Age ProblemPhase 4NCT04316871
Dosage of Epidural Morphine in Elderly Patients
A Phase 4 study testing 1.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate, Normal saline and 3 mg of Morphine Sulfate in people with Age Problem and Abdominal Cancer, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This a clinical trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of three different doses of morphine, namely 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg, via the epidural route regarding reducing pain in elderly patients after a cancer surgery in the lower abdomen Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Age Problem, Abdominal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- 1.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate, Normal saline and 3 mg of Morphine Sulfate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 20 Mar 2020to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. Men and women aged ≥ 60 years, who are planned to undergo lower abdominal cancer surgery.
- 2- ASA I and II classifications. 2. Surgeries via infra-umbilical abdominal incision is considered eligible.
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal.
- Patients who are morbidly obese (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2).
- Those with contraindications to neuraxial analgesia. 4- psychiatric illness that would interfere with the perception and the assessment of pain.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Epidural Morphine for Geriatrics Undergoing Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery: a Dose Response Study
This a clinical trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of three different doses of morphine, namely 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg, via the epidural route regarding reducing pain in elderly patients after a cancer surgery in the lower abdomen
Read the detailed description
Acute postoperative pain is a common complaint for several days after surgery. However, acute postoperative pain remains even more under controlled in elderly patients, especially those with cognitive impairment and malignancy. Geriatric population is reported to be at higher risk for unwanted side effects from analgesic treatments compared to younger patients due to different major risk factors such as: decline in organ function, polypharmacy, pharmacokinetics, drug sensitivity, and frailty. Despite of the higher risk of opioids, especially morphine, causing toxicity and adverse effect; they are still the cornerstone treatment of severe acute postoperative pain. Morphine in those patients is very likely to cause toxicity because of accumulation of its active metabolites compared to other opioids with fewer or no active metabolites. Epidural morphine is an effective route for an effective drug. Furthermore, unwanted side effects with neuraxial opioids are minor and managed easily. Regarding clinical outcomes, clinical studies showed a lot of improvements associated with postoperative opioid analgesia. Now, there is a clinical necessity to achieve the best management of acute postoperative pain in elderly patients with the least possibility of adverse side effects. We aim in this randomized, assessor blinded, clinical trial at Assuit University to determine the optimum dose of epidural morphine for the highest control of acute postoperative pain in geriatrics who are planned to have lower abdominal cancer surgery.
- Conditions
- Age Problem, Abdominal Cancer
- Being tested
- 1.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate, Normal saline, 3 mg of Morphine Sulfate, 4.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate
- Keywords
- Injections, Epidural, Morphine Sulfate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
1.5 mg of Morphine SulfateDrug
Also called A
1.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.
Normal salineDrug
Also called D
Normal saline will be given epidurally.
3 mg of Morphine SulfateDrug
Also called B
3 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.
4.5 mg of Morphine SulfateDrug
Also called C
4.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group D | Placebo comparator | A total volume of 10 mL injection 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist. Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
| Group A | Active comparator | A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 1.5 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist. Receives: Drug: 1.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate |
| Group B | Active comparator | A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 3 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist. Receives: Drug: 3 mg of Morphine Sulfate |
| Group C | Active comparator | A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 4 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist. Receives: Drug: 4.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.
The mean total PCA morphine consumption (mg) in the first 72 hr. postoperatively
Measured: 72 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Visual Analog Scale
Visual Analog Scale is a visual chart scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 ( the worst pain ever) used by the patient to report the severity of their pain to assess the pain intensity, and all patients were instructed how to evaluate their pain and how to use the patient-controlled analgesia.
Measured: 72 hours
Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale
It is an six-point scale informed by degree of responsiveness to verbal and tactile stimulus where awake levels were as follows:
I = anxious, agitated, or restless; II = cooperative, oriented, and tranquil; III = response to command, and asleep levels were dependent on the patient's response to a light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; IV = brisk response; V = a sluggish response; and VI = no response
Measured: Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale at 2 hours postoperative
Nausea Score
It is a subjective scale to assess the nauseating side effects of morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Nausea scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where:
0 was recorded if the side effect was absent;
- if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment;
- if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.
Measured: 72 hours
Vomiting Score
It is a subjective scale to assess the vomiting as a side effect of epidural morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Vomiting scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where:
0 was recorded if the side effect was absent;
- if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment;
- if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.
Measured: 72 hours
Pruritus Score
It is a subjective scale to assess the pruritus as a side effect of morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Pruritus scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where:
0 was recorded if the side effect was absent;
- if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment;
- if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.
Measured: 72 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2020
- Study start20 Mar 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Age ProblemStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This randomized, double blinded, clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee of faculty of medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt. The maximum total PCA morphine consumption was 12 ± 16 mg while in healthy controls was 70± 35 mg. We aim to enroll at least 60-80 participants considering the following assumptions: * Main statistical test is ANOVA\\t-test to detect the difference of the difference of PCA morphine consumption between the four groups. * Main outcome variable is total PCA morphine consumption after lower abdominal cancer surgery in elderly patients receiving three different doses of epidural morphine in comparison with its consumption in healthy controls not receiving epidural morphine. * Effect size = 0.75, Alpha = 0.05, Power = 0.80 * Allocation ratio N4/N3/N2/N1 = 1/1/1/1. * 22 patients should be enrolled in each group to account for dropouts.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muhammad Mostafa Shawqi Abdelnasser, Assiut University
- Investigators
- Diab Hetta, MD, Study director, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04316871
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EPMDose
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data will not be publicly available due to containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.
Publications
McKeown JL. Pain Management Issues for the Geriatric Surgical Patient. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015 Sep;33(3):563-76. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
PubMed 26315638Palmer CM, Nogami WM, Van Maren G, Alves DM. Postcesarean epidural morphine: a dose-response study. Anesth Analg. 2000 Apr;90(4):887-91. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00021.
PubMed 10735794
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Epidural Morphine for Geriatrics Undergoing Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery: a Dose Response Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04316871
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EPMDose
- Conditions
- Age Problem, Abdominal Cancer
- Keywords
- Injections, Epidural, Morphine Sulfate
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This a clinical trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of three different doses of morphine, namely 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg, via the epidural route regarding reducing pain in elderly patients after a cancer surgery in the lower abdomen
Detailed description
Acute postoperative pain is a common complaint for several days after surgery. However, acute postoperative pain remains even more under controlled in elderly patients, especially those with cognitive impairment and malignancy. Geriatric population is reported to be at higher risk for unwanted side effects from analgesic treatments compared to younger patients due to different major risk factors such as: decline in organ function, polypharmacy, pharmacokinetics, drug sensitivity, and frailty. Despite of the higher risk of opioids, especially morphine, causing toxicity and adverse effect; they are still the cornerstone treatment of severe acute postoperative pain. Morphine in those patients is very likely to cause toxicity because of accumulation of its active metabolites compared to other opioids with fewer or no active metabolites. Epidural morphine is an effective route for an effective drug. Furthermore, unwanted side effects with neuraxial opioids are minor and managed easily. Regarding clinical outcomes, clinical studies showed a lot of improvements associated with postoperative opioid analgesia. Now, there is a clinical necessity to achieve the best management of acute postoperative pain in elderly patients with the least possibility of adverse side effects. We aim in this randomized, assessor blinded, clinical trial at Assuit University to determine the optimum dose of epidural morphine for the highest control of acute postoperative pain in geriatrics who are planned to have lower abdominal cancer surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- This randomized, double blinded, clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee of faculty of medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt. The maximum total PCA morphine consumption was 12 ± 16 mg while in healthy controls was 70± 35 mg. We aim to enroll at least 60-80 participants considering the following assumptions: * Main statistical test is ANOVA\t-test to detect the difference of the difference of PCA morphine consumption between the four groups. * Main outcome variable is total PCA morphine consumption after lower abdominal cancer surgery in elderly patients receiving three different doses of epidural morphine in comparison with its consumption in healthy controls not receiving epidural morphine. * Effect size = 0.75, Alpha = 0.05, Power = 0.80 * Allocation ratio N4/N3/N2/N1 = 1/1/1/1. * 22 patients should be enrolled in each group to account for dropouts.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group D | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal salineA total volume of 10 mL injection 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist. |
| Group A | Active comparator | Drug: 1.5 mg of Morphine SulfateA total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 1.5 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist. |
| Group B | Active comparator | Drug: 3 mg of Morphine SulfateA total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 3 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist. |
| Group C | Active comparator | Drug: 4.5 mg of Morphine SulfateA total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 4 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 1. Men and women aged ≥ 60 years, who are planned to undergo lower abdominal cancer surgery.
- 2- ASA I and II classifications. 2. Surgeries via infra-umbilical abdominal incision is considered eligible.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient refusal.
- Patients who are morbidly obese (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2).
- Those with contraindications to neuraxial analgesia. 4- psychiatric illness that would interfere with the perception and the assessment of pain.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 mg of Morphine SulfateAlso: A1.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally. | Drug | Group A |
| Normal salineAlso: DNormal saline will be given epidurally. | Drug | Group D |
| 3 mg of Morphine SulfateAlso: B3 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally. | Drug | Group B |
| 4.5 mg of Morphine SulfateAlso: C4.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally. | Drug | Group C |
Primary outcome
Total Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.
Time frame: 72 hours
The mean total PCA morphine consumption (mg) in the first 72 hr. postoperatively
5 secondary outcomes
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 72 hours
Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale
Time frame: Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale at 2 hours postoperative
Nausea Score
Time frame: 72 hours
Vomiting Score
Time frame: 72 hours
Pruritus Score
Time frame: 72 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 26315638McKeown JL. Pain Management Issues for the Geriatric Surgical Patient. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015 Sep;33(3):563-76. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
- Background: PubMed 10735794Palmer CM, Nogami WM, Van Maren G, Alves DM. Postcesarean epidural morphine: a dose-response study. Anesth Analg. 2000 Apr;90(4):887-91. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data will not be publicly available due to containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.
Related trials for Age Problem
Recruiting
Evaluation of the PPAL
Age Problems
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Vascular Aging and Microcirculation: Physiological Aspects of Vascular Aging in the Elderly Population (VAMP-Aging)
Aging Problems
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Managing Hepatitis B (Hep. B) and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Related Cancers and Mental Health.
Hepatitis B, Human Papilloma Virus
Active, not recruiting
Brain Health Virtual Reality Study
Aging, Aging Problems
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Twin Pregnancy Cohort
Pregnant With Complication, Twin Pregnancy With Antenatal Problem
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Diab Hetta, MD study director
Assiut University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing 1.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate, Normal saline and 3 mg of Morphine Sulfate in people with Age Problem and Abdominal Cancer, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption. (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04316871, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2025.