AzTrials
AzTrials

Rejection Heart TransplantNCT04311346

Cardiac MRI and Cardiac Allograft Rejection

An observational study of Rejection Heart Transplant, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 1 site in Finland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this a prospective, blinded, collaboration study between pediatric and adult transplant departments. Cardiac MRI data on patient with heart transplantations will be collected during years 2020-2022. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Rejection Heart Transplant
What is being tested?
Cardiac MR
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteFinland
Study dates
7 Mar 2020to 7 Mar 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All cardiac transplantations both in adults and in children have been centralized to Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. All patients both adults and children exposed to cardiac transplatations during the study period will be recruited to the study, if no contraindication for cardiac MR examination. Sample size calculation: the required total sample size is 72 patients

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of Cardiac Transplantation
  • Patient must be suitable for cardiac CMR imagnining

Who cannot join

  • Patient has pace maker

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tiina H Ojala, MD, PhD contact

+358504270558

tiina.h.ojala@hus.fi

Karl Lemström, Professor contact

+358504272281

karl.lemstrom@hus.fi

Finland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital

    Helsinki, 218

    Taneli Raivio, MD, taneli.raivio@hus.fi

    Karl Lemström, Professor

    Recruiting

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: Cardiac MRI - Approaches for New Diagnostic Noninvasive Tools for the Detection of Cardiac Allograft Rejection

In this a prospective, blinded, collaboration study between pediatric and adult transplant departments. Cardiac MRI data on patient with heart transplantations will be collected during years 2020-2022. Based on sample size calculations, the data has enough power to answer the question, whether MRI can be used as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for detection of acute rejection as such or whether it can be used as fist line noninvasive screening tool for detecting those needing for the more detailed invasive study. A clinical protocol will be developed to optimize the management and outcome of the patients having cardiac transplantation aiming to decrease the number of invasive procedures in these patients.

Read the detailed description

Background Heart transplantation is a treatment for select patients with end-stage heart failure. Improvements in immunosuppressive therapies and patient management have increased the life expectancy of heart transplant patients. One-year survivals are 90% and 80%, with 65 % and 49% of pediatric and adult patients surviving 8 - 15 years after transplantation in Finland, respectively. Despite this success, rejection remains the "Achilles heel" of heart transplantation. The early detection of acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (chronic rejection) are paramount to avoiding graft loss. Unlike in kidney and liver transplantation, there are no clinically validated biomarkers for detecting heart transplant rejection.

Biopsy and invasive coronary angiography are widely accepted as the gold standard for diagnosing acute graft rejection and chronic rejection (vasculopathy) in both pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients, respectively. However, biopsies are invasive, and they carry a significant risk of complication regarding that majority of endocardial biopsies are performed in asymptomatic patients. In addition, the histologic assessment of biopsies is often subjective. Due to the lack of consensus, biopsy protocols are center-specific and depend on the experience and personal preference of the transplant team. Helsinki pediatric transplant protocol can be considered as high-intensity biopsy center. At best, the routine surveillance biopsies can detect late episodes of moderate to severe rejection in children with an 8% - 10% annual incidence up to 11 years after transplantation. However, there is no correlation between the intensity of biopsies and the incidence of rejection or 4-year mortality in the pediatric population, suggesting the need for other monitoring practices for rejection.

Cardiac MRI. Advanced multimodality imaging techniques, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may provide a future alternative to the monitoring practices for children and adults following heart transplantation. This has the potential to decrease the frequency of biopsies and radiation, especially in low-risk patients. Cardiac MRI can assess myocardial changes over time after transplantation. In heart transplant patients, MRI facilitates the detection of acute and chronic rejection and allows monitoring of gradual adverse remodeling. Volumetric assessment of the ventricles can further independently predict hospitalizations and mortality. The most widely investigated MRI parameters for detecting acute rejection are the T2 (indicates myocardial edema) and T1 relaxation times (indicates extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and fibrosis). Further, the assessment of global left ventricular function, myocardial strain analysis as well as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) have been used for detection of chronic myocardial changes. Except for LGE and ECV, all of them can be measured noninvasively without the need for gadolinium contrast.

Even biopsy results may fail to predict rejection. A retrospective study of adults found that T2 time of ≥56 ms had a 97% negative predictive value for detecting acute rejection grade > 2. Interestingly, up to 80% of patients with a simultaneous negative biopsy but prolonged T2 relaxation time developed acute rejection in the next 30 days. The study suggested that T2 time measurement may be equal, or even superior to biopsy. However, the use of T2 relaxation time early after transplantation is limited, as it may be elevated in the first 25 days after transplantation regardless of the rejection status.

Contrast-enhanced MRI with gadolinium may provide additional information to T2 and T1 relaxation times and further limit the need for biopsies. It can identify areas of myocardial inflammation, scarring, and diffuse fibrosis, as well as assess myocardial perfusion. The prevalence of late gadolinium enhancement increases with the severity of rejection, whereas early gadolinium enhancement reflects extracellular space expansion secondary to acute necrosis and edema. Both myocardial edema (identified on T2- weighted imaging) and early myocardial contrast enhancement distinguish patients with International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade 2R rejection from those with grades 1R and 0R. Further, it has been reported that late enhancement in serially assessed transplant patients is associated with major adverse cardiac events and mortality. A recent study in 20 pediatric heart transplant patients showed that MRI-derived fibrosis markers correlate with the severity of fibrosis on biopsy. Although replacement fibrosis is irreversible, other MRI measurements change over time. Therefore, serial imaging can provide insight not only into disease progression but also on the efficacy of treatment. This is particularly relevant in acute rejection where the evaluation of myocardial edema with T2 mapping and interstitial expansion or fibrosis (T1 mapping ) can be accomplished with and without the administration of contrast agents and could easily limit the number of biopsies.

Hypothesis

Noninvasive cardiac MRI imaging can replace traditional invasive diagnostic procedures in detecting allograft rejection in cardiac transplant patients. This novel imaging strategy will reduce the cumulative stress and radiation and will guide clinical decision-making in these severely ill patients.

Patients and methods In this prospective blinded study, cardiac MRI data on new heart transplantations will be collected during years 2020-2021 (N = 72, including pediatric and adult patients). Estimated total count of invasive biopsies in the pediatric population is 100-150/2y samples, and the adult numbers will be three times higher (300-450/2y). The risk of the primary endpoint of acute rejection/immunoactivation is the highest during the first five years after transplantation. The immunoactivation occurs in 18 % and 10 % of samples taken <3 months and > 3 months after transplantation, respectively. Cardiac MRI immunoactivation/rejection findings will be blindly compared with the histological analysis of invasive endocardial biopsy done by one pathologist.

Sample size calculation (statistical consultation Tero Vahlberg, PhD): Clinically acceptable sensitivity for cardiac MRI to detect an acute rejection is 80%. Assuming an alpha level of 0.05, marginal error (precision) of 10% for sensitivity and 15% prevalence for rejection, the required total sample size is 410 samples. For specificity of 80% for cardiac MRI using the same assumptions, the required total sample size is 72 patients.

The required sample size is 410 biopsies and estimated time needed for data collection is two years. The data has then enough power to answer the question - whether MRI can be used as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for detection of acute rejection as such or whether it can be used as a fist line noninvasive screening tool for detecting those needing more detailed invasive study. MRI measurements published in adults for the detection of rejection or myocardial inflammation will be used. The detection of the secondary endpoint of vasculopathy/chronic rejection will be studied similarly to acute rejection. Cardiac MRI studies focusing on the vasculopathy findings will be carried out during the annual follow-up visits (two times during the study period/per patients, total n= 200). The MRI phenotype will be compared with invasive angiography findings. Advanced echocardiographic measurements will be further used for clinical, echocardiographic studies done in parallel with the cardiac MRI studies. The advanced echocardiographic methodology is based on the last 20 years research of group. Shortly, the methods to be used for functional MRI studies are the same as used in echo modality.

Ethical aspects The studies are designed to comply with the Helsinki Declaration and the Conventions of the Council of Europe on human rights. The results are reviewed and published anonymously. All clinical studies fulfill the general ethical requirements for clinical studies. The investigators have obtained following ethical permits from HUS ethical committee.

Clinical importance of the study Our project is realistic and timely. This project aims to promote noninvasive diagnostic strategies to replace traditional invasive procedures reducing cumulative stress and radiation in this group of severely ill heart transplant patients. This will be possible by creating a substantial amount of non-invasive research data on the myocardial mechanisms after transplantation. The investigators acknowledge that this project is ambitious. Our interdisciplinary research-group has vast experience of working with the proposed methods facilitating the success of this project. Our study results will build the foundations for new protocols to optimize the management and outcome of these patients. The methods the investigators use are validated, and the studies are well designed. The investigators are convinced that the results of the study will largely improve the clinical care of these patients. As MRI imaging is less expensive than invasive procedures, this approach will result in reduced health care costs in the long term.

Being tested
Cardiac MR
Keywords
CMR, cardiac rejection, cardiac transplatation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cardiac MRDiagnostic test

    Cardiac MR diagnostic tool for detection of acute rejection, double blind comparison with invasive cardiac biopsy

Study groups in NCT04311346
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cardiac transplantPatients exposed to cardiac transplantation
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Cardiac MR

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cardiac rejection

    Grade 0- Grade >2

    Measured: Month 1

  2. Cardiac rejection

    Grade 0- Grade >2

    Measured: Month 2

  3. Cardiac rejection

    Grade 0- Grade >2

    Measured: Month 3

  4. Cardiac rejection

    Grade 0- Grade >2

    Measured: Month 4

  5. Cardiac rejection

    Grade 0- Grade >2

    Measured: Month 5

  6. Cardiac rejection

    Grade 0- Grade >2

    Measured: Month 6

  7. Cardiac rejection

    Grade 0- Grade >2

    Measured: Year 1

  8. Cardiac rejection

    Grade 0- Grade >2

    Measured: Year 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2020
  2. Study start7 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion7 Mar 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion7 Mar 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
72 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04311346
Sponsor's protocol ID
Helsinki UCH CMR
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
12 Mar 2020
Last updated
17 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Taipale MA, Pentikainen MO, Martelius LA, Mutka A, Kytola SI, Kankainen M, Peltonen JI, Syrjala SO, Lahtiharju AJI, Lommi JJ, Jahnukainen TJ, Lemstrom KB, Ojala TH. Cardiac magnetic resonance in heart transplant recipients: histological, clinical and cell-free DNA validation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jul 31;26(8):1420-1428. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf145.

    PubMed 40384031

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rejection Heart Transplant, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 1 site in Finland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tiina H Ojala, MD, PhD (+358504270558, tiina.h.ojala@hus.fi), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cardiac rejection (time frame: Month 1). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04311346, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in