AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal CancerWhistleNCT04336202

Watch and Wait Management on Rectal Cancer Patients Using New Swift Local Therapy

A study testing External beam radiotherapy + Endorectal brachytherapy in people with Rectal Cancer and Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions, run by Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital at 1 site in Canada.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Within our institution, the principal investigator have acquired expertise in endorectal brachytherapy, a localized treatment for colorectal cancer. Until now a modality which uses an endorectal applicator has been used, which has certain limitations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
External beam radiotherapy + Endorectal brachytherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
27 Oct 2020to Jan 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with histologic diagnosis by proctoscopic biopsy of invasive rectal adenocarcinoma will be considered for entry in this study.
  • Patient in whom the diagnosis of invasive rectal cancer has been obtained by incisional biopsy (surgical or endoscopic biopsy) that the majority of the tumor has not been removed .
  • The tumor should be either palpable by clinical rectal exam or accessible via a rigid proctoscope, and its proximal border should be located no more than 15 cm from the anal verge.
  • Rectal cancer clinically stage as T2-T3 N1+ by MRI or endoscopic ultrasound.
  • Tumor of 5 cm or less length, non obstructive
  • Patient is not suitable for surgery nor chemotherapy due to medical conditions
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patient must consent to be in the study and consent form must be signed, witnessed and dated prior to registration .
  • Patients must be accessible geographically for follow up.
  • Adults older than 18 years of age

Who cannot join

  • Patient with malignant rectal tumors other than adenocarcinoma, i.e, sarcoma, lymphoma, carcinoid, squamous cell, cloacogenic, etc.
  • Patient who demonstrate prior to randomization, evidence of free perforation, as manifested by free fluid in the abdomen.
  • Patient who are curable by standard of care with either surgery or eligible for the Morpheus study.
  • Patient who have received any previous therapy (radiation , chemotherapy) for rectal cancer.
  • Patient whose tumor is fixed by clinical examination to surrounding structures, precluding the possibility of adequate surgical resection even with pelvic exenteration.
  • Patient with a performance status of 3 or 4.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patient with tumor involving the anal canal.
  • Patient who are pregnant at the time of randomization.
  • Patient with psychiatric or addictive disorders that would preclude obtaining informed consent.
  • Patient who have multiple primary tumors involving both the colon and rectum that would preclude them from being classified as having only rectal cancer.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Jewish General Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study of Dose-escalation Strategy of Radiotherapy Followed by Endorectal Brachytherapy With the Use of a New Rectal Applicator in Inoperable, Ederly Rectal Cancer Patients

Within our institution, the principal investigator have acquired expertise in endorectal brachytherapy, a localized treatment for colorectal cancer. Until now a modality which uses an endorectal applicator has been used, which has certain limitations. In the context of this study, a new applicator will be used which is already approved by Health Canada for endorectal brachytherapy, thereby improving the participant's quality of life and optimizing treatment time.

Read the detailed description

The main goal of this study is to treat patients using external beam radiotherapy followed by endorectal brachytherapy using a new applicator. Validating the feasibility of this new applicator, assessing the treatment time required when using it, the necessary workload required and ultimately avoid the need for surgery are our main priorities. Currently, this option is still experimental, although several patients have been treated with this method during the last ten years.

In this pilot study, 45 patients will be recruited, whom have medical conditions (co-morbidities) that make surgery very difficult, or patients that are refusing surgery.

Being tested
External beam radiotherapy + Endorectal brachytherapy
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • External beam radiotherapy + Endorectal brachytherapyRadiation

    In this study, all participants will receive a treatment of external beam radiotherapy without chemotherapy, which will be followed by three (3) treatments of endorectal brachytherapy with the new applicator.

Study groups in NCT04336202
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
External beam radiotherapy + Endorectal brachytherapyOtherIn this study, all participants will receive a treatment of external beam radiotherapy without chemotherapy, which will be followed by three (3) treatments of endorectal brachytherapy with the new applicator.
Receives: Radiation: External beam radiotherapy + Endorectal brachytherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The feasibility of the new device

    To measure the percentage (%) of clinical complete responders versus non-complete clinical responders and compare it to the percentage of an already proven device to determine if the new device can be used to treat rectal cancer patients. The cancer response will be assessed by rectoscopy, biopsy and imaging.

    Measured: 2 years post treatment

  2. Toxicity using the new device

    Use the CTCAE guidelines to measure the percentage (%) of toxicity (G3 and above) of this novel X-Ray device. All grade 3 post-treatment complications will be reported (Proctitis, rectal bleeding, diarrhea). The toxicity will be assessed by the clinician during the follow-up visits.

    An early stopping rule for possible severe toxicity during and post treatment toxicity will be used in this study.

    The following early stopping rules will be applied to test the null hypothesis that the proportion of severe toxicity is less or equal to 25 % at 0.05:

    • 3 severe toxicities (G3-4) out of the first 12 evaluable patients or
    • 5 severe toxicities (G3-4) out of the first 22 evaluable patients or
    • 7 severe toxicities (G3-4) out of the first 36 evaluable patients.

    Measured: 2 years post treatment

  3. Workload

    To evaluate the workload of this modality in regards to time management (the time required to treat patients (pre-treatment and during treatment) and the number of ressources required. The principal investigator will compare it to an already existent equivalent treatment.

    Measured: 2 years post treatment

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Tumor response

    Number of participants (#) that are complete clinical responders

    Measured: At clinical evaluation, 13 weeks since beginning of treatments

  2. Local control

    Number (#) of participants with Local control assessed during follow-up visits

    Measured: 2 years post treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2020
  2. Study start27 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion27 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2028 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Issues with applicator

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04336202
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-2230
Acronym
Whistle
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
20 Feb 2020
Last updated
24 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Rutten HJ, den Dulk M, Lemmens VE, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA. Controversies of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in elderly patients. Lancet Oncol. 2008 May;9(5):494-501. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70129-3.

    PubMed 18452860
  • Dekker JW, van den Broek CB, Bastiaannet E, van de Geest LG, Tollenaar RA, Liefers GJ. Importance of the first postoperative year in the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1533-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1671-x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

    PubMed 21445672
  • Garant A, Magnan S, Devic S, Martin AG, Boutros M, Vasilevsky CA, Ferland S, Bujold A, DesGroseilliers S, Sebajang H, Richard C, Vuong T. Image Guided Adaptive Endorectal Brachytherapy in the Nonoperative Management of Patients With Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Dec 1;105(5):1005-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.042. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

    PubMed 31476417
  • Liang LH, Tomic N, Vuong T, Aldelaijan S, Bekerat H, DeBlois F, Seuntjens J, Devic S. Physics aspects of the Papillon technique-Five decades later. Brachytherapy. 2018 Jan-Feb;17(1):234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.09.016.

    PubMed 29102741
  • Gerard JP, Chapet O, Ramaioli A, Romestaing P. Long-term control of T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma with radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Sep 1;54(1):142-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02879-1.

    PubMed 12182984
  • Sun Myint A, Smith FM, Gollins SW, Wong H, Rao C, Whitmarsh K, Sripadam R, Rooney P, Hershman MJ, Fekete Z, Perkins K, Pritchard DM. Dose escalation using contact X-ray brachytherapy (Papillon) for rectal cancer: does it improve the chance of organ preservation? Br J Radiol. 2017 Dec;90(1080):20170175. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170175. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

    PubMed 28937269

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing External beam radiotherapy + Endorectal brachytherapy in people with Rectal Cancer and Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions, run by Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The feasibility of the new device (time frame: 2 years post treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04336202, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in