AzTrials
AzTrials

Anterior Urethral Stricture, MalePASTISNCT04452890

Pre-operative Assessment by Sonourethrography Only in Anterior Urethral Strictures.

A study testing Sonourethrography in people with Anterior Urethral Stricture, Male, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The choice of the best surgical technique for urethral stricture repair depends on the stricture length. Estimating the length of urethral strictures is therefore of utmost importance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Anterior Urethral Stricture, Male
What is being tested?
Sonourethrography
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 Jul 2020to 30 Jun 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: 18 years or older
  • Anterior urethral strictures (except for meatal strictures)

Who cannot join

  • Posterior urethral strictures
  • Meatal strictures
  • History of hypospadias repair
  • History of phalloplasty

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Dept. of Urology, Ghent University Hospital

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: PASTIS-Trial: Pre-operative Assessment by Sonourethrography Only in Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Feasibility Trial

The choice of the best surgical technique for urethral stricture repair depends on the stricture length. Estimating the length of urethral strictures is therefore of utmost importance.

Different clinical studies have proven that SUG has a higher sensitivity to evaluate the length of urethral strictures compared to RUG or VCUG.

The goal of this study is to assess the feasibility of using SUG as single pre-operative assessment tool in patients with suspicion of anterior urethral strictures. In this way, use of RUG and/or VCUG could be omitted in the pre-operative work-up of patients with anterior urethral strictures, thereby avoiding significant radiation load of patients.

Read the detailed description

Urethral stricture disease (USD) is a medical condition in which a narrowing of the urethral lumen occurs due to pathological fibrosis and cicatrix formation of the urethral mucosa and surrounding spongious tissue (spongiofibrosis). Urethral strictures may occur at any location from the bladder neck to the external urethral meatus and are categorized based on their localisation in anterior strictures (including the urethral meatus, penile urethra and bulbar urethra) and posterior strictures (including the prostatic urethra and membranous urethra). USD is a disease of all ages but the prevalence increases with increasing age since the cumulative risk of having had urethral instrumentation equally increases. All processes that cause urethral trauma may provoke USD. The majority of strictures nowadays is idiopathic or caused by iatrogenic trauma of the urethra.

The pathological narrowing of the urethral lumen can lead to a wide variety of symptoms which ask for specific diagnostic investigations, in which imaging of the urethra plays a central role. Retrograde urethrography (RUG) and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) are considered to be the gold standard diagnostic investigation techniques for diagnosis of USD.

In both techniques, contrast is instilled in the urethra through the urethral meatus and radiographic imaging is used to visualize the urethra. RUG and VCUG offer the possibility to visualize the urethra completely and to evaluate the number, length and location of urethral strictures. On the other hand, these techniques have some crucial disadvantages. First and foremost, the radiation load of the genitopelvic region in often young patients is inevitable in RUG and VCUG. Secondly, it is impossible to evaluate the degree of spongiofibrosis with radiographic imaging.

In 1988, McAnnich, et al. were the first to describe sonourethrography (SUG) for the diagnosis of anterior urethral strictures in males. In this technique, a Foley catheter is inserted in the urethral meatus and a physiological solution is instilled in the urethra while a linear 7,5 MHz ultrasound probe is placed sagitally over the course of the urethra. SUG is not only able to evaluate the length and localization of a US, but it also enables the investigator to evaluate the grade of spongiofibrosis.

Different strudies have shown that SUG has a higher sensitivity for the measurement of urethral stricture length compared to classical radiographic imaging such as RUG or VCUG. Since the choice of the most adequate surgical technique depends on the length of the urethral stricture, correct estimation of the urethral stricture length is of the utmost importance.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the use of sonourethrography as single diagnostic tool in the pre-operative diagnostic work-up of males with suspicion of anterior urethral strictures. In this way, classic radiographic imaging such as RUG and VCUG could be omitted in these patients, saving them from a significant radiation load.

Fifty patients with penile strictures and fifty patients with bulbar strictures will be included in this study. When 50% of patients (25 penile and 25 bulbar strictures) have completed the study, an interim analysis will be conducted. If this analysis shows that RUG or VCUG can be omitted in 80% or more of patients, the study will be stopped.

Being tested
Sonourethrography
Medical subject headings
Urethral Stricture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SonourethrographyDiagnostic test

    Ultrasound of the urethra.

Study groups in NCT04452890
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SonourethrographyExperimentalUltrasound of the urethra (Sonourethrography - SUG): In this procedure, a Foley catheter is inserted into the top of the urethra and physiological serum is instilled into the urethra while a linear 7.5 MHz ultrasound probe is placed sagitally on the course of the urethra to detect a narrowing of the urethra.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Sonourethrography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sonourethrography feasibility: proportion of patients in whom the pre-operative surgical treatment planning was accurate

    To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom the pre-operative surgical treatment planning was accurate based on sonourethrography only.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Identification of predictors for failure of treatment planning by sonourethrography by regression analysis.

    To evaluate which factors are predictive for failure of treatment planning by sonourethrography only.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2020
  2. Study start1 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Single center, prospective feasibility trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04452890
Sponsor's protocol ID
BC-06980-ADP
Acronym
PASTIS
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
12 Jun 2020
Last updated
7 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sonourethrography in people with Anterior Urethral Stricture, Male, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sonourethrography feasibility: proportion of patients in whom the pre-operative surgical treatment planning was accurate (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in