AzTrials
AzTrials

Patient SafetyPSI-RECORd-GPNCT04346121

Non-COVID Patient-safety Incidents Reported by General Practitioners in Time of Lockdown: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Descriptive Study.cRisis

An observational study of Patient Safety, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The COVID-19 epidemic is causing a global health crisis. In France, it has imposed a major reorganization of the healthcare system. This emergency reorganization is unprecedented. It involved first, second and third line care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Patient Safety
What is being tested?
GPs reports of potential patient safety incidents, non-COVID-19 related
How many people
132 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
28 Apr 2020to 29 Jun 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: General practitioners will be invited via an email issued to report potential patient safety incidents unrelated to COVID-19 that they have observed since March 14, 2020 (date of entry into Stage 3 of the COVID-19 epidemic)

Who may be able to join

  • General practitioners practising in primary care, in France, who have given their consent to receive e-mails from the Collège National des Généralistes Enseignants (CNGE)
  • Any patient undergoing primary care

Who cannot join

  • Other primary health care professionals

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • University Hospital

    Nantes, 44000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Non-COVID Patient-safety Incidents Reported by General Practitioners in Time of Lockdown: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Descriptive Study.

The COVID-19 epidemic is causing a global health crisis. In France, it has imposed a major reorganization of the healthcare system. This emergency reorganization is unprecedented. It involved first, second and third line care. Following this reorganization and from the first days of confinement, a decrease in care activity not related to COVID-19 was observed in médical offices, in emergency services, and in secondary and tertiary care services. This decrease in activity could indicate a decrease in pathologies related to work, transportation or non-COVID-19 infections, due to a favourable effect of lockdown. Nevertheless, some health professionals report the opposite in the media and on social networks, an unusual increase in events (appendicular peritonitis treated late, increase in domestic violence, etc.), while others are surprised by a decrease in activity that is difficult to explain (leukaemia diagnoses by biologists, for example). One hypothesis is that such changes could be related to the reorganisation of the health care system or to the consequences of lockdown.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a systematic collection and analysis of patient safety incidents (also called "adverse events" in France). The objective is to assess the roles of the system and human factors in patient safety, in order to propose changes to the global system and local organisation. In France, there is a system for reporting serious adverse events related to care. Only 4% of the 820 serious adverse events reported in 2018 were reported by primary healthcare professionals (1). However, patient safety incidents in primary care are known to have specific mechanisms, types and mechanisms (2).

Read more

We hypothesize that the COVID-19 health crisis may have induced unusual patient safety incidents through new mechanisms in a context associating reorganization of the healthcare system and population lockdown. Such a scenario requires the implementation of a massive collection of potential incidents and their systematic and well-structured analysis.

Thus, the objective of our study is to describe patient safety incidents related to the reorganization of care and/or lockdown in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis (types, severity, mechanisms) reported by general practitioners in France.

  1. HAS. Retour d'expérience sur les événements indésirables graves associés à des soins (EIGS) [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 7]. Available from: https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_2882289/fr/retour-d-experience-sur-les-evenements-indesirables-graves-associes-a-des-soins-eigs
  2. Carson-Stevens A, Hibbert P, Avery A, Butlin A, Carter B, Cooper A, et al. A cross-sectional mixed methods study protocol to generate learning from patient safety incidents reported from general practice. BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 1;5(12):e009079.
Conditions
Patient Safety
Being tested
GPs reports of potential patient safety incidents, non-COVID-19 related
Keywords
Safety care, COVID, primary care, organization of care

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GPs reports of potential patient safety incidents, non-COVID-19 relatedOther

    GPs reports of potential patient safety incidents, non-COVID-19 related

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Describe patient safety incidents (types, severity, contributing and correcting factors) - 1000 PSI required

    Describe patient safety incidents (types, severity, contributing and correcting factors) by the reorganization of care and/or lockdown reported by French GPs in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis - 1000 PSI required

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Describe patient safety incidents (types, severity, contributing and correcting factors) - 100 PSI required

    Describe patient safety incidents (types, severity, contributing and correcting factors) by the reorganization of care and/or lockdown reported by French GPs in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis - 100 PSI required

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2020
  2. Study start28 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion29 Jun 2020
  4. Study completion29 Jun 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
132 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04346121
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC20_0182
Acronym
PSI-RECORd-GP
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
10 Apr 2020
Last updated
26 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Fournier JP, Amelineau JB, Hild S, Nguyen-Soenen J, Daviot A, Simonneau B, Bowie P, Donaldson L, Carson-Stevens A. Patient-safety incidents during COVID-19 health crisis in France: An exploratory sequential multi-method study in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2021 Dec;27(1):142-151. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1945029.

    PubMed 34212814

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patient Safety, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Describe patient safety incidents (types, severity, contributing and correcting factors) - 1000 PSI required (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04346121, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in