AzTrials
AzTrials

Eating DisordersNCT04405440

Excessive Avoidance Behaviors in Anorexia Nervosa: the Role of Reward

An observational study of Eating Disorders and Anxiety, run by Bram Vervliet at 2 sites in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigates excessive avoidance behaviors in patients with a diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) compared to a healthy control group. The study further examines the role of reward (relief) as a putative factor in maintaining excessive avoidance behaviors in AN. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Eating Disorders, Anxiety, Anorexia Nervosa
What is being tested?
Behavioral avoidance task
How many people
100 participants
Where
2 sitesBelgium
Study dates
1 May 2019to 1 Sep 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: The anorexia patients are recruited from a primary care clinic. Healthy controls are recruited from the general population

Who may be able to join

  • For the AN group, patients need to be physically strong and sufficiently emotionally stable
  • For the healthy group, the investigators will recruit participants without a previous or current history of psychiatric, cardiovascular, neurological or other relevant disorder

Who cannot join

  • For the AN group, the investigators will exclude patients who are insufficiently emotionally stable and/or physically weak to participate in the study as estimated by the treating physicians of the units on which the patients are admitted
  • Insufficient verbal skills to understand the questionnaires and the computer task
  • Participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Laurence Claes, Prof. Dr. contact

+32 16 32 61 33

laurence.claes@kuleuven.be

Bram Vervliet, Prof. Dr. contact

bram.vervliet@kuleuven.be

Belgium2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Psychiatry | UZ Leuven campus Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

    Laurence Claes, Prof. Dr., laurence.claes@kuleuven.be

    Recruiting
  • University of KU Leuven, Faculteit Psychologie en Pedagogische Wetenschappen

    Leuven, 3000

    Laurence Claes, Prof. Dr., 32 16 32 61 33, laurence.claes@kuleuven.be

    Bram Vervliet, Prof. Dr., bram.vervliet@kuleuven.be

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

This study investigates excessive avoidance behaviors in patients with a diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) compared to a healthy control group. The study further examines the role of reward (relief) as a putative factor in maintaining excessive avoidance behaviors in AN.

Read the detailed description

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a life-threatening mental disease with a disappointing treatment outcome. Fear of weight gain and diet restrictions are considered the core symptoms of AN. Although from a diagnostic perspective AN is conceptualized as an eating-related disorder connected to an extremely low Body Mass Index (BMI) and body image distortion, AN might represent a specific phenotype of anxiety disorders characterized by tenacious avoidance behaviors, especially the restrictive subtype. To date, avoidance in AN is often investigated as a general personality trait (e.g. harm avoidance) but poorly examined in its behavioral form (which is life-threatening, such as food-avoidance). Hence, the investigators will perform a systematic investigation of excessive avoidance behaviors within a laboratory setting. Within a learning perspective, the investigators will investigate excessive avoidance in a group of 30 AN patients and 30 healthy volunteers. To achieve this, a well-validated avoidance paradigm will be used. Most critically, the investigators will examine whether patients with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa show persistent avoidance behaviors compared to a control group. Additionally, the investigators will examine if, in the anorexia group, higher subjective relief to successful omissions of negative events during avoidance learning predicts persistent (excessive) avoidance behaviors after fear extinction.

Being tested
Behavioral avoidance task
Medical subject headings
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Anorexia Nervosa

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Behavioral avoidance taskBehavioural

    Behavioral task able to measure avoidance actions, US-expectancy, and reward-related indexes in different learning times

Study groups in NCT04405440
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthy controlsThe healthy control group will perform a well-validated avoidance (behavioral) task and will fill in some questionnaires about eating behaviors, emotions, and feelings.
Receives: Behavioral: Behavioral avoidance task
Anorexia Nervosa patientsAs the healthy controls, the participants of the anorexia nervosa group will perform the same behavioral task and will fill in the same questionnaires
Receives: Behavioral: Behavioral avoidance task

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Button clicks during a red cue will be recorded as a measure of avoidance (binary response)

    To investigate whether, compared to healthy controls, individuals with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa show excessive avoidance behaviors (frequent clicking to prevent the aversive stimulus). Repeated measure ANOVA (analysis of variance) will be employed to evaluate differences between groups. If data will violate the assumption of normality, mixed or generalize methods will be used.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Relief pleasantness ratings (Visual Analog Scale, from neutral [0] to very pleasant [100])

    To investigate whether, compared to healthy controls, individuals with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa show higher relief pleasantness during the omission of the aversive stimuli. The investigators will also test if such responses predict a return in avoidance behaviors (button click) after fear has been extinguished. Repeated measure ANOVA (analysis of variance) and multiple linear regressions will be employed to evaluate differences between groups. If data will violate the assumption of normality mixed or generalize methods will be used.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. US-Expectancy ratings (Likert scale from 0:no picture to 10:certainly a picture)

    To investigate whether, compared to healthy controls, individuals with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa show higher US-expectancies during both avoidance learning and fear extinction learning. Repeated measure ANOVA (analysis of variance) will be employed to evaluate differences between groups. If data will violate the assumption of normality mixed or generalize methods will be used.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Eating Disorders Inventory [EDI]

    Higher scores at the EDI, and especially to the drive for thinness subscale, correlate with higher avoidance actions.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Distress Tolerance Scale [DTS]

    Lower scores at the DTS correlate with higher relief and higher avoidance actions

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 May 2020
  2. Study start1 May 2019
  3. Primary completion1 May 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04405440
Sponsor's protocol ID
S62060
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
28 Nov 2019
Last updated
28 May 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kaye WH, Bulik CM, Thornton L, Barbarich N, Masters K. Comorbidity of anxiety disorders with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2215-21. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2215.

    PubMed 15569892
  • Godart NT, Flament MF, Lecrubier Y, Jeammet P. Anxiety disorders in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: co-morbidity and chronology of appearance. Eur Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;15(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(00)00212-1.

    PubMed 10713801
  • Koskina A, Campbell IC, Schmidt U. Exposure therapy in eating disorders revisited. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Feb;37(2):193-208. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.010. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

    PubMed 23201859
  • Murray SB, Loeb KL, Le Grange D. Dissecting the Core Fear in Anorexia Nervosa: Can We Optimize Treatment Mechanisms? JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 1;73(9):891-2. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1623. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27463780
  • Murray SB, Strober M, Craske MG, Griffiths S, Levinson CA, Strigo IA. Fear as a translational mechanism in the psychopathology of anorexia nervosa. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Dec;95:383-395. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

    PubMed 30392878
  • Wierenga CE, Bischoff-Grethe A, Melrose AJ, Irvine Z, Torres L, Bailer UF, Simmons A, Fudge JL, McClure SM, Ely A, Kaye WH. Hunger does not motivate reward in women remitted from anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 1;77(7):642-52. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.024. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

    PubMed 25481622
  • Park RJ, Godier LR, Cowdrey FA. Hungry for reward: How can neuroscience inform the development of treatment for Anorexia Nervosa? Behav Res Ther. 2014 Nov;62:47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 26.

    PubMed 25151600

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Eating Disorders and Anxiety, run by Bram Vervliet at 2 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Laurence Claes, Prof. Dr. (+32 16 32 61 33, laurence.claes@kuleuven.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Button clicks during a red cue will be recorded as a measure of avoidance (binary response) (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04405440, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in