AzTrials
AzTrials

Dialysis Fistula CreationESAVFONCT04404985

Endovascular vs Surgical Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes

A study testing Surgical AVF and Endo-vascular AVF in people with Dialysis Fistula Creation and Endo-vascular AVFs, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred type of vascular access for dialysis, but many of them fail to mature. There are two techniques of creating AVFs either the traditional way with surgery( Surgical AVFs) or novel per-cutaneous technique Endo- AVFs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dialysis Fistula Creation, Endo-vascular AVFs
What is being tested?
Surgical AVF and Endo-vascular AVF
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 May 2022to 30 Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Study will include participants who are 18 years and older who are scheduled to have an AVF
  • preoperative ultrasound showed feasibility to have an endo-vascular AVF vs surgical upper arm AVF

Who cannot join

  • Age below 18 years
  • participants eligible for low forearm AVF ( radio-cephalic)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UAB

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35201

Other trials in United States

About this study

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred type of vascular access for dialysis, but many of them fail to mature. There are two techniques of creating AVFs either the traditional way with surgery( Surgical AVFs) or novel per-cutaneous technique Endo- AVFs.

Investigators will pilot an randomized clinical trial of endo-AVFs and surgical AVFs at University of Alabama at Birmingham to determine the feasibility of patient recruitment, randomization, and retention. This pilot study will set the stage for a full-scale randomized clinical trial in future.

Read the detailed description

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred type of vascular access for dialysis, but many of them fail to mature. Despite concerted efforts to improve surgical AVF outcomes during the past 20 years, many new AVFs fail to mature, even after interventions to salvage them (assisted maturation). Postoperative ultrasounds of immature AVFs frequently demonstrate decreased flow with narrowing at the anastomosis . Surgically created AVFs typically have a 90o angle at the anastomosis, yet computational fluid dynamics suggest that an anastomotic angle <30o improves the flow hemodynamics. Therefore, there has been great interest in novel AVF technologies to limit vascular injury and improve flow dynamics and maturation rates. The new technology evaluated herein (endovascular AVF (endo-AVF) has the potential to achieve these goals and reduce the cost of vascular access care.

Endo-AVF, a novel per-cutaneous technique of AVF creation, was approved by the FDA in 2018, and has been used in U.S. hemodialysis patients . In contrast to the surgical technique (the current standard), this non-surgical approach (1) minimizes vascular injury at the time of AVF creation and (2) creates a channel between the artery and vein with an angle approaching 0o. These two features provide a scientific rationale for superior maturation compared with that of surgical AVF Investigators will perform a single-center, prospective pilot randomized clinical trial. Investigators will recruit 80 patients who have advanced chronic kidney disease or on hemodialysis with a catheter ,who there pre- operative Ultrasound showed they are eligible to surgical or endo-vascular AVF. Participants will be randomized to one of two groups: an surgical AVF intervention group that will undergo a routine surgical fistula creation, or an endo-vascular AVF intervention group will undergo per-cutaneous fistula creation . Participants will be followed for 2 years.

Being tested
Surgical AVF, Endo-vascular AVF

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Surgical AVFProcedure or surgery

    Surgical fistula creation is standard surgical procedures, where a small cut through the skin is made to create a channel directly between a vein and artery .

    The study procedures are standard clinical practice, and not considered an experimental procedure.

  • Endo-vascular AVFProcedure or surgery

    Endovascular fistula creation is a minimally invasive procedure used to create a canal between close artery and vein at the forearm. A magnet attached to a catheter is passed over a guidewire into the artery while another magnet passed over the guidewire into the vein. The two magnets are aligned close to each other, then the radiofrequency electrode is released from the venous catheter and energized for 2 seconds, creating a channel between the vein and the artery.

Study groups in NCT04404985
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Surgical AVFsActive comparatorParticipants who initiated dialysis with a catheter or have advanced chronic kidney disease ,these patients who an Surgical AVF intervention group that will undergo a routine surgical AVF creation.
Receives: Procedure: Surgical AVF
Endo-vascular AVFExperimentalParticipants who initiated dialysis with a catheter or have advanced chronic kidney disease ,these patients who an endo-vascular AVF intervention group that will undergo a per-cutaneous AVF creation.
Receives: Procedure: Endo-vascular AVF

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Physiological fistula maturity

    Assess by ultrasound . To assess blood flow within the fistula.

    Measured: 0-6 weeks

  2. Physiological fistula maturity

    Assess by ultrasound . To assess diameter of the fistula

    Measured: 0-6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Clinical fistula maturity

    Assess by ultrasound. Able to use the fistula for dialysis

    Measured: 6 weeks-6 months

  2. Fistula survival

    Assess by ultrasound. Continue to able to use fistula for dialysis

    Measured: 0-2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 May 2020
  2. Study start1 May 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2026
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04404985
Sponsor's protocol ID
F0002
Acronym
ESAVFO
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
19 May 2020
Last updated
27 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Surgical AVF and Endo-vascular AVF in people with Dialysis Fistula Creation and Endo-vascular AVFs, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Physiological fistula maturity (time frame: 0-6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in