AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal AgentPhase 4NCT04332627

Comparison of QoR-15 in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine

A Phase 4 study testing Sugammadex and Neostigmine in people with Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal Agent and Sugammadex, run by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The quality of recovery in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using Sumamadex and Neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy was compared through the QoR(Quality of Recovery)-15 questionnaire. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 70 years
What is being tested?
Sugammadex and Neostigmine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
77 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
24 Feb 2020to 21 May 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy aged 20-70

Who cannot join

  • neuromuscular disease
  • allergy to rocuronium, sugammadex, neostigmine
  • cognitive impairment ( disable to answer the questionnaire )
  • refuse to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Quality of Recovery Score (QoR-15) According to Neuromuscular Blocking Reversal Agent in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine

The quality of recovery in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using Sumamadex and Neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy was compared through the QoR(Quality of Recovery)-15 questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

Quality of Recovery questionnaire includes five details (Emotional status, Physical comfort, Physiological support, Physical independece, Pain), and is a proven method of reliability, consistency and validity for evaluating recovery from surgery and anesthesia.

After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients experience various discomforts such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and placebo due to general anesthesia.

Neostigmine has side effects such as crampy abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. In addition, residual neuromuscular blockade was higher in neostigmine compared with sugammadex.

Although sugammadex expected to improve patient's recovery, it is still controversial that sugammadex contributes to clinically meaningfull difference compared with neostigmine.

Therefore, the aim of our study is comparison of quality of recovery through QoR-15 questionnaire in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using sugammadex and neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Being tested
Sugammadex, Neostigmine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SugammadexDrug

    sugammadex 2mg/kg or 4mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : 4mg/kg, TOF 1-4 : 2mg/kg)

  • NeostigmineDrug

    with glycopyrrolate 0.4mg, neostigmine 0.02mg/kg or 0.04mg/kg or 0.05mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : wait until TOF 2, TOF2-3: 0.05mg/kg, TOF4: 0.04mg/kg)

Study groups in NCT04332627
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
sugammadexActive comparatorsugammadex 2mg/kg or 4mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : 4mg/kg, TOF 1-4 : 2mg/kg)
Receives: Drug: Sugammadex
neostigminePlacebo comparatorwith glycopyrrolate 0.4mg, neostigmine 0.02mg/kg or 0.04mg/kg or 0.05mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : wait until TOF 2, TOF2-3: 0.05mg/kg, TOF4: 0.04mg/kg)
Receives: Drug: Neostigmine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score

    the difference of Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 score between preoperative and postoperative 1 and 2 days (minimum value : 0, maximum value : 150, the higher the score, the better the result)

    Measured: preoperative 1 days to postoperative 2 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. recovery time

    from injection of sugammadex or neostigmien to extubation and confirm of adequate spontaneous breathing

    Measured: perioperative - until 48hours

  2. PACU(post-anesthesia care unit) stay time

    from entry of PACU to go general ward

    Measured: perioperative - until 48hours

  3. postoperative pain score

    postoperative pain score measured by 11-point NRS(numerical rating scale) score (minimum : 0, maximum : 11, the lower the score, the lesser pain)

    Measured: at postoperative 30minutes, 6hours, 24hours

  4. the incidence of administration of postoperative rescue drug

    administration of analgesic drug and anti-emetic drug for postoperative management

    Measured: perioperative - until 72hours

  5. hospital stay

    days of hospital stay

    Measured: preoperative - until discharge (usually 48 hours to 72hours)

  6. urinary retention

    residual urine > 300ml diagnosed by bladder ultrasonography

    Measured: postoperative - until discharge (usually 48 hours to 72hours)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2020
  2. Study start24 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion21 May 2020
  4. Study completion21 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04332627
Sponsor's protocol ID
B-1910/571-004
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
1 Apr 2020
Last updated
24 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.

    PubMed 23411725
  • Hristovska AM, Duch P, Allingstrup M, Afshari A. Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 14;8(8):CD012763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012763.

    PubMed 28806470

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Sugammadex and Neostigmine in people with Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal Agent and Sugammadex, run by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score (time frame: preoperative 1 days to postoperative 2 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04332627, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in