AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute PancreatitisPhase 2PATIENCENCT04291599

Initial Pain Management in Pediatric Pancreatitis: Opioid vs. Non-Opioid

A Phase 2 study testing Ketorolac and Opioid in people with Acute Pancreatitis, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This will be a phase 2, single-center, unblinded randomized controlled pilot trial of two arms comparing opioid-sparing analgesia to the current Boston Children's Hospital institutional practice which has been reported to predominantly include administration of opioids as a first-line analgesic to pediatric patients… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 21 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Pancreatitis
What is being tested?
Ketorolac and Opioid
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Mar 2022to 24 Jul 2025
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who present to the ED and are admitted to BCH with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis or an acute bout of chronic pancreatitis based on INSPPIRE14 Criteria (Appendix 1)
  • Age ≤21 years
  • Patient weight ≥8 kg

Who cannot join

  • Allergy to morphine (and hydromorphone) or aspirin/NSAID
  • History of renal or hepatic insufficiency
  • History of peptic ulceration
  • History of bleeding diathesis
  • Pregnant females
  • Patients who have a documented history of substance abuse disorder or those who use opioids chronically
  • Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
  • Patients who received intravenous opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in transit or during their ED admission.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Boston Children's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

This will be a phase 2, single-center, unblinded randomized controlled pilot trial of two arms comparing opioid-sparing analgesia to the current Boston Children's Hospital institutional practice which has been reported to predominantly include administration of opioids as a first-line analgesic to pediatric patients who present to the emergency department with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP). This is a pilot trial for which many outcomes have not previously been studied in the pediatric AP population. The focus of this investigation will be to investigate the magnitude and variability of effect sizes for designing a future multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common pancreatic disease of childhood with an increasing incidence estimated at 13.2 cases in 100,000 children per year. Given the dearth of pediatric literature, most pediatric providers often rely on diagnostic, prognostic and treatment guidelines that have been derived from adults. This is problematic because adult therapeutic guidelines fail to consider the unique age-related responses and requirements of childhood. Pain management is one of the cornerstones in the treatment of pancreatitis, with abdominal pain being the most common presenting symptom of AP. Currently, there are no data on optimal pain management in pediatric AP. Older guidelines suggest that the "use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is advantageous" as it allows the patient to self-administer opioids and strike a balance between analgesia and side effects. This requires cognitive maturity to understand how to use PCA and poses challenges for younger children, particularly infants and toddlers, as well as pediatric patients with developmental delay. It is particularly concerning that greater than 94% of surveyed pediatric practitioners would use morphine or related opioids as a first-line therapy in children with AP especially when there have been no studies examining the benefits/risks of opioid vs non-opioid analgesics or opioid-sparing therapies in pediatric AP. Furthermore, we recently reported a retrospective analysis demonstrating that opioids are prescribed far more frequently either alone or in combination with non-opioids (70%) than non-opioid alternatives alone (30%). Amongst all types of analgesia prescribed to children who presented to the BCH emergency department (ED) with acute pancreatitis, morphine was the most common. Further research in this area is imperative, particularly given the recent opioid epidemic. From a pediatric perspective, it has been demonstrated that adolescents are amongst those at risk for opioid abuse, thus there is an urgent need to determine whether opioids are necessary for the management of pain in this vulnerable population with AP.

Being tested
Ketorolac, Opioid
Keywords
Pancreatitis
Medical subject headings
Pancreatitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • KetorolacDrug

    Also called Toradol

    Subjects will be randomized to either receive opioid (standard of care) or opioid-sparing analgesia.

  • OpioidDrug

    Also called Morphine, hydromorphone

    Subjects will be randomized to either receive opioid (standard of care) or opioid-sparing analgesia

Study groups in NCT04291599
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental Arm - Ketorolac (Opioid-Sparing)ExperimentalPatients assigned to this arm of the study will follow the standardized step-up approach to pain management per the hospital Evidenced Based Guideline (EBG). If analgesia is not obtained with first-line medications such as acetaminophen, the patient will be given the NSAID ketorolac intravenously every 6 hours at the standard weight-based dose throughout hospitalization. If the patient experiences continued pain, they (or their guardian/ caregiver) may request a rescue medication in the form of low-dose morphine (or an alternative opioid if allergic to morphine) at 0.025 mg/kg/dose every 4 hours.
Receives: Drug: Ketorolac
Control Arm - Conventional Treatment/Standard of Hospital CareActive comparatorPatients assigned to this arm of the study will be treated per institutional policy and procedural care as dictated by established hospital order sets and at the discretion of the provider. This may involve the step-up approach per the hospital EBG utilizing acetaminophen or ibuprofen as first-line agents; however, it remains at the discretion of the treating provider. The current standard of care for children presenting to the ED is based on prescribing order sets within the electronic medical record (EMR). Physicians in the BCH emergency department choose in an intermittently-prescribed manner, standard doses of analgesia including acetaminophen (Tylenol) or ibuprofen per the hospital EBG, as well as opioids (morphine, hydromorphone).
Receives: Drug: Opioid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy: amount of opioid analgesia (mg/kg/hr) from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA

    The primary endpoint for efficacy is the amount of opioid analgesia (mg/kg/hr) from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA.

    Measured: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Safety: number of hours from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA

    The secondary endpoint for safety is defined as the total number of incident adverse events, grade 2 or higher, from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA.

    Measured: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA

  2. Length of stay

    The secondary endpoint for length of stay is defined as the number of hours from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA.

    Measured: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA

  3. Time to initiation of oral or enteral diet

    The secondary endpoint for time to initiation of oral or enteral diet is defined as the number of hours from the time of enrollment until first oral or enteral intake. The number of hours will be expressed to two decimal places to account for fractions of an hour.

    Measured: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA

  4. Predefined Feasibility Outcomes to Assess Trial Success

    The secondary endpoint for feasibility is defined as (1) ≥80% of eligible patients approached for consent during the trial, and (2) ≥20% of eligible patients randomized into the trial.

    Measured: duration of trial, approximately 1 year from the start of enrollment

  5. Pain resolution: pain scores

    To compare pain resolution from time of enrollment throughout hospital stay by comparing pain scores in patients receiving opioid-sparing therapies to those receiving standard of care opioid analgesics.

    Measured: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2020
  2. Study start15 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion24 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion24 Jul 2025

Why it stopped: Inadequate patients recruited. Completion of funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This will be a phase 2, single-center, unblinded randomized controlled pilot trial of two arms comparing opioid-sparing analgesia to the current BCH institutional practice which has been reported to predominantly include administration of opioids as a first-line analgesic to pediatric patients who present to the emergency department with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04291599
Sponsor's protocol ID
P00034168
Acronym
PATIENCE
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
3 Feb 2020
Last updated
8 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Banks PA, Freeman ML; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2379-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17032204
  • Grover AS, Mitchell PD, Manzi SF, Fox VL. Initial Pain Management in Pediatric Acute Pancreatitis: Opioid Versus Non-opioid. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Feb;66(2):295-298. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001809.

    PubMed 29077648
  • Wu BU, Banks PA. Clinical management of patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(6):1272-81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.075.

    PubMed 23622137
  • Forsmark CE, Baillie J; AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee; AGA Institute Governing Board. AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(5):2022-44. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.065. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17484894
  • Rudd RA, Seth P, David F, Scholl L. Increases in Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2010-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Dec 30;65(50-51):1445-1452. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm655051e1.

    PubMed 28033313
  • Munro HM, Walton SR, Malviya S, Merkel S, Voepel-Lewis T, Loder RT, Farley FA. Low-dose ketorolac improves analgesia and reduces morphine requirements following posterior spinal fusion in adolescents. Can J Anaesth. 2002 May;49(5):461-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03017921.

    PubMed 11983659
  • Howard ML, Isaacs AN, Nisly SA. Continuous Infusion Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Perioperative Pain Management. J Pharm Pract. 2018 Feb;31(1):66-81. doi: 10.1177/0897190016665539. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

    PubMed 27580638
  • Hadland SE, Wood E, Levy S. How the paediatric workforce can address the opioid crisis. Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1260-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31573-2. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27673455
  • Bai HX, Lowe ME, Husain SZ. What have we learned about acute pancreatitis in children? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011 Mar;52(3):262-70. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182061d75.

    PubMed 21336157
  • Nydegger A, Heine RG, Ranuh R, Gegati-Levy R, Crameri J, Oliver MR. Changing incidence of acute pancreatitis: 10-year experience at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;22(8):1313-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04936.x. Epub 2007 Apr 19.

    PubMed 17489962
  • Morinville VD, Barmada MM, Lowe ME. Increasing incidence of acute pancreatitis at an American pediatric tertiary care center: is greater awareness among physicians responsible? Pancreas. 2010 Jan;39(1):5-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181baac47.

    PubMed 19752770
  • Abu-El-Haija M, Lin TK, Palermo J. Update to the management of pediatric acute pancreatitis: highlighting areas in need of research. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Jun;58(6):689-93. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000360.

    PubMed 24614126
  • Miech R, Johnston L, O'Malley PM, Keyes KM, Heard K. Prescription Opioids in Adolescence and Future Opioid Misuse. Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):e1169-77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1364.

    PubMed 26504126
  • Morinville VD, Husain SZ, Bai H, Barth B, Alhosh R, Durie PR, Freedman SD, Himes R, Lowe ME, Pohl J, Werlin S, Wilschanski M, Uc A; INSPPIRE Group. Definitions of pediatric pancreatitis and survey of present clinical practices. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Sep;55(3):261-5. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31824f1516.

    PubMed 22357117
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

    PubMed 18929686

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Ketorolac and Opioid in people with Acute Pancreatitis, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Inadequate patients recruited. Completion of funding). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy: amount of opioid analgesia (mg/kg/hr) from the time of enrollment until discharge home, transfer to the ICU, or initiation of PCA (time frame: time of enrollment through study completion (approximately 5 days), or transfer to the ICU or initiation of PCA). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04291599, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in