Cardiac Implantable Electronic DevicesNCT04389697
Fasting Versus Non-Fasting for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (FastCIED Study)
A study testing Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedure in people with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices, run by Helios Health Institute GmbH at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
There was no evidence to suggest that a shortened fluid fast results in an increased risk of aspiration, regurgitation or related morbidity compared with the standard 'nil by mouth from midnight' fasting policy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
- What is being tested?
- Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 201 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 29 Jan 2020to 6 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients >18 years undergoing elective implantation or generator exchange of cardiac implantable electronic devices
Who cannot join
- Patients presenting with an acute unstable condition (bradycardia < 30/min or temporary pacing wire)
- Patients scheduled for deep sedation
- Patients with increased intra-abdominal pressure (severe intra-abdominal tumors, severe ascites, very severe obesity: BMI>40 kg/m2).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Department of Electrophysiology, Leipzig Heart Center
Leipzig, Saxony, 04289
About this study
There was no evidence to suggest that a shortened fluid fast results in an increased risk of aspiration, regurgitation or related morbidity compared with the standard 'nil by mouth from midnight' fasting policy. However, there is no available data regarding the safety and efficacy of fasting approach in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a non-fasting protocol is non-inferior in regard to safety to a fasting protocol (current practice) in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation procedures
- Conditions
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
- Being tested
- Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedureDietary supplement
Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the start of the procedure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedure Receives: Dietary Supplement: Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedure |
| Control arm | No intervention | Fasting for solids for up to 6 hours and fluids up to 2 hours before the procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patients well-being
Post-interventional patients well-being including (to be assessed by questionnaire with the help of a Numeric Rating Scale (rang: 0-10, higher scores mean a worse outcome): abdominal pain, thirst, mouth dryness, headache, anxiety, hunger, nausea, vomiting, tiredness and weakness, dizziness Incidence of Intra -procedural adverse events like emergency intubation and perioperative pulmonary aspiration vomiting)
Measured: During the first 24 hours after the procedure
Secondary outcomes (23)
Usages of inotropic and vasopressor agents
Amount of used inotropic and vasopressor agents during the intervention
Measured: During the intervention
Usage of sedatives
Amount of used sedative agents during the intervention
Measured: During the intervention
Usage of analgesics
Amount of used analgesics agents during the intervention
Measured: During the intervention
Usage anti-vomiting agents
Amount of used anti-vomiting agents during the intervention
Measured: During the intervention
Serum creatinine level
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural, during the first 24 hours after the procedure
Serum urea level
Serum urea (mg/dL)
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural, during the first 24 hours after the procedure
eGFR
GFR is Glomerular Filtration Rate and it is a key indicator of renal function. eGFR is estimated GFR and is a mathematically derived entity based on a patient's serum creatinine level, age, sex and race.
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural, during the first 24 hours after the procedure
Heart rate
Heart rate (frequency per minute) will be assessed by using a monitoring device
Measured: pre-intervention, and then every 15 minutes during the procedure
Oxygen saturation
Oxygen saturation (%) will be assessed by using a monitoring device
Measured: pre-intervention, and then every 15 minutes during the procedure
Blood pressure
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) will be assessed by using a monitoring device
Measured: pre-intervention, and then every 15 minutes during the procedure
blood pH
Will be assessed by venous blood gas analysis (number).
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural
blood PaCo2
Will be assessed by venous blood gas analysis (mmHg).
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural
blood HCO3
Will be assessed by venous blood gas analysis (mEq/L).
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural
blood sugar
Will be assessed by venous blood gas analysis (mg/dL).
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural, pre-intervention, 8 hours after procedure
Sodium
Will be assessed by blood test.
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural, pre-intervention, 8 hours after procedure
Potassium
Will be assessed by blood test (mm/L).
Measured: 1 hour pre-procedural, pre-intervention, 8 hours after procedure
Patients general satisfaction
Patients general satisfaction with procedure as assessed by the patient satisfaction survey form using Numeric Rating Scale (rang: 0-10, higher scores mean a better outcome)
Measured: During the first 24 hours after the procedure
Sleep quality
Sleep quality based on Numeric Rating Scale (rang: 0-10, higher scores mean a better outcome)
Measured: During the first 24 hours after the procedure
Surgical site pain
Surgical site pain based on Numeric Rating Scale (rang: 0-10, higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Measured: During the first 24 hours after the procedure
Length of ICU stay
Based on the number of ICU stay nights
Measured: Up to 30 days
Length of hospital stay
Based on the number of ICU stay nights plus ward stay
Measured: Up to 30 days
Operation site infection rate
Operation site (Chest) infection rate via Telephone /follow-up visits
Measured: During 30 days after the procedure
Incidence of death
The investigators will then divide the causes into 1) operation related and 2) non-operation related causes
Measured: During 30 days after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2020
- Study start29 Jan 2020
- Primary completion6 Nov 2020
- Study completion6 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac Implantable Electronic DevicesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Helios Health Institute GmbH
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kerstin Bode, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of LeipzigAlireza Sepehri Shamloo, MD, Principal investigator, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of LeipzigGerhard Hindricks, MD, Study chair, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04389697
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-0310
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Bode K, Gerhards M, Doering M, Lucas J, Tijssen J, Dagres N, Hilbert S, Richter S, Nedios S, Lurz J, Moscoso-Luduena C, Arya A, Shamloo AS, Hindricks G. A randomized trial of non-fasting vs. fasting for cardiac implantable electronic device procedures (Fast-CIED Study). Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(10):1617-1626. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac081.
PubMed 35726877
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fasting Versus Non-Fasting for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (FastCIED Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04389697
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-0310
- Conditions
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Helios Health Institute GmbHUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There was no evidence to suggest that a shortened fluid fast results in an increased risk of aspiration, regurgitation or related morbidity compared with the standard 'nil by mouth from midnight' fasting policy. However, there is no available data regarding the safety and efficacy of fasting approach in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a non-fasting protocol is non-inferior in regard to safety to a fasting protocol (current practice) in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation procedures
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedureClear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedure |
| Control arm | No intervention | –Fasting for solids for up to 6 hours and fluids up to 2 hours before the procedure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients >18 years undergoing elective implantation or generator exchange of cardiac implantable electronic devices
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients presenting with an acute unstable condition (bradycardia < 30/min or temporary pacing wire)
- Patients scheduled for deep sedation
- Patients with increased intra-abdominal pressure (severe intra-abdominal tumors, severe ascites, very severe obesity: BMI>40 kg/m2).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedureClear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the start of the procedure | Dietary supplement | Intervention arm |
Primary outcome
Patients well-being
Time frame: During the first 24 hours after the procedure
Post-interventional patients well-being including (to be assessed by questionnaire with the help of a Numeric Rating Scale (rang: 0-10, higher scores mean a worse outcome): abdominal pain, thirst, mouth dryness, headache, anxiety, hunger, nausea, vomiting, tiredness and weakness, dizziness Incidence of Intra -procedural adverse events like emergency intubation and perioperative pulmonary aspiration vomiting)
23 secondary outcomes
Usages of inotropic and vasopressor agents
Time frame: During the intervention
Usage of sedatives
Time frame: During the intervention
Usage of analgesics
Time frame: During the intervention
Usage anti-vomiting agents
Time frame: During the intervention
Serum creatinine level
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural, during the first 24 hours after the procedure
Serum urea level
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural, during the first 24 hours after the procedure
eGFR
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural, during the first 24 hours after the procedure
Heart rate
Time frame: pre-intervention, and then every 15 minutes during the procedure
Oxygen saturation
Time frame: pre-intervention, and then every 15 minutes during the procedure
Blood pressure
Time frame: pre-intervention, and then every 15 minutes during the procedure
blood pH
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural
blood PaCo2
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural
blood HCO3
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural
blood sugar
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural, pre-intervention, 8 hours after procedure
Sodium
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural, pre-intervention, 8 hours after procedure
Potassium
Time frame: 1 hour pre-procedural, pre-intervention, 8 hours after procedure
Patients general satisfaction
Time frame: During the first 24 hours after the procedure
Sleep quality
Time frame: During the first 24 hours after the procedure
Surgical site pain
Time frame: During the first 24 hours after the procedure
Length of ICU stay
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Operation site infection rate
Time frame: During 30 days after the procedure
Incidence of death
Time frame: During 30 days after the procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35726877Bode K, Gerhards M, Doering M, Lucas J, Tijssen J, Dagres N, Hilbert S, Richter S, Nedios S, Lurz J, Moscoso-Luduena C, Arya A, Shamloo AS, Hindricks G. A randomized trial of non-fasting vs. fasting for cardiac implantable electronic device procedures (Fast-CIED Study). Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(10):1617-1626. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac081.
Related trials for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
Active, not recruitingObservational study
EValuation of prognostIc and Cost reDuction by tElemonitoring iN CIEDs Usual carE: an Updated Analysis Using 2019-2023 Data
Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD), Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)
RecruitingObservational study
Blood Clotting Markers and Heart Ultrasound in People With Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation
Device-detected Atrial Fibrillation, Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 3
New Treatment of Cardiac Device Infections; Immediate Reimplantation After Removal of Infected System
Endocarditis, Bacterial
Not yet recruiting
Cardiac Anodal Biphasic Pacing
Cardiac Pacing
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Short-Term Arm Sling Use After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Placement
Postoperative Care After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kerstin Bode, MD, MSc principal investigator
Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig
Alireza Sepehri Shamloo, MD principal investigator
Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig
Gerhard Hindricks, MD study chair
Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Clear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedure in people with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices, run by Helios Health Institute GmbH at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patients well-being (time frame: During the first 24 hours after the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04389697, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2021.