diet records. Each food item will be categorized as either a "food to consume," a "food to avoid," or a "neutral food" based on the parameter of the diet participants who were instructed to follow. Food will also be categorized into servings in accordance with Canada's Food Guide. Therefore, compliance score will be based on standard servings of foods subjects were instructed to eat vs. foods they were instructed to avoid. To account for differences in total energy intake, compliance scores will be expressed as a ratio of the servings of foods to consume over the total servings of food (avoid + consume) multiplied by 100. The percent compliance will then be generated.
Measured: Week-5 (post measures collected following 1-week group allocation period and 4-week intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Oct 2020
- Primary completion3 Jun 2022
- Study completion3 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Eligible participants who consent to study participation will be randomized to one of two groups: placebo diet, or non-dieting control. Those on the placebo diet will be given a meal plan and recipes while the non-dieting control group will be asked to continue eating as usual. The intervention will run for 4-week period.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eldon Loh, MD, Principal investigator, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04271904
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AINP001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Loh E, Guy SD, Mehta S, Moulin DE, Bryce TN, Middleton JW, Siddall PJ, Hitzig SL, Widerstrom-Noga E, Finnerup NB, Kras-Dupuis A, Casalino A, Craven BC, Lau B, Cote I, Harvey D, O'Connell C, Orenczuk S, Parrent AG, Potter P, Short C, Teasell R, Townson A, Truchon C, Bradbury CL, Wolfe D. The CanPain SCI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation Management of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord: introduction, methodology and recommendation overview. Spinal Cord. 2016 Aug;54 Suppl 1:S1-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.88.
PubMed 27444714Guy SD, Mehta S, Casalino A, Cote I, Kras-Dupuis A, Moulin DE, Parrent AG, Potter P, Short C, Teasell R, Bradbury CL, Bryce TN, Craven BC, Finnerup NB, Harvey D, Hitzig SL, Lau B, Middleton JW, O'Connell C, Orenczuk S, Siddall PJ, Townson A, Truchon C, Widerstrom-Noga E, Wolfe D, Loh E. The CanPain SCI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation Management of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord: Recommendations for treatment. Spinal Cord. 2016 Aug;54 Suppl 1:S14-23. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.90.
PubMed 27444715Allison DJ, Thomas A, Beaudry K, Ditor DS. Targeting inflammation as a treatment modality for neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Jun 17;13(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0625-4.
PubMed 27316678
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of a Sham Anti-inflammatory Diet on Inflammation and Participant Blinding in Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04271904
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AINP001
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Inflammation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot study will evaluate the effects of a placebo anti-inflammatory diet in individuals with spinal cord injury. It is being performed to ensure that the placebo diet does not induce reductions in inflammation and also adequately conceals group allocation.
Detailed description
Anti-inflammatory diet is a novel treatment that may be beneficial for managing chronic inflammation and neuropathic pain (NP) after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). NP is a common complication following SCI that significantly decreases quality of life. Treatment options are limited, and current treatments can have significant side effects. Those with SCI have identified a need for additional treatment options, particularly those that are not medications.
As pain is a subjective outcome, awareness of group allocation could influence treatment expectations and participant rated scores of neuropathic pain. It is therefore important to ensure that an adequate placebo intervention is utilized. This pilot study will assess whether the placebo diet to be used in an upcoming RCT provides sufficient group allocation concealment (i.e. ensure participants are unaware of whether they are on the anti-inflammatory diet or placebo diet). This pilot study will also assess whether the placebo diet is in fact inflammation neutral (ie. induces no reductions in inflammation).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Eligible participants who consent to study participation will be randomized to one of two groups: placebo diet, or non-dieting control. Those on the placebo diet will be given a meal plan and recipes while the non-dieting control group will be asked to continue eating as usual. The intervention will run for 4-week period.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo Diet | Sham comparator | Other: Placebo DietParticipants on the placebo diet will be given a meal plan and recipes by the study dietitian. The dietitian will assist in developing a diet that is isocaloric to the anti-inflammatory diet and healthy (for the sake of the participants' well-being, and to blind participants), while allowing many foods that are (counterintuitively) pro-inflammatory (e.g. whole wheat bread, white beans, oats, soy, eggplant, raspberries, pumpkin seeds, popcorn, etc). There are many counter-intuitive restrictions in the anti-inflammatory diet that we will be using (banned foods include white beans, soy, eggplant, oats, raspberries, strawberries, prunes, walnuts, cashews, soy milk. Allowed foods include maple syrup, honey, lean beef, lamb, brown rice, feta cheese, butter). Therefore, even fairly astute and educated participants may have trouble discerning which diet they are consuming (anti-inflammatory or placebo). |
| Non-dieting Control | No intervention | –Those in the non-dieting control condition will not be asked to alter their diet in any way. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Signed informed consent obtained prior to any study-related activities
- A spinal cord injury at least 6 months duration, nonprogressive for at least 6 months
- Dosing of other pain medications (NSAIDs, opioids, non-opioid analgesics, anti-epileptic drugs, antidepressants) should be stable for at least 1 month prior to study entry.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Current infection of any kind.
- Presence of other neurologic conditions, medical conditions or pain that could confound the assessment of neuropathic pain after SCI
- Currently enrolled in another clinical trial
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study, may influence the result of the study, or affect the patient's ability to participate in the study
- Following a physical examination, the patient has any abnormalities that, in the opinion of the investigator would prevent the patient from safe participation in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo DietThe dietitian will assist in developing a diet that is isocaloric to the anti-inflammatory diet and healthy (for the sake of the participants' well-being, and to blind participants), while allowing many foods that are (counterintuitively) pro-inflammatory (e.g. whole wheat bread, white beans, oats, soy, eggplant, raspberries, pumpkin seeds, popcorn, etc). Occasional "cheat" foods are built into the placebo diet but with more pro-inflammatory options (e.g. two glasses of wine per week). | Other | Placebo Diet |
Primary outcome
C-Reactive Protein
Time frame: Baseline and Week-5 (post measures collected following 1-week group allocation period and 4-week intervention)
Change in plasma C-reactive protein from baseline to post intervention.
Diet Compliance
Time frame: Week-5 (post measures collected following 1-week group allocation period and 4-week intervention)
Diet compliance will be assessed following the intervention. Compliance to the specific diet will be assessed by a detailed analysis of all diet records. Each food item will be categorized as either a "food to consume," a "food to avoid," or a "neutral food" based on the parameter of the diet participants who were instructed to follow. Food will also be categorized into servings in accordance with Canada's Food Guide. Therefore, compliance score will be based on standard servings of foods subjects were instructed to eat vs. foods they were instructed to avoid. To account for differences in total energy intake, compliance scores will be expressed as a ratio of the servings of foods to consume over the total servings of food (avoid + consume) multiplied by 100. The percent compliance will then be generated.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2023.
- Background: PubMed 27444714Loh E, Guy SD, Mehta S, Moulin DE, Bryce TN, Middleton JW, Siddall PJ, Hitzig SL, Widerstrom-Noga E, Finnerup NB, Kras-Dupuis A, Casalino A, Craven BC, Lau B, Cote I, Harvey D, O'Connell C, Orenczuk S, Parrent AG, Potter P, Short C, Teasell R, Townson A, Truchon C, Bradbury CL, Wolfe D. The CanPain SCI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation Management of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord: introduction, methodology and recommendation overview. Spinal Cord. 2016 Aug;54 Suppl 1:S1-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.88.
- Background: PubMed 27444715Guy SD, Mehta S, Casalino A, Cote I, Kras-Dupuis A, Moulin DE, Parrent AG, Potter P, Short C, Teasell R, Bradbury CL, Bryce TN, Craven BC, Finnerup NB, Harvey D, Hitzig SL, Lau B, Middleton JW, O'Connell C, Orenczuk S, Siddall PJ, Townson A, Truchon C, Widerstrom-Noga E, Wolfe D, Loh E. The CanPain SCI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation Management of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord: Recommendations for treatment. Spinal Cord. 2016 Aug;54 Suppl 1:S14-23. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.90.
- Background: PubMed 27316678Allison DJ, Thomas A, Beaudry K, Ditor DS. Targeting inflammation as a treatment modality for neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Jun 17;13(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0625-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eldon Loh, MD principal investigator
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Spinal Cord Injury and Inflammation, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
C-Reactive Protein (time frame: Baseline and Week-5 (post measures collected following 1-week group allocation period and 4-week intervention)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04271904, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2023.