AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureNCT04289181

A Trial to Evaluate Medically Tailored Meals With Patients With Heart Failure

A study testing Medically Tailored Meals in people with Heart Failure, run by Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal is to conduct a pilot trial that provides 4 weeks of medically-tailored meals (MTM) to patients with heart failure (HF) via collaboration with the Philadelphia Meals on Wheels chapter to assess the feasibility of such an intervention. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Medically Tailored Meals
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Mar 2020to 1 Apr 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have a diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF), as determined by the treating physician
  • Are 50 years of age or older
  • Are a patient in the ED or inpatient at TJUH or Methodist Hospita
  • Are able to keep food fresh for a week after delivery (e.g., not homeless)
  • Have an address that is within the delivery radius of Meals on Wheels-Philadelphia
  • Be able and willing to be available for follow-up contact

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant, planning to be pregnant, or currently breastfeeding.
  • Does not eat by mouth (i.e. receives tube feeds or total parenteral nutrition [TPN])
  • Psychiatric co-morbidity that would preclude study participation
  • Non-English speaking
  • In police custody or incarcerated
  • Currently receiving MTM from Meals on Wheels or another provider

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Trial Assessing the Feasibility of Providing Medically-tailored Meals to Patients Diagnosed With Heart Failure

The goal is to conduct a pilot trial that provides 4 weeks of medically-tailored meals (MTM) to patients with heart failure (HF) via collaboration with the Philadelphia Meals on Wheels chapter to assess the feasibility of such an intervention. Patients will be enrolled during either an inpatient hospitalization or an emergency department (ED) visit, and will be randomized into 1 of 2 arms: 1) MTM or 2) usual care that follows guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Evidence gathered from this study will guide the design of a larger randomized controlled trial to be submitted to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to evaluate the scalability, sustainability and cost-effectiveness of MTM for improving outcomes for patients with HF.

Read the detailed description

While medication adherence and transitions from hospitalization to home care play important roles in heart failure (HF) care, the majority of HF maintenance is by the patients in the home. Despite the availability of evidence-based guidance and treatments, many patients with HF do not achieve optimal outcomes. In prior work, patients with HF identified primary needs of improved access to food and nutrition education. Dietary recommendations for HF in clinical practice have historically emphasized the reduction of a single micronutrient (sodium) and fluid management, which oversimplifies the complexity between multiple dietary inadequacies, including micronutrient deficiencies, and HF pathophysiology. In addition, patients may have other comorbidities thus requiring further modification of the patient's diet. As a result, several innovative models for food services have emerged to address patient needs for improved healthy food access. Currently, select non-profit organizations across the U.S. deliver millions of medically-tailored meals (MTM) to patients with chronic illnesses, based on the premise that food can be as helpful as medicine in improving patient outcomes. Small studies assessing MTM in isolation have demonstrated reduced healthcare utilization and cost, however, no randomized trials have assessed the sustained impact of this intervention. The goal is to evaluate the feasibility of providing medically-tailored meals to patients with HF. Data from this study can be used to design further studies testing the effectiveness of MTM on improving outcomes for patients with HF.

Meals on Wheels, a provider of meals to senior citizens across the country, has only recently begun piloting medically-tailored meals, and this presents the opportunity to work with the organization to test the feasibility of MTM in the Philadelphia region.

Conditions
Heart Failure
Being tested
Medically Tailored Meals
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Medically Tailored MealsOther

    4 weeks of medically tailored meals

Study groups in NCT04289181
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Medically Tailored Meals (MTM)ExperimentalParticipants randomized to the MTM arm will receive MTM for 4 weeks. Meals will be prepared and delivered by Meals on Wheels, a non-profit organization that has been delivering meals to seniors nationwide for decades. Meals on Wheels will deliver 21 complete meals to the patient's home each week. They can accommodate a wide range of patient needs and preferences (e.g., low sodium, gluten-free, no pork products, cultural preferences). Meals on Wheels will contact the patient directly to set up an initial assessment phone call to collect relevant data (e.g., specific patient goals for their HF) and to set up a delivery schedule. Nearing the 4-week mark when meal delivery ends, investigators will check-in with each participant to track progress, assess treatment fidelity and answer any questions. All patients will receive information on community resources (e.g., food pantries, food banks) in the area.
Receives: Other: Medically Tailored Meals
Usual CareNo interventionPatients in this arm will receive usual services offered at Jefferson for patients with HF. This includes regular visits with a HF provider (primary care or cardiology), standard nutrition teaching, medication optimization and post discharge support. During routine office visits, providers reinforce messages about self-management and provide lists of local and national resources related to nutrition and HF self-management. These services follow guideline directed medical therapy. All patients will receive information on community resources (e.g., food pantries, food banks) in the area.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility: Enrollment

    Feasibility will be measured by the number of patients enrolled in the study. We aim to enroll 30 total patients.

    Measured: One year

  2. Feasibility: Retention

    Feasibility will be measured by the percent of enrolled patients who complete follow-up visits at 4 weeks

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Feasibility: Retention

    Feasibility will be measured by the percent of enrolled patients who complete follow-up visits at 12 weeks

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Patient satisfaction with intervention

    Satisfaction will be measured using a series of satisfaction related questions to better understand patients' experience with receiving medically tailored meals. Likert scale questions will be asked upon the completion of the meal deliveries at the 4 week follow-up assessment. Questions will assess the convenience, taste, and size of received meals.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Feasibility of administering the patient activation measure short form (PAM-13)

    The PAM-13 is composed of 13 items measuring patients' self-reported knowledge, motivation, and skills for health management. Each item is measured on a 5-point likert scale from disagree strongly to agree strongly. Those who score lower on the scale have lower self-management skills, while those who score higher on the scale are more engaged in their self-management.

    Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks

  3. Feasibility of administering the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale

    The Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale consists of 15 multiple choice questions assessing knowledge about Heart Failure in general (4 items), treatment (6 items), and symptoms and symptom recognition (5 items). Patients are instructed to choose the correct response from the three choices provided. The assessment is scored from 0 (no knowledge) to 15 (optimal knowledge).

    Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks

  4. Feasibility of administering the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 12 (KCCQ-12)

    The KCCQ-12, a self-administered 12-item instrument, assesses physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference, and overall quality of life (QoL) in HF patients. Higher scores on the KCCQ-12 indicate better QoL. The KCCQ summary score independently predicts clinical outcomes such as hospitalization and mortality in outpatients with HF, including those recently hospitalized for acute decompensation. It is a reliable and valid measure in HF patients that is more sensitive to change than other measures of QoL, and is especially responsive in patients with multiple comorbidities. A change in KCCQ score of 5 points is clinically significant and correlates with changes in clinical status, physical function, and outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks

  5. Feasibility of administering the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF)

    The MLHF measures the effects of heart failure and treatments for heart failure on an individual's quality of life. The questionnaire includes 21 items scored on a 6-point likert scale from zero (no impact) to five (big impact). All questions ask the patient to identify how much HF has affected their life during the past month. The survey is scored by adding all 21 responses for a total score. A physical dimension score (8 items) and emotional dimension score (5 items) can also be derived by adding the scores for specific items.

    Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Feb 2020
  2. Study start5 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2021
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Enrolled patients will be randomized to 1 of 2 arms: 1) MTM; or 2) usual care in a 1:1 ratio. A computer-generated list of random numbers will be prepared in advance by the study biostatistician and loaded into a REDCap randomization tool to ensure the research staff are blinded to assignment pre-randomization.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04289181
Sponsor's protocol ID
19G.837
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
17 Feb 2020
Last updated
5 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Medically Tailored Meals in people with Heart Failure, run by Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility: Enrollment (time frame: One year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in