RehabilitationNCT04378036
Hippotherapy Simulator in Children With Cerebral Palsy
A study testing Neurodevelopmental Therapy and Hippotherapy Simulator in people with Rehabilitation and Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to research the effects of hippotherapy simulator in children with Cerebral Palsy. In order to evaluate its effectiveness, assessment of gross motor functions, lower extremity functions, muscle tone and spasticity, trunk control, sitting and standing balance, walking functions and functional… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rehabilitation, Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
- What is being tested?
- Neurodevelopmental Therapy and Hippotherapy Simulator
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 14 Dec 2016to 28 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Having a diagnosis of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
- Children aged between 5 - 18 years
- GMFCS level is I, II or III
- Independent seating
- Walking with at least 10 meters of independent, orthotic and/or auxiliary device
- Can understand simple verbal instruction
Show all 9Show fewer
- Those with hip adductor muscle spasticity level less than 2 according to MAS
- Having bilateral passive hip abduction enough to could sit into the hippotherapy simulator device
- Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Those with hip dislocation
- Severe contracture or deformity to prevent the study
- Advanced scoliosis (above 20 degrees)
- Acute uncontrolled acute seizures
- Uncontrollable severe epileptic attacks
- Visual and auditory problems
- Injection of botulinum toxin in the last 6 months patients
- Underwent surgical operation such as muscle relaxation, tendon extension, and selective dorsal rhizotomy in the last 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Özdel Dilbade Özel Eğitim ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezi
Istanbul
About this study
Official title: The Effects of a Hippotherapy Simulator in Children With Cerebral Palsy
The aim of this study was to research the effects of hippotherapy simulator in children with Cerebral Palsy. In order to evaluate its effectiveness, assessment of gross motor functions, lower extremity functions, muscle tone and spasticity, trunk control, sitting and standing balance, walking functions and functional independence were being applied.
Read the detailed description
"Cerebral Palsy (CP) describes a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture, causing activity limitation, that is attributed to nonprogressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain." The motor disorders of CP are often accompanied by disturbances of sensation, perception, cognition, communication, and behavior, by epilepsy, and by secondary musculoskeletal problems.
CP is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder that begins in early childhood, continues for life and causes physical impairment. Damage occurring in the developing brain results in voluntary movement, postural and motor control disorders, balance problems and gait disorders.
Hippotherapy is used effectively in increasing the participation of children with CP by improving their balance, motor function, posture and mobility and improving their quality of life. Although hippotherapy has many physical, functional, emotional and social benefits for children with CP, it also has some disadvantages that limit its use in the treatment of these children. There are risks such as serious injuries caused by children being afraid of a horse, falling from a horse or kicking a horse, increased hypertonicity due to fear and stress on the horse and exposure to allergic reactions due to environmental antigens. In order to overcome these conditions and reach more patients, hippotherapy simulator systems, which have been increasing rapidly in recent years, have been developed.
Hippotherapy simulators are systems that mimic the walking and movements of a real horse. As they are a newly developed system, studies investigating their effectiveness, especially in children with CP, are very limited. The aim of this study is to research the effects of hippotherapy simulator on gross motor functions, lower extremity functions, muscle tone and spasticity, trunk control, sitting and standing balance, walking functions and functional independence in children with Cerebral Palsy.
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation, Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
- Being tested
- Neurodevelopmental Therapy, Hippotherapy Simulator
- Keywords
- Cerebral Palsy, Hippotherapy, Postural Balance, Gait, Postural Control
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neurodevelopmental TherapyOther
The Neurodevelopmental Therapy rehabilitation program was determined according to the children's level of gross motor function, age, gender, mental state, and preferences. Neurodevelopmental Therapy program consists of the rehabilitation of muscle tone disorders, increasing sensory-perception-motor integrity, exercises to increase limb functions and body control, stretching and strengthening exercises for muscle shortness and weakness, exercises that include movements in daily life and training activities such as standing, walking, body care.
Hippotherapy SimulatorDevice
Horse Riding Simulator (HRS) device was used as a hippotherapy simulator device. HRS is a device that moves forward, backward, backward-to-back, right-to-left swing and up-and-down swing in 3 dimensions, similar to the movements of a real horse, forming an 8-shaped movement on five axes. After the children sat in the saddle section, they were first taken to the warm-up speed program for 5 minutes, then to another one of the other speed levels (gradually moved to other speed levels as appropriate for the development and tolerance of children) and finally to the warm-up speed program for 5 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neurodevelopmental Therapy Group | Active comparator | The number of participants in this group is 30. All participants were included in the rehabilitation program using only the Neurodevelopmental Therapy approach for 16 sessions (8 weeks x 2 days x 45 minutes). Receives: Other: Neurodevelopmental Therapy |
| Hippotherapy Simulator Group | Active comparator | The same participants were taken into a rehabilitation program in which 16 sessions (8 weeks x 2 days a week) the Hippotherapy Simulator device (30 minutes) and Neurodevelopmental Therapy (NDT) (15 minutes) (HS + NDT method) were used together. Receives: Other: Neurodevelopmental Therapy; Device: Hippotherapy Simulator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFSS)
Functional levels of participants were determined with the "Gross Motor Function Classification System" (GMFSS) before treatment. It is a system that classifies the gross motor functions of children with cerebral palsy. It classifies gross motor functions into five levels.
Measured: Baseline
Change in gross motor function from baseline to week 8 to week 16
The gross motor functions of the participants were evaluated using Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. It is a valid and reliable assessment tool widely used to evaluate motor functions in children with cerebral palsy. It consists of 88 items and includes 5 subsections: (A) lying and Rolling; (B) sitting; (C) crawling and kneeling; (D) standing; (E) walking, running and jumping.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Change in range of motion from baseline to week 8 to week 16
The range of motion of the joints in the lower extremities was measured using the universal goniometer before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Change in spasticity from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Muscle spasticity of the lower limbs was evaluated with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. In the evaluations made with MAS, the muscle tone is rated between "0" and "4". "0" indicates that there is no increase in muscle tone, and "4" indicates that the affected part is rigid in flexion and extension.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Change in muscle tones of lower extremities from baseline to week 8 to week 16
The tone, stiffness, and flexibility of the lower limb muscles were evaluated with the Myoton®PRO Digital Palpation Device before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. It is an evidence-based Class 1 device (MDD Annex IX) that evaluates the biomechanical properties of soft biological tissues non-invasively, objectively, reliably, cheaply, quickly and easily.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Change in trunk postural control from baseline to week 8 to week 16
The functional strength of the trunk, postural control and quality of trunk movements were evaluated with The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. TIS has been developed to evaluate the trunk of individuals with stroke and is a scale that has been adapted for use with children with cerebral palsy. TIS evaluates the body functionally in terms of strength in the sitting position. In addition, it evaluates the relationship between the body part and function by evaluating the body's static and dynamic balances and body coordination. It consists of three subsections: static, dynamic and coordination.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Change in dynamic and functional balance from baseline to week 8 to week 16.
The dynamic and functional balances of the participants were evaluated with The Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. PBS is an assessment tool adapted from the Berg Balance Scale (BDS) to evaluate children's functional balance in daily life activities. The scale consists of 14 sections and each section is scored between 0 and 4; the highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 56.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Change in dynamic balance in sitting and standing positions from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Pedalo® Sensamove Balance Test Pro (Holz-Hoerz Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH), Germany) Software with miniboard was used to evaluate the dynamic balance functions of the participants during their sitting, standing position at the beginning, at the 8th and at the 16th week. This device has been developed to record the movements of the user in order to learn about the balance, response time and possible imbalances of the body.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
The Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM)
The functional independence of children in daily activities was assessed with The Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM) initially, at week 8 and at week 16. WeeFIM consists of 6 parts: self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, and social communication, and a total of 18 activities are questioned. It is scored from 1 to 7 according to whether it receives help, performs on time or whether an auxiliary device is required when performing the function in each item.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Change in walking functions from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Win-Track (Medicapteurs, France) path and software system was used to evaluate the walking functions (Spatio-temporal parameters) of participants at the beginning, in the 8th and the 16th week. Win-Track; static, posturography and gait analysis is a foot pressure-sensitive walking path that provides complete freedom in posture and movement acquisition. It records foot pressure up to 200 images per second during standing, walking or certain activities (such as sports movements, postural sequences) through 12.288 sensors on the Win-Track, which is in the form of a one-piece platform.
Measured: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2020
- Study start14 Dec 2016
- Primary completion28 Oct 2017
- Study completion28 Oct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RehabilitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Marmara UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two different treatment methods were applied to the participants (n=30). Rehabilitation programs based on individual Neurodevelopmental Therapy were applied to the participants included in the study for eight weeks (first group). In the next eight weeks, the Hippotherapy Simulator system was applied to the same participants in addition to individual Neurodevelopmental Therapy-based rehabilitation programs (study group).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, canangunayyazici, Marmara University
- Investigators
- Canan GÜNAY YAZICI, PhD(c), Principal investigator, Marmara University Institute of Health SciencesZübeyir SARI, Assoc Prof, Study director, Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04378036
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MarHippos
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 4 May 2020
- Last updated
- 8 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, Dan B, Jacobsson B. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb;109:8-14.
PubMed 17370477Garvey MA, Giannetti ML, Alter KE, Lum PS. Cerebral palsy: new approaches to therapy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2007 Mar;7(2):147-55. doi: 10.1007/s11910-007-0010-x.
PubMed 17324366Papavasiliou AS. Management of motor problems in cerebral palsy: a critical update for the clinician. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2009 Sep;13(5):387-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
PubMed 18778959Zadnikar M, Kastrin A. Effects of hippotherapy and therapeutic horseback riding on postural control or balance in children with cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Aug;53(8):684-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03951.x. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
PubMed 21729249Meregillano G. Hippotherapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004 Nov;15(4):843-54, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2004.02.002.
PubMed 15458756Lee DR, Lee NG, Cha HJ, Yun Sung O, You SJ, Oh JH, Bang HS. The effect of robo-horseback riding therapy on spinal alignment and associated muscle size in MRI for a child with neuromuscular scoliosis: an experimenter-blind study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(1):23-7. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0673.
PubMed 21876292Lee CW, Kim SG, Na SS. The effects of hippotherapy and a horse riding simulator on the balance of children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Mar;26(3):423-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.423. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
PubMed 24707098Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Apr;39(4):214-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x.
PubMed 9183258Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ, Walter SD, Wood EP, Raina PS, Galuppi BE. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000 Oct;80(10):974-85.
PubMed 11002433Glanzman AM, Swenson AE, Kim H. Intrarater range of motion reliability in cerebral palsy: a comparison of assessment methods. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008 Winter;20(4):369-72. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31818b7994.
PubMed 19011528Mutlu A, Livanelioglu A, Gunel MK. Reliability of Ashworth and Modified Ashworth scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Apr 10;9:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-44.
PubMed 18402701Schneider S, Peipsi A, Stokes M, Knicker A, Abeln V. Feasibility of monitoring muscle health in microgravity environments using Myoton technology. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Jan;53(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s11517-014-1211-5. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
PubMed 25331739Saether R, Helbostad JL, Adde L, Jorgensen L, Vik T. Reliability and validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jul;34(7):2075-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.029. Epub 2013 May 1.
PubMed 23643761Franjoine MR, Gunther JS, Taylor MJ. Pediatric balance scale: a modified version of the berg balance scale for the school-age child with mild to moderate motor impairment. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2003 Summer;15(2):114-28. doi: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000068117.48023.18.
PubMed 17057441Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil. 2001 Jun;15(3):311-9. doi: 10.1191/026921501676877265.
PubMed 11386402
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of a Hippotherapy Simulator in Children With Cerebral Palsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04378036
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MarHippos
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation, Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
- Keywords
- Cerebral Palsy, Hippotherapy, Postural Balance, Gait, Postural Control
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to research the effects of hippotherapy simulator in children with Cerebral Palsy. In order to evaluate its effectiveness, assessment of gross motor functions, lower extremity functions, muscle tone and spasticity, trunk control, sitting and standing balance, walking functions and functional independence were being applied.
Detailed description
"Cerebral Palsy (CP) describes a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture, causing activity limitation, that is attributed to nonprogressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain." The motor disorders of CP are often accompanied by disturbances of sensation, perception, cognition, communication, and behavior, by epilepsy, and by secondary musculoskeletal problems.
CP is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder that begins in early childhood, continues for life and causes physical impairment. Damage occurring in the developing brain results in voluntary movement, postural and motor control disorders, balance problems and gait disorders.
Hippotherapy is used effectively in increasing the participation of children with CP by improving their balance, motor function, posture and mobility and improving their quality of life. Although hippotherapy has many physical, functional, emotional and social benefits for children with CP, it also has some disadvantages that limit its use in the treatment of these children. There are risks such as serious injuries caused by children being afraid of a horse, falling from a horse or kicking a horse, increased hypertonicity due to fear and stress on the horse and exposure to allergic reactions due to environmental antigens. In order to overcome these conditions and reach more patients, hippotherapy simulator systems, which have been increasing rapidly in recent years, have been developed.
Hippotherapy simulators are systems that mimic the walking and movements of a real horse. As they are a newly developed system, studies investigating their effectiveness, especially in children with CP, are very limited. The aim of this study is to research the effects of hippotherapy simulator on gross motor functions, lower extremity functions, muscle tone and spasticity, trunk control, sitting and standing balance, walking functions and functional independence in children with Cerebral Palsy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two different treatment methods were applied to the participants (n=30). Rehabilitation programs based on individual Neurodevelopmental Therapy were applied to the participants included in the study for eight weeks (first group). In the next eight weeks, the Hippotherapy Simulator system was applied to the same participants in addition to individual Neurodevelopmental Therapy-based rehabilitation programs (study group).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neurodevelopmental Therapy Group | Active comparator | Other: Neurodevelopmental TherapyThe number of participants in this group is 30. All participants were included in the rehabilitation program using only the Neurodevelopmental Therapy approach for 16 sessions (8 weeks x 2 days x 45 minutes). |
| Hippotherapy Simulator Group | Active comparator | Other: Neurodevelopmental Therapy, Device: Hippotherapy SimulatorThe same participants were taken into a rehabilitation program in which 16 sessions (8 weeks x 2 days a week) the Hippotherapy Simulator device (30 minutes) and Neurodevelopmental Therapy (NDT) (15 minutes) (HS + NDT method) were used together. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Having a diagnosis of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
- Children aged between 5 - 18 years
- GMFCS level is I, II or III
- Independent seating
- Walking with at least 10 meters of independent, orthotic and/or auxiliary device
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Those with hip dislocation
- Severe contracture or deformity to prevent the study
- Advanced scoliosis (above 20 degrees)
- Acute uncontrolled acute seizures
- Uncontrollable severe epileptic attacks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neurodevelopmental TherapyThe Neurodevelopmental Therapy rehabilitation program was determined according to the children's level of gross motor function, age, gender, mental state, and preferences. Neurodevelopmental Therapy program consists of the rehabilitation of muscle tone disorders, increasing sensory-perception-motor integrity, exercises to increase limb functions and body control, stretching and strengthening exercises for muscle shortness and weakness, exercises that include movements in daily life and training activities such as standing, walking, body care. | Other | Hippotherapy Simulator Group, Neurodevelopmental Therapy Group |
| Hippotherapy SimulatorHorse Riding Simulator (HRS) device was used as a hippotherapy simulator device. HRS is a device that moves forward, backward, backward-to-back, right-to-left swing and up-and-down swing in 3 dimensions, similar to the movements of a real horse, forming an 8-shaped movement on five axes. After the children sat in the saddle section, they were first taken to the warm-up speed program for 5 minutes, then to another one of the other speed levels (gradually moved to other speed levels as appropriate for the development and tolerance of children) and finally to the warm-up speed program for 5 minutes. | Device | Hippotherapy Simulator Group |
Primary outcome
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFSS)
Time frame: Baseline
Functional levels of participants were determined with the "Gross Motor Function Classification System" (GMFSS) before treatment. It is a system that classifies the gross motor functions of children with cerebral palsy. It classifies gross motor functions into five levels.
Change in gross motor function from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
The gross motor functions of the participants were evaluated using Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. It is a valid and reliable assessment tool widely used to evaluate motor functions in children with cerebral palsy. It consists of 88 items and includes 5 subsections: (A) lying and Rolling; (B) sitting; (C) crawling and kneeling; (D) standing; (E) walking, running and jumping.
Change in range of motion from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
The range of motion of the joints in the lower extremities was measured using the universal goniometer before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week.
Change in spasticity from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Muscle spasticity of the lower limbs was evaluated with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. In the evaluations made with MAS, the muscle tone is rated between "0" and "4". "0" indicates that there is no increase in muscle tone, and "4" indicates that the affected part is rigid in flexion and extension.
Change in muscle tones of lower extremities from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
The tone, stiffness, and flexibility of the lower limb muscles were evaluated with the Myoton®PRO Digital Palpation Device before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. It is an evidence-based Class 1 device (MDD Annex IX) that evaluates the biomechanical properties of soft biological tissues non-invasively, objectively, reliably, cheaply, quickly and easily.
Change in trunk postural control from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
The functional strength of the trunk, postural control and quality of trunk movements were evaluated with The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. TIS has been developed to evaluate the trunk of individuals with stroke and is a scale that has been adapted for use with children with cerebral palsy. TIS evaluates the body functionally in terms of strength in the sitting position. In addition, it evaluates the relationship between the body part and function by evaluating the body's static and dynamic balances and body coordination. It consists of three subsections: static, dynamic and coordination.
Change in dynamic and functional balance from baseline to week 8 to week 16.
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
The dynamic and functional balances of the participants were evaluated with The Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) before treatment, in the 8th week and the 16th week. PBS is an assessment tool adapted from the Berg Balance Scale (BDS) to evaluate children's functional balance in daily life activities. The scale consists of 14 sections and each section is scored between 0 and 4; the highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 56.
Change in dynamic balance in sitting and standing positions from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Pedalo® Sensamove Balance Test Pro (Holz-Hoerz Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH), Germany) Software with miniboard was used to evaluate the dynamic balance functions of the participants during their sitting, standing position at the beginning, at the 8th and at the 16th week. This device has been developed to record the movements of the user in order to learn about the balance, response time and possible imbalances of the body.
The Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM)
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
The functional independence of children in daily activities was assessed with The Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM) initially, at week 8 and at week 16. WeeFIM consists of 6 parts: self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, and social communication, and a total of 18 activities are questioned. It is scored from 1 to 7 according to whether it receives help, performs on time or whether an auxiliary device is required when performing the function in each item.
Change in walking functions from baseline to week 8 to week 16
Time frame: baseline, 8th. week, 16th. week
Win-Track (Medicapteurs, France) path and software system was used to evaluate the walking functions (Spatio-temporal parameters) of participants at the beginning, in the 8th and the 16th week. Win-Track; static, posturography and gait analysis is a foot pressure-sensitive walking path that provides complete freedom in posture and movement acquisition. It records foot pressure up to 200 images per second during standing, walking or certain activities (such as sports movements, postural sequences) through 12.288 sensors on the Win-Track, which is in the form of a one-piece platform.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2020.
- Background: PubMed 17370477Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, Dan B, Jacobsson B. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb;109:8-14.
- Background: PubMed 17324366Garvey MA, Giannetti ML, Alter KE, Lum PS. Cerebral palsy: new approaches to therapy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2007 Mar;7(2):147-55. doi: 10.1007/s11910-007-0010-x.
- Background: PubMed 18778959Papavasiliou AS. Management of motor problems in cerebral palsy: a critical update for the clinician. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2009 Sep;13(5):387-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
- Background: PubMed 21729249Zadnikar M, Kastrin A. Effects of hippotherapy and therapeutic horseback riding on postural control or balance in children with cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Aug;53(8):684-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03951.x. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 15458756Meregillano G. Hippotherapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004 Nov;15(4):843-54, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2004.02.002.
- Background: PubMed 21876292Lee DR, Lee NG, Cha HJ, Yun Sung O, You SJ, Oh JH, Bang HS. The effect of robo-horseback riding therapy on spinal alignment and associated muscle size in MRI for a child with neuromuscular scoliosis: an experimenter-blind study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(1):23-7. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0673.
- Background: PubMed 24707098Lee CW, Kim SG, Na SS. The effects of hippotherapy and a horse riding simulator on the balance of children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Mar;26(3):423-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.423. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
- Background: PubMed 9183258Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Apr;39(4):214-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x.
- Background: PubMed 11002433Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ, Walter SD, Wood EP, Raina PS, Galuppi BE. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000 Oct;80(10):974-85.
- Background: PubMed 19011528Glanzman AM, Swenson AE, Kim H. Intrarater range of motion reliability in cerebral palsy: a comparison of assessment methods. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008 Winter;20(4):369-72. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31818b7994.
- Background: PubMed 18402701Mutlu A, Livanelioglu A, Gunel MK. Reliability of Ashworth and Modified Ashworth scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Apr 10;9:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-44.
- Background: PubMed 25331739Schneider S, Peipsi A, Stokes M, Knicker A, Abeln V. Feasibility of monitoring muscle health in microgravity environments using Myoton technology. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Jan;53(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s11517-014-1211-5. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects of Virtual Reality and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Stabilometric Platform to Improve Standing Balance in Patients With Friedreich's Ataxia
Friedreich Ataxia
Enrolling by invitation
Brief Prolonged Exposure Therapy Versus Clinical Standard to Reduce Posttraumatic Stress Post Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, PTSD
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Mirror Therapy System in Patients With Stroke
Stroke
Recruiting
Baduanjin Rehabilitation for Functional Restoration in ICI-Associated Myocarditis
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Related Myocarditis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Canan GÜNAY YAZICI, PhD(c) principal investigator
Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences
Zübeyir SARI, Assoc Prof study director
Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Neurodevelopmental Therapy and Hippotherapy Simulator in people with Rehabilitation and Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFSS) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04378036, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2020.