AzTrials
AzTrials

MigrainePhase 3DELIVERNCT04418765

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Participants That Are Not Helped by Previous Preventive Treatments

A Phase 3 study testing Eptinezumab in people with Migraine, run by H. Lundbeck A/S at 138 sites in 17 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluation of eptinezumab in the prevention of migraine in participants with unsuccessful prior preventive treatments. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Migraine
What is being tested?
Eptinezumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
892 participants
Where
138 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
1 Jun 2020to 15 Sep 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The participant has a diagnosis of migraine, with a history of chronic or episodic migraines of at least 12 months prior to the Screening Visit
  • The participant has a migraine onset of ≤50 years of age.
  • The participant has ≥4 migraine days per month for each month within the past 3 months prior to the Screening Visit.
  • The participant has demonstrated compliance with the Headache eDiary by entry of data for at least 24 of the 28 days following the Screening Visit.
  • The participant fulfils the following criteria for chronic migraine (CM) or episodic migraine (EM) in prospectively collected information in the eDiary during the screening period:
  • For participants with CM: Migraine occurring on ≥8 days and headache occurring on >14 days
Show all 9Show fewer
  • For participants with EM: Migraine occurring on ≥4 days and headache occurring on ≤14 days
  • The participant has documented evidence of treatment failure (must be supported by medical record or by physician's confirmation specific to each treatment) in the past 10 years of 2-4 different migraine preventive medications.
  • The participant has a history of either previous or active use of triptans for migraine.

Who cannot join

  • The participant has experienced failure on a previous treatment targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway.
  • The participant has a treatment failure on valproate/divalproex or botulinum toxin A/B and the treatment is not the latest preventive medication prior to study inclusion. The medication is regarded as the latest if the medication start date is after the start date of the other preventive medications and the medication stop date is after the stop date of the other preventive medications.
  • The participant has confounding and clinically significant pain syndromes, (for example, fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, complex regional pain syndrome).
  • The participant has a diagnosis of acute or active temporomandibular disorder.
  • The participant has a history or diagnosis of chronic tension-type headache, hypnic headache, cluster headache, hemicrania continua, new daily persistent headache, or unusual migraine subtypes such as hemiplegic migraine (sporadic and familial), ophthalmoplegic migraine, and migraine with neurological accompaniments that are not typical of migraine aura (diplopia, altered consciousness, or long duration).
  • The participant has a psychiatric condition that is uncontrolled and/or untreated for a minimum of 6 months prior to the Screening Visit. Participants with a lifetime history of psychosis and/or mania in the last 5 years prior to the Screening Visit are excluded.
  • The participant has a history of clinically significant cardiovascular disease or vascular ischaemia or thromboembolic events (for example, cerebrovascular accident, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism).
  • Other in- and exclusion criteria may apply

Trial locations and contacts

138 sites in 17 countries.

138 sites in 17 countries

Poland19 sites
  • Centrum Medyczne Pratia - Bydgoszcz

    Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 85-796

  • Synexus - Czestochowa

    Częstochowa, Silesian Voivodeship, 42-202

  • Centrum Medyczne Pratia - Czestochowa

    Częstochowa, 42-200

  • Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze J Brzezicki B Gornikiewicz Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska

    Elblag, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, 82-300

  • Synexus - Gdynia

    Gdynia, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 81-537

  • Synexus - Katowice

    Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-040

  • Pratia MCM Krakow

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 30-510

  • Specjalistyczne Gabinety Sp. z o.o.

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 30-539

  • SOMED CR - Lodz

    Lodz, 90-368

  • Prywatny Gabinet Lekarski Urszula Chyrchel-Paszkiewicz

    Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-093

  • Indywidualna Praktyka Lekarska dr hab. n. med. Anna Szczepanska-Szerej

    Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-582

  • Instytut Zdrowia dr Boczarska-Jedynak

    Oświęcim, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 32-600

  • Centrum Medyczne Solumed

    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 60-529

  • Synexus - Poznan

    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 60-702

  • Neuro-Care Katowice

    Siemianowice Śląskie, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-100

  • Concept Medica Trials Prywatny Gabinet Lekarski Urszula Chyrchel-Paszkiewicz

    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 00-773

  • SOMED CR - Warsaw

    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 01-737

  • MTZ Clinical Research Powered by Pratia

    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 01-868

  • Centrum Medyczne Oporow

    Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 52-416

Other trials in Poland

Czechia15 sites
  • CCR Brno

    Brno, Jihormoravsky Kraj, 602 00

  • Fakultní Nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne

    Brno, South Moravian, 656 91

  • MUDr. Helena Hojdíkova s.r.o. Neurologicka Ambulance

    Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralové, 500 03

  • Nemocnice Jihlava

    Jihlava, 586 01

  • Neurosanatio s.r.o

    Litomyšl, 57001

  • CCR Ostrava

    Ostrava, Severomoravsky Kraj, 702 00

  • Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava

    Ostrava-Poruba-Poruba, Moravian-Silesian, 708 52

  • CCR Prague

    Prague, Prague, 130 00

  • Fakultní Thomayerova nemocnice

    Prague, Prague, 140 59

  • Neurologicka Ambulance - Forbeli

    Prague, Prague, 160 00

  • Neuropsychiatrie S.R.O.

    Prague, Prague, 160 00

  • Institut Neuropsychiatrické Péce

    Prague, Prague, 186 00

  • Vestra Clinics

    Rychnov nad Kněžnou, Hradec Kralové, 516 01

  • Neurologie, MP-neuro s.r.o., poliklinika Modry pavilon

    Slezská Ostrava, 710 00

  • NeuroMed Zlín s.r.o.

    Zlín, 760 01

Other trials in Czechia

Germany15 sites
  • Synexus Clinical Research - Berlin

    Berlin, 12627

  • Neurozentrum Bielefeld

    Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, 33647

  • Neurologische Praxis Dr. Stude

    Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44787

  • Praxis Astrid Gendolla

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45133

  • Universitätsklinikum Essen

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45147

  • Synexus - Prüfzentrum Frankfurt/Main

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60313

  • CTC North

    Hamburg, Hamburg (Hansestadt), 20251

  • Migräne- und Kopfschmerzklinik Königstein

    Königstein im Taunus, Hesse, 61462

  • Synexus - Leipzig

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04103

  • Neuroplus

    Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68163

  • Praxis Dr. Steinwachs

    Nuremberg, Bavaria, 90402

  • MVZ Dr. Roth & Kollegen GbR

    Ostfildern, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73760

  • NeuroConcept AG

    Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70182

  • Neuropraxis München Süd

    Unterhaching, 82008

  • Studienzentrum Nord West

    Westerstede, Lower Saxony, 26655

Other trials in Germany

United States14 sites
  • Albuqerque Clinical Trials

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102

  • Dent Neurologic Institute - Amherst

    Amherst, New York, 14226

  • Michigan Headache and Neurological Institute

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104-5131

  • Northwest Clinical Research Center (NWCRC)

    Bellevue, Washington, 98007

  • Integrative Clinical Trials

    Brooklyn, New York, 11229

  • CTI Clinical Research Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212

  • Hometown Urgent Care & Occupational Health/Hometown Research - Huber Heights

    Dayton, Ohio, 45424

  • Sarkis Clinical Trials - Gainesville

    Gainesville, Florida, 32607

  • Accel Research Sites - Maitland

    Maitland, Florida, 32751

  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions - Memphis

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Clinical Research Institute Inc. - Minneapolis

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402

  • Lynn Health Science Institute - Oklahoma City

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Northwest Neurological

    Spokane, Washington, 99202

  • Diablo Clinical Research

    Walnut Creek, California, 94598

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom12 sites
  • Synexus - Scotland Clinical Research Centre

    Bellshill, England, ML4 3NJ

  • Synexus - Wales

    Cardiff, Wales, CF15 9SS

  • Synexus - The Lancashire Clinic

    Chorley, England, PR7 7NA

  • Synexus Midlands Clinical Research Centre

    Edgbaston, England, B15 2SQ

  • Synexus - The Hexham Clinic

    Hexham, England, NE46 1QJ

  • Synexus - Merseyside Clinical Research Centre

    Liverpool, England, L22 0LG

  • Panthera Biopartners - North London

    London, England, EN3 4GS

  • Synexus - Manchester Clinical Research Centre

    Manchester, England, M15 6SE

  • Panthera Biopartners - Manchester

    Manchester, England, OL11 4AU

  • Panthera Biopartners - Preston

    Preston, England, PR2 9QB

  • Synexus - Thames Valley Clinical Research Centre

    Reading, England, RG2 0TG

  • Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust

    Salford, England, M6 8HD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Spain11 sites
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Universitario de Basurto

    Bilbao, Biscay, 48013

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda

    Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222

  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra - Pamplona

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío

    Seville, 41013

  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia, 46010

  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid

    Valladolid, 47003

  • Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro - Clinico Universitario Vigo

    Vigo, Pontevedra, 36213

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Georgia10 sites
  • Helsicore - Israeli-Georgian Medical Research Clinic

    Tbilisi, K'alak'i T'bilisi, 0112

  • LLC Todua Clinic

    Tbilisi, K'alak'i T'bilisi, 0112

  • Pineo Medical Ecosystem

    Tbilisi, 0114

  • Archangel Saint Michael Multiprofile Clinical Hospital

    Tbilisi, 0159

  • Aversi Clinic - Central Branch

    Tbilisi, 0160

  • Mediclub Georgia Medical

    Tbilisi, 0160

  • Jerarsi Clinic

    Tbilisi, 0167

  • Malkhaz Katsiashvili Multiprofile Emergency Center

    Tbilisi, 0172

  • Simon Khechinashvili University Hospital

    Tbilisi, 0179

  • Consilium Medulla Multiprofile Clinic

    Tbilisi, 0186

Other trials in Georgia

Bulgaria6 sites
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Heart and Brain EAD

    Pleven, 5804

  • Medical Center - Teodora EOOD

    Rousse, 7012

  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment in Neurology and Psychiatry Sveti Naum

    Sofia, Sofia-Grad, 1113

  • First Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Sofia

    Sofia, Sofia-Grad, 1142

  • Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital

    Sofia, 1407

  • Medical Center Medica Plus

    Veliko Tarnovo, 5006

Other trials in Bulgaria

France6 sites
  • Centre Hosptitalier Universitaire d'Angers

    Angers, Pays de la Loire Region, 49 933

  • Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer

    Bron, Rhone-Alps, 69500

  • Hôpital Roger Salengro

    Lille, Nord, 59037

  • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille

    Marseille, Provence Alpes Cote D'Azure, 13 354

  • Hôpital Cimiez

    Nice, Côte-d'Or, 91179 - 06003

  • Hôpital Charles-Nicolle

    Rouen, Haute-Normandie, 76000

Other trials in France

Italy6 sites
  • IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna

    Bologna, 40139

  • Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Careggi

    Florence, 50139

  • Fondazione Mondino - Istituto Neurologico Nazionale a Carattere Scientifico IRCCS

    Pavia, 27100

  • Universita Campus Bio-Medico di Roma

    Roma, Rome, 00128

  • Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Sant' Andrea

    Roma, Rome, 00189

  • Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) - San Raffaele Pisana

    Rome, Roma, 00163

Other trials in Italy

Finland5 sites
  • Terveystalo Ruoholahti

    Helsinki, Southern Finland, 00180

  • Itä-Suomen Yliopisto - Kuopion Kampus

    Kuopio, 70210

  • Tampereen Yliopistollinen Sairaala

    Tampere, Länsi-Suomen Lääni, 33520

  • Terveystalo Tampere

    Tampere, 33100

  • Terveystalo Turku Pulssi

    Turku, Western Finland, 20100

Other trials in Finland

Belgium4 sites
  • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende - Campus Sint-Jan

    Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, 8000

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

    Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1090

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

    Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000

  • Jessa Ziekenhuis - Campus Virga Jesse

    Hasselt, Limburg, 3500

Other trials in Belgium

Slovakia4 sites
  • Neurologicka ambulancia MUDr. Dupejova s.r.o.

    Banská Bystrica, 97404

  • In Medic

    Bardejov, 8501

  • MEDBAJ s.r.o.

    Dolný Kubín, 026 01

  • Medicínske Centrum Konzílium - Dubnica nad Vahom

    Dubnica nad Váhom, 01841

Other trials in Slovakia

Sweden4 sites
  • Stortorgets neurologmottagning

    Helsingborg, Skåne County, 25220

  • Centralsjukhuset Kristianstad

    Kristianstad, Skåne County, 291 85

  • Universitetssjukhuset i Linköping

    Linköping, Östergötland County, 581 85

  • Migränkliniken Europa AB

    Värnamo, Kronoborgs Län, 331 50

Other trials in Sweden

Denmark3 sites
  • Sydvestjysk Sygehus - Esbjerg

    Esbjerg, 6700

  • Rigshospitalet Glostrup

    Glostrup Municipality, Capital Region, 2600

  • Odense Universitetshospital

    Odense, Region Syddanmark, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Hungary3 sites
  • UNO Medical Trials Kft.

    Budapest, 1152

  • Valeomed Diagnosztikai Kozpont

    Esztergom, Komarom-Esztergom County, 2500

  • Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz

    Kistarcsa, Pest County, 2143

Other trials in Hungary

Russia1 site
  • University Headache Clinic

    Moscow, 121467

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments

Evaluation of eptinezumab in the prevention of migraine in participants with unsuccessful prior preventive treatments.

Read the detailed description

The total study duration from the screening visit to the completion visit is approximately 76 weeks and includes a screening period (28-30 days), a placebo-controlled treatment period (24 weeks) and a treatment extension period (48 weeks).

The participant will start treatment at the baseline visit and follow a 12-week dosing schedule with either eptinezumab (100 or 300 milligrams [mg]) or placebo by intraveneous (IV) infusion. Participants who were assigned to placebo in the placebo-controlled treatment period, will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: eptinezumab 300 mg or eptinezumab 100 mg.

Conditions
Migraine
Being tested
Eptinezumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Migraine Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EptinezumabDrug

    Eptinezumab, concentrate for solution for infusion 100 mg/milliliter (mL)

  • PlaceboDrug

    concentrate for solution for infusion, intravenously

Study groups in NCT04418765
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo matching to eptinezumab by IV infusion, every 12 weeks starting from Baseline (Day 0) through Week 24.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Eptinezumab 100 mgExperimentalParticipants will receive eptinezumab 100 mg by IV infusion, every 12 weeks starting from Baseline (Day 0) through Week 24.
Receives: Drug: Eptinezumab
Eptinezumab 300 mgExperimentalParticipants will receive eptinezumab 300 mg by IV infusion, every 12 weeks starting from Baseline (Day 0) through Week 24.
Receives: Drug: Eptinezumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Migraine Days (MMDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

  2. Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 13 - 24

  3. Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

  4. Change From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score at Week 12

    The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  5. Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 13 - 24

  6. Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 13 - 24

  7. Percentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

  8. Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

  9. Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

  10. Percentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

  11. Change From Baseline in the Number of MHDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

  12. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A migraine attack was defined as a headache that occurred on a single day or lasted >1 day and that met the criteria for a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

  13. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Headache Episodes With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    A headache episode was defined as a headache lasted ≥30 minutes or that met the criteria for a migraine (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

  14. Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    In the evening eDiary, participants were asked each day to fill out whether they used any of the following medications during that day: Ergotamine, triptan, analgesic, opioid, or combination analgesic. A day where the participant answered that they took any of those in the evening eDiary was considered a day with use of acute migraine medication.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

  15. Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

    In the evening eDiary, participants were asked each day to fill out whether they used any of the following medications during that day: Ergotamine, triptan, analgesic, opioid, or combination analgesic. A day where the participant answered that they took any of those in the evening eDiary was considered a day with use of acute migraine medication.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 13- 24

  16. Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    Number of MMDs with acute medication usage was derived using the answer to "Did you take any medications to treat this headache?" in the headache diary. The question was asked when a participant was ending a headache. Thus, a migraine day with acute medication usage was defined as a migraine day with the extra condition that this question was answered as "Yes".

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

  17. Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

    Number of MMDs with acute medication usage was derived using the answer to "Did you take any medications to treat this headache?" in the headache diary. The question was asked when a participant was ending a headache. Thus, a migraine day with acute medication usage was defined as a migraine day with the extra condition that this question was answered as "Yes".

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 13 - 24

  18. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 12

    The PGIC is a single, participant-reported item reflecting the participant's impression of change in his/her disease status since the start of the study (that is, in relation to activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life). Participants rated their impression of change in disease status on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a higher score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.

    Measured: Week 12

  19. PGIC Score at Week 24

    The PGIC is a single, participant-reported item reflecting the participant's impression of change in his/her disease status since the start of the study (that is, in relation to activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life). Participants rated their impression of change in disease status on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a higher score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.

    Measured: Week 24

  20. Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs in Participants With Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

  21. Percentage of Participants With Migraine on the Day After First Dosing

    Measured: Day 1

  22. Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) Score at Week 12

    Participants were asked about their most bothersome symptom associated with their migraines during the Baseline Visit. Participants were asked to rate the improvement in this symptom from baseline on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a high score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status. The MBS areas included: nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light, sensitivity to sound, mental cloudiness, fatigue, pain with activity, mood changes, and other symptoms.

    Measured: Week 12

  23. Change From Baseline in the HIT-6 Score at Week 24

    The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  24. Change From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12

    The MSQ is a participant-reported outcome designed to assess the quality of life in participants with migraine. It consists of 14 items covering 3 domains: role function restrictive (7 items); role function preventive (4 items); and emotional function (3 items). Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). Raw domain scores were summed and transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale. Higher scores indicated better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  25. Change From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12

    The EQ-5D-5L is a participant-reported assessment designed to measure the participant's well-being. It consists of 5 descriptive items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and depression/anxiety) and a VAS of the overall health state. Each descriptive item was rated on a 5-point index ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The VAS ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  26. Change From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24

    The MSQ is a participant-reported outcome designed to assess the quality of life in participants with migraine. It consists of 14 items covering 3 domains: role function restrictive (7 items); role function preventive (4 items); and emotional function (3 items). Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). Raw domain scores were summed and transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale. Higher scores indicated better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  27. Change From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score at Week 24

    The EQ-5D-5L is a participant-reported assessment designed to measure the participant's well-being. It consists of 5 descriptive items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and depression/anxiety) and a VAS of the overall health state. Each descriptive item was rated on a 5-point index ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The VAS ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  28. Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12

    The WPAI Questionnaire is a participant-reported instrument developed to measure the impact on work productivity and regular activities attributable to a specific health problem (migraine). Recall period is the past 7 days. It contains 6 items that measure: 1) employment status, 2) hours missed from work due to the specific health problem, 3) hours missed from work for other reasons, 4) hours actually worked, 5) degree health affected productivity while working, and 6) degree health affected productivity in regular unpaid activities. Four scores were calculated from the responses to these 6 items: absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment. Scores were calculated as impairment percentages (0-100%), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e, worse outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  29. Change From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24

    The WPAI Questionnaire is a participant-reported instrument developed to measure the impact on work productivity and regular activities attributable to a specific health problem (migraine). Recall period is the past 7 days. It contains 6 items that measure: 1) employment status, 2) hours missed from work due to the specific health problem, 3) hours missed from work for other reasons, 4) hours actually worked, 5) degree health affected productivity while working, and 6) degree health affected productivity in regular unpaid activities. Four scores were calculated from the responses to these 6 items: absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment. Scores were calculated as impairment percentages (0-100%), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e, worse outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  30. Percentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in HIT-6 Score

    The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

    Measured: Baseline to Week 12

  31. Percentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 24 in HIT-6 Score

    The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  32. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner

    Number of participants who visited to a family doctor/general practitioner has been reported.

    Measured: Week 12

  33. HCRU: Visits to a Specialist

    Number of participants who visited to a specialist has been reported.

    Measured: Week 12

  34. HCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine

    Number of participants who visited to emergency department due to your migraine has been reported.

    Measured: Week 12

  35. HCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine

    Number of participants who admitted in the hospital due to migraine has been reported.

    Measured: Week 12

  36. HCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine

    Number of participants who had total number of overnight hospital stays due to migraine has been reported.

    Measured: Week 12

  37. Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72

  38. Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72

  39. Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72

    A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72

  40. Change From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72

    The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jun 2020
  2. Study start1 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
892 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04418765
Sponsor's protocol ID
18898A
Acronym
DELIVER
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
3 Jun 2020
Last updated
29 Sep 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Ailani J, Ashina M, Awad SF, Lee XY, Boserup LP, Soni-Brahmbhatt S, Sperling B, Lipton RB. Long-Term Improvements Following Initial Migraine Response in Eptinezumab-Treated Participants With Migraine for Whom 2-4 Prior Preventive Treatments Have Failed. Eur J Neurol. 2026 Mar;33(3):e70571. doi: 10.1111/ene.70571.

    PubMed 41834318
  • Pozo-Rosich P, Tassorelli C, Boserup LP, Awad SF, Lee XY, Ailani J. Sustained Efficacy of Eptinezumab in Participants with Migraine for Whom Prior Preventive Treatments Failed and Who Self-reported Psychiatric Comorbidities: Post Hoc Analysis of the Placebo-controlled DELIVER Trial. Neurol Ther. 2026 Apr;15(2):753-774. doi: 10.1007/s40120-026-00893-4. Epub 2026 Feb 11.

    PubMed 41670910
  • Tassorelli C, Starling AJ, Awad SF, Lee XY, Boserup LP, Asher D, Soni-Brahmbhatt S, Sperling B, Goadsby PJ. Early and Sustained Shift in Headache Day Frequency Following Eptinezumab Treatment in Adults With Migraine for Whom 2-4 Previous Preventive Treatments Have Failed: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized DELIVER Trial. Eur J Neurol. 2025 Dec;32(12):e70460. doi: 10.1111/ene.70460.

    PubMed 41395928
  • Barbanti P, Awad SF, Rae-Espinoza H, Regnier SA, Lee XY, Goadsby PJ. Impact of eptinezumab on work productivity beyond reductions in monthly migraine days: post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Dec 18;8(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00813-w.

    PubMed 39692817
  • Jonsson L, Awad SF, Regnier SA, Talon B, Kymes S, Lee XY, Goadsby PJ. Structural equation modeling for identifying the drivers of health-related quality of life improvement experienced by patients with migraine receiving eptinezumab. J Headache Pain. 2024 Mar 28;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01752-z.

    PubMed 38549121
  • Pozo-Rosich P, Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Jensen S, Boserup LP, Josiassen MK, Sperling B. Eptinezumab Demonstrated Efficacy Regardless of Prior Preventive Migraine Treatment Failure Type: Post Hoc Analyses of the DELIVER Study. Neurol Ther. 2024 Apr;13(2):339-353. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00575-5. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

    PubMed 38236314
  • Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Gendolla A, Sperling B, Ettrup A, Josiassen MK, Starling AJ. Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: extension of a randomized controlled trial. J Headache Pain. 2023 Nov 20;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01688-w.

    PubMed 37985968
  • Pinto S, Oliveira Santos M, Gromicho M, Swash M, de Carvalho M. Impact of diabetes mellitus on the respiratory function of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol. 2024 Feb;31(2):e16129. doi: 10.1111/ene.16129. Epub 2023 Nov 13.

    PubMed 37955564
  • Jonsson L, Regnier SA, Kymes S, Awad SF, Talon B, Lee XY, Goadsby PJ. Estimating treatment effects on health utility scores for patients living with migraine: a post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(7):797-803. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2219898. Epub 2023 Jun 2.

    PubMed 37256558
  • Ashina M, Lanteri-Minet M, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, Sperling B, Pozo-Rosich P. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with prior preventive treatment failures: subgroup analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled DELIVER study. Cephalalgia. 2023 May;43(5):3331024231170807. doi: 10.1177/03331024231170807.

    PubMed 37125484
  • Goadsby PJ, Barbanti P, Lambru G, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, Sperling B. Eptinezumab improved patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures. Eur J Neurol. 2023 Apr;30(4):1089-1098. doi: 10.1111/ene.15670. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

    PubMed 36583633
  • Barbanti P, Goadsby PJ, Lambru G, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, Sperling B. Effects of eptinezumab on self-reported work productivity in adults with migraine and prior preventive treatment failure in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled DELIVER study. J Headache Pain. 2022 Dec 2;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01521-w.

    PubMed 36460983
  • Ashina M, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, Sperling B. Safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures (DELIVER): a multi-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jul;21(7):597-607. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00185-5.

    PubMed 35716692

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Eptinezumab in people with Migraine, run by H. Lundbeck A/S at 138 sites in 17 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 138 sites in Poland, Czechia, Germany, United States, United Kingdom and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Migraine Days (MMDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12 (time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04418765, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in