AzTrials
AzTrials

Neurogenic Bladder DysfunctionbTUNEDNCT04315142

Bladder and TranscUtaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for nEurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

A study testing Experimental TTNS in people with Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction, run by University of Zurich at 12 sites in 4 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Many patients with neurological diseases suffer from neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), which often severely impairs quality of life, due to urinary urgency with or without incontinence and voiding dysfunction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction
What is being tested?
Experimental TTNS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
48 participants
Where
12 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
1 Mar 2020to 30 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Informed consent
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Last urethro-cystoscopy and bladder washing cytology within 1 year before inclusion
  • Last urodynamic investigation within 6 months and no change of bladder medication since then
  • Refractory LUTD due to a neurological disorder:
  • Neurogenic OAB (i.e. urgency frequency syndrome with or without urgency incontinence) refractory to antimuscarinics (pharmacotherapy for at least 4 weeks with at least 2 antimuscarinics)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Neurogenic voiding dysfunction (i.e. incomplete bladder emptying/incomplete / complete urinary retention) refractory to alpha-blocker (pharmacotherapy with an alpha-blocker for at least 4 weeks)
  • Combination of neurogenic OAB and neurogenic voiding dysfunction (i.e. urgency frequency syndrome with or without urgency incontinence and incomplete / complete urinary retention) refractory to antimuscarinics (pharmacotherapy for at least 4 weeks with at least 2 antimuscarinics) and alpha-blocker (pharmacotherapy with an alpha- blocker for at least 4 weeks)
  • Motor response induced by TTNS stimulation at least at one leg
  • Willing not to change or start any new medications or treatments for the LUT during the entire study period (from screening till unblinding)

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications to the investigational product
  • Known or suspected non-adherence, drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia
  • Participation in another study with investigational drug or product within the 30 days preceding and during the present study
  • Neuromodulation treatment for urological indication in the last six months or ongoing
  • Botulinum toxin injections in the detrusor and/or urethral sphincter in the last six months
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Individuals especially in need of protection (according to Research with Human Subjects published by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences [www.samw.ch/en/News/News.html]
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 4 countries.

12 sites in 4 countries

Switzerland8 sites
  • Cantonal Hospital Aarau

    Aarau

  • REHAB Basel

    Basel

  • EOC - Regional Hospital Bellinzona and Valleys

    Bellinzona

  • Inselspital Bern, University Hospital

    Bern, Canton of Bern

  • Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois CHUV

    Lausanne, 1011

  • Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen

    Sankt Gallen

  • Cantonal Hospital Winterthur

    Winterthur, Canton of Zurich

  • Balgrist University Hospital

    Zurich

Other trials in Switzerland

Italy2 sites
  • Careggi University Hospital

    Florence

  • Tor Vergata University Hospital

    Rome

Other trials in Italy

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospital Antwerp

    Edegem

Other trials in Belgium

Brazil1 site
  • University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) for Treating Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Multicentre, Randomised, Sham-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial

Many patients with neurological diseases suffer from neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), which often severely impairs quality of life, due to urinary urgency with or without incontinence and voiding dysfunction. In addition, the upper urinary tract may be jeopardized because of high intravesical pressure caused by detrusor overactivity (DO) with concurrent detrusor-sphincter-dyssynergia and/or low bladder compliance.

The treatment of NLUTD is a challenge since conventional conservative therapies often fail and more invasive treatments such as intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections, bladder augmentation and urinary diversion have to be considered. Neuromodulation therapies including tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) may be alternative non-invasive treatment options.

Read more

Indeed, TNS is an effective and safe treatment for idiopathic overactive bladder proven in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but its value in neurological patients is unclear. In a recent systematic review, the investigators found evidence that TNS might become a promising treatment option for NLUTD, however, more reliable data from well-designed RCTs are urgently needed to reach definitive conclusions.

However, this study will be the first adequately sampled and powered, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind trial assessing transcutaneous TNS (TTNS) for NLUTD. It will provide significant insights into the efficacy of TTNS in patients suffering from NLUTD and in the case that this treatment is really effective in the neurological population, the investigators findings would completely revolutionize the management of NLUTD in daily clinical practice. Moreover, this interdisciplinary clinical trial will relevantly influence the neurological and urological approach in the management of NLUTD promoting future collaborative projects improving patients' medical care and underlying the pioneering role of Switzerland in the rapidly developing and ambitious research field of neuro-urology.

Being tested
Experimental TTNS, Sham TTNS
Keywords
Randomized, Sham-controlled, Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), Neurogenic detrusor overactivity, Neuromodulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental TTNSDevice

    30-minute TTNS intervention is performed 2 days a week during a treatment period of 6 weeks

  • Sham TTNSDevice

    30-minute sham intervention is performed 2 days a week during a treatment period of 6 weeks

Study groups in NCT04315142
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Experimental TTNS
TTNS sham stimulationSham comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Sham TTNS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success of TTNS

    Success of TTNS defined as:

    • ≥50% reduction in incontinence rates per 24 hours and/or ≥50% reduction in micturition/catheterization frequency per 24 hours in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB)
    • Reduction of post void residual (PVR) below 25% of bladder capacity if bladder capacity
    • 100 mL, or below 50% of bladder capacity if bladder capacity <100 mL in patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction
    • In patients with combined neurogenic OAB and neurogenic voiding dysfunction: The success criteria of leading symptom/dysfunction will be chosen

    Measured: study week 8 / study end

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Volumetric changes during urodynamics and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Cystometric capacity [mL], volume at first DO [mL], voided volume [mL] and post void residual [mL] as assessed by urodynamic measurement

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  2. Changes in bladder compliance [mL/cmH2O] during urodynamics and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  3. Pressure changes during urodynamics and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Maximum DO pressure [cmH2O], detrusor leak-point pressure [cmH2O], maximum detrusor pressure [cmH2O] during storage phase, maximum detrusor pressure [cmH2O] during voiding phase, detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate [cmH2O] as assessed by urodynamic measurement

    Measured: Baseline; study week 1-8 / study end

  4. Changes in maximum flow rate [mL/s] as assessed by urodynamics and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  5. Changes in vesicoureterorenal reflux (VUR) as assessed by videography during urodynamics and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  6. Changes in pelvic floor activity as assessed by electromyography (EMG) during urodynamics and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  7. Changes in bladder storage and voiding parameters and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Assessed by a bladder diary

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  8. Changes in bowel diary parameters and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Assessed by a bowel diary

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  9. Goal attainment scaling assessed by a self-assessment goal achievement (SAGA) questionnaire

    The baseline SAGA module asks patients to rate the importance of 9 prespecified (fixed) treatment goals that describe reducing the following LUTS: frequency (daytime and nighttime); sensation of pressure; primary sensation to use the bathroom; bladder voiding; starting or maintaining a urine stream; urine loss when coughing, laughing, exercising, or sneezing; urine leakage; and urgency. In addition to the 9 fixed goals, patients can list up to 5 additional (open) treatment goals. Patients rate the importance of each goal using a 5-point scale ranging from "not very important goal" to "very important goal." In the SAGA follow-up module, patients rate their achievement of each individualized goal and overall goal achievement with a 5-point scale ranging from "did not achieve goal" to "greatly exceeded goal."

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  10. Changes in International Prostate Symptom (IPSS) questionnaire and their relation to clinical outcomes

    The IPSS ("International Prostate Symptom Questionnaire") score is based on questions concerning urinary symptoms and quality of life (QoL). It consists of 8 items covering 7 urinary symptoms related dimensions (subscales) and 1 additional item assessing quality of life. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale (0=not at all; 5=almost always). The lowest possible score in the total IPSS score is 0 (asymptomatic); the highest possible score is 35 (symptomatic). The QoL index is rated on a 7-point scale, with 0 indicating "delighted" and 6 "terrible."

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  11. Changes in urinary symptoms as assessed by the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) questionnaire and their relation to clinical outcomes

    The USP ("Urinary Symptom Profile") score is based on questions concerning urinary symptoms and their severity in males and females. It consists of 13 items covering 3 dimensions (subscales) with 7 overactive bladder (OAB), 3 stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and 3 low stream (LS) related items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale. The lowest score is 0 (asymptomatic); the highest score is 3 (symptomatic).

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  12. Changes in Qualiveen questionnaire scores and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Qualiveen-30 assesses the Specific Impact of Urinary Problems (SIUP) on Quality of Life. It consists of 30 items covering 4 domains, namely inconvenience (9 questions), restrictions (8 questions), fears (8 questions), and impact on daily life (5 questions). Each item is rated on a 5-point ordinal scale (0=asymptomatic; 4=symptomatic). The index of the SIUP on Quality of Life is the mean of the four individual scores. The lowest possible overall score in the Qualiveen-30 is 0 (Urinary problems have no specific impact on QoL); the highest possible score is 30 (Urinary problems have a huge specific impact on QoL).

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  13. Changes in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and their relation to clinical outcomes

    The FSFI ("Female Sexual Function Index") is based on questions concerning female sexual functions. It consists of 19 items covering 6 domains, namely sexual desire, arousal (both subjective and physiologic), lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The lowest possible score in the total FSFI is 2 (asymptomatic); the highest possible score is 36 (symptomatic).

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  14. Changes in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and their relation to clinical outcomes

    The IIEF ("International Index of Erectile Function") is based on questions concerning erectile dysfunction. It consists of 15 items covering 5 domains, namely erectile functioning, orgasmic functioning, sexual desire, and intercourse satisfaction along with a fifth component which encompasses the concept of overall sexual satisfaction. While items 1-10 are rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale from 0 to 5, items 11-15 are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores are reflecting less dysfunction. Domain scores are computed by summing the sores for individual items in each domain.

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  15. Variability and validity of University of South Australia Urinary Symptom Assessment questionnaire (USA2) for treatment follow-up

    The USA2 ("University of South Australia Urinary Symptom Assessment") assesses multiple dimensions of urgency sensation. 10 items are rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale from 0 to 5. Lower scores are reflecting lesser urgency symptoms. Domain scores are computed by summing the sores for individual items in each domain.

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  16. Changes in Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) questionnaire and their relation to clinical outcomes

    The NBD ("Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction") score is based on questions concerning constipation and fecal incontinence and was developed for and validated in the spinal cord injury population. It consists of 10 items. The lowest possible score in the total NBD is 0 (asymptomatic); the highest possible score is 47 (symptomatic). The interpretation of the total NBD score is very minor NBD (0-6), minor NBD (7-9), moderate NBD (10-13), and severe NBD (≥14).

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  17. Changes in neurophysiology measurements of evoked potentials (EPs) as well as nerve conduction measurements and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Measured: Baseline; once per week during the TTNS intervention period; study week 8 / study end

  18. Volumetric changes during rectal sensitivity testing and barostat assessment and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Initial sensation [mL], volume at urge to defecate [mL], maximum tolerated volume [mL] as assessed by rectal sensitivity testing; rectal capacity [mL] assessed by barostat assessment

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  19. Pressure changes during anorectal manometry and barostat assessment and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Basal Internal anal sphincter pressure [mmHg], squeeze external anal sphincter pressure [mmHg], relaxation internal anal sphincter pressure during defecation [mmHg], intraabdominal pressure during defecation [mmHg]

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  20. Changes in rectal compliance [mL/cmH2O] during anorectal manometry and barostat assessment and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  21. Changes in defecatory disorder [Rao's classification] identified during anorectal manometry and their relation to clinical outcomes

    Anorectal manometry is the preferable test for defecatory disorder. Rao's classification describes the four types manometric patterns (I-IV) that are identified through manometric assessments.

    Measured: Baseline; study week 8 / study end

  22. Incidence of side effects as well as number and intensity/severity (mild/moderate/severe) of AEs and SAE

    Categories:

    • infection - Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
    • infection - other than UTI
    • skin irritation at the electrode site
    • pressure ulcer
    • severe neurological deterioration
    • severe or sudden increase in pain
    • severe or sudden increase in spasticity
    • deep vein thrombosis / pulmonary embolism
    • autonomic dysreflexia
    • urgent (unexpected) transfer/admittance to an acute care facility

    Measured: During complete study period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2020
  2. Study start1 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2025

Why it stopped: Difficulties in recruiting participants

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04315142
Sponsor's protocol ID
bTUNED
Acronym
bTUNED
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
9 Mar 2020
Last updated
11 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Stalder SA, Gross O, Anderson CE, Bachmann LM, Baumann S, Birkhauser V, Bywater M, Del Popolo G, Engeler DS, Agro EF, Friedl S, Grilo N, Kiss S, Koschorke M, Leitner L, Liechti MD, Mehnert U, Musco S, Sadri H, Stachele L, Tornic J, van der Lely S, Wyler S, Kessler TM. bTUNED: transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. BJU Int. 2023 Sep;132(3):343-352. doi: 10.1111/bju.16081. Epub 2023 Jun 13.

    PubMed 37204144

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experimental TTNS in people with Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction, run by University of Zurich at 12 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in Switzerland, Italy, Belgium, Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Difficulties in recruiting participants). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Success of TTNS (time frame: study week 8 / study end). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04315142, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in