Multiple SclerosisNCT04356248
Training and Energy Management Education to Improve Quality of Life in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis
A study testing Endurance Training and Education in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Klinik Valens at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) often suffer from impaired mobility and reduced aerobic capacity. Moreover, 65% of PwMS recognize fatigue as their most disabling symptom that quickly impacts patients' health-related quality of life (QoL). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Endurance Training and Education
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 106 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 13 Jul 2020to 11 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Definite MS diagnosis (revised McDonald criteria, 2018).
- Age >18y
- Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≤ 6.5
- Fatigue Scale of Motor and Cognitive function (FSMC) total score > 43
- Literacy and understanding German
- Informed Consent
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding / have the intention to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.)
- Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
- Cognitive impairment Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) < 21
Show all 9Show fewer
- Major Depression or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) >11 at baseline
- Stem cell treatment in the last 6 months
- Participation in a previous high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or inpatient energy management education (IEME) study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: High Intensity Training and Energy Management Education vs. Standard Training and Muscle Relaxation, to Improve Quality of Life in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis, a Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial With Six Months' Follow-up
Persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) often suffer from impaired mobility and reduced aerobic capacity. Moreover, 65% of PwMS recognize fatigue as their most disabling symptom that quickly impacts patients' health-related quality of life (QoL). Systematic reviews that evaluate therapeutic options for MS-neurorehabilitation show good evidence for exercise and energy management/conservation programs to improve fatigue or its impact on daily life. Guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary approach but to date only unimodal interventions are investigated. This study aims to investigate the influence of the combination of two different therapeutic concepts: inpatient energy management education (IEME) + High-intensity interval training (HIIT). This intervention is compared with a control group that undergoes progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) + low-intensity training (ST). IEME or PMR is performed on two days (tue-thur) and HIIT or ST on three days (mo-wed-fr) / week. The primary outcome is the effect on the quality of life after three weeks rehabilitation and after returning home (at 4 and 6 months follow-up) in PwMS.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Endurance Training, Education
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endurance TrainingBehavioural
Treatment in both arms consists of specific endurance exercise modalities (HIIT or ST). Treatments differ in the applied training intensities. Participants in both arms will exercise 3 times per week over a period of 3 weeks on a bicycle ergometer. Exercise sessions will be supervised by a trained physical therapist. Exercise intensity will be heart rate monitored based on the maximum heart rate (HRmax) assessed during the initial cardiopulmonary exercise test. Exercise sessions in both arms will include a warm-up and a cool-down period at low intensity (50% HRmax) for 3 min each.
EducationBehavioural
Treatment in both arms consists of specific energy management education interventions (IEME or PMR). Treatments differ in the applied education approaches. Participants in both arms will exercise 2 times per week over a period of 3 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-intensity interval training + energy management education | Experimental | * High-intensity interval training (HIIT): physiologically defined heart rate-controlled cycling with 80-100 rounds per minute (rpm) at 95-100% of maximum heart rate (HRmax). Participants will perform 5 × 1.5-min high-intensive exercise bouts at 95-100% of their HRmax followed by active breaks of unloaded pedalling over 2 min with the aim to achieve 60% of HRmax.
* Energy management education (IEME): face-to-face education sessions of 6.5 h in duration over a 3-week period, all conducted by a trained occupational therapist. Participants acquire knowledge and understanding about factors that influence energy and the consequences of fatigue on their habits and lifestyle. Six weeks after returning home, the participants will receive a reinforcement letter in the form of information material to remember the content of the IEME and to reinforce the implementation of the behaviour change in managing energy. Receives: Behavioral: Endurance Training; Behavioral: Education |
| Low-intensity training + progressive muscle relaxation | Active comparator | * Low-intensity training (ST): participants will exercise for 24 min continuously at 65% of participants' HRmax (60-70 rpm).
* Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR): The aim of PMR is to achieve enhanced mental relaxation by reducing muscle tension. Participants will attend six 1-h group sessions over the 3-week intervention period, instructed by a trained physical therapist. Six weeks after returning home, the participants will receive a reinforcement letter with information material for remembering the content of the PMR techniques and to reinforce the implementation of the exercises at home. Receives: Behavioral: Endurance Training; Behavioral: Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short-form 36 (SF-36)
Changes of health-related quality of life will be assessed with the SF-36. The SF-36 questionnaire comprises 36 items. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better QoL.
Measured: 6 months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and 4 months (day 122).
Secondary outcomes (6)
Indicators of inflammatory activity
Soluble factors that are known to be produced or secreted in response to exercise and are suspected to modify immune homeostasis and blood brain barrier function through their inflammatory and anti-inflammatory properties. Changes of Matrix-metalloproteinases-2 (MMP-2), Tryptophan, Kynurenine, Kynurenine acid, Interferon-gamma (IFN-Gamma) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) will be assessed. Higher values indicate higher levels of Inflammation.
Measured: Three weeks (day 0 - day 21).
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Changes of cardiorespiratory fitness will be measured by peak oxygen consumption achieved in the cardiopulmonary exercise test. Higher values indicate better cardiorespiratory fitness.
Measured: Three weeks (day 0 - day 21).
Self-efficacy in performing energy conservation strategies (SEPECSA)
Changes of self-efficacy in performing energy conservation strategies will be assessed with a self-reported questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items. The participants are asked to rank how confident they are that they can perform each item on a scale from 1 (= not at all confident/sure) to 10 (= completely confident/sure). The final score is found by adding the total items' score and dividing it by 14, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in self-efficacy.
Measured: Six months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and after 4 months (day 122).
Self-perceived competence in activities of daily living (OSA)
Changes of self-perceived competence are assessed with a self reported questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 21 items that represent participation in habits and roles, performance of skills, and volition for participation. Participants rate each item with two 4-point likert scales to indicate their self-perception of occupational competence (I have a lot of problems doing this - I have some difficulty doing this - I do this well - I do this extremely well) and value for importance (This is not so important to me - This is important to me - This is more important to me - This is most important to me). Following these two steps, clients review their ratings and choose areas of occupational performance and participation that they would like to change. Higher scores indicate better competences.
Measured: Six months (day 0 - day 21) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and four months (day 122).
Fatigue Scale of motor and cognitive function (FSMC)
Changes of motor and cognitive fatigue are assessed on a 5-point likert-scale. Max 50 Points for subscales, 100 Points for the Total score. Cut-off for fatigue is set for the total score at 43 and for the motoric and cognitive subscores at 22 with higher values participants being more fatigued.
Measured: Six months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and four months (day 122).
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Changes of anxiety and depression over three weeks training on a 4-point likert scale scored 0-3. Max 21 Points for each subscale, cut off for anxiety and Depression are set at 7 Points higher values represent more anxiety and Depression.
Measured: 6 months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and four months (day 122).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2020
- Study start13 Jul 2020
- Primary completion11 May 2022
- Study completion11 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Klinik Valens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Sport University, Cologne, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jens Bansi, Klinik Valens
- Investigators
- Jens Bansi, PhD, Principal investigator, Klinik Valens
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04356248
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-000769
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kupjetz M, Langeskov-Christensen M, Riemenschneider M, Inerle S, Ligges U, Gaemelke T, Patt N, Bansi J, Gonzenbach RR, Reuter M, Rosenberger F, Meyer T, McCann A, Ueland PM, Eskildsen SF, Nygaard MKE, Joisten N, Hvid L, Dalgas U, Zimmer P. Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Reveal Distinct Kynurenine Pathway Metabolite Patterns: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2025 Nov;12(6):e200461. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200461. Epub 2025 Sep 18.
PubMed 40966534Belen S, Patt N, Kupjetz M, Ueland PM, McCann A, Gonzenbach R, Bansi J, Zimmer P. Vitamin B6 status is related to disease severity and modulated by endurance exercise in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Jun;121(6):1403-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.04.014. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
PubMed 40252731Kupjetz M, Patt N, Joisten N, Ueland PM, McCann A, Gonzenbach R, Bansi J, Zimmer P. Baseline Inflammation but not Exercise Modality Impacts Exercise-induced Kynurenine Pathway Modulation in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Secondary Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Tryptophan Res. 2024 Nov 11;17:11786469241284423. doi: 10.1177/11786469241284423. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39534856Kupjetz M, Patt N, Joisten N, Ueland PM, McCann A, Gonzenbach R, Bansi J, Zimmer P. The serum kynurenine pathway metabolic profile is associated with overweight and obesity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Apr;72:104592. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104592. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
PubMed 36881945Patt N, Kool J, Hersche R, Oberste M, Walzik D, Joisten N, Caminada D, Ferrara F, Gonzenbach R, Nigg CR, Kamm CP, Zimmer P, Bansi J. High-intensity interval training and energy management education, compared with moderate continuous training and progressive muscle relaxation, for improving health-related quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a randomized controlled superiority trial with six months' follow-up. BMC Neurol. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02084-0.
PubMed 33573608
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Intensity Training and Energy Management Education vs. Standard Training and Muscle Relaxation, to Improve Quality of Life in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis, a Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial With Six Months' Follow-up
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04356248
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020-000769
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Klinik ValensUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Sport University, Cologne, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
- Study start
- 13 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) often suffer from impaired mobility and reduced aerobic capacity. Moreover, 65% of PwMS recognize fatigue as their most disabling symptom that quickly impacts patients' health-related quality of life (QoL). Systematic reviews that evaluate therapeutic options for MS-neurorehabilitation show good evidence for exercise and energy management/conservation programs to improve fatigue or its impact on daily life. Guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary approach but to date only unimodal interventions are investigated. This study aims to investigate the influence of the combination of two different therapeutic concepts: inpatient energy management education (IEME) + High-intensity interval training (HIIT). This intervention is compared with a control group that undergoes progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) + low-intensity training (ST). IEME or PMR is performed on two days (tue-thur) and HIIT or ST on three days (mo-wed-fr) / week. The primary outcome is the effect on the quality of life after three weeks rehabilitation and after returning home (at 4 and 6 months follow-up) in PwMS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-intensity interval training + energy management education | Experimental | Behavioral: Endurance Training, Behavioral: Education* High-intensity interval training (HIIT): physiologically defined heart rate-controlled cycling with 80-100 rounds per minute (rpm) at 95-100% of maximum heart rate (HRmax). Participants will perform 5 × 1.5-min high-intensive exercise bouts at 95-100% of their HRmax followed by active breaks of unloaded pedalling over 2 min with the aim to achieve 60% of HRmax. * Energy management education (IEME): face-to-face education sessions of 6.5 h in duration over a 3-week period, all conducted by a trained occupational therapist. Participants acquire knowledge and understanding about factors that influence energy and the consequences of fatigue on their habits and lifestyle. Six weeks after returning home, the participants will receive a reinforcement letter in the form of information material to remember the content of the IEME and to reinforce the implementation of the behaviour change in managing energy. |
| Low-intensity training + progressive muscle relaxation | Active comparator | Behavioral: Endurance Training, Behavioral: Education* Low-intensity training (ST): participants will exercise for 24 min continuously at 65% of participants' HRmax (60-70 rpm). * Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR): The aim of PMR is to achieve enhanced mental relaxation by reducing muscle tension. Participants will attend six 1-h group sessions over the 3-week intervention period, instructed by a trained physical therapist. Six weeks after returning home, the participants will receive a reinforcement letter with information material for remembering the content of the PMR techniques and to reinforce the implementation of the exercises at home. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Definite MS diagnosis (revised McDonald criteria, 2018).
- Age >18y
- Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≤ 6.5
- Fatigue Scale of Motor and Cognitive function (FSMC) total score > 43
- Literacy and understanding German
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding / have the intention to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.)
- Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endurance TrainingTreatment in both arms consists of specific endurance exercise modalities (HIIT or ST). Treatments differ in the applied training intensities. Participants in both arms will exercise 3 times per week over a period of 3 weeks on a bicycle ergometer. Exercise sessions will be supervised by a trained physical therapist. Exercise intensity will be heart rate monitored based on the maximum heart rate (HRmax) assessed during the initial cardiopulmonary exercise test. Exercise sessions in both arms will include a warm-up and a cool-down period at low intensity (50% HRmax) for 3 min each. | Behavioural | High-intensity interval training + energy management education, Low-intensity training + progressive muscle relaxation |
| EducationTreatment in both arms consists of specific energy management education interventions (IEME or PMR). Treatments differ in the applied education approaches. Participants in both arms will exercise 2 times per week over a period of 3 weeks. | Behavioural | High-intensity interval training + energy management education, Low-intensity training + progressive muscle relaxation |
Primary outcome
Short-form 36 (SF-36)
Time frame: 6 months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and 4 months (day 122).
Changes of health-related quality of life will be assessed with the SF-36. The SF-36 questionnaire comprises 36 items. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better QoL.
6 secondary outcomes
Indicators of inflammatory activity
Time frame: Three weeks (day 0 - day 21).
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Time frame: Three weeks (day 0 - day 21).
Self-efficacy in performing energy conservation strategies (SEPECSA)
Time frame: Six months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and after 4 months (day 122).
Self-perceived competence in activities of daily living (OSA)
Time frame: Six months (day 0 - day 21) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and four months (day 122).
Fatigue Scale of motor and cognitive function (FSMC)
Time frame: Six months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and four months (day 122).
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: 6 months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and four months (day 122).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40966534Kupjetz M, Langeskov-Christensen M, Riemenschneider M, Inerle S, Ligges U, Gaemelke T, Patt N, Bansi J, Gonzenbach RR, Reuter M, Rosenberger F, Meyer T, McCann A, Ueland PM, Eskildsen SF, Nygaard MKE, Joisten N, Hvid L, Dalgas U, Zimmer P. Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Reveal Distinct Kynurenine Pathway Metabolite Patterns: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2025 Nov;12(6):e200461. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200461. Epub 2025 Sep 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40252731Belen S, Patt N, Kupjetz M, Ueland PM, McCann A, Gonzenbach R, Bansi J, Zimmer P. Vitamin B6 status is related to disease severity and modulated by endurance exercise in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Jun;121(6):1403-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.04.014. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39534856Kupjetz M, Patt N, Joisten N, Ueland PM, McCann A, Gonzenbach R, Bansi J, Zimmer P. Baseline Inflammation but not Exercise Modality Impacts Exercise-induced Kynurenine Pathway Modulation in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Secondary Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Tryptophan Res. 2024 Nov 11;17:11786469241284423. doi: 10.1177/11786469241284423. eCollection 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36881945Kupjetz M, Patt N, Joisten N, Ueland PM, McCann A, Gonzenbach R, Bansi J, Zimmer P. The serum kynurenine pathway metabolic profile is associated with overweight and obesity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Apr;72:104592. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104592. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33573608Patt N, Kool J, Hersche R, Oberste M, Walzik D, Joisten N, Caminada D, Ferrara F, Gonzenbach R, Nigg CR, Kamm CP, Zimmer P, Bansi J. High-intensity interval training and energy management education, compared with moderate continuous training and progressive muscle relaxation, for improving health-related quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a randomized controlled superiority trial with six months' follow-up. BMC Neurol. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02084-0.
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Metformin as an add-on or Monotherapy in Treatment of Aging People With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Dalfampridine Combined With Physical Therapy for Mobility Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeting Agonists of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor for Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jens Bansi, PhD principal investigator
Klinik Valens
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Endurance Training and Education in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Klinik Valens at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short-form 36 (SF-36) (time frame: 6 months (day 0 - day 183) with time points set after three weeks (day 21) and 4 months (day 122).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04356248, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2022.