AzTrials
AzTrials

Educational ProblemsNCT04376255

Augmented Reality Medical Simulation

A study testing Augmented Reality (AR) in people with Educational Problems, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In order to improve the quality of care we provide to patients, medical trainees need to experience low incident, high mortality events in a safe learning environment. There is a selection bias for predisposing characteristics of health care providers, as most people who have pursued a career in medicine are motivated… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Educational Problems
What is being tested?
Augmented Reality (AR)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
101 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Aug 2020to 16 Aug 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Trainees or personnel working and/or volunteering at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford / Stanford Health Care facilities
  • 18 years and older

Who cannot join

  • Have a history of severe motion sickness
  • Currently have nausea
  • History of seizures
  • Are clinically unstable
  • Currently using corrective glasses (not compatible with AR headset)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford

    Palo Alto, California, 94303

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Augmented Reality Medical Simulation: A Multi-Collaborative Study of Acceptance and Usability

In order to improve the quality of care we provide to patients, medical trainees need to experience low incident, high mortality events in a safe learning environment. There is a selection bias for predisposing characteristics of health care providers, as most people who have pursued a career in medicine are motivated to learn how to manage medical emergencies. Resources have been traditionally enabled with conventional simulation centers or mobile simulation units. However, these are costly and difficult to access. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a mixed reality alternative to conventional simulation. The need for this is inherent in becoming a medical provider and use of these resources will improve health practices and health services.

Being tested
Augmented Reality (AR)
Keywords
Augmented Reality, Simulation, Education

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Augmented Reality (AR)Other

    AR headset - a device that the participants will wear over their head and eyes and will add holographic elements to a live view of workplace training scenario

Study groups in NCT04376255
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mixed Reality SimulationExperimentalParticipants in the experimental arm will be introduced to workplace training modules through an Augmented Reality (AR) headset.
Receives: Other: Augmented Reality (AR)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Qualitative Interview Assessment of Remote Simulations

    Primary Aim: The primary aim is to study the acceptance of AR simulation among anesthesia residents using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

    Measured: Post-Simulation, Approximate time duration (3-5 minutes)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. System Usability Scale (SUS) Questionnaire

    The first secondary aim is to evaluate AR simulation usability via the System Usability Scale (SUS) and ISO 9241-400 Assessment of human-ergonomic factors.

    Measured: Post-Simulation, Approximate time duration (3-5 minutes)

  2. Ergonomic Survey

    : The final secondary aim will evaluate the ergonomics of the headset via the ISO 9241-400 Assessment of human-ergonomic factors.

    Measured: Post-Simulation, Approximate time duration (3-5 minutes)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2020
  2. Study start18 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion16 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion16 Aug 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04376255
Sponsor's protocol ID
55657
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
1 May 2020
Last updated
5 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Augmented Reality (AR) in people with Educational Problems, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Qualitative Interview Assessment of Remote Simulations (time frame: Post-Simulation, Approximate time duration (3-5 minutes)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in