AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple Organ Dysfunction SyndromePedIMODNCT04438460

Pediatric Immune Response to Multi-Organ Dysfunction

A study testing Blood test in people with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 2 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) is defined by the association of at least two failures of vital organs, with various etiologies (septic shock, polytrauma, acute respiratory distress syndrome, etc.). Associated mortality remains high in children (between 20 and 50%). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome
What is being tested?
Blood test
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
186 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
29 Jul 2020to 16 Apr 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Patient Group:
  • 1 month < Age < 12 years
  • Multiple organ dysfunction within 48 hours following intensive care unit admission
  • Beneficiary of a social security scheme.
  • Consent signed by at least one parent / holder of parental authority
  • Control Group:
Show all 10Show fewer
  • 1 month < Age < 12 years
  • Hospitalized for simple elective surgery
  • Beneficiary of a social security scheme.
  • Consent signed by at least one parent / holder of parental authority

Who cannot join

  • Patient Group:
  • Weight < 5 kg
  • Known immunosuppression
  • Prolonged corticotherapy
  • Chronic inflammatory disease
  • Malignant pathology with ongoing treatment
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Hepatic cirrhosis
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) positive or patient with Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS)
  • Pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS)
  • Control Group:
  • Weight < 5 kg
  • Known immunosuppression
  • Prolonged corticotherapy
  • Chronic inflammatory disease
  • Malignant pathology with ongoing treatment
  • Ongoing infection
  • Organ failure
  • Hepatic cirrhosis
  • PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive or patient with Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS)
  • Pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant

    Bron, 69500

  • Hopital Mère Enfant

    Nantes, 44093

Other trials in France

About this study

Multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) is defined by the association of at least two failures of vital organs, with various etiologies (septic shock, polytrauma, acute respiratory distress syndrome, etc.). Associated mortality remains high in children (between 20 and 50%).

In septic shock, one of the main causes of MOD, induced immunosuppression can occur, with immune alterations affecting all cells of immunity. This induced immunosuppression is associated with an additional risk of secondary acquired infections and death in adults. Among all the cells and all the markers studied, the expression of Human Leukocyte Antigen - DR isotype (HLA-DR) on the surface of the monocyte (mHLA-DR, expressed in number of sites per cell) appeared as one of the best biomarkers of this induced immunosuppression. Decreased expression of monocyte Human Leukocyte Antigen - DR isotype (mHLA-DR) in adults is linked to an increased risk of developing secondary infection and death.

Read more

These results were confirmed by team in the context of pediatric septic shock, with an attack of innate immunity in the foreground. Persistent lowering of mHLA-DR for more than 3 days after onset of shock was associated with the occurrence of secondary acquired infections: 50% of children had mHLA-DR of less than 8000 sites / cells on D3, of which 60 % developed secondary infection within 30 days. No child with mHLA-DR greater than 8000 sites / cells had secondary infection.

Such immune alterations appear to be non-specific for septic shock, as they have also been described after multiple trauma or severe respiratory infections.

The hypothesize is that multi-systemic aggression leading to multi-visceral failure syndrome could also lead to significant immunosuppression, regardless of the etiology of this MOD.

At present, the proportion of persistent immunosuppression induced by MOD, all etiologies combined, is poorly documented in pediatrics. Estimating this proportion in a large pediatric cohort, while exploring as fully as possible the associated immune alterations and acquired secondary infections, would improve the pathophysiological understanding and pediatric specificities of this phenomenon.

Being tested
Blood test
Keywords
Multiple organ dysfunction, Immunosuppression, mHLA-DR, Pediatrics, Secondary infection
Medical subject headings
Multiple Organ Failure, Coinfection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood testBiological

    For patient group, blood tests will be performed at day 1-2, day 3-5 and day 60.

    For control group, blood test will be performed the day of elective surgery.

Study groups in NCT04438460
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patient groupExperimental150 children aged 1 month to 12 years with multi-visceral failure syndrome within 48 hours of hospitalization in pediatric resuscitation will be included in this study
Receives: Biological: Blood test
Control groupOther60 children aged 1 month to 12 years hospitalized for simple elective surgery will be included in this study
Receives: Biological: Blood test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Secondary acquired infection (SAI)

    This criterion will be related to the duration of follow-up and expressed as an incidence of SAI occurrence.This incidence will be calculated in the two groups "Presence of immunosuppression" and "Absence of immunosuppression", defined from the value of mHLA-DR at D3-D5: "Presence of immunosuppression" if mHLA-DR < 8000 sites/cells and "Absence of immunosuppression" if mHLA-DR ≥ 8000 sites/cells. The diagnosis of secondary acquired infection will be made by an independent committee.

    Measured: Day 60

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. blood counts : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Blood cell counts will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. mHLA-DR expression : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    mHLA-DR expressed as a number of site / cell will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months

    Measured: Day 1

  3. transcriptome : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Gene expression through messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) analysis will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 1

  4. plasma cytokines : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Cytokine levels will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 1

  5. blood counts : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Blood cell counts will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months

    Measured: Day 3

  6. mHLA-DR expression : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    mHLA-DR expressed as a number of site / cell will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 3

  7. transcriptome : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Gene expression through messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) analysis will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 3

  8. plasma cytokines : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Cytokine levels will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 3

  9. blood counts : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Blood cell counts will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 60

  10. mHLA-DR expression : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    mHLA-DR expressed as a number of site / cell will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 60

  11. transcriptome : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Gene expression through messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) analysis will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 60

  12. plasma cytokines : Characterization of alterations in the myeloid lineage

    Cytokine levels will be compared between the groups "secondary acquired infections" and "no secondary acquired infection" occurring within 2 months.

    Measured: Day 60

  13. mHLA-DR measurement

    Evaluation of the immunological recovery at month 2 with regard to the initial state and in comparison with the controls.

    Measured: Day 60

  14. Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) measurement

    Characterization of MDSC will be measured and compared between patient and control

    Measured: Day 1

  15. Intra-cellular production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) by the monocyte

    Evaluate the feasibility of a new test : measure of the intra-cellular production of TNF α by the monocyte. It will be compared between patient and control.

    Measured: Day 1

  16. MDSC measurement

    Characterization of MDSC will be measured

    Measured: Day 3

  17. Intra-cellular production of TNFα by the monocyte

    Evaluate the feasibility of a new test : measure of the intra-cellular production of TNF α by the monocyte.

    Measured: Day 3

  18. Monocytic and dendritic subpopulations measurement

    Characterization of monocytic and dendritic subpopulations will be realized and compared between patient and control.

    Measured: Day 1

  19. Gamma-delta T lymphocytes measurement

    Characterization of gamma-delta T lymphocytes will be realized and compared between patient and control.

    Measured: Day 1

  20. Monocytic and dendritic subpopulations measurement

    Characterization of monocytic and dendritic subpopulations will be realized

    Measured: Day 3

  21. Gamma-delta T lymphocytes measurement

    Characterization of gamma-delta T lymphocytes will be realized

    Measured: Day 3

  22. Monocytic and dendritic subpopulations measurement

    Characterization of monocytic and dendritic subpopulations will be realized

    Measured: Day 60

  23. Gamma-delta T lymphocytes measurement

    Characterization of gamma-delta T lymphocytes will be realized

    Measured: Day 60

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2020
  2. Study start29 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion16 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion16 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
186 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04438460
Sponsor's protocol ID
69HCL20_0068
Other IDs
2020-A00343-36
Acronym
PedIMOD
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
28 May 2020
Last updated
29 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blood test in people with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Secondary acquired infection (SAI) (time frame: Day 60). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in