Type 2 Diabetes MellitusNCT04371497
Switch From U-100 Insulin Analog to U-500 Regular Insulin in Pumps for Type 2 Diabetes
An observational study of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by University Hospital, Caen.
Trial summary
The aim of the study was to perform a 3-year retrospective analysis from a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes that were treated by a pump device and were uncontrolled despite high U-100 insulin requirements. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2011to 30 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with Type 2 Diabetes, treated by pump therapy with U-100 U/ml rapid-acting analog, with a Total daily Insulin dose > 100 U per day, willing to switch to U-500 U/ml insulin administered by Pump
Who may be able to join
- T2D diabetes
- Pump therapy with U-100 U/ml rapid-acting analog prior to initiation of U-500 U/ml insulin
- Total daily Insulin dose > 100 U per day
Who cannot join
- follow up < 3 months
About this study
Official title: Three-year Retrospective Study on the Switch From Rapid-acting Insulin Analog to Concentrated U-500 Regular Insulin in Insulin-resistant Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated by Pump Therapy
The aim of the study was to perform a 3-year retrospective analysis from a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes that were treated by a pump device and were uncontrolled despite high U-100 insulin requirements. The study reports outcomes after the switch from U-100 U/ml Rapid-Acting Analog to U-500 U/ml Regular Insulin, both administered by Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion.
Read the detailed description
This study is a retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients with Type 2 Diabetes from six French centers, who were previously treated by insulin pump therapy, and then switched from U-100 Rapid Acting Insulin analog to 500 U/mL Regular Insulin (Eli Lilly Inc, France) between June 2011 and September 2017. All participants had been previously treated by Multiple Daily Insulin injections and then had been treated by Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion with U-100 Rapid Acting Insulin analog administered by an insulin pump. Patient's selection criteria included an insulin-resistant state defined by a Total Daily insulin Dose greater than 100 U per day, and a switch from U-100 Rapid Acting Insulin analog to 500 U/mL Regular Insulin during the study period. Data collection from patient medical records included HbA1c, lipid levels, weight, Total Daily insulin Dose, and the recordings of hypoglycemia episodes. Outcomes were recorded at different timelines including baseline and 6, 12, 24 and 36-months after the switch from U-100 to U-500 insulin. Blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (ipro2, Medtronic Inc., USA) was analyzed in a subgroup of patients having CGM data available at baseline on U-100 insulin and after 6-months on U-500 insulin.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, Insulin Resistance, Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion, Insulin Pump, Concentrated Insulin
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Insulin Resistance
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
differential HbA1c before and after insulin switch
HbA1c comparison between baseline and 1, 2, 3 year(s) after the switch to U-HbA1c comparison between baseline and 1, 2, 3 year(s) after the switch to U-500 insulin
Measured: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Total Daily Insulin Dose
Total Daily Insulin Dose at baseline and 1, 2, 3 year(s) after the switch to U-500 insulin
Measured: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Body Weight
Body Weight measured at baseline and 1, 2, 3 year(s) after the switch to U-500
Measured: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Lipids
Plasma Lipids measured at baseline and 1, 2, 3 year(s) after the switch to U-500
Measured: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Hypoglycemia events
Episodes of Hypoglycemia recorded before and during the study
Measured: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Continuous Glucose Monitoring before and after insulin switch
Continuous Glucose Monitoring comparison between baseline and 6-month after the switch to U-500
Measured: baseline, 6-month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2020
- Study start1 Jun 2011
- Primary completion30 Sep 2017
- Study completion30 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, CaenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Caen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04371497
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHU 20-504
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Three-year Retrospective Study on the Switch From Rapid-acting Insulin Analog to Concentrated U-500 Regular Insulin in Insulin-resistant Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated by Pump Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04371497
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHU 20-504
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, Insulin Resistance, Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion, Insulin Pump, Concentrated Insulin
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, CaenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study was to perform a 3-year retrospective analysis from a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes that were treated by a pump device and were uncontrolled despite high U-100 insulin requirements. The study reports outcomes after the switch from U-100 U/ml Rapid-Acting Analog to U-500 U/ml Regular Insulin, both administered by Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion.
Detailed description
This study is a retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients with Type 2 Diabetes from six French centers, who were previously treated by insulin pump therapy, and then switched from U-100 Rapid Acting Insulin analog to 500 U/mL Regular Insulin (Eli Lilly Inc, France) between June 2011 and September 2017. All participants had been previously treated by Multiple Daily Insulin injections and then had been treated by Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion with U-100 Rapid Acting Insulin analog administered by an insulin pump. Patient's selection criteria included an insulin-resistant state defined by a Total Daily insulin Dose greater than 100 U per day, and a switch from U-100 Rapid Acting Insulin analog to 500 U/mL Regular Insulin during the study period. Data collection from patient medical records included HbA1c, lipid levels, weight, Total Daily insulin Dose, and the recordings of hypoglycemia episodes. Outcomes were recorded at different timelines including baseline and 6, 12, 24 and 36-months after the switch from U-100 to U-500 insulin. Blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (ipro2, Medtronic Inc., USA) was analyzed in a subgroup of patients having CGM data available at baseline on U-100 insulin and after 6-months on U-500 insulin.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with Type 2 Diabetes, treated by pump therapy with U-100 U/ml rapid-acting analog, with a Total daily Insulin dose > 100 U per day, willing to switch to U-500 U/ml insulin administered by Pump
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- T2D diabetes
- Pump therapy with U-100 U/ml rapid-acting analog prior to initiation of U-500 U/ml insulin
- Total daily Insulin dose > 100 U per day
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- follow up < 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
differential HbA1c before and after insulin switch
Time frame: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
HbA1c comparison between baseline and 1, 2, 3 year(s) after the switch to U-HbA1c comparison between baseline and 1, 2, 3 year(s) after the switch to U-500 insulin
5 secondary outcomes
Total Daily Insulin Dose
Time frame: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Body Weight
Time frame: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Lipids
Time frame: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Hypoglycemia events
Time frame: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years
Continuous Glucose Monitoring before and after insulin switch
Time frame: baseline, 6-month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
SWitching to Appropriate Prescription in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome
Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic Syndrome, Diabete Type 2
Active, not recruiting
Pilot of Continuous Glucose Monitor-Augmented Food Is Medicine
Nutrition, Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
Whole Food for Families: A Pilot RCT of a Dietary Guidelines-Based Intervention to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes
PreDiabetes, Diet, Healthy
Not yet recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of the Fully Closed Loop iLet Bionic Pancreas in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes (Insulin-requiring, Type 1 or Type 2)
Recruiting
6-Weeks of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Immune Cell Function and Bioenergetics
Type 2 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by University Hospital, Caen.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
differential HbA1c before and after insulin switch (time frame: baseline, 1-year, 2-years, 3-years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2022.