AzTrials
AzTrials

Migraine DisordersNCT04287140

The Effect of Intravenous Fluid Therapy in Acute Migraine Attacks

A study testing Bolus fluid administration in people with Migraine Disorders and Headache, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is a single-center, double-blind, randomized protocol comparison. The study will be conducted in Marmara University School of Medicine Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine between April 2020 and October 2020. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Migraine Disorders, Headache, Acute Pain
What is being tested?
Bolus fluid administration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Apr 2020to 1 Nov 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age 18 years or older
  • migraine with or without aura according to International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 (ICHD-3) diagnostic criteria confirmed by one-to-one physical exam in the ED
  • no declaration and sign of pregnancy, or pregnancy not diagnosed during the ED evaluation before randomization,
  • did not receive any IV fluid of 100 cc or more at any facility in the last 12 hours,
  • intramuscular diclofenac potassium 75 mg, the standard treatment protocol, is ordered by the physician (no history of known allergic reaction to diclofenac potassium),
  • severe dehydration not present as determined by the researcher (hypotension, dry mouth, tongue and eyeballs, decreased urine output)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • no other indication for fluid infusion,
  • no contraindication to fluid administration (heart failure patients with diuretic use, renal failure patients with fluid restriction, hemodynamic instability),
  • do not have accompanying symptoms and signs related to headaches secondary to other obvious pathologies rather than migraine,
  • consent to be included in the study.
  • Exclusion criteria: no patients will be excluded from the study after randomization. All patients will be evaluated for the primary outcome with an intent-to-treat approach.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital

    Istanbul

    Yusuf Turan, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Utility of Adding 1 L Intravenous Normal Saline to Standard 75 mg Intramuscular Diclofenac Potassium Injection in Patients Presented to the Emergency Department With an Acute Migraine Attack

The study is a single-center, double-blind, randomized protocol comparison. The study will be conducted in Marmara University School of Medicine Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine between April 2020 and October 2020.

The population consists of non-pregnant, adult patients (age of 18 or more) who will be confirmed as migraine according to The International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD-3) in the emergency department (ED). After the patient was found suitable for the standard treatment protocol, they will be randomized to receive a 1000 ml bolus of normal saline for 1 hour or normal saline at 10 cc/h for 1 hour. The pain level, functional status, and side effects will be assessed before the beginning, at the 1st hour, 2nd hour and at the 24th hour.

The objective of this study is to determine the effect of an intravenous (IV) fluid bolus on migraine headache among patients treated in the ED.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Headache is a common complaint that is seen in 70-80% of the population and is a common health problem in emergency services. When evaluating the patient with headache, the first step is to determine whether the headache is primary or secondary (1, 2). Primary headaches are classified according to their symptoms and clinical features. Tension-type headache, migraine, and cluster headache are the most common types of primary headaches (3). Secondary headaches can be classified as headaches due to the head and neck trauma, headaches secondary to neurovascular diseases, and headaches due to withdrawal syndromes secondary to drug abuse (4). Migraine is a primary type of headache characterized by recurrent throbbing (usually unilateral) and associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and other symptoms. Patients with migraine are usually not pleased with the treatment options due to headaches refractory to treatment (5).

The current approach to the treatment of migraine headaches consists of two components: treatment of the acute migraine attacks, and prophylactic treatment.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), migraine attacks are the eighth cause of loss of work and performance in the attack period among all lifelong diseases (12). Therefore, effective treatment of migraine attacks is important for the patient and socioeconomic wellbeing of the community. More than 90% of the migraine patients experience acute migraine attacks despite prophylactic treatment and need pain medications (6). Common treatment options used in the ED are phenothiazines (7), serotonin receptor agonists (8), and corticosteroids (9). Headache guideline of the American Academy of Neurology published in 2000 also recommends diclofenac as an effective alternative for the treatment of acute migraine attacks (10, 11). Effective attack therapy has the potential to significantly reduce inefficiency caused by migraine attacks by shortening the duration and reducing the severity of attacks.

Although clinical evidence is uncertain, approximately 40% of patients presenting to the ED with a headache are treated with IV fluids (13). Studies with healthy volunteers showed that mild dehydration reduces the pain threshold and increases central pain-related activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and thalamus (14). Therefore, it is logical to think that dehydration may trigger acute migraine attacks (15). This led to the common approach to use IV fluids besides pain medications in the ED as a routine procedure. A clear benefit would obviously increase the satisfaction of the patient from the ED services, by increasing the pain threshold, decreasing length of stay, and need for rescue treatment. However, on the contrary, IV fluid therapy without an obvious benefit to the patient has a cost burden on the system, uses labor and time of the ED staff, and may increase the duration of the length of stay in the ED.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and side effects related to the addition of 1000 cc bolus NS to the standard treatment of migraine in the ED.

Being tested
Bolus fluid administration
Keywords
migraine, pain, normal saline, diclofenac, emergency department, adult, acute attack
Medical subject headings
Migraine Disorders, Headache, Acute Pain, Pain, Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bolus fluid administrationOther

    1000 ml of 0.9% normal saline bolus over one hour

Study groups in NCT04287140
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SalineExperimental1000 ml of 0.9% normal saline bolus over one hour.
Receives: Other: Bolus fluid administration
No SalineNo intervention10 ml of 0.9% normal saline over one hour.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VAS(headache)

    The patient will be asked to place a mark between the 0 and 10 cm points indicated on a 10 cm line, the distance of the marked point to 0 will be taken as the VAS(headache) score in mm.

    Measured: at the 2nd hour

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. VAS(headache)

    The patient will be asked to place a mark between the 0 and 10 cm points indicated on a 10 cm line, the distance of the marked point to 0 will be taken as the VAS(headache) score in mm.

    Measured: at the 1st hour

  2. VAS(nausea)

    The patient will be asked to place a mark between the 0 and 10 cm points indicated on a 10 cm line, the distance of the marked point to 0 will be taken as the VASnausea score in mm.

    Measured: at the 1st hour

  3. VAS(nausea)

    The patient will be asked to place a mark between the 0 and 10 cm points indicated on a 10 cm line, the distance of the marked point to 0 will be taken as the VASnausea score in mm.

    Measured: at the 2nd hour

  4. Level of Functional Disability

    Categorized as none, mild (makes it difficult to do daily tasks), moderate (not able to do daily tasks), severe (requires bed rest).

    Measured: at the 1st hour

  5. Level of Functional Disability

    Categorized as none, mild (makes it difficult to do daily tasks), moderate (not able to do daily tasks), severe (requires bed rest).

    Measured: at the 2nd hour

  6. Level of Functional Disability

    Categorized as none, mild (makes it difficult to do daily tasks), moderate (not able to do daily tasks), severe (requires bed rest).

    Measured: at the 24th hour

  7. Adverse Events

    The proportion of patients with the following adverse events in each group will be actively pursued during the administration of treatment at the ED: hypernatremia, fluid retention, high blood pressure, injection site reactions

    Measured: at the 1st hour

  8. Adverse Events

    The proportion of patients with the following adverse events in each group will be actively pursued during the administration of treatment at the ED: hypernatremia, fluid retention, high blood pressure, injection site reactions

    Measured: at the 2nd hour

  9. Adverse Events

    The proportion of patients with the following adverse events in each group will be actively pursued during the administration of treatment at the ED: hypernatremia, fluid retention, high blood pressure, injection site reactions

    Measured: at the 24th hour

  10. Successful Treatment

    The proportion of patients will successful and failed treatments will be compared between study groups. Successful treatment is defined if VAS(headache) is decreased at least 50% from the highest VAS(headache) reported by the patient at any time-point without the need of additional analgesics and/or antiemetics. Failed treatment is defined if VAS(headache) is decreased not more than 10% from the highest VAS(headache) or patient's declaration that the headache is the same at the 2nd hour. All patients defined as failed treatment will be offered the rescue treatment (analgesic and/or antiemetic).

    Measured: at the 2nd hour

  11. Time-to-discharge

    Duration between the time of admission to the emergency department and discharge up to 24 hours.

    Measured: 0 to 24 hours

  12. The presence of headache

    The patients will be asked to answer if their headache is still present or not, and will be requested to answer as "yes" or "no".

    Measured: at the 24th hour

  13. The recurrence of headache

    The patients will be asked to answer if their headache has recurred (may still be present or not) or not, and will be requested to answer as "yes" or "no".

    Measured: at the 24th hour

  14. Ability to tolerate oral intake

    If the patient could eat a regular meal without vomiting in the 30 minutes after intake, they will be considered as "able to eat". All other conditions will be considered a "no".

    Measured: at the 24th hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Feb 2020
  2. Study start1 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment Secondary Purpose: Adverse Event
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04287140
Sponsor's protocol ID
09.2019.497
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
5 Dec 2019
Last updated
29 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29368949
  • Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Katsarava Z, Lainez JM, Lampl C, Lanteri-Minet M, Rastenyte D, Ruiz de la Torre E, Tassorelli C, Barre J, Andree C. The impact of headache in Europe: principal results of the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain. 2014 May 21;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-31.

    PubMed 24884549
  • Stovner Lj, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton R, Scher A, Steiner T, Zwart JA. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):193-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01288.x.

    PubMed 17381554
  • Sharma TL. Common Primary and Secondary Causes of Headache in the Elderly. Headache. 2018 Mar;58(3):479-484. doi: 10.1111/head.13252. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

    PubMed 29322494
  • Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Simon D. Medical consultation for migraine: results from the American Migraine Study. Headache. 1998 Feb;38(2):87-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3802087.x.

    PubMed 9529763
  • Cooke LJ, Becker WJ. Migraine prevalence, treatment and impact: the canadian women and migraine study. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010 Sep;37(5):580-7. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100010738.

    PubMed 21059502
  • Friedman BW, Esses D, Solorzano C, Dua N, Greenwald P, Radulescu R, Chang E, Hochberg M, Campbell C, Aghera A, Valentin T, Paternoster J, Bijur P, Lipton RB, Gallagher EJ. A randomized controlled trial of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for treatment of acute migraine. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;52(4):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.027. Epub 2007 Nov 19.

    PubMed 18006188
  • Bird S, Derry S, Moore RA. Zolmitriptan for acute migraine attacks in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 21;2014(5):CD008616. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008616.pub2.

    PubMed 24848613
  • Singh A, Alter HJ, Zaia B. Does the addition of dexamethasone to standard therapy for acute migraine headache decrease the incidence of recurrent headache for patients treated in the emergency department? A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1223-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00283.x. Epub 2008 Oct 25.

    PubMed 18976336
  • Dahlof C, Bjorkman R. Diclofenac-K (50 and 100 mg) and placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. 1993 Apr;13(2):117-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1993.1302117.x.

    PubMed 8495453
  • Massiou H, Serrurier D, Lasserre O, Bousser MG. Effectiveness of oral diclofenac in the acute treatment of common migraine attacks: a double-blind study versus placebo. Cephalalgia. 1991 May;11(2):59-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1991.1102059.x.

    PubMed 1860132
  • Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basanez MG, Baxter A, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bernabe E, Bhalla K, Bhandari B, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Black JA, Blencowe H, Blore JD, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Bonaventure A, Boufous S, Bourne R, Boussinesq M, Braithwaite T, Brayne C, Bridgett L, Brooker S, Brooks P, Brugha TS, Bryan-Hancock C, Bucello C, Buchbinder R, Buckle G, Budke CM, Burch M, Burney P, Burstein R, Calabria B, Campbell B, Canter CE, Carabin H, Carapetis J, Carmona L, Cella C, Charlson F, Chen H, Cheng AT, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahiya M, Dahodwala N, Damsere-Derry J, Danaei G, Davis A, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Dellavalle R, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Derrett S, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dherani M, Diaz-Torne C, Dolk H, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Edmond K, Elbaz A, Ali SE, Erskine H, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ewoigbokhan SE, Farzadfar F, Feigin V, Felson DT, Ferrari A, Ferri CP, Fevre EM, Finucane MM, Flaxman S, Flood L, Foreman K, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Franklin R, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabbe BJ, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Ganatra HA, Garcia B, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gmel G, Gosselin R, Grainger R, Groeger J, Guillemin F, Gunnell D, Gupta R, Haagsma J, Hagan H, Halasa YA, Hall W, Haring D, Haro JM, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Higashi H, Hill C, Hoen B, Hoffman H, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Huang JJ, Ibeanusi SE, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jarvis D, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Jonas JB, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Kawakami N, Keren A, Khoo JP, King CH, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Lalloo R, Laslett LL, Lathlean T, Leasher JL, Lee YY, Leigh J, Lim SS, Limb E, Lin JK, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Liu W, Loane M, Ohno SL, Lyons R, Ma J, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Malekzadeh R, Mallinger L, Manivannan S, Marcenes W, March L, Margolis DJ, Marks GB, Marks R, Matsumori A, Matzopoulos R, Mayosi BM, McAnulty JH, McDermott MM, McGill N, McGrath J, Medina-Mora ME, Meltzer M, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Meyer AC, Miglioli V, Miller M, Miller TR, Mitchell PB, Mocumbi AO, Moffitt TE, Mokdad AA, Monasta L, Montico M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Moran A, Morawska L, Mori R, Murdoch ME, Mwaniki MK, Naidoo K, Nair MN, Naldi L, Narayan KM, Nelson PK, Nelson RG, Nevitt MC, Newton CR, Nolte S, Norman P, Norman R, O'Donnell M, O'Hanlon S, Olives C, Omer SB, Ortblad K, Osborne R, Ozgediz D, Page A, Pahari B, Pandian JD, Rivero AP, Patten SB, Pearce N, Padilla RP, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Pesudovs K, Phillips D, Phillips MR, Pierce K, Pion S, Polanczyk GV, Polinder S, Pope CA 3rd, Popova S, Porrini E, Pourmalek F, Prince M, Pullan RL, Ramaiah KD, Ranganathan D, Razavi H, Regan M, Rehm JT, Rein DB, Remuzzi G, Richardson K, Rivara FP, Roberts T, Robinson C, De Leon FR, Ronfani L, Room R, Rosenfeld LC, Rushton L, Sacco RL, Saha S, Sampson U, Sanchez-Riera L, Sanman E, Schwebel DC, Scott JG, Segui-Gomez M, Shahraz S, Shepard DS, Shin H, Shivakoti R, Singh D, Singh GM, Singh JA, Singleton J, Sleet DA, Sliwa K, Smith E, Smith JL, Stapelberg NJ, Steer A, Steiner T, Stolk WA, Stovner LJ, Sudfeld C, Syed S, Tamburlini G, Tavakkoli M, Taylor HR, Taylor JA, Taylor WJ, Thomas B, Thomson WM, Thurston GD, Tleyjeh IM, Tonelli M, Towbin JA, Truelsen T, Tsilimbaris MK, Ubeda C, Undurraga EA, van der Werf MJ, van Os J, Vavilala MS, Venketasubramanian N, Wang M, Wang W, Watt K, Weatherall DJ, Weinstock MA, Weintraub R, Weisskopf MG, Weissman MM, White RA, Whiteford H, Wiersma ST, Wilkinson JD, Williams HC, Williams SR, Witt E, Wolfe F, Woolf AD, Wulf S, Yeh PH, Zaidi AK, Zheng ZJ, Zonies D, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2163-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2.

    PubMed 23245607
  • Jones CW, Gaughan JP, McLean SA. Epidemiology of intravenous fluid use for headache treatment: Findings from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May;35(5):778-781. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Jan 15.

    PubMed 28233646
  • Ogino Y, Kakeda T, Nakamura K, Saito S. Dehydration enhances pain-evoked activation in the human brain compared with rehydration. Anesth Analg. 2014 Jun;118(6):1317-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a9b028.

    PubMed 24384865
  • Blau JN. Water deprivation: a new migraine precipitant. Headache. 2005 Jun;45(6):757-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05143_3.x.

    PubMed 15953311

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bolus fluid administration in people with Migraine Disorders and Headache, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yusuf Turan, MD (00902166254545 ext. 8807, dryusufturan@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VAS(headache) (time frame: at the 2nd hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04287140, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in