Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 3CONDORNCT04278417
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab Versus Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
A Phase 3 study testing Brolucizumab 6 mg and Panretinal photocoagulation laser in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 120 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab compared to panretinal photocoagulation laser (PRP) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Brolucizumab 6 mg and Panretinal photocoagulation laser
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 689 participants
- Where
- 120 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 19 Nov 2020to 19 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation
- Able to complete adequate fundus photographs and retinal images
- Diagnosis of type 1 or 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and HbA1c less than or equal to 12% at screening
- DM treatment stable for at least 3 months
- PDR diagnosis with no previous PRP treatment in the study eye
Who cannot join
- Concomitant conditions or ocular disorders in the study eye at Screening or Baseline that could compromise a response to study treatment.
- Presence of diabetic macular edema in the study eye
- Active infection or inflammation in the study eye
- Uncontrolled glaucoma (IOP greater than 25 mmHg)
- Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment within 6 months
- Treatment with intraocular corticosteroids
Show all 10Show fewer
- End stage renal disease requiring dialysis or kidney transplant
- Uncontrolled blood pressure
- Systemic anti-VEGF therapy at any time
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
120 sites in 16 countries.
120 sites in 16 countries
United States40 sites
Austin Retina Associates
Austin, Texas, 78705
Texan Eye P A
Austin, Texas, 78731
Retina And Vitreous Of Texas
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Retina Consultants TX Rsrch Ctr
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Retina- Vitreous Assoc Medical Group
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Retina Associates Of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Advanced Research LLC
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33064
Rand Eye Institute
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33064
Retina Associates
Elmhurst, Illinois, 60126
Erie Retinal Surgery
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16507
Pinnacle Research Institute
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33309
National Ophthalmic Research Institute
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912-7125
Texas Retina Associates
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Retina Consultants of Orange County
Fullerton, California, 92835
Cumberland Valley Retina Consultants
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Valley Retina Institute PA
Harlingen, Texas, 78550
Retina Consultants of Houston PA
Houston, Texas, 77030
Salehi Retina Institute
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
Midwest Eye Institute
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46280
University of Mississippi Med Ctr
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Florida Retina Institute
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Southeastern Retina Associates P C
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37923
Charleston Neuroscience Institute
Ladson, South Carolina, 29456
Blue Oc Clin Res at Palm Bch Eye Ct
Lakeland, Florida, 33801
Retina Associates PA
Lenexa, Kansas, 66215
MedEye Associates
Miami, Florida, 33143
John-Kenyon American Eye Institute PC
New Albany, Indiana, 47150
Virginia Eye Consultants
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Dean McGee Eye Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Florida Retina Institute
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Eye Center of North Florida
Panama City, Florida, 32405
Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Retina Consultants of Southern California
Redlands, California, 92374
Medical Center Opthamology Assoc
San Antonio, Texas, 78240
Retina Associates Of South Texas PA
San Antonio, Texas, 78240
Cascade Medical Research Institute
Springfield, Oregon, 97477
Premiere Practice Management LLC
Torrance, California, 90505
Lundquist Inst BioMed at Harbor
Torrance, California, 90509-2910
Retina Associates SW
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Miramar Eye Specialists
Ventura, California, 93003
Japan17 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Akita, 010-8543
Novartis Investigative Site
Asahikawa, Hokkaido, 078 8510
Novartis Investigative Site
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8309
Novartis Investigative Site
Hachiōji, Tokyo, 193-0944
Novartis Investigative Site
Kita-gun, Kagawa-ken, 761-0793
Novartis Investigative Site
Kobe, 650-0017
Novartis Investigative Site
Kōriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052
Novartis Investigative Site
Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011
Novartis Investigative Site
Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621
Novartis Investigative Site
Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8902
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagakute, Aichi-ken, 480-1195
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466 8560
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, 545-8586
Novartis Investigative Site
Sakura, Chiba, 285-8741
Novartis Investigative Site
Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498
Novartis Investigative Site
Tsu, Mie-ken, 514-8507
Novartis Investigative Site
Yoshida-gun, Fukui, 910-1193
China16 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100050
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100191
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100730
Novartis Investigative Site
Changchun, Jilin, 130041
Novartis Investigative Site
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantong, Jiangsu, 226000
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, 200080
Novartis Investigative Site
Shantou, Guangdong, 515041
Novartis Investigative Site
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110000
Novartis Investigative Site
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300020
Novartis Investigative Site
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325027
Novartis Investigative Site
Wuhan, Hubei, 430060
Novartis Investigative Site
Wuhan, Hubei, 430070
Novartis Investigative Site
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004
Russia8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Cheboksary, 428028
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 119021
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 127473
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 127486
Novartis Investigative Site
Omsk, 644024
Novartis Investigative Site
Sterlitamak, 453128
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulyanovsk, 432063
Novartis Investigative Site
Yekaterinburg, 620109
India5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 016
Novartis Investigative Site
Chandigarh, 160012
Novartis Investigative Site
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641014
Novartis Investigative Site
New Delhi, 110 029
Novartis Investigative Site
Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, 627003
Argentina4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, 1116
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, C1061AAE
Novartis Investigative Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Bs As, Buenos Aires, C1015ABO
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, De Santa Fe, B7602
Australia4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Albury, New South Wales, 2640
Novartis Investigative Site
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170
Novartis Investigative Site
Parramatta, New South Wales, 2150
Novartis Investigative Site
Strathfield, New South Wales, 2135
Brazil4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Blumenau, Santa Catarina, 89052-504
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01427-002
Novartis Investigative Site
Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18031-060
Canada4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Boisbriand, Quebec, J7H 1S6
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K2B 7E9
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
South Korea4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bundang Gu, Gyeonggi-do, 13620
Novartis Investigative Site
Daegu, 705703
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Seocho Gu, 06591
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 06351
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, 06100
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, 06230
Novartis Investigative Site
Istanbul, 34420
Novartis Investigative Site
Izmir, 35340
Mexico3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ciudad de, Mexico City, 06800
Novartis Investigative Site
Mexico City, 06760
Novartis Investigative Site
Tijuana, 22010
Philippines3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Makati, NCR, 1229
Novartis Investigative Site
Makati, 1229
Novartis Investigative Site
Pasig, 1605
Taiwan2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Hualien City, 970
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 80756
Puerto Rico1 site
Emanuelli Research and Development Center LLC
Arecibo, 00612
About this study
Official title: A 96-week, Two-arm, Randomized, Single-masked, Multi-center, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6 mg Compared to Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab compared to panretinal photocoagulation laser (PRP) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). This evaluation will provide information that brolucizumab is non-inferior to PRP with respect to the change in best corrected visual acuity at Week 54.
Read the detailed description
Phase III, 96-week, two-arm, randomized (1:1 ratio), single-masked, multi-center, active-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab compared to Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in subjects with Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Subjects who consented underwent screening assessments to evaluate their eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatments:
Brolucizumab 6 mg: 3 x q6w loading then q12w maintenance through Week 90, with the option from Week 48 onwards to extend the treatment interval by 6 weeks at a time up to 24 weeks, and revert to q12w if disease worsens. More frequent injection with q6w interval in the maintenance phase could be administered at the discretion of the Investigator if the disease worsens.
PRP: initial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed with additional PRP treatment (may split into 2-4 sessions) as needed up to Week 90.
Visits occurred every 6 weeks throughout the study, regardless of treatment or not.
- Conditions
- Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- Being tested
- Brolucizumab 6 mg, Panretinal photocoagulation laser
- Keywords
- proliferative diabetic retinophathy, retinal neovascularization, anti-VEGF, brolucizumab, intravitreal injection, panretinal photocoagulation
- Medical subject headings
- Retinal Neovascularization
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brolucizumab 6 mgBiological
Also called RTH258
3 x q6w loading injections, followed by q12w maintenance through Week 90
Panretinal photocoagulation laserProcedure or surgery
Also called PRP
initial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed with additional PRP treatment as needed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brolucizumab 6 mg | Experimental | Intra-vitreal injection. 3 x q6w loading injections, followed by q12w maintenance through Week 90 Receives: Biological: Brolucizumab 6 mg |
| Panretinal photocoagulation laser Arm | Active comparator | Initial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed with additional PRP treatment as needed Receives: Procedure: Panretinal photocoagulation laser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study Eye
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of >= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included.
Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.
Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.
Measured: Baseline, Week 54
Secondary outcomes (12)
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study Eye
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is derived from the diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) as assessed by the central reading center (CRC) using 7-field color fundus photography image. The DRSS on the original score with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR) were then converted into a 12-level scale (Range is from 1 - diabetic retinopathy (DR) absent, to 12- very advanced PDR). (A lower score represents a better outcome.) The event of "No PDR" is then defined as DRSS (12-level scale) < 7.
Measured: Week 54
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study Eye
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is derived from the diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) as assessed by the central reading center (CRC) using 7-field color fundus photography image. The DRSS on the original score with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR) were then converted into a 12-level scale (Range is from 1 - diabetic retinopathy (DR) absent, to 12- very advanced PDR). (A lower score represents a better outcome.) The event of "No PDR" is then defined as DRSS (12-level scale) < 7.
Measured: Week 96
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study Eye
Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.
PRP = Panretinal photocoagulation laser
Measured: Up to Week 54
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study Eye
Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.
PRP = Panretinal photocoagulation laser
Measured: Up to Week 96
Area Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study Eye
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of >= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included.
Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.
Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.
The AUC in change from Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 (or Week 96) is referred to as the averaged change from Baseline in BCVA at each visit up to 54 (or Week 96), which was calculated as (BCVA at Week 6 + BCVA at Week 12 + ... + BCVA at Week 54 (or Week 96)) / number of visits with valid BCVA data from Week 6 to Week 54 (or Week 96) - BCVA at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, up to Week 54 and up to Week 96
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment".
A lower score represents better functioning.
Measured: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment".
A lower score represents better functioning.
Measured: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment".
A lower score represents better functioning.
Measured: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment".
A lower score represents better functioning.
Measured: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Number and Percentage of Subjects Developing Vision-threatening Complications Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy up to Week 54 and up to Week 96
The vision-threatening complications associated with Diabetic retinopathy (DR) are defined as any event of the following list occurring in the study eye at any time point after Baseline:
- Center-involved Diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) as defined as Central sub-field thickness (CSFT) ≥280 µm according to Central reading center (CRC) evaluation of Optical coherent tomography (OCT) image
- Retinal detachment
- Vitreous hemorrhage
- Neovascular glaucoma, iris/ anterior chamber angle neovascularization
- Vitrectomy for DR complications
Measured: up to Week 54 and up to Week 96
Ocular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.
AEs that started after alternative diabetic retinopathy treatment/relevant diabetic macular edema treatment in the study eye are censored.
Measured: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment up to Week 90, plus approximately 6 weeks post-treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.
Non-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.
AEs that started after alternative diabetic retinopathy treatment/relevant diabetic macular edema treatment in the study eye are censored.
Measured: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment up to Week 90, plus approximately 6 weeks post-treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2020
- Study start19 Nov 2020
- Primary completion30 Oct 2023
- Study completion19 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 689 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04278417
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRTH258D2301
- Acronym
- CONDOR
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Publications
Wolf S, Chen Y, Li X, Shimura M, Sakamoto T, Wykoff CC, Emanuelli A, Salehi-Had H, Yan K, Kovacic L, Kim Y. Brolucizumab in the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: The CONDOR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2026 Jun 1;144(6):500-507. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.1008.
PubMed 42024409
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 96-week, Two-arm, Randomized, Single-masked, Multi-center, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6 mg Compared to Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04278417
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CONDOR / CRTH258D2301
- Conditions
- Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- Keywords
- proliferative diabetic retinophathy, retinal neovascularization, anti-VEGF, brolucizumab, intravitreal injection, panretinal photocoagulation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 689 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 19 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Aug 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab compared to panretinal photocoagulation laser (PRP) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). This evaluation will provide information that brolucizumab is non-inferior to PRP with respect to the change in best corrected visual acuity at Week 54.
Detailed description
Phase III, 96-week, two-arm, randomized (1:1 ratio), single-masked, multi-center, active-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab compared to Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in subjects with Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Subjects who consented underwent screening assessments to evaluate their eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatments:
Brolucizumab 6 mg: 3 x q6w loading then q12w maintenance through Week 90, with the option from Week 48 onwards to extend the treatment interval by 6 weeks at a time up to 24 weeks, and revert to q12w if disease worsens. More frequent injection with q6w interval in the maintenance phase could be administered at the discretion of the Investigator if the disease worsens.
PRP: initial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed with additional PRP treatment (may split into 2-4 sessions) as needed up to Week 90.
Visits occurred every 6 weeks throughout the study, regardless of treatment or not.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brolucizumab 6 mg | Experimental | Biological: Brolucizumab 6 mgIntra-vitreal injection. 3 x q6w loading injections, followed by q12w maintenance through Week 90 |
| Panretinal photocoagulation laser Arm | Active comparator | Procedure: Panretinal photocoagulation laserInitial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed with additional PRP treatment as needed |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation
- Able to complete adequate fundus photographs and retinal images
- Diagnosis of type 1 or 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and HbA1c less than or equal to 12% at screening
- DM treatment stable for at least 3 months
- PDR diagnosis with no previous PRP treatment in the study eye
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Concomitant conditions or ocular disorders in the study eye at Screening or Baseline that could compromise a response to study treatment.
- Presence of diabetic macular edema in the study eye
- Active infection or inflammation in the study eye
- Uncontrolled glaucoma (IOP greater than 25 mmHg)
- Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment within 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brolucizumab 6 mgAlso: RTH2583 x q6w loading injections, followed by q12w maintenance through Week 90 | Biological | Brolucizumab 6 mg |
| Panretinal photocoagulation laserAlso: PRPinitial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed with additional PRP treatment as needed | Procedure or surgery | Panretinal photocoagulation laser Arm |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study Eye
Time frame: Baseline, Week 54
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of >= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.
12 secondary outcomes
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study Eye
Time frame: Week 54
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study Eye
Time frame: Week 96
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study Eye
Time frame: Up to Week 54
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study Eye
Time frame: Up to Week 96
Area Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study Eye
Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 54 and up to Week 96
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96
Number and Percentage of Subjects Developing Vision-threatening Complications Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy up to Week 54 and up to Week 96
Time frame: up to Week 54 and up to Week 96
Ocular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye
Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment up to Week 90, plus approximately 6 weeks post-treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.
Non-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term
Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment up to Week 90, plus approximately 6 weeks post-treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42024409Wolf S, Chen Y, Li X, Shimura M, Sakamoto T, Wykoff CC, Emanuelli A, Salehi-Had H, Yan K, Kovacic L, Kim Y. Brolucizumab in the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: The CONDOR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2026 Jun 1;144(6):500-507. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.1008.
- A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on www.novctrd.comLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Related trials for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Recruiting
To Investigate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Trained Non-medical Professionals Performing Laser Treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR), and the Potential Impact on Service Capacity. Assess Feasibility of Conducting a Full Trial Comparing Trained ECPs With Ophthalmologists
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Test Whether BI 764524 Helps People With an Eye Condition Called Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Observational Study of Diabetic Retinopathy Progression in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Continuous Delivery of Ranibizumab Via the Port Delivery System for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy-related Vitreous Hemorrhage With Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Limited PRP.
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetic Retinopathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered VX-01
Diabetic Retinopathy, NPDR - Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
120 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Brolucizumab 6 mg and Panretinal photocoagulation laser in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 120 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 120 sites in United States, Japan, China, Russia, India and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Aug 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study Eye (time frame: Baseline, Week 54). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04278417, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2025.