AzTrials
AzTrials

Fall Injury PreventionAPDM systemNCT04354623

Developing a Falls Prediction Tool Using Both Accelerometer and Video Gait Analysis Data in Older Adults

An observational study of Fall Injury Prevention, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures (accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensor data) in older adults monitored longitudinally. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Fall Injury Prevention
What is being tested?
A 6-minute walk test
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
15 Apr 2025to 22 Apr 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Older adult

Study population: We're planning to recruit 100 subjects from the Geriatric Medicine clinic at Vancouver General Hospital

Who may be able to join

  • All subjects must be aged 65 years and older • All subjects must have had at least one fall in the last year and have been referred to the falls clinic (High Risk Subjects) OR have had no falls on the last year and have responded to our newspaper advertisement (Low Risk Subjects)

Who cannot join

  • Subjects age less than 65 years old

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, VGH Research Pavilion Room 186

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures (accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensor data) in older adults monitored longitudinally. This Stability Measures (SM) database will allow us to use new machine learning methods to develop and then validate algorithms that predict future falls, allowing for better targeting of vulnerable patients.

Read the detailed description

Recent advances in machine learning have disrupted the standard approach to assessing medical prognosis. Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures ( accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensors data) in older adults monitores longitudinally. This Stability Measures (SM) database will allow us to use new machine learning methods to develop and validate algorithms that predict future falls, allowing to better targetting of vulnerable individuals.

Although there have been numerous attempts to quantify fall risk in older adults using bedside scales 7-12, no previous group has attempted to use a combination of both accelerometer and video measures to assess gait stability. Since these measures will be captured in both frequently falling and infrequently falling patients, we will have SM data for various windows of time (1, 2, 3 and 4-weeks) prior to at least 100 fall events, a dataset that has never been captured before.

HYPOTHESES:

  1. A combination of accelerometer, gyroscope, and video data can be used to predict falls longitudinally, first by the use of a training dataset followed by verification on a validation data set.
  2. All the above sensor-based inputs can be combined as a simple, automated predcition tool to predict fall risk in older adults Current Methods of Falls Risk Assessment: Current methods of predicting falls in physician offices rely heavily on simple bedside tests12-14. Although useful, all of these measures have quite low sensitivity and specificity, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of approximately 0.707-12.

In fact, a recent meta-analysis "could not identify any tool which had an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity, or which was clearly better than a simple clinical judgment of risk of falling"

METHODS:

  1. Subjects: i) High Risk Subjects (n=50): All subjects will be recruited from falls and geriatrics clinics at Vancouver General Hospital. These clinics see about 2500 patients per year and are currently used for research recruitment. Each clinic patient has gait speed measured, which will allow to recruit both high and low risk fallers. This test will allow us to recruit 50 subjects at marked risk for falls, providing us with prospectively gathered dataset of greater than 100 events, five times higher than any other sensor study. ii) Low Risk Subjects (n=50): In addition, we will use newspaper advertisements to recruit and then screen low risk subjects. All subjects will have a gait speed > 0.8 m/s and have had no falls in the last year.

All study patients with come to the laboratory (Gerontology and Diabetes Research Laboratory, VGH Research Pavilion) for a one hour session. Each subject will perform a 6-minute walk test during which gait assessment will be obtained from the APDM system (Portland, OR). In addition there will be four video cameras (on the front, back and sides) that will measure raw video data for our gait analysis. The camera does not record any facial data (in fact, 'deepfake' software in the system deletes all facial details) and the patient's movements are converted to a 'stick figure' prior to being saved in the system. In addition, a Xethru X4M03 kit was will be used to collect ultra-sideband radar data (UWB). The UWB radar operates in 5.9-10.3 GHz, providing high spatial resolution. The radar is placed 1.5 m above the floor level. To collect heel-toe strike timing data, the subject will ambulate on the GAITRite system (CIR Systems Inc, Franklin, NJ), with a 90 × 700-cm × 3.2-mm walkway.

Being tested
A 6-minute walk test

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • A 6-minute walk testOther

    Also called Video recording

    Each subject will perform a 6-minute walk test during which gait assessment will be obtained from the APDM system (Portland, OR). In addition there will be four video cameras (on the front, back and sides) that will measure raw video data for our gait analysis. The camera does not record any facial data (in fact, 'deepfake' software in the system deletes all facial details) and the patient's movements are converted to a 'stick figure' prior to being saved in the system.

Study groups in NCT04354623
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High Risk Subjects (n=50)All subjects will be recruited from falls and geriatrics clinics at Vancouver General Hospital. These clinics see about 2500 patients per year and are currently used for research recruitment. Each clinic patient has gait speed measured, which will allow to recruit both high and low risk fallers. This test will allow us to recruit 50 subjects at marked risk for falls, providing us with prospectively gathered dataset of greater than 100 events, five times higher than any other sensor study.
Receives: Other: A 6-minute walk test
Low Risk Subjects (n=50)We will use newspaper advertisements to recruit and then screen low risk subjects. All subjects will have a gait speed > 0.8 m/s and have had no falls in the last year.
Receives: Other: A 6-minute walk test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Classification of accuracy of the algorithm on the validation dataset

    Consisting of True positive (TP), False positive (FP) rate, Precision, Recall (similar to sensitivity), F-measure (conveys the balance between precision and recall) and the Receiver Operation Curve area

    Measured: 60 min

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2020
  2. Study start15 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion22 Apr 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04354623
Sponsor's protocol ID
H19-03094
Acronym
APDM system
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
16 Apr 2020
Last updated
1 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Fall Injury Prevention, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Classification of accuracy of the algorithm on the validation dataset (time frame: 60 min). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in