AzTrials
AzTrials

Balance PosturalNCT04404829

Informational Manual Therapy to Improve Standing Balance

A study testing Manual Therapy in people with Balance Postural and Pain, run by Universitat Internacional de Catalunya at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of Informational Manual Therapy (IMT) on quiet standing and quality of life in healthy individuals. The IMT also is known as the Poyet-Pialoux method, is a holistic, no orthopedic, and soft manual therapy. Design: This is a one-group pretest-posttest design. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Balance Postural, Pain, Quality of Life
What is being tested?
Manual Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
57 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 May 2020to 15 Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy people

Who cannot join

  • Not having problems with balance, Not suffering from an injury in the 3 months before the study, Not suffering from a fracture in the previous 6 month before the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08195

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: The Effect of the Informational Manual Therapy for Improving Quiet Standing, Pain and Quality of Life in Healthy Individuals

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of Informational Manual Therapy (IMT) on quiet standing and quality of life in healthy individuals. The IMT also is known as the Poyet-Pialoux method, is a holistic, no orthopedic, and soft manual therapy.

Design: This is a one-group pretest-posttest design. It is a within-subjects experiment in which each participant is tested first under the control condition and then under the treatment condition.

Setting: University laboratory. Intervention: One IMT session was performed on 57 healthy individuals aged from 18 to 65 years. They were grouped into three age groups. The treatment session was performed by 5 therapists on two days. The primary outcome was quite standing assessed by the SATEL force platform. Secondary outcomes were bodily pain assessed by the pain sections of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and quality of life by EQ-5D-3L (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). The primary outcome was evaluated before and immediately after treatment and after 7-10 days. The secondary outcomes were assessed after treatment and 3 weeks later.

Read the detailed description

Methods Study Design: The study has a one-group pretest-posttest design. The personal data of individuals were kept confidential and the data were shared anonymously upon request from the principal researcher. The TREND statement will be followed.

Subjects Fifty-seven participants will be recruited to participate in this study; the sample was one of convenience. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are as follows: age from 18 to 65 years old, not having a positive diagnosis for any disease which influences balance, no participation in any other trial, not suffering from an injury in the 3 months before the study or fractures in the previous 6 months, and no falls in the previous month. All individuals provided informed consent before enrolment.

Intervention All the participants received a single session of 30-45 min of IMT. All the treatment sessions took place at the UIC laboratory. The IMT session was performed over two days by four physiotherapists and a doctor. All have more than five years of experience in IMT treatment.

The first level of IMT was treated in this study: the objective is to harmonize the Cranio-sacral and sacro-pelvic systems, as this is fundamental for maintaining good posture. The first therapeutic maneuvers should be focused on releasing of the sacrum and the pelvis. The first is considered a key area for the correct transmission of forces and loads from the lower limbs to the upper limbs and vice versa and shares the role of rigid elements for this purpose (bones) and tensile elements (muscles, ligaments, fascia) in the whole body. At this level. Compensatory injuries that the body has started after a primary injury are treated on this level, through the Fluidic Chains. This also includes the treatment of some traumatic injuries, such as cranial strains, the compression of spheno-basilar synchondrosis, injuries of the pelvis and occipital bone, and damage to the flexion-extension and lateral displacement of the vertebrae. The diagnosis of this level is performed by cranial somotopias (reflex points on the skull and face). Practically all the treatment is carried out on the sacrum. The first step is the "fuses," which are vibration zones that act as a protection system for the body (1). These points sometimes stop working, which interrupts the correct movement of the PRM: 1st fuse: Inn-trang (on the forehead between the two eyebrows, the 4th sacral vertebra is stimulated if it is not adjusted). A massage on the scalp in several very soft circles that goes from the frontal to the occipital area is performed 6 times. 2nd fuse: 1st dorsal vertebra, 4th cervical, 4th dorsal, and 3rd lumbar. 3rd fuse: C0 (base of the occipital), a zone of the 2nd sacral vertebra, and the space between the spines of the 2nd and 3rd dorsal vertebrae and finally point R1 (between the 2nd and 3 rd metatarsal). If any point is blocked it is treated and harmonized with a soft touch towards the occipital.

Being tested
Manual Therapy
Keywords
balance, pain, quality of life, manual therapy
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Manual TherapyOther

    Also called Poyet-Pialoux method

    The first level of IMT was treated in this study: the objective is to harmonize the cranio-sacral and sacro-pelvic systems, as this is fundamental for maintaining good posture. The first therapeutic maneuvers should be focused on releasing of the sacrum and the pelvis. The first is considered a key area for the correct transmission of forces and loads from the lower limbs to the upper limbs and vice versa and shares the role of rigid elements for this purpose (bones) and tensile elements (muscles, ligaments, fascia) in the whole body. In this level. Compensatory injuries that the body has started after a primary injury are treated on this level, through the Fluidic Chains. The diagnosis of this level is performed by cranial somotopias. Practically all the treatment is carried out on the sacrum. The first step are the "fuses," which are vibration zones which act as a protection system for the body. These points sometimes stop working, which interrupts the correct movement of the PRM.

Study groups in NCT04404829
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Informational Manual TherapyExperimentalIt is an integral no orthopedic and very soft manual therapy
Receives: Other: Manual Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. static standing posture

    It was assessed using the force platform Satel 40 Hz model PF2002, software v 33.5 8C (France).

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  2. static standing posture

    It was assessed using the force platform Satel 40 Hz model PF2002, software v 33.5 8C (France).

    Measured: immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. How much bodily pain have you had during the past 4 weeks?

    by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). 1 - None,2 - Very mild,3 - Mild, 4 - Moderate, 5 - Severe, - 6 very severe

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  2. How much bodily pain have you had during the past 4 weeks?

    by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). 1 - None,2 - Very mild,3 - Mild, 4 - Moderate, 5 - Severe, - 6 very severe

    Measured: three weeks, post-intervention

  3. During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including both work outside the home and housework)?

    by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). 1 - Not at all, 2 - A little bit, 3 - Moderately, 4 - Quite a bit, 5 - Extremely

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  4. During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including both work outside the home and housework)?

    by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). 1 - Not at all, 2 - A little bit, 3 - Moderately, 4 - Quite a bit, 5 - Extremely

    Measured: three weeks after treatment

  5. mobility

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  6. mobility

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire.Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: three weeks post-intervention

  7. self-care

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  8. self-care

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire.Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: three weeks post-intervention

  9. usual activities

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  10. usual activities

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: three weeks post-intervention

  11. pain/discomfort

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  12. pain/discomfort

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: three weeks post-intervention

  13. anxiety/depression

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  14. anxiety/depression

    by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems

    Measured: three weeks post-intervention

  15. visual analogue scale for health

    by the EQ-VAS, ranging from 0 ("worst possible") to 100 ("best possible").

    Measured: baseline, pre-intervention

  16. visual analogue scale for health

    by the EQ-VAS, ranging from 0 ("worst possible") to 100 ("best possible").

    Measured: three weeks post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 May 2020
  2. Study start1 May 2020
  3. Primary completion22 May 2020
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The study has a one-group pretest-posttest design.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
57 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04404829
Sponsor's protocol ID
Poyet-Pialoux method
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
17 May 2020
Last updated
4 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is not any plan

Publications

  • Bordoni B, Zanier E. Sutherland's legacy in the new millennium: the osteopathic cranial model and modern osteopathy. Adv Mind Body Med. 2015 Spring;29(2):15-21.

    PubMed 25831430
  • Tseui JJ. Eastern and western approaches to medicine. West J Med. 1978 Jun;128(6):551-7.

    PubMed 664653
  • Liem T, Neuhuber W. Osteopathic Treatment Approach to Psychoemotional Trauma by Means of Bifocal Integration. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;120(3):180-189. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.021.

    PubMed 32091561
  • Lee RP. The living matrix: a model for the primary respiratory mechanism. Explore (NY). 2008 Nov-Dec;4(6):374-8. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2008.08.003.

    PubMed 18984549
  • Frymann VM. A study of the rhythmic motions of the living cranium. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1971 May;70(9):928-45. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5207590
  • Ballester-Rodes M, Carreras-Costa F, Versyp-Ducaju T, Ballester-Rodes M, Mehta D. Field dynamics in atrioventricular activation. Clinical evidence of a specific field-to-protein interaction. Med Hypotheses. 2019 Mar;124:56-59. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

    PubMed 30798917

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Manual Therapy in people with Balance Postural and Pain, run by Universitat Internacional de Catalunya at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

static standing posture (time frame: baseline, pre-intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04404829, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in