Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationPhase 2NCT04398511
L Brevis for Traumatic Oral Lesions in Orthodontic Patients
A Phase 2 study testing L brevis in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication and Oral Mucositis, run by Universidade de Passo Fundo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Introduction: Traumatic oral lesions are common in the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, and pathogenic oral bacteria might be involved. We tested whether the probiotic Lactobacillus brevis CD2 (L brevis) is benefic in this condition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication, Oral Mucositis, Bacterium; Agent
- What is being tested?
- L brevis
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 7 Jan 2019to 13 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- need for orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance
Who cannot join
- Oral lesions
- Uncompensated systemic diseases
- Regular use of corticoids, antibiotics, immuno regulators and antidepressive agents
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Lactobacillus Brevis CD2 on Traumatic Oral Lesions Induced by Fixed Orthodontic Appliance: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Introduction: Traumatic oral lesions are common in the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, and pathogenic oral bacteria might be involved. We tested whether the probiotic Lactobacillus brevis CD2 (L brevis) is benefic in this condition. Methods: In a double-blind clinical trial, 20 patients were randomized to 21 days course of lozenges containing L brevis CD2 (4 billion colony-forming units after breakfast, lunch and dinner) or placebo, starting on the day of installation of the fixed orthodontic appliance. Main outcomes were days without oral lesions and oral pain score [ranging between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum)]. Oral health related quality of life was measured by OHIP-14 before and after treatments.
Read the detailed description
Study protocol After signing the informed consent form, the patients underwent an oral examination and answered about clinical information, oral pain scale, and the OHIP-14 questionnaire. The pain scale was graded between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum), Likert standard. There was also a drawing for the distribution of coded treatments, through a number taken by the patient from a manila envelope. After the orthodontic appliance installation session, each patient was instructed to use the coded treatment for the next 21 days, two gums after breakfast, after lunch and after dinner, totalizing 12 billion UFC of L brevis or placebo per day. The patient was provided with a diary to note the daily appearance of lesions and their evolution during the 21-day period, as well as the occurrence of any new symptoms (potential adverse effect), in addition to proof of the commitment assumed by the use of the tablets. After 21 days, each patient was reexamined by the author of the study, who collected the diaries and obtained information regarding the oral examination, oral pain scale, data on adherence to treatment and self-completion of the OHIP-14.
Statistical analysis Quantitative data are described with mean and standard deviation (or standard error of the mean) or median and range, while qualitative data are displayed with absolute and relative frequencies. Student's t-test was used for comparison of quantitative data between groups, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (WMW) test being employed when the assumptions for that test were not met. Exact chi-square and Fisher´s exact test (FET) were used for categorical data. Treatment effect on OHIP-14 was analyzed using a Generalize Estimating Equations (GEE) model with Poisson distribution and log link, the predictors being treatment, time (beginning and end of treatment) and interaction treatment*time. The analyses were performed with softwares GraphPrism version 4.0 and SPSS® (IBM SPSS statistics v18). Sample size was estimated using WinPEPI v11.65. The P value indicative of significance was < 0.05. Because the final outcome was prevention or mitigation (not maintenance or augmentation) of undesirable symptoms, one-tailed tests were used for comparisons between groups respect to days without oral lesions, oral pain and OHIP-14 scores.
- Being tested
- L brevis, Placebo
- Keywords
- Fixed orthodontic appliance, Lactobacillus brevis CD2, Oral pain, Traumatic oral lesions
- Medical subject headings
- Stomatitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
L brevisDrug
Also called Oral probiotic
Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges (4 billion CFU) after breakfast, lunch and dinner for 21 days.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo lozenges after breakfast, lunch and dinner for 21 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| L brevis | Experimental | Lactobacillus brevis CD2 in lozenges containing 4 billion CFU. Patients used a lozenge 15 min after breakfast, lunch and dinner, during 21 days, starting in the day of installation of the orthodontic appliance. Receives: Drug: L brevis |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo in lozenges, identical to those of L brevis. Patients used a lozenge 15 min after breakfast, lunch and dinner, during 21 days, starting in the day of installation of the orthodontic appliance. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of days without traumatic oral lesions
Oral lesions (ulcers) due to fixed orthodontic appliance
Measured: First 21 days after appliance installation
Oral pain scale
Oral pain score measured by Likert scale between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum pain)
Measured: First 21 days after appliance installation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2020
- Study start7 Jan 2019
- Primary completion29 Nov 2019
- Study completion13 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade de Passo Fundo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fernando Fornari, Universidade de Passo Fundo
- Investigators
- Fernando Fornari, Prof., Principal investigator, University of Passo Fundo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04398511
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- University of Passo Fundo
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 16 May 2020
- Last updated
- 21 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rennick LA, Campbell PM, Naidu A, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Effectiveness of a novel topical powder on the treatment of traumatic oral ulcers in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2016 May;86(3):351-7. doi: 10.2319/050415-303.1. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
PubMed 26401826Kluemper GT, Hiser DG, Rayens MK, Jay MJ. Efficacy of a wax containing benzocaine in the relief of oral mucosal pain caused by orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Oct;122(4):359-65. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.126405.
PubMed 12411880Bagatin CR, Andrucioli MCD, Ferreira JTL, Matsumoto MAN, da Silva RAB, da Silva LAB, Romano FL, Nelson-Filho P. Biofilm formation in Haas palatal expanders with and without use of an antimicrobial agent: an in situ study. Microsc Res Tech. 2017 May;80(5):471-477. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22817. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
PubMed 27935660Gizani S, Petsi G, Twetman S, Caroni C, Makou M, Papagianoulis L. Effect of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri on white spot lesion development in orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Feb;38(1):85-89. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv015. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
PubMed 25840585Anusha RL, Umar D, Basheer B, Baroudi K. The magic of magic bugs in oral cavity: Probiotics. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):43-7. doi: 10.4103/2231-4040.154526.
PubMed 25878972Haukioja A. Probiotics and oral health. Eur J Dent. 2010 Jul;4(3):348-55.
PubMed 20613927Rastogi P, Saini H, Dixit J, Singhal R. Probiotics and oral health. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;2(1):6-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.85845.
PubMed 22442601Riccia DN, Bizzini F, Perilli MG, Polimeni A, Trinchieri V, Amicosante G, Cifone MG. Anti-inflammatory effects of Lactobacillus brevis (CD2) on periodontal disease. Oral Dis. 2007 Jul;13(4):376-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01291.x.
PubMed 17577323Sharma A, Rath GK, Chaudhary SP, Thakar A, Mohanti BK, Bahadur S. Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges reduce radiation- and chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Apr;48(6):875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
PubMed 21741230Sharma A, Tilak T, Bakhshi S, Raina V, Kumar L, Chaudhary S, Sahoo R, Gupta R, Thulkar S. Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges prevent oral mucositis in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy followed by haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. ESMO Open. 2017 Feb 13;1(6):e000138. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000138. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 28848667Lee JK, Kim SJ, Ko SH, Ouwehand AC, Ma DS. Modulation of the host response by probiotic Lactobacillus brevis CD2 in experimental gingivitis. Oral Dis. 2015 Sep;21(6):705-12. doi: 10.1111/odi.12332. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
PubMed 25720615
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Lactobacillus Brevis CD2 on Traumatic Oral Lesions Induced by Fixed Orthodontic Appliance: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04398511
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- University of Passo Fundo
- Keywords
- Fixed orthodontic appliance, Lactobacillus brevis CD2, Oral pain, Traumatic oral lesions
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade de Passo FundoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
- Study start
- 7 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: Traumatic oral lesions are common in the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, and pathogenic oral bacteria might be involved. We tested whether the probiotic Lactobacillus brevis CD2 (L brevis) is benefic in this condition. Methods: In a double-blind clinical trial, 20 patients were randomized to 21 days course of lozenges containing L brevis CD2 (4 billion colony-forming units after breakfast, lunch and dinner) or placebo, starting on the day of installation of the fixed orthodontic appliance. Main outcomes were days without oral lesions and oral pain score [ranging between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum)]. Oral health related quality of life was measured by OHIP-14 before and after treatments.
Detailed description
Study protocol After signing the informed consent form, the patients underwent an oral examination and answered about clinical information, oral pain scale, and the OHIP-14 questionnaire. The pain scale was graded between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum), Likert standard. There was also a drawing for the distribution of coded treatments, through a number taken by the patient from a manila envelope. After the orthodontic appliance installation session, each patient was instructed to use the coded treatment for the next 21 days, two gums after breakfast, after lunch and after dinner, totalizing 12 billion UFC of L brevis or placebo per day. The patient was provided with a diary to note the daily appearance of lesions and their evolution during the 21-day period, as well as the occurrence of any new symptoms (potential adverse effect), in addition to proof of the commitment assumed by the use of the tablets. After 21 days, each patient was reexamined by the author of the study, who collected the diaries and obtained information regarding the oral examination, oral pain scale, data on adherence to treatment and self-completion of the OHIP-14.
Statistical analysis Quantitative data are described with mean and standard deviation (or standard error of the mean) or median and range, while qualitative data are displayed with absolute and relative frequencies. Student's t-test was used for comparison of quantitative data between groups, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (WMW) test being employed when the assumptions for that test were not met. Exact chi-square and Fisher´s exact test (FET) were used for categorical data. Treatment effect on OHIP-14 was analyzed using a Generalize Estimating Equations (GEE) model with Poisson distribution and log link, the predictors being treatment, time (beginning and end of treatment) and interaction treatment*time. The analyses were performed with softwares GraphPrism version 4.0 and SPSS® (IBM SPSS statistics v18). Sample size was estimated using WinPEPI v11.65. The P value indicative of significance was < 0.05. Because the final outcome was prevention or mitigation (not maintenance or augmentation) of undesirable symptoms, one-tailed tests were used for comparisons between groups respect to days without oral lesions, oral pain and OHIP-14 scores.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| L brevis | Experimental | Drug: L brevisLactobacillus brevis CD2 in lozenges containing 4 billion CFU. Patients used a lozenge 15 min after breakfast, lunch and dinner, during 21 days, starting in the day of installation of the orthodontic appliance. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo in lozenges, identical to those of L brevis. Patients used a lozenge 15 min after breakfast, lunch and dinner, during 21 days, starting in the day of installation of the orthodontic appliance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- need for orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Oral lesions
- Uncompensated systemic diseases
- Regular use of corticoids, antibiotics, immuno regulators and antidepressive agents
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| L brevisAlso: Oral probioticLactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges (4 billion CFU) after breakfast, lunch and dinner for 21 days. | Drug | L brevis |
| PlaceboPlacebo lozenges after breakfast, lunch and dinner for 21 days. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of days without traumatic oral lesions
Time frame: First 21 days after appliance installation
Oral lesions (ulcers) due to fixed orthodontic appliance
Oral pain scale
Time frame: First 21 days after appliance installation
Oral pain score measured by Likert scale between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum pain)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2020.
- Background: PubMed 26401826Rennick LA, Campbell PM, Naidu A, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Effectiveness of a novel topical powder on the treatment of traumatic oral ulcers in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2016 May;86(3):351-7. doi: 10.2319/050415-303.1. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
- Background: PubMed 12411880Kluemper GT, Hiser DG, Rayens MK, Jay MJ. Efficacy of a wax containing benzocaine in the relief of oral mucosal pain caused by orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Oct;122(4):359-65. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.126405.
- Background: PubMed 27935660Bagatin CR, Andrucioli MCD, Ferreira JTL, Matsumoto MAN, da Silva RAB, da Silva LAB, Romano FL, Nelson-Filho P. Biofilm formation in Haas palatal expanders with and without use of an antimicrobial agent: an in situ study. Microsc Res Tech. 2017 May;80(5):471-477. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22817. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
- Background: PubMed 25840585Gizani S, Petsi G, Twetman S, Caroni C, Makou M, Papagianoulis L. Effect of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri on white spot lesion development in orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Feb;38(1):85-89. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv015. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
- Background: PubMed 25878972Anusha RL, Umar D, Basheer B, Baroudi K. The magic of magic bugs in oral cavity: Probiotics. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):43-7. doi: 10.4103/2231-4040.154526.
- Background: PubMed 20613927Haukioja A. Probiotics and oral health. Eur J Dent. 2010 Jul;4(3):348-55.
- Background: PubMed 22442601Rastogi P, Saini H, Dixit J, Singhal R. Probiotics and oral health. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;2(1):6-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.85845.
- Background: PubMed 17577323Riccia DN, Bizzini F, Perilli MG, Polimeni A, Trinchieri V, Amicosante G, Cifone MG. Anti-inflammatory effects of Lactobacillus brevis (CD2) on periodontal disease. Oral Dis. 2007 Jul;13(4):376-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01291.x.
- Background: PubMed 21741230Sharma A, Rath GK, Chaudhary SP, Thakar A, Mohanti BK, Bahadur S. Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges reduce radiation- and chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Apr;48(6):875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
- Background: PubMed 28848667Sharma A, Tilak T, Bakhshi S, Raina V, Kumar L, Chaudhary S, Sahoo R, Gupta R, Thulkar S. Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges prevent oral mucositis in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy followed by haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. ESMO Open. 2017 Feb 13;1(6):e000138. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000138. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25720615Lee JK, Kim SJ, Ko SH, Ouwehand AC, Ma DS. Modulation of the host response by probiotic Lactobacillus brevis CD2 in experimental gingivitis. Oral Dis. 2015 Sep;21(6):705-12. doi: 10.1111/odi.12332. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
Bacterial Diversity Study Using 16S rRNA Sequencing of Periodontal Samples From Patients With Orthodontic Retainers
Fixed Orthodontic Retainer, Orthodontic Appliances, Removable
Recruiting
Comparison of MI Paste Plus and Resin Infiltration in White Spot Lesions Following Orthodontic Treatment
White Spot Lesions, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
The Effect of Intraoral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Orthodontics Pain
Orthodontic Appliance, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of a 3-step Bonding System (Transbond™ XT) and a 2-step System (GC Ortho Connect™) on Demineralization Around Maxillary Orthodontic Brackets
Tooth Demineralization, White Spot Lesion
Recruiting
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fernando Fornari, Prof. principal investigator
University of Passo Fundo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing L brevis in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication and Oral Mucositis, run by Universidade de Passo Fundo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of days without traumatic oral lesions (time frame: First 21 days after appliance installation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04398511, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2020.