Kidney StoneNCT04435132
Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Access
A study testing PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic device in people with Kidney Stone, run by NDR Medical Technology Pte Ltd at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
This is a first-in-man (FIM) study to show feasibility and safety profile of the newly developed robotic device for percutaneous access in PCNL surgery. Patients with renal stone disease who had standard indications for prone PCNL were included in the study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Stone
- What is being tested?
- PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 7 Aug 2018to 1 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 21 to 75 years
- Diagnosed with kidney stone disease and planned for prone PCNL with indication for surgery as per standard of care
- Subject who understand the purpose of testing, voluntary and informed consent, patients undergoing invasive imaging follow-up.
Who cannot join
- Bleeding disorders
- Patient on anticoagulation/antiplatelets drugs
- Pyonephrosis
- Pregnant women
- Not able to have prone position for the procedure due to comorbidities
- Moderate to severe renal failure
- The patient's life expectancy is less than 12 months
- Poor compliance and patients unable to complete the study in accordance with the requirements.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Access: Interventional, Non-randomized, Open-label, Non-comparative and First-in-Man Study
This is a first-in-man (FIM) study to show feasibility and safety profile of the newly developed robotic device for percutaneous access in PCNL surgery. Patients with renal stone disease who had standard indications for prone PCNL were included in the study. PCNL was conducted with percutaneous puncture with the aid of robotic device with the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy. 5 patients were recruited in this pilot study over a period of 3 months. Punctures were performed by the board-qualified urologist.
Read the detailed description
All patients underwent preoperative investigations and imaging study (CT Urogram/Intravenous Pyelography) done prior to the operation as per standard operation preparation. Intraoperatively fluoroscopic imaging was done for the patients and the images were synchronized to the software. Robotic arm was placed on the site of surgery as for prone PCNL and diaphragm of the arm was centred over the site of desire calyx of entry. A needle was engaged into the centre of the diaphragm and using the software the need was aligned in the line of puncture automatically based on the fluoroscopic images. After the alignment was done the needle was advanced manually by the surgeon until the entry was confirmed by efflux of urine from the puncture needle. After the entry was confirmed a standard PCNL using 24 F or 30 F Balloon dilator was performed and stone cleared using Cyberwand/ Shockpulse etc. All the intraoperative and perioperative parameters as mentioned in the data collection form was measured. Results was analysed with the main focus on time of obtaining the puncture, accuracy of puncture, radiation exposure time till calyceal entry which was confirmed by free flow of urine and for any complications.
Patients aged between 21 to 75 years old who were diagnosed with kidney stone diseas and planned for prone PCNL with indication for surgery as per standard of care were recruited. They understood the purpose of testing and offered their voluntary and informed consent.
The robotic device i.e. ANT lesses the learning curve of percutaneous access as it reduces the need for surgeon's visualization of the calyceal system and the needle alignment. It also improved efficiency as there is less dependence on human skills during the procedure. As a whole, the FIM trial was a success. The performance of the ANT system during the trial was satisfactory. The robot alignment time is less than 30 seconds. Total puncture time was around 6 minutes and no AEs were reported.
- Conditions
- Kidney Stone
- Being tested
- PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic device
- Keywords
- PCNL, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Calculi
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic deviceDevice
During the surgery, the robot was positioned over the estimated insertion point. It was aligned to be parallel to the fluoroscope imaging plane as much as possible. The needle is to be placed through the holder, and slightly penetrate the surface of the skin. An x-ray image is then taken to ensure that the whole device can be seen on the screen. Image calibration is then performed through the software GUI. After which, the clinician is also to perform needle tip selection. After which, needle alignment will then be performed. Once needle alignment is complete, the clinician will then advance the trocar needle into the patient's body, using the fluoroscopy to judge the penetration depth. Once the target has been reached, the needle style is to be extracted. The indication of leakage of fluid through the outer needle confirms the success of the procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PCNL with the aid of the robotic device | Experimental | Patients will undergo prone PCNL under fluoroscopic guidance and with the aid of the robotic device. Receives: Device: PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Needle insertion time
Time taken for PCNL procedure
Measured: During procedure
Needle alignment time
Time taken for needle alignment
Measured: During procedure
Time to target
Time taken for the needle to reach the calyx, from on the skin to successful needle targeting
Measured: During procedure
Number of needle insertion attempts to obtain access
Number of attempts before successfully reaching the calyx
Measured: During procedure
Radiation dosage from placement of robot to efflux of urine
A measure of the radiation exposed during the surgical procedure
Measured: During procedure
Radiation dosage from placement of robot to successful needle target via image confirmation
A measure of the radiation exposed during the surgical procedure
Measured: During procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2020
- Study start7 Aug 2018
- Primary completion1 Nov 2018
- Study completion1 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kidney StoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Recruitment was carried out in University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) Hospital clinics and impatient wards. 5 patients were recruited with no preferred selection for gender or race. Patients recruited were set to be between 21 to 75 years of age. Patients presenting to to clinic or admitted to ward for renal stone disease were assessed for indications of PCNL. Patients were assessed for renal stone disease as per standard of care - imaging study with CT scan, renal function, clinical assessment of fitness and suitability for prone PCNL. Once patients were planned for prone PCNL, they will be informed about this study, the use of robotic device, potential benefits and complications by study investigators. If they are agreeable to informed consent, they will be recruited into the study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NDR Medical Technology Pte Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Malaya
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04435132
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NDR-RA-PA-MY
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mozer P, Troccaz J, Stoianovici D. Urologic robots and future directions. Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):114-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831cc1ba.
PubMed 19057227Cinquin P. How today's robots work and perspectives for the future. J Visc Surg. 2011 Oct;148(5 Suppl):e12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 21981795Oo MM, Gandhi HR, Chong KT, Goh JQ, Ng KW, Hein AT, Tan YK. Automated Needle Targeting with X-ray (ANT-X) - Robot-assisted device for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with its first successful use in human. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):e919. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0003.
PubMed 29699415
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Access: Interventional, Non-randomized, Open-label, Non-comparative and First-in-Man Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04435132
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NDR-RA-PA-MY
- Conditions
- Kidney Stone
- Keywords
- PCNL, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NDR Medical Technology Pte LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Malaya
- Study start
- 7 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a first-in-man (FIM) study to show feasibility and safety profile of the newly developed robotic device for percutaneous access in PCNL surgery. Patients with renal stone disease who had standard indications for prone PCNL were included in the study. PCNL was conducted with percutaneous puncture with the aid of robotic device with the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy. 5 patients were recruited in this pilot study over a period of 3 months. Punctures were performed by the board-qualified urologist.
Detailed description
All patients underwent preoperative investigations and imaging study (CT Urogram/Intravenous Pyelography) done prior to the operation as per standard operation preparation. Intraoperatively fluoroscopic imaging was done for the patients and the images were synchronized to the software. Robotic arm was placed on the site of surgery as for prone PCNL and diaphragm of the arm was centred over the site of desire calyx of entry. A needle was engaged into the centre of the diaphragm and using the software the need was aligned in the line of puncture automatically based on the fluoroscopic images. After the alignment was done the needle was advanced manually by the surgeon until the entry was confirmed by efflux of urine from the puncture needle. After the entry was confirmed a standard PCNL using 24 F or 30 F Balloon dilator was performed and stone cleared using Cyberwand/ Shockpulse etc. All the intraoperative and perioperative parameters as mentioned in the data collection form was measured. Results was analysed with the main focus on time of obtaining the puncture, accuracy of puncture, radiation exposure time till calyceal entry which was confirmed by free flow of urine and for any complications.
Patients aged between 21 to 75 years old who were diagnosed with kidney stone diseas and planned for prone PCNL with indication for surgery as per standard of care were recruited. They understood the purpose of testing and offered their voluntary and informed consent.
The robotic device i.e. ANT lesses the learning curve of percutaneous access as it reduces the need for surgeon's visualization of the calyceal system and the needle alignment. It also improved efficiency as there is less dependence on human skills during the procedure. As a whole, the FIM trial was a success. The performance of the ANT system during the trial was satisfactory. The robot alignment time is less than 30 seconds. Total puncture time was around 6 minutes and no AEs were reported.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Recruitment was carried out in University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) Hospital clinics and impatient wards. 5 patients were recruited with no preferred selection for gender or race. Patients recruited were set to be between 21 to 75 years of age. Patients presenting to to clinic or admitted to ward for renal stone disease were assessed for indications of PCNL. Patients were assessed for renal stone disease as per standard of care - imaging study with CT scan, renal function, clinical assessment of fitness and suitability for prone PCNL. Once patients were planned for prone PCNL, they will be informed about this study, the use of robotic device, potential benefits and complications by study investigators. If they are agreeable to informed consent, they will be recruited into the study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PCNL with the aid of the robotic device | Experimental | Device: PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic devicePatients will undergo prone PCNL under fluoroscopic guidance and with the aid of the robotic device. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age between 21 to 75 years
- Diagnosed with kidney stone disease and planned for prone PCNL with indication for surgery as per standard of care
- Subject who understand the purpose of testing, voluntary and informed consent, patients undergoing invasive imaging follow-up.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Bleeding disorders
- Patient on anticoagulation/antiplatelets drugs
- Pyonephrosis
- Pregnant women
- Not able to have prone position for the procedure due to comorbidities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic deviceDuring the surgery, the robot was positioned over the estimated insertion point. It was aligned to be parallel to the fluoroscope imaging plane as much as possible. The needle is to be placed through the holder, and slightly penetrate the surface of the skin. An x-ray image is then taken to ensure that the whole device can be seen on the screen. Image calibration is then performed through the software GUI. After which, the clinician is also to perform needle tip selection. After which, needle alignment will then be performed. Once needle alignment is complete, the clinician will then advance the trocar needle into the patient's body, using the fluoroscopy to judge the penetration depth. Once the target has been reached, the needle style is to be extracted. The indication of leakage of fluid through the outer needle confirms the success of the procedure. | Device | PCNL with the aid of the robotic device |
Primary outcome
Needle insertion time
Time frame: During procedure
Time taken for PCNL procedure
Needle alignment time
Time frame: During procedure
Time taken for needle alignment
Time to target
Time frame: During procedure
Time taken for the needle to reach the calyx, from on the skin to successful needle targeting
Number of needle insertion attempts to obtain access
Time frame: During procedure
Number of attempts before successfully reaching the calyx
Radiation dosage from placement of robot to efflux of urine
Time frame: During procedure
A measure of the radiation exposed during the surgical procedure
Radiation dosage from placement of robot to successful needle target via image confirmation
Time frame: During procedure
A measure of the radiation exposed during the surgical procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2020.
- Background: PubMed 19057227Mozer P, Troccaz J, Stoianovici D. Urologic robots and future directions. Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):114-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831cc1ba.
- Background: PubMed 21981795Cinquin P. How today's robots work and perspectives for the future. J Visc Surg. 2011 Oct;148(5 Suppl):e12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 5. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 29699415Oo MM, Gandhi HR, Chong KT, Goh JQ, Ng KW, Hein AT, Tan YK. Automated Needle Targeting with X-ray (ANT-X) - Robot-assisted device for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with its first successful use in human. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):e919. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0003.
- Urologic robots and future directionsLink provided by the sponsor.
- How today's robots work and perspectives for the future. J Visc Surg. 2011Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Kidney Stone
Recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheaths Versus Conventional Sheaths for Treatment of Nephrolithiasis
Kidney Stone
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Novel Antimicrobial Solution to Prevent Infections
Kidney Stone, Infection
Not yet recruiting
DISS vs FANS in Suction-Assisted RIRS for Medium-Sized Renal Stones
Kidney Stones, Nephrolithiasis
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial to Assess the Efficacy of EMPAgliflozin and Personalized Dietary Counseling for Kidney STONE Prevention
Kidney Stone, Nephrolithiasis
RecruitingObservational study
Renal Stone Treatment Global Registry
Urolithiasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic device in people with Kidney Stone, run by NDR Medical Technology Pte Ltd at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Needle insertion time (time frame: During procedure). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04435132, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2020.