Fall Injury PreventionAPDM systemNCT04354623
Developing a Falls Prediction Tool Using Both Accelerometer and Video Gait Analysis Data in Older Adults
An observational study of Fall Injury Prevention, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures (accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensor data) in older adults monitored longitudinally. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Fall Injury Prevention
- What is being tested?
- A 6-minute walk test
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2025to 22 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Older adult
Study population: We're planning to recruit 100 subjects from the Geriatric Medicine clinic at Vancouver General Hospital
Who may be able to join
- All subjects must be aged 65 years and older • All subjects must have had at least one fall in the last year and have been referred to the falls clinic (High Risk Subjects) OR have had no falls on the last year and have responded to our newspaper advertisement (Low Risk Subjects)
Who cannot join
- Subjects age less than 65 years old
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, VGH Research Pavilion Room 186
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
About this study
Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures (accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensor data) in older adults monitored longitudinally. This Stability Measures (SM) database will allow us to use new machine learning methods to develop and then validate algorithms that predict future falls, allowing for better targeting of vulnerable patients.
Read the detailed description
Recent advances in machine learning have disrupted the standard approach to assessing medical prognosis. Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures ( accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensors data) in older adults monitores longitudinally. This Stability Measures (SM) database will allow us to use new machine learning methods to develop and validate algorithms that predict future falls, allowing to better targetting of vulnerable individuals.
Although there have been numerous attempts to quantify fall risk in older adults using bedside scales 7-12, no previous group has attempted to use a combination of both accelerometer and video measures to assess gait stability. Since these measures will be captured in both frequently falling and infrequently falling patients, we will have SM data for various windows of time (1, 2, 3 and 4-weeks) prior to at least 100 fall events, a dataset that has never been captured before.
HYPOTHESES:
- A combination of accelerometer, gyroscope, and video data can be used to predict falls longitudinally, first by the use of a training dataset followed by verification on a validation data set.
- All the above sensor-based inputs can be combined as a simple, automated predcition tool to predict fall risk in older adults Current Methods of Falls Risk Assessment: Current methods of predicting falls in physician offices rely heavily on simple bedside tests12-14. Although useful, all of these measures have quite low sensitivity and specificity, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of approximately 0.707-12.
In fact, a recent meta-analysis "could not identify any tool which had an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity, or which was clearly better than a simple clinical judgment of risk of falling"
METHODS:
- Subjects: i) High Risk Subjects (n=50): All subjects will be recruited from falls and geriatrics clinics at Vancouver General Hospital. These clinics see about 2500 patients per year and are currently used for research recruitment. Each clinic patient has gait speed measured, which will allow to recruit both high and low risk fallers. This test will allow us to recruit 50 subjects at marked risk for falls, providing us with prospectively gathered dataset of greater than 100 events, five times higher than any other sensor study. ii) Low Risk Subjects (n=50): In addition, we will use newspaper advertisements to recruit and then screen low risk subjects. All subjects will have a gait speed > 0.8 m/s and have had no falls in the last year.
All study patients with come to the laboratory (Gerontology and Diabetes Research Laboratory, VGH Research Pavilion) for a one hour session. Each subject will perform a 6-minute walk test during which gait assessment will be obtained from the APDM system (Portland, OR). In addition there will be four video cameras (on the front, back and sides) that will measure raw video data for our gait analysis. The camera does not record any facial data (in fact, 'deepfake' software in the system deletes all facial details) and the patient's movements are converted to a 'stick figure' prior to being saved in the system. In addition, a Xethru X4M03 kit was will be used to collect ultra-sideband radar data (UWB). The UWB radar operates in 5.9-10.3 GHz, providing high spatial resolution. The radar is placed 1.5 m above the floor level. To collect heel-toe strike timing data, the subject will ambulate on the GAITRite system (CIR Systems Inc, Franklin, NJ), with a 90 × 700-cm × 3.2-mm walkway.
- Conditions
- Fall Injury Prevention
- Being tested
- A 6-minute walk test
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
A 6-minute walk testOther
Also called Video recording
Each subject will perform a 6-minute walk test during which gait assessment will be obtained from the APDM system (Portland, OR). In addition there will be four video cameras (on the front, back and sides) that will measure raw video data for our gait analysis. The camera does not record any facial data (in fact, 'deepfake' software in the system deletes all facial details) and the patient's movements are converted to a 'stick figure' prior to being saved in the system.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High Risk Subjects (n=50) | All subjects will be recruited from falls and geriatrics clinics at Vancouver General Hospital. These clinics see about 2500 patients per year and are currently used for research recruitment. Each clinic patient has gait speed measured, which will allow to recruit both high and low risk fallers. This test will allow us to recruit 50 subjects at marked risk for falls, providing us with prospectively gathered dataset of greater than 100 events, five times higher than any other sensor study. Receives: Other: A 6-minute walk test | |
| Low Risk Subjects (n=50) | We will use newspaper advertisements to recruit and then screen low risk subjects. All subjects will have a gait speed > 0.8 m/s and have had no falls in the last year. Receives: Other: A 6-minute walk test |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Classification of accuracy of the algorithm on the validation dataset
Consisting of True positive (TP), False positive (FP) rate, Precision, Recall (similar to sensitivity), F-measure (conveys the balance between precision and recall) and the Receiver Operation Curve area
Measured: 60 min
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2020
- Study start15 Apr 2025
- Primary completion15 Apr 2026
- Study completion22 Apr 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fall Injury PreventionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kenneth Madden, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Kenneth Madden, MD, Principal investigator, UBC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04354623
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H19-03094
- Acronym
- APDM system
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 1 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Developing a Falls Prediction Tool Using Both Accelerometer and Video Gait Analysis Data in Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04354623
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APDM system / H19-03094
- Conditions
- Fall Injury Prevention
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Apr 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures (accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensor data) in older adults monitored longitudinally. This Stability Measures (SM) database will allow us to use new machine learning methods to develop and then validate algorithms that predict future falls, allowing for better targeting of vulnerable patients.
Detailed description
Recent advances in machine learning have disrupted the standard approach to assessing medical prognosis. Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures ( accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensors data) in older adults monitores longitudinally. This Stability Measures (SM) database will allow us to use new machine learning methods to develop and validate algorithms that predict future falls, allowing to better targetting of vulnerable individuals.
Although there have been numerous attempts to quantify fall risk in older adults using bedside scales 7-12, no previous group has attempted to use a combination of both accelerometer and video measures to assess gait stability. Since these measures will be captured in both frequently falling and infrequently falling patients, we will have SM data for various windows of time (1, 2, 3 and 4-weeks) prior to at least 100 fall events, a dataset that has never been captured before.
HYPOTHESES:
- A combination of accelerometer, gyroscope, and video data can be used to predict falls longitudinally, first by the use of a training dataset followed by verification on a validation data set.
- All the above sensor-based inputs can be combined as a simple, automated predcition tool to predict fall risk in older adults Current Methods of Falls Risk Assessment: Current methods of predicting falls in physician offices rely heavily on simple bedside tests12-14. Although useful, all of these measures have quite low sensitivity and specificity, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of approximately 0.707-12.
In fact, a recent meta-analysis "could not identify any tool which had an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity, or which was clearly better than a simple clinical judgment of risk of falling"
METHODS:
- Subjects: i) High Risk Subjects (n=50): All subjects will be recruited from falls and geriatrics clinics at Vancouver General Hospital. These clinics see about 2500 patients per year and are currently used for research recruitment. Each clinic patient has gait speed measured, which will allow to recruit both high and low risk fallers. This test will allow us to recruit 50 subjects at marked risk for falls, providing us with prospectively gathered dataset of greater than 100 events, five times higher than any other sensor study. ii) Low Risk Subjects (n=50): In addition, we will use newspaper advertisements to recruit and then screen low risk subjects. All subjects will have a gait speed > 0.8 m/s and have had no falls in the last year.
All study patients with come to the laboratory (Gerontology and Diabetes Research Laboratory, VGH Research Pavilion) for a one hour session. Each subject will perform a 6-minute walk test during which gait assessment will be obtained from the APDM system (Portland, OR). In addition there will be four video cameras (on the front, back and sides) that will measure raw video data for our gait analysis. The camera does not record any facial data (in fact, 'deepfake' software in the system deletes all facial details) and the patient's movements are converted to a 'stick figure' prior to being saved in the system. In addition, a Xethru X4M03 kit was will be used to collect ultra-sideband radar data (UWB). The UWB radar operates in 5.9-10.3 GHz, providing high spatial resolution. The radar is placed 1.5 m above the floor level. To collect heel-toe strike timing data, the subject will ambulate on the GAITRite system (CIR Systems Inc, Franklin, NJ), with a 90 × 700-cm × 3.2-mm walkway.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High Risk Subjects (n=50) | – | Other: A 6-minute walk testAll subjects will be recruited from falls and geriatrics clinics at Vancouver General Hospital. These clinics see about 2500 patients per year and are currently used for research recruitment. Each clinic patient has gait speed measured, which will allow to recruit both high and low risk fallers. This test will allow us to recruit 50 subjects at marked risk for falls, providing us with prospectively gathered dataset of greater than 100 events, five times higher than any other sensor study. |
| Low Risk Subjects (n=50) | – | Other: A 6-minute walk testWe will use newspaper advertisements to recruit and then screen low risk subjects. All subjects will have a gait speed > 0.8 m/s and have had no falls in the last year. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- We're planning to recruit 100 subjects from the Geriatric Medicine clinic at Vancouver General Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All subjects must be aged 65 years and older • All subjects must have had at least one fall in the last year and have been referred to the falls clinic (High Risk Subjects) OR have had no falls on the last year and have responded to our newspaper advertisement (Low Risk Subjects)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects age less than 65 years old
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| A 6-minute walk testAlso: Video recordingEach subject will perform a 6-minute walk test during which gait assessment will be obtained from the APDM system (Portland, OR). In addition there will be four video cameras (on the front, back and sides) that will measure raw video data for our gait analysis. The camera does not record any facial data (in fact, 'deepfake' software in the system deletes all facial details) and the patient's movements are converted to a 'stick figure' prior to being saved in the system. | Other | High Risk Subjects (n=50), Low Risk Subjects (n=50) |
Primary outcome
Classification of accuracy of the algorithm on the validation dataset
Time frame: 60 min
Consisting of True positive (TP), False positive (FP) rate, Precision, Recall (similar to sensitivity), F-measure (conveys the balance between precision and recall) and the Receiver Operation Curve area
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fall Injury Prevention
Recruiting
Effects of a Community-based Multicomponent Physical Exercise Program on Physical Function, Frailty, and Sarcopenia in Older Adults From the Municipality of Santoña: a Quasi-experimental Study.
Frailty/Sarcopenia, Frailty in Older Adults
Not yet recruiting
Effects of a Novel Perturbation Balance Training Program on Laboratory and Real-World Trip-Induced Losses of Balance and Falls Among Balance-Impaired Older Adults
Accidental Fall
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Vision Care in Preventing Falls in Hospitalized Patients
Falls, Ulcer, Pressure
Not yet recruiting
Multicomponent Exercise and Pain Science Education for Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (MovePainFall)
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Digital STEADI Efficacy
Fall, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kenneth Madden, MD principal investigator
UBC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Fall Injury Prevention, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Classification of accuracy of the algorithm on the validation dataset (time frame: 60 min). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.